Social Well-Being for a Sustainable Future: The Influence of Trust in Big Business and Banks on Perceptions of Technological Development from a Life Satisfaction Perspective in Latin America
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1. Technological Development and Impact on People’s Life
2.2. Life and Technological Development
2.3. Different Types of Trust and Institutional Trust
2.4. State of the Art of Institutional Trust (Large Companies and Banks)
2.5. National Pride in Latin American Countries
2.6. Inequality in Latin America. Regional Problems
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Databases
3.2. Analysis of Bibliometric Networks
3.3. Application of the WVS and the World Bank in Research
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Statistical Description of the Variables
4.2. Results
5. Conclusions
6. Limitations Improve
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fernández-Macías, E. Automation, Digitalisation and Platforms: Implications for Work and Employment; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Piccarozzi, M.; Aquilani, B.; Gatti, C. Industry 4.0 in management studies: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Büchi, G.; Cugno, M.; Castagnoli, R. Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 150, 119790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Potter, A.; Graham, S. Supplier involvement in eco-innovation: The co-development of electric, hybrid and fuel cell technologies within the Japanese automotive industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 210, 1216–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mabkhot, M.M.; Ferreira, P.; Maffei, A.; Podržaj, P.; Mądziel, M.; Antonelli, D.; Lanzetta, M.; Barata, J.; Boffa, E.; Finžgar, M. Mapping industry 4.0 enabling technologies into united nations sustainability development goals. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Craggs, B.; Rashid, A. Trust beyond computation alone: Human aspects of trust in blockchain technologies. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS), Montreal, QC, Canada, 15 August 2019; pp. 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martín, J.C.; Román, C.; Viñán, C. An institutional trust indicator based on fuzzy logic and ideal solutions. Mathematics 2020, 8, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tassara, C. Agenda 2030 y retos de inclusión social en América Latina y el Caribe. Doc. Trab. Fund. Carol. Segunda Época 2020, 29, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuglsang, L.; Jagd, S. Making sense of institutional trust in organizations: Bridging institutional context and trust. Organization 2015, 22, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norton, E.C.; Wang, H.; Ai, C. Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata J. 2004, 4, 154–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nadirov, O.; Aliyev, K.; Dehning, B.; Sharifzada, I.; Aliyeva, R. Life Satisfaction and Tax Morale in Azerbaijan: Mediating Role of Institutional Trust and Financial Satisfaction. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamil, I.; Baniamin, H.M. How culture may nurture institutional trust: Some empirical insights from Bangladesh and Nepal. Dev. Policy Rev. 2021, 39, 419–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Philbeck, T.; Davis, N. The fourth industrial revolution. J. Int. Aff. 2018, 72, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
- Rainnie, A.; Dean, M. Industry 4.0 and the future of quality work in the global digital economy. Labour Ind. J. Soc. Econ. Relat. Work 2020, 30, 16–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harwood, S.; Eaves, S. Conceptualising technology, its development and future: The six genres of technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2020, 160, 120174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdel-Basset, M.; Gamal, A.; Chakrabortty, R.K.; Ryan, M. Development of a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for sustainability evaluation of bioenergy production technologies: A case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 290, 125805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Zhang, K.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Chen, Z.; Yin, L. Exploring the development of research, technology and business of machine tool domain in new-generation information technology environment based on machine learning. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hoosain, M.S.; Paul, B.S.; Ramakrishna, S. The impact of 4IR digital technologies and circular thinking on the United Nations sustainable development goals. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Shao, X.-F.; Wu, C.-H.; Qiao, P. A systematic literature review on applications of information and communication technologies and blockchain technologies for precision agriculture development. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 298, 126763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lizarralde, R.; Ganzarain, J.; Zubizarreta, M. Assessment and Selection of Technologies for the Sustainable Development of an R&D Center. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10087. [Google Scholar]
- Sisinni, E.; Saifullah, A.; Han, S.; Jennehag, U.; Gidlund, M. Industrial internet of things: Challenges, opportunities, and directions. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 4724–4734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soares, A.M.; Kovaleski, J.L.; Gaia, S.; Chiroli, D.M.d.G. Building sustainable development through technology transfer offices: An approach based on levels of maturity. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Upham, P.; Smith, B. Using the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix to synthesize biofuel and bioenergy impact assessment results: The example of medium scale bioenergy heat options. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 65, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadeh, A.; Radu, C.F.; Feniser, C.; Borşa, A. Governmental intervention and its impact on growth, economic development, and technology in OECD countries. Sustainability 2020, 13, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feige, D.; Vonortas, N.S. Context appropriate technologies for development: Choosing for the future. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2017, 119, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H.; Zhao, S.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Duan, L.; Zhang, W. The coupling relationship between standard development and technology advancement: A game theoretical perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2018, 135, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolcar, M.R. The Large UV/Optical/Infrared Surveyor (LUVOIR): Decadal Mission concept technology development overview. In Proceedings of the UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts VIII, San Diego, CA, USA, 6–10 August 2017; Volume 10398, pp. 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasperczyk, D.; Urbaniec, K.; Barbusiński, K.; Rene, E.R.; Colmenares-Quintero, R.F. Development and adaptation of the technology of air biotreatment in trickle-bed bioreactor to the automotive painting industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 309, 127440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quitzow, R.; Huenteler, J.; Asmussen, H. Development trajectories in China’s wind and solar energy industries: How technology-related differences shape the dynamics of industry localization and catching up. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 158, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganda, F. The impact of innovation and technology investments on carbon emissions in selected organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 217, 469–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussin, F.; Aroua, M.K. Recent trends in the development of adsorption technologies for carbon dioxide capture: A brief literature and patent reviews (2014–2018). J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 253, 119707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mossberg, J.; Frishammar, J.; Söderholm, P.; Hellsmark, H. Managerial and organizational challenges encountered in the development of sustainable technology: Analysis of Swedish biorefinery pilot and demonstration plants. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 124150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, B.; Shin, J.; Lee, S. Technology assessment model for sustainable development of LNG terminals. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 927–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, H.; Hwang, J.; Kim, H. Appropriate technology for grassroots innovation in developing countries for sustainable development: The case of Laos. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 232, 1167–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V. Impacts of COVID-19: A research agenda to support people in their fight. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 55, 102197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Siegrist, M. Trust and risk perception: A critical review of the literature. Risk Anal. 2021, 41, 480–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Genoe, M.R.; Zimmer, C. Breathing easier? The contradictory experience of leisure among people living with COPD. Act. Adapt. Aging 2017, 41, 138–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kayler, L.K.; Dolph, B.; Seibert, R.; Keller, M.; Cadzow, R.; Feeley, T.H. Development of the living donation and kidney transplantation information made easy (KidneyTIME) educational animations. Clin. Transplant. 2020, 34, e13830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matsui, T.; Onishi, K.; Misaki, S.; Fujimoto, M.; Suwa, H.; Yasumoto, K. Easy-to-deploy living activity sensing system and data collection in general homes. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), Austin, TX, USA, 23–27 March 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Reale, M. Living one day is easy, living a life is hard: A Sudanese refugee in Sicily. Cult. Stud. Crit. Methodol. 2015, 15, 490–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roos, R.; Myezwa, H.; van Aswegen, H. “Not easy at all but I am trying”: Barriers and facilitators to physical activity in a South African cohort of people living with HIV participating in a home-based pedometer walking programme. AIDS Care 2015, 27, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Segal, E.; Hassoun, G.; Maor, C.; Shahar, E. Quantitative ultrasonometry: An alternative and easy method to evaluate bone quality in people living with human immunodeficiency virus. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2019, 19, 112. [Google Scholar]
- Chilvers, S.; Chesterman, N.; Lim, A. ‘Life is easier now’: Lived experience research into mentalization-based art psychotherapy. Int. J. Art Ther. 2021, 26, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henke, O.; Mauter, D.; Behzadi, A.; Bhusal, D.; Singh, A.; Riedel, T.; Thuss-Patience, P. Schmerzen sind eher zu ertragen als das Alleinsein. Z. Palliativmedizin 2015, 16, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longo, C.; Shankar, A.; Nuttall, P. “It’s not easy living a sustainable lifestyle”: How greater knowledge leads to dilemmas, tensions and paralysis. J. Bus. Ethics 2019, 154, 759–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pesantes, M.A.; Tetens, A.; Valle, A.D.; Miranda, J.J. “It is Not Easy Living with This Illness”: A Syndemic Approach to Medication Adherence and Lifestyle Change among Low-income Diabetes Patients in Lima, Peru. Hum. Organ. 2019, 78, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blien, U.; Dauth, W.; Roth, D.H. Occupational routine intensity and the costs of job loss: Evidence from mass layoffs. Labour Econ. 2021, 68, 101953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neumann, W.P.; Winkelhaus, S.; Grosse, E.H.; Glock, C.H. Industry 4.0 and the human factor–A systems framework and analysis methodology for successful development. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 233, 107992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parry, E.; Battista, V. Generation Z in the UK: More of the Same–High Standards and Demands. In Generations Z in Europe; Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2019; ISBN 1-78973-492-4. [Google Scholar]
- Rimbau-Gilabert, E. Digitalización y bienestar de los trabajadores. IUSLabor Rev. Anàlisi. Dret. Treb. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciziceno, M.; Travaglino, G.A. Perceived corruption and individuals’ life satisfaction: The mediating role of institutional trust. Soc. Indic. Res. 2019, 141, 685–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nilsen, L.G.; Thoresen, S.; Wentzel-Larsen, T.; Dyb, G. Trust after terror: Institutional trust among young terror survivors and their parents after the 22nd of July terrorist attack on Utøya Island, Norway. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saz-Gil, M.I.; Cosenza, J.P.; Zardoya-Alegría, A.; Gil-Lacruz, A.I. Exploring corporate social responsibility under the background of sustainable development goals: A proposal to corporate volunteering. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thoresen, S.; Birkeland, M.S.; Wentzel-Larsen, T.; Blix, I. Loss of trust may never heal. Institutional trust in disaster victims in a long-term perspective: Associations with social support and mental health. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McEvily, B.; Tortoriello, M. Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. J. Trust Res. 2011, 1, 23–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sitkin, S.B.; George, E. Managerial trust-building through the use of legitimating formal and informal control mechanisms. Int. Sociol. 2005, 20, 307–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horak, S.; Yang, I. Affective networks, informal ties, and the limits of expatriate effectiveness. Int. Bus. Rev. 2016, 25, 1030–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horak, S.; Klein, A.; Li, X. Can general and particularistic types of trust mix? Advancing the trust (dis-) continuity debate in a Chinese context. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 2022, 17, 1273–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagasra, A.B.; Doan, S.; Allen, C.T. Racial differences in institutional trust and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and refusal. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çera, G.; Çera, E.; Ribeiro, H.N.R.; Maloku, S. The role of trust in government and institutional environment in future business climate. Int. J. Entrep. Ventur. 2021, 13, 425–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coulibaly, T.P.; Du, J.; Diakité, D.; Abban, O.J.; Kouakou, E. A proposed conceptual framework on the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: The role of network contact frequency and institutional trust. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Sommet, N.; Na, J.; Spini, D. Social class—Not income inequality—Predicts social and institutional trust. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 2022, 13, 186–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kricorian, K.; Turner, K. COVID-19 vaccine reluctance in older black and hispanic adults: Cultural scensitivity and institutional trust. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2021, S1, S214. [Google Scholar]
- Latov, Y.V. Institutional Trust as a Social Capital in Modern Russia (on the Results of Monitoring). Polis Polit. Stud. 2021, 5, 161–175. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S. Subjective well-being and mental health during the pandemic outbreak: Exploring the role of institutional trust. Res. Aging 2022, 44, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, J.; Ma, H. Interpersonal injustice and perceived legitimacy of authority: The role of institutional trust and informational justice. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2021, 31, 184–197. [Google Scholar]
- Ling, D.C.; Wang, C.; Zhou, T. Institutional common ownership and firm value: Evidence from real estate investment trusts. Real Estate Econ. 2021, 49, 187–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lipps, J.; Schraff, D. Regional inequality and institutional trust in Europe. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 2021, 60, 892–913. [Google Scholar]
- Malkina, M.Y.; Ovchinnikov, V.N.; Kholodilin, K.A. Institutional factors influencing political trust in modern Russia. J. Inst. Stud. 2020, 12, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, L.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, L. Perceived quality of primary healthcare services and its association with institutional trust among caregivers of persons diagnosed with a severe mental illness in China. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 2021, 28, 394–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schaap, D. Police trust-building strategies. A socio-institutional, comparative approach. Polic. Soc. 2021, 31, 304–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Silverberg, S.L.; Puchalski Ritchie, L.M.; Gobat, N.; Murthy, S. COVID-19 infection prevention and control procedures and institutional trust: Perceptions of Canadian intensive care and emergency department nurses. Can. J. Anesth. Can. Anesth. 2021, 68, 1165–1175. [Google Scholar]
- Silvola, H.; Vinnari, E. The limits of institutional work: A field study on auditors’ efforts to promote sustainability assurance in a trust society. Account. Audit. Account. J. 2021, 34, 1–30. [Google Scholar]
- Ishiyama, J.; Martinez, M.; Ozsut, M. Do “Resource-Cursed States” Have Lower Levels of Social and Institutional Trust? Evidence from Africa and Latin America. Soc. Sci. Q. 2018, 99, 872–894. [Google Scholar]
- Seifert, N. Yet another case of Nordic exceptionalism? Extending existing evidence for a causal relationship between institutional and social trust to the Netherlands and Switzerland. Soc. Indic. Res. 2018, 136, 539–555. [Google Scholar]
- Sønderskov, K.M.; Dinesen, P.T. Trusting the state, trusting each other? The effect of institutional trust on social trust. Polit. Behav. 2016, 38, 179–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Spadaro, G.; Gangl, K.; Van Prooijen, J.-W.; Van Lange, P.A.; Mosso, C.O. Enhancing feelings of security: How institutional trust promotes interpersonal trust. PloS ONE 2020, 15, e0237934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amemiya, J.; Fine, A.; Wang, M.-T. Trust and discipline: Adolescents’ institutional and teacher trust predict classroom behavioral engagement following teacher discipline. Child Dev. 2020, 91, 661–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, G.; Tan, W.; Zhang, S.; Yan, B. Influence of Interpersonal and Institutional Trust on Farmers’ Participation Willingness of E-commerce Poverty Alleviation. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 727644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeager, D.S.; Purdie-Vaughns, V.; Hooper, S.Y.; Cohen, G.L. Loss of institutional trust among racial and ethnic minority adolescents: A consequence of procedural injustice and a cause of life-span outcomes. Child Dev. 2017, 88, 658–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daskalopoulou, I. Individual-level evidence on the causal relationship between social trust and institutional trust. Soc. Indic. Res. 2019, 144, 275–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esau, M.V. Exploring institutional trust and organizational performance through the case of the City of Cape Town. Int. J. Public Adm. 2016, 39, 686–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baek, Y.M.; Jung, C.S. Focusing the mediating role of institutional trust: How does interpersonal trust promote organizational commitment? Soc. Sci. J. 2015, 52, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ingenhoff, D.; Sommer, K. Trust in companies and in CEOs: A comparative study of the main influences. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 95, 339–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robbins, S.P.; Judge, T. Organizational Behavior; Pearson South Africa: Cape Town, South Africa, 2009; ISBN 0-13-600717-1. [Google Scholar]
- Ariely, D. Payoff: The Hidden Logic That Shapes Our Motivations; Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA, 2016; ISBN 1-5011-2005-0. [Google Scholar]
- Petrick, J.A.; Quinn, J.F. The challenge of leadership accountability for integrity capacity as a strategic asset. J. Bus. Ethics 2001, 34, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priego, A.M.; Lizano, M.M.; Madrid, E.M. Business failure: Incidence of stakeholders’ behavior. Acad. Rev. Latinoam. Adm. 2014, 27, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Leaniz, P.M.G.; del Bosque Rodríguez, I.R. Corporate image and reputation as drivers of customer loyalty. Corp. Reput. Rev. 2016, 19, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freeman, R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; ISBN 0-521-15174-0. [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez-Padron, T.L.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ferrell, O.C. A stakeholder marketing approach to sustainable business. In Marketing in and for a Sustainable Society; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2016; ISBN 1-78635-282-6. [Google Scholar]
- Peterson, D.K. The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Bus. Soc. 2004, 43, 296–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber, M. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. Eur. Manag. J. 2008, 26, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calvo, N.; Calvo, F. Corporate social responsibility and multiple agency theory: A case study of internal stakeholder engagement. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 1223–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vallaeys, F. ¿ Por qué la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial no es todavía transformadora? Una aclaración filosófica. Andamios 2020, 17, 309–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Murtin, F.; Fleischer, L.; Siegerink, V.; Aassve, A.; Algan, Y.; Boarini, R.; González, S.; Lonti, Z.; Grimalda, G.; Vallve, R.H. Trust and its determinants: Evidence from the Trustlab experiment. OECD Stat. Work. Pap. 2018, 29, 514–552. [Google Scholar]
- Fuoli, M.; Hart, C. Trust-building strategies in corporate discourse: An experimental study. Discourse Soc. 2018, 29, 514–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Masri, N.W.; You, J.-J.; Ruangkanjanases, A.; Chen, S.-C. The Effects of Customer Learning and Shopping Value on Intention Purchase and Reuse in a Digital Market: The Institutional Trust–Commitment Perspective. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spink, P.; Lotta, G.; Burgos, F. Institutional vulnerability and trust in public agencies: Views from both sides of the street. Governance 2021, 34, 1057–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ervasti, H.; Kouvo, A.; Venetoklis, T. Social and institutional trust in times of crisis: Greece, 2002–2011. Soc. Indic. Res. 2019, 141, 1207–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mathias, A.; Páez, D.; Espinosa, A.; Sandoval, S.; Alzugaray, C.; Arnoso, M.; Cárdenas, M.; da Costa, S.; Reyes, C.; Rimé, B. The association between Truth Commissions evaluation, emotional climate and institutional trust: Comparison and meta-analysis of surveys in six South American countries (La relación entre la evaluación de las Comisiones de la verdad, el clima emocional y la confianza institucional: Comparación y metanálisis en seis países de Sudamérica). Int. J. Soc. Psychol. 2020, 35, 203–245. [Google Scholar]
- Arellano-Gault, D. The quest for public trust: The limits of information access reforms based on the new institutional economics. The case of Mexico. Int. J. Public Adm. 2016, 39, 694–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bechert, I. Of Pride and Prejudice—A Cross-National Exploration of Atheists’ National Pride. Religions 2021, 12, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdem, S. History as Antidote to Wounded National Pride: Politics of History in Kemal Tahir’s Devlet Ana. Turk. Hist. Rev. 2021, 11, 257–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, G.; Lee, J.M. National Pride and Political Participation: The Case of South Korea. Asian Perspect. 2021, 45, 809–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shibli, N. Political Geographies of Islamophobia: Chinese Ethno-Religious Racism and Structural Violence in East Turkestan. Islam. Stud. J. 2021, 6, 150–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yen, W.-T.; Kay, K.; Chen, F.-Y. Is Trading with China Different? Self-Interest, National Pride, and Trade Preferences. J. East Asian Stud. 2021, 21, 97–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.H.; Kim, H.J.K. National pride, social trust, and cultural nativism: Findings from East and Southeast Asia. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 2021, 84, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mlinar, K.; Krammer, G. Multicultural attitudes of prospective teachers: The influence of multicultural ideology and national pride. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 2021, 84, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cord, A.F.; Bartkowski, B.; Beckmann, M.; Dittrich, A.; Hermans-Neumann, K.; Kaim, A.; Lienhoop, N.; Locher-Krause, K.; Priess, J.; Schröter-Schlaack, C. Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 28, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bittencourt, T.A.; Giannotti, M.; Marques, E. Cumulative (and self-reinforcing) spatial inequalities: Interactions between accessibility and segregation in four Brazilian metropolises. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2021, 48, 1989–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bucca, M. Merit and blame in unequal societies: Explaining Latin Americans’ beliefs about wealth and poverty. Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobil. 2016, 44, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Signor, D.; Kim, J.; Tebaldi, E. Persistence and determinants of income inequality: The Brazilian case. Rev. Dev. Econ. 2019, 23, 1748–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winkelried, D.; Escobar, B. Declining inequality in Latin America? Robustness checks for Peru. J. Econ. Inequal. 2022, 20, 223–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houghton, C.; Meskell, P.; Delaney, H.; Smalle, M.; Glenton, C.; Booth, A.; Chan, X.H.S.; Devane, D.; Biesty, L.M. Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: A rapid qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres-Samuel, M.; Vásquez, C.L.; Luna, M.; Bucci, N.; Viloria, A.; Crissien, T.; Manosalva, J. Performance of education and research in Latin American countries through data envelopment analysis (DEA). Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020, 170, 1023–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adsera, A.; Menendez, A. Fertility changes in Latin America in periods of economic uncertainty. Popul. Stud. 2011, 65, 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neubert, M.; Van Der Krogt, A.S. Decision-makers impact on the internationalization of high-technology firms in emerging markets. J. Glob. Entrep. Res. 2019, 9, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez Mejía, A. Liberalización económica y crecimiento económico. Modelo Logit Multinomial aplicado a la metodología de “Doing Business”. Entramado 2011, 7, 32–49. [Google Scholar]
- Mercado, M.E.; Macías, E.F.; Bernardi, F. Análisis de datos con Stata; CIS-Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas: Madrid, Spain, 2012; ISBN 84-7476-512-9. [Google Scholar]
- Pérez López, César; Moral Arce, Ignacio. In Econometría a través de Stata; Garceta, Grupo Editorial: Madrid, Spain, 2021; ISBN 978-84-17289-74-4.
- Gu, Y.; Hole, A.R.; Knox, S. Fitting the generalized multinomial logit model in Stata. Stata J. 2013, 13, 382–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tyler, T.R. Trust within organisations. Pers. Rev. 2003, 3, 556–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gebru, T.; Krause, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, D.; Deng, J.; Aiden, E.L.; Fei-Fei, L. Using deep learning and Google Street View to estimate the demographic makeup of neighborhoods across the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 13108–13113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
López-Concepción, A.; Gil-Lacruz, A.; Saz-Gil, I.; Bazán-Monasterio, V. Social Well-Being for a Sustainable Future: The Influence of Trust in Big Business and Banks on Perceptions of Technological Development from a Life Satisfaction Perspective in Latin America. Sustainability 2023, 15, 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010628
López-Concepción A, Gil-Lacruz A, Saz-Gil I, Bazán-Monasterio V. Social Well-Being for a Sustainable Future: The Influence of Trust in Big Business and Banks on Perceptions of Technological Development from a Life Satisfaction Perspective in Latin America. Sustainability. 2023; 15(1):628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010628
Chicago/Turabian StyleLópez-Concepción, Arelys, Ana Gil-Lacruz, Isabel Saz-Gil, and Víctor Bazán-Monasterio. 2023. "Social Well-Being for a Sustainable Future: The Influence of Trust in Big Business and Banks on Perceptions of Technological Development from a Life Satisfaction Perspective in Latin America" Sustainability 15, no. 1: 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010628
APA StyleLópez-Concepción, A., Gil-Lacruz, A., Saz-Gil, I., & Bazán-Monasterio, V. (2023). Social Well-Being for a Sustainable Future: The Influence of Trust in Big Business and Banks on Perceptions of Technological Development from a Life Satisfaction Perspective in Latin America. Sustainability, 15(1), 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010628