Invasive Alien Plants and Invasion Risk Assessment on Pingtan Island
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Sample Site Survey
2.3. Determination of Alien Invasive Plants
2.4. The Invasion of Risk Assessment
3. Results
3.1. Composition of Alien Invasive Plants
3.2. Origin
3.3. Flora
3.4. Life Forms
3.5. Habitats
3.6. Risk Assessment Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Invasive Plants
4.2. Invasion Risk Assessment
4.3. Preventive Measures
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Species | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 5.1 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lantana camara L. | 4 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 49.0 |
Cenchrus echinatus L. | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 45.0 |
Spartina alterniflora Loisel. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 45.0 |
Panicum repens L. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 43.5 |
Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 42.5 |
Macfadyena unguis-cati (L.) A. Gentry | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 42.0 |
Ageratina adenophora (Sprengel) R. M. King & H. Robinson | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 42.0 |
Malvastrum coromandelianum L. | 3 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 40.5 |
Praxelis clematidea (Griseb.) R.King & H.Rob. | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 40.0 |
Mikania micrantha Kunth. | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 40.0 |
Phytolacca americana L. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 40.0 |
Bidens pilosa L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 40.0 |
Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A.Gray | 0 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 39.0 |
Sphagneticola trilobata (L.) Pruski | 1 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 39.0 |
Phytolacca acinosa Roxb. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 39.0 |
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.King & H.Rob. | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 38.0 |
Datura stramonium L. | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 37.0 |
Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 36.0 |
Ambrosia trifida L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 36.0 |
Amaranthus viridis L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 35.5 |
Symphyotrichum subulatum (Michx.) G.L.Nesom | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 35.5 |
Oxalis pes-caprae L. | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 35.0 |
Flaveria bidentis (L.) Kuntze | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 35.0 |
Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 34.0 |
Solidago canadensis L. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 34.0 |
Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 34.0 |
Erigeron canadensis L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 33.5 |
Anredera cordifolia (Ten.) Steenis | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 33.5 |
Amaranthus retroflexus L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.0 |
Ricinus communis L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 32.5 |
Scoparia dulcis L. | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 32.0 |
Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 32.0 |
Solanum rostratum Dunal. | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 32.0 |
Soliva anthemifolia (Juss.) R.Br. ex Less. | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 32.0 |
Galinsoga parviflora Cav. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 31.0 |
Euphorbia dentata Michx. | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 31.0 |
Sonchus oleraceus L. | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 31.0 |
Crassocephalum crepidioides (Benth.) S. Moore | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 31.0 |
Euphorbia hirta L. | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 30.5 |
Oenothera drummondii Hook. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30.5 |
Erigeron bonariensis L. | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 30.0 |
Ipomoea cairica (L.) Sweet | 1 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30.0 |
Ageratum conyzoides L. | 0 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 29.0 |
Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit | 4 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 29.0 |
Agave americana L. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 29.0 |
Sphagneticola calendulacea (L.) Pruski | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.0 |
Mimosa pudica L. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 29.0 |
Chenopodium glaucum L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 29.0 |
Dysphania ambrosioides (L.) Mosyakin & Clemants | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 28.0 |
Solanum torvum Sw. | 4 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28.0 |
Pistia stratiotes L. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 27.0 |
Spermacoce alata Aublet. | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 27.0 |
Oenothera biennis L. | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.0 |
Parthenium hysterophorus L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 27.0 |
Lepidium virginicum L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 26.0 |
Solanum pseudocapsicum L. | 4 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 26.0 |
Bryophyllum pinnatum (Lam.) Oken | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26.0 |
Oxalis corymbosa DC. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 26.0 |
Crotalaria trichotoma Bojer. | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.0 |
Cuphea hyssopifolia Kunth. | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.0 |
Amaranthus spinosus L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 24.0 |
Paspalum urvillei Steud. | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 24.0 |
Tetragonia tetragonioides (Pallas) Kuntze. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.0 |
Daucus carota L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 24.0 |
Amaranthus blitum L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.0 |
Mirabilis jalapa L. | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 23.0 |
Pilea microphylla (L.) Liebm. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.0 |
Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw. | 4 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.0 |
Celosia argentea L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.0 |
Passiflora suberosa L. | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.0 |
Erigeron acris L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.0 |
Sonchus asper (L.) Hill. | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 23.0 |
Cuphea carthagenensis (Jacq.) J. F. Macbr. | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.0 |
Amaranthus tricolor L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.0 |
Callisia repens L. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.0 |
Sesbania cannabina (Retz.) Poir. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.0 |
Portulaca pilosa L. | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.0 |
Atropa belladonna L. | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 22.0 |
Ocimum basilicum L. | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.0 |
Atriplex patens (Litv.) Iljin | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22.0 |
Ipomoea nil (L.) Roth | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.0 |
Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.0 |
Euphorbia cyathophora Murr. | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21.0 |
Aloe vera L. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21.0 |
Tephrosia candida DC. | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21.0 |
Lolium temulentum L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 21.0 |
Cosmos bipinnatus Cav. | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21.0 |
Hyssopus officinalis L. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.0 |
Vicia sativa L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 20.0 |
Hibiscus sabdariffa L. | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.0 |
Raphanus raphanistrum L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20.0 |
Impatiens balsamina L. | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 |
Bidens frondosa L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18.0 |
Canna indica L. | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 |
Tradescantia zebrina Bosse. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.0 |
Tribulus terrestris L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17.0 |
Ipomoea triloba L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17.0 |
Talinum paniculatum (Jacq.) Gaertn. | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16.0 |
Zehneria japonica (Thunb.) H.Y.Liu | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16.0 |
Nasturtium officinale R. Br. | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15.0 |
Onopordum acanthium L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.0 |
Lepidium apetalum Willd. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.0 |
Zephyranthes candida (Lindl.) Herb. | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.0 |
Astragalus sinicus L. | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13.0 |
References
- Jiang, H.; Fan, Q.; Li, J.T.; Shi, S.; Li, S.P.; Liao, W.B.; Shu, W.S. Naturalization of alien plants in China. Biodivers. Conserv. 2011, 20, 1545–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eunyoung, K.; Jaeyong, C.; Wonkyong, S. Introduction and Spread of the Invasive Alien Species Ageratina altissima in a Disturbed Forest Ecosystem. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6152. [Google Scholar]
- Ye, Z.Y. Flora of seed plants in Pingtan Island, Fujian and effects of exotic plants. Guihaia 2017, 37, 280–293. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, W.H.; Cai, F.; Chen, S.; Zhu, J.; Qi, H.; Zhao, S.; Liu, J. Ecological Suitability of Island Development Based on Ecosystem Services Value, Biocapacity and Ecological Footprint: A Case Study of Pingtan Island, Fujian, China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, H.; Xiao, Y.; Deng, Y. Island Ecosystem Evaluation and Sustainable Development Strategies: A Case Study of the Zhoushan Archipelago. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2021, 28, e01603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, W.; Li, R.; Chi, X.; Chen, N.; Chen, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, F. Island urbanization and its ecological consequences: A case study in the Zhoushan Island, East China. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 76, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, X.; Ming, Y.; Gao, Y.; Hu, X. Dynamic Monitoring and Analysis of Ecological Quality of Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Zone, a New Type of Sea Island City, Based on RSEI. Sustainability 2019, 12, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Andow, D.A.; Ruiz, G.M.; Carlton, J.T. Pathways-Based Risk Assessment of Exotic Species Invasions. In Invasive Species: Vectors and Management Strategies; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; pp. 439–455. [Google Scholar]
- Weber, E.; Gut, D. Assessing the risk of potentially invasive plant species in central Europe. J. Nat. Conserv. 2004, 12, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wittenberg, R.; Cock, M.J. Invasive Alien Species: A Toolkit of Best Prevention and Management Practices; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Pisani, D.; Pazienza, P.; Perrino, E.V.; Caporale, D.; De Lucia, C. The Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services of Biodiversity Componnts in Protected Areas: A Review for a Framework of Analysis for the Gargano National Park. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stinca, A.; Musarella, C.M.; Rosati, L.; Laface, V.L.A.; Licht, W.; Fanfarillo, E.; Wagensommer, R.P.; Galasso, G.; Fascetti, S.; Esposito, A.; et al. Italian Vascular Flora: New Findings, Updates and Exploration of Floristic Similarities between Regions. Diversity 2021, 13, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, J.M.; Zhang, J.L.; Zhao, D.M.; Bai, P.P.; Wu, D.C.; Deng, C.Y.; Zheng, Y.S. Seed plant flora of parks in Haitan Island, Fujian Province. J. Fujian Agric. For. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2018, 47, 587–592. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, X.X.; Zhang, Z.K.; Lin, H.Z.; Lin, X.; Wang, Q.; Huang, L.Q. Species Diversity Characteristics of Vegetation Communities in Different Succession Stages in Pingtan Island. For. Resour. Manag. 2019, 66–73. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.L.; Zheng, J.Z.; Wei, K.; He, Y.Q.; Shi, X.J.; Liu, J.X.; Deng, C.Y. Investigation and landscape application evaluation of wild native groundcover plant resources in Pingtan. Pratacultural Sci. 2019, 36, 368–381. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, L.Q.; Zhang, Z.K.; Zheng, J.M.; Huang, S.J.; Lin, L.L.; Wang, Q.; Deng, C.Y.; Liu, X.Z. Functional Traits and Evolution Trend of Wild Plants in Continental Island: A Case Study of Pingtan Island. J. Trop. Subtrop. Bot. 2017, 25, 429–437. [Google Scholar]
- Lewison, R.L.; Rudd, M.A.; Al-Hayek, W.; Baldwin, C.; Hines, E. How the DPSIR framework can be used for structuring problems and facilitating empirical research in coastal systems. Environ. Sci. Policy 2016, 56, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Andreu, J.; Vila, M. Risk analysis of potential invasive plants in Spain. J. Nat. Conserv. 2010, 18, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Toole, D.K. A risk assessment system for alien plant bio-invasion in Xiamen, China. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20, 989–997. [Google Scholar]
- Pheloung, P.C.; Williams, P.A.; Halloy, S.R. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J. Environ. Sci. 1999, 57, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Editing Group of Flora of Fujian Province, Science and Technology Commission of Fujian Province. Flora of Fujian 1–6 Volumes; Fujian Science and Technology Press: Fujian, China, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Institute of Botany, CAS. Iplant. Available online: http://www.iplant.cn/frps (accessed on 15 April 2020).
- He, J.Q. Exotic Plants in China; Shanghai Scientific & Technology Publishers: Shanghai, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Z.Y. The areal types of seed plant genera in China. Plant Divers. 1991, 13, 1–139. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Z.Y.; Zhou, Z.K.; Li, D.Z.; Peng, H.; Sun, H. The Areal-types of the World Families of Seed Plants. Plant Divers. 2003, 3, 245–257. [Google Scholar]
- Notice on the Publication of the List of the First Invasive Alien Species in China. Available online: http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/zj/wj/200910/t20091022_172155.htm (accessed on 16 April 2021).
- Notice on the Publication of the List of the Second Invasive Alien Species in China. Available online: http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bwj/201001/t20100126_184831.htm (accessed on 16 April 2021).
- Notice on the Publication of the List of the Third Invasive Alien Species in China. Available online: http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201408/t20140828_288367.htm (accessed on 16 April 2021).
- Notice on the Publication of the List of the Fourth Invasive Alien Species in China. Available online: http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201612/t20161226_373636.htm (accessed on 16 April 2021).
- National Key Management List of Invasive Alien Species (First Batch). Available online: http://www.moa.gov.cn/nybgb/2013/dsanq/201712/t20171219_6119282.htm (accessed on 16 April 2021).
- 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species. Available online: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2000-126.pdf (accessed on 16 April 2021).
- Bulleri, F.; Benedetti-Cecchi, L.; Jaklin, A.; Ivea, L. Linking disturbance and resistance to invasion via changes in biodiversity: A conceptual model and an experimental test on rocky reefs. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 2010–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Li, Z.P.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Y.B.; Chen, H.; Lin, N.; Qiu, R.Z. Spatial variation and driving factors of invasive plants in Fujian Province, China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 30, 2682–2690. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, W.; Ye, G.F.; You, S.S.; Zheng, S.Q.; Han, M.M.; Du, L.H. Study on Status and Management Strategy of Invasive Alien Plants on Dongshan Island in Fujian. For. Resour. Manag. 2010, 45–50. Available online: http://www.lyzygl.com.cn/EN/Y2010/V0/I6/45 (accessed on 21 December 2021).
- Peng, Z.B.; Jiang, Y.; Jiang, J.S. Risk evaluation indicator system for exotic plant invasion in Hainan Island, South China. Chin. J. Ecol. 2013, 32, 2029–2034. [Google Scholar]
- Gooden, B.; French, K.; Turner, P.J.; Downey, P.O. Impact threshold for an alien plant invader, Lantana camara L., on native plant communities. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142, 2631–2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thomas, S.E.; Evans, H.C.; Cortat, G.; Koutsidou, C.; Day, M.D.; Ellison, C.A. Assessment of the microcyclic rust Puccinia lantanae as a classical biological control agent of the pantropical weed Lantana camara. Biol. Control. 2021, 160, 104688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berry, Z.C.; Wevill, K.; Curran, T.J. The invasive weed Lantana camara increases fire risk in dry rainforests by altering fuel beds. Weed Res. 2011, 51, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhileepan, K.; Treviño, M.; Bayliss, D.; Saunders, M.; Shortus, M.; McCarthy, J.; Snow, E.L.; Walter, G.H. Introduction and establishment of Carvalhotingis visenda (Hemiptera: Tingidae) as a biological control agent for cat’s claw creeper Macfadyena unguis-cati (Bignoniaceae) in Australia. Biol. Control. 2010, 55, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dehnen, S.K.; Conroy, J. Working with gardeners to identify potential invasive ornamental garden plants: Testing a citizen science approach. Biol. Invasions 2018, 20, 3069–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gari, S.R.; Newton, A.; Icely, J.D. A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological systems. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2015, 103, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Distribution Area Type | Families | Families % | Genus | Genus % |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Cosmopolitan | 17 | 45.9 | 13 | 16.7 |
2 Pantropic | 17 | 45.9 | 31 | 39.7 |
3 East Asia and America Disjunct | 2 | 5.4 | 17 | 21.8 |
4 Old World Tropics | — | — | 1 | 1.3 |
6 Trop. Asia to Trop. Africa | — | — | 3 | 3.8 |
8 North Temperate | 1 | 2.7 | 6 | 7.7 |
10 Old World Temperate | — | — | 2 | 2.6 |
12 Mediterranean region, West to Central Asia | — | — | 5 | 6.4 |
Total | 37 | 100 | 78 | 100 |
Life Form | Families | Genus | Species | Species% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Annual herb | 16 | 33 | 41 | 39.4% |
Biennial herb | 5 | 8 | 10 | 9.6% |
Perennial herb | 20 | 32 | 37 | 35.6% |
Herbaceous climber | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4.8% |
Subshrubby herb | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4.8% |
Shrub | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5.8% |
Total | 54 | 88 | 104 | 100% |
First Level Index | Second Level Index | Indicator Connotation and Assignment |
---|---|---|
1 The driving force of alien invasive plant invasion (38) | 1.1 Life form (10) | Shrub (4); Sub shrubby herb (3); Herbaceous vine (2); Perennial herb (1); Annual or biennial herb (0) |
1.2 Flowering duration (5) | Long flowering period (>6 months) (3); Mid-flowering period (5–6 months) (2); Short flowering period (<5 months) (0) | |
1.3 Modes of reproduction (10) | Both seed propagation and vegetative propagation (6); Seed propagation (3); Vegetative reproduction (1) | |
1.4 Seed fecundity (3) | The seeds are large and easy to germinate (2); The seed quantity is average and easy to germinate (1); The number of seeds is small, or are not easy to germinate (0) | |
1.5 Invasion method (5) | High possibility of intentional introduction (3); Natural diffusion is more likely to be introduced (2) | |
1.6 Communication ability (5) | Seeds can spread naturally over long distances (3); Seeds spread naturally at close range (2) | |
2 Adaptability of invasive alien plants to the local environment (15) | 2.1Adversity resistance (adaptability to adversity, such as salt-alkali, strong wind, drought, barrenness, water logging, etc.) (8) | Adapt to most adversities (5); Adapt to a few adversities (2); Cannot adapt to such adversities (1) |
2.2 Climatic suitability (2) | Suitable for growth (2); Not suitable for growth (0) | |
2.3 Soil and water environmental suitability (5) | Suitable for growth (4); Not suitable for growth (1) | |
3 Local distribution of alien invasive plants (20) | 3.1 Distribution of abundance (6) | Extremely common (3); Common (2); Locally formed population (1); Unformed population (0) |
3.2 Distribution of habitat types (roadside wasteland, abandoned farmland, front and back of house, parterre and lawns, understory forest edge, seaside sandy land) (8) | Distributed in 5-6 kinds of habitats (5); Distributed in 3–4 habitats (2); Distributed in 1–2 kinds of habitats, or commonly seen in cultivation (1) | |
3.3 Important value (6) | Important value >10 (3); 7 q ≤ Important value < 10 (1.5); 4 ≤ Important value < 7 (1); 1 ≤ Important value < 4 (0.5); Important value < 1 (0) | |
4 The impact of alien invasive plants on the local area (9) | 4.1 Impact on native plants (2) | Produce inhibiting effect (2); Does not produce inhibition (0) |
4.2 Impact on agriculture, forestry, and fishery (1) | Has a certain hazard (1); No obvious hazard (0) | |
4.3 Impact on human and animal health (1) | Has a certain hazard (1); No obvious hazard (0) | |
4.4 Impact on the tourist landscape (5) | Significant impact, serious harm (3); Have an impact, but cause little harm (2); No obvious hazard (0) | |
5 The response measures (18) | 5.1 Feasibility of prevention (18) | No effective prevention measures, only temporary control (10); Effective prevention and treatment measures, obvious short-term effects, easy to relapse (6); With effective control measures, it can eliminate invasive plants for a long time at one time (2); It has medicinal, feed, edible, and ornamental values, and no control measures have been taken (0) |
Risk Score R | Level | Species | Species% |
---|---|---|---|
R ≥ 35 | I high risk invasive species | 23 | 22.1 |
25 ≤ R < 35 | II medium risk invasive species | 37 | 35.6 |
R < 25 | III low risk invasive species | 44 | 42.3 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Luo, M.; Xiao, L.; Chen, X.; Lin, K.; Liu, B.; He, Z.; Liu, J.; Zheng, S. Invasive Alien Plants and Invasion Risk Assessment on Pingtan Island. Sustainability 2022, 14, 923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020923
Luo M, Xiao L, Chen X, Lin K, Liu B, He Z, Liu J, Zheng S. Invasive Alien Plants and Invasion Risk Assessment on Pingtan Island. Sustainability. 2022; 14(2):923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020923
Chicago/Turabian StyleLuo, Minxian, Lifang Xiao, Xuhui Chen, Kaiqin Lin, Bao Liu, Zongming He, Jinfu Liu, and Shiqun Zheng. 2022. "Invasive Alien Plants and Invasion Risk Assessment on Pingtan Island" Sustainability 14, no. 2: 923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020923
APA StyleLuo, M., Xiao, L., Chen, X., Lin, K., Liu, B., He, Z., Liu, J., & Zheng, S. (2022). Invasive Alien Plants and Invasion Risk Assessment on Pingtan Island. Sustainability, 14(2), 923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020923