Next Article in Journal
The Relationship between Concrete Strength and Classes of Resistance against Corrosion Induced by Carbonation: A Proposal for the Design of Extremely Durable Structures in Accordance with Eurocode 2
Previous Article in Journal
Trends and Challenges of Technology-Enhanced Learning in Geotechnical Engineering Education
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Mini-Review on Syngas Fermentation to Bio-Alcohols: Current Status and Challenges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Biorefinery for the Sustainable Biochemicals Production: Process Design and Technological Advances

by
Shashi Kant Bhatia
1,2
1
Institute for Ubiquitous Information Technology and Application, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Biological Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
Sustainability 2023, 15(10), 7973; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107973
Submission received: 23 April 2023 / Revised: 28 April 2023 / Accepted: 7 May 2023 / Published: 13 May 2023
To fulfill the demands of an ever-increasing population and ensure sustainable development, the implementation of a bio-economy based on renewable resources is necessary [1]. Most chemicals are produced using fossil-fuel resources and thus their depletion and subsequent waste generation are major challenges. A shift towards the use of renewable resources for biochemical production (food, feed, chemicals, and materials) and bioenergy (biodiesel, bioelectricity, and biogas) is a suitable alternative for a sustainable economy [2,3,4]. A biorefinery is a clean and green technology analogous to petroleum-based refineries. In this system, plants and microorganisms can be utilized to produce a variety of biochemicals [5,6]. Different types of biochemicals can be produced using direct extraction from plants, microbial fermentation, and a biotransformation approach [7,8,9]. Although the advantages of the biorefinery are well known, biochemical production at the commercial level is still hindered by the unavailability of inexpensive raw materials, the inability of microbes to utilize feedstocks efficiently, and low growth and productivity. Together, advances in molecular biology, fermentation technology, reactor designs, and downstream processing have been able to overcome some of these challenges, but there is a long way to go. This Special Issue focuses on biobased refineries and includes nine published review and research articles covering topics on itaconic acid production, biodiesel synthesis, biogas, and syngas fermentation (Figure 1 provides a word cloud of the articles published in this Special Issue).
Biochemical production using microbial fermentation is attracting attention due to its environmentally friendly and reduced waste generation characteristics. Itaconic acid is a bio-based organic acid used in several industries due to its wide applications in the plastics, textile, paint, and pharmaceutical sectors. Numerous microbes have been reported to produce itaconic acid, among which Aspergillus terreus is well known for commercial scale production. This review discusses itaconic acid’s synthesis, yield improvement, and applications in food, pharmaceuticals, and textiles [10]. With the increase in the global population, the demand for renewable energy resources such as biodiesel and biogas is also increasing in order to reduce greenhouse gas emission. Cnicus benedictus fruit oil can be used as a raw material for biodiesel production. Two extraction methods have been tested, and a response surface methodology was used to optimize the process’s efficiency. The optimal working conditions were different for each extraction technique, with ultrasound-assisted extraction being more efficient. The extracted oil was esterified with methanol to produce biodiesel, which was characterized and whose fuel properties were determined [11]. Cheap and abundantly available raw materials are desirable for the economization of the biorefinery process. Microalgae offer high potential for biofuel production, but their low lipid content renders them expensive. Suitable algal strains can be identified and genetically modified to maximize lipid production. Adjusting environmental and nutritional parameters is another option. This review provides an overview of approaches to enhance lipid productivity, including DNA manipulation, and discusses the economic and commercial status of microalgae biofuels [12].
Biogas is another type of fuel that can be produced by the anaerobic digestion of feedstock. Various sludge treatment techniques can be used to improve solubility and biodegradation. Mechanical pretreatment, with or without low-temperature heat treatment, significantly enhances solubility and biomethane yield. Anaerobic digestion time is reduced from 28 to 10 days with pretreated sludge. Mechanical pretreatment and heat treatment offer high potential with respect to increasing treatment capacity in sludge treatment plants [13]. Methane production can be further improved using thermophilic anaerobic digestion (TAD) technology. TAD has several advantages over mesophilic anaerobic digestion (MAD) and is being widely explored for its efficient enzymatic systems and economic sustainability. One review included in this Special Issue highlights the relevant role of thermophilic microorganisms as inocula in the anaerobic digestion of organic matter and the strategies for enhancing the efficiency of TAD [14]. Biogas is a mixture of CO2, CH4, and H2S, which restricts its utilization as a vehicular fuel, thereby rendering biogas upgradation a necessary step. Conventional upgradation technologies are expensive and require maintenance. Biological upgradation methods are being investigated as a potential solution, and the following review discusses the various available technologies and their challenges, limitations, future perspective, and scope [15]. Methane can also be transformed into other valuable products. Researchers studied Methylosarcina sp. LC-4 regarding its role as a potential organism for the production of biodiesel from methane. The organism’s methane uptake rate was enhanced by supplementing it with copper and tungstate micronutrients. A modified nitrate minimal salt media (NMS) yielded a high FAME content of 13 ± 1% (w/w), which is suitable for biodiesel production [16]. Syngas can also be transformed into valuable products. Chemical sequestration is costly, so researchers are investigating the potential of microorganisms such as algae and bacteria to sequester carbon from the gas phase. The following article also highlights the challenges of scaling up the employed technology, including with respect to microbial contamination and inconsistent syngas composition [17]. Microbes can also be used for bioremediation. The hydrocarbon degradation potential of an artificial lake in the Sikkim Himalayan region was examined through metagenomic analysis, revealing the presence of genes for the degradation of hydrocarbons and iron-reducing bacteria. The site was also found to be rich in β-galactosidase genes and similar to freshwater lakes at taxonomic and functional levels, which could have industrial significance in the mining of genes encoding relevant enzymes [18].
As the Editor of this Special Issue, I have observed that the utilization of waste materials as feedstocks for microbial fermentation to produce biochemicals and biofuels can improve the economic considerations of the process. I am sure that this Special Issue will pique the interest of researchers in this area and provide readers with a broad and updated overview of this topic.

Acknowledgments

I acknowledge all the authors and reviewers who have contributed to developing this Special Issue. In addition, I would like to thank the technical support team at MDPI for their assistance in preparing this issue. The author acknowledges the KU Research Professor Program of Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bhatia, S.K.; Rajesh Banu, J.; Singh, V.; Kumar, G.; Yang, Y.-H. Algal biomass to biohydrogen: Pretreatment, influencing factors, and conversion strategies. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 368, 128332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jung, H.-R.; Choi, T.-R.; Han, Y.H.; Park, Y.-L.; Park, J.Y.; Song, H.-S.; Yang, S.-Y.; Bhatia, S.K.; Gurav, R.; Park, H.; et al. Production of blue-colored polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) by one-pot production and coextraction of indigo and PHB from recombinant Escherichia coli. Dyes Pigments 2020, 173, 107889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kumar, A.; Singh, S.K.; Kant, C.; Verma, H.; Kumar, D.; Singh, P.P.; Modi, A.; Droby, S.; Kesawat, M.S.; Alavilli, H.; et al. Microbial Biosurfactant: A New Frontier for Sustainable Agriculture and Pharmaceutical Industries. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bhatia, S.K.; Yi, D.-H.; Kim, Y.-H.; Kim, H.-J.; Seo, H.-M.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Jeon, J.-M.; Jang, K.-S.; Kim, Y.-G.; et al. Development of semi-synthetic microbial consortia of Streptomyces coelicolor for increased production of biodiesel (fatty acid methyl esters). Fuel 2015, 159, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bhatia, S.K.; Jagtap, S.S.; Bedekar, A.A.; Bhatia, R.K.; Patel, A.K.; Pant, D.; Rajesh Banu, J.; Rao, C.V.; Kim, Y.-G.; Yang, Y.-H. Recent developments in pretreatment technologies on lignocellulosic biomass: Effect of key parameters, technological improvements, and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 300, 122724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Patel, A.K.; Singhania, R.R.; Awasthi, M.K.; Varjani, S.; Bhatia, S.K.; Tsai, M.-L.; Hsieh, S.-L.; Chen, C.-W.; Dong, C.-D. Emerging prospects of macro- and microalgae as prebiotic. Microb. Cell Factories 2021, 20, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ahuja, V.; Bhatt, A.K.; Banu, J.R.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, G.; Yang, Y.-H.; Bhatia, S.K. Microbial Exopolysaccharide Composites in Biomedicine and Healthcare: Trends and Advances. Polymers 2023, 15, 1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lee, H.-J.; Jung, H.J.; Kim, B.; Cho, D.-H.; Kim, S.H.; Bhatia, S.K.; Gurav, R.; Kim, Y.-G.; Jung, S.-W.; Park, H.J.; et al. Enhancement of polyhydroxybutyrate production by introduction of heterologous phasin combination in Escherichia coli. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 225, 757–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ham, S.; Han, Y.-H.; Kim, S.H.; Suh, M.J.; Cho, J.Y.; Lee, H.-J.; Park, S.-H.; Park, K.; Ahn, J.-O.; Joo, J.C.; et al. Application of l-glutamate oxidase from Streptomyces sp. X119-6 with catalase (KatE) to whole-cell systems for glutaric acid production in Escherichia coli. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 38, 2106–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Devi, N.; Singh, S.; Manickam, S.; Cruz-Martins, N.; Kumar, V.; Verma, R.; Kumar, D. Itaconic Acid and Its Applications for Textile, Pharma and Agro-Industrial Purposes. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Matei, P.L.; Busuioc, C.; Ionescu, N.; Stoica-Guzun, A.; Chira, N.-A. Cnicus benedictus Oil as a Raw Material for Biodiesel: Extraction Optimization and Biodiesel Yield. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Babu, S.S.; Gondi, R.; Vincent, G.S.; JohnSamuel, G.C.; Jeyakumar, R.B. Microalgae Biomass and Lipids as Feedstock for Biofuels: Sustainable Biotechnology Strategies. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ahn, J.-Y.; Chang, S.-W. Effects of Sludge Concentration and Disintegration/Solubilization Pretreatment Methods on Increasing Anaerobic Biodegradation Efficiency and Biogas Production. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, R.; Hans, M.; Kumar, S.; Yadav, Y.K. Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion: An Advancement towards Enhanced Biogas Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Upadhyay, A.; Kovalev, A.A.; Zhuravleva, E.A.; Kovalev, D.A.; Litti, Y.V.; Masakapalli, S.K.; Pareek, N.; Vivekanand, V. Recent Development in Physical, Chemical, Biological and Hybrid Biogas Upgradation Techniques. Sustainability 2023, 15, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sana, N.; Arnepalli, D.N.; Krishnan, C. Enhanced Bioconversion of Methane to Biodiesel by Methylosarcina sp. LC-4. Sustainability 2023, 15, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ahuja, V.; Bhatt, A.K.; Ravindran, B.; Yang, Y.-H.; Bhatia, S.K. A Mini-Review on Syngas Fermentation to Bio-Alcohols: Current Status and Challenges. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kaushal, G.; Thakur, M.; Rai, A.K.; Singh, S.P. A Comprehensive Metagenomic Analysis Framework Revealing Microbiome Profile and Potential for Hydrocarbon Degradation and Carbohydrate Metabolism in a Himalayan Artificial Lake. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Word cloud of articles published in the Special Issue. The most frequent words are displayed in a larger font.
Figure 1. Word cloud of articles published in the Special Issue. The most frequent words are displayed in a larger font.
Sustainability 15 07973 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bhatia, S.K. Biorefinery for the Sustainable Biochemicals Production: Process Design and Technological Advances. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7973. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107973

AMA Style

Bhatia SK. Biorefinery for the Sustainable Biochemicals Production: Process Design and Technological Advances. Sustainability. 2023; 15(10):7973. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107973

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bhatia, Shashi Kant. 2023. "Biorefinery for the Sustainable Biochemicals Production: Process Design and Technological Advances" Sustainability 15, no. 10: 7973. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107973

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop