Next Article in Journal
Innovation Research in Tourism and Hospitality Field: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Creating Street Greenery in Urban Pedestrian Roads on Microclimates and Particulate Matter Concentrations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sustainable Development of Underutilized Pedestrian Underpass in Seoul

1
Suninterline Architecture & Design Lab, Seoul 04075, Korea
2
College of Architecture & Urban Planning, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(13), 7878; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137878
Submission received: 19 May 2022 / Revised: 15 June 2022 / Accepted: 20 June 2022 / Published: 28 June 2022

Abstract

:
Since the Korean War, Seoul has applied a growth-oriented approach to urban development, resulting in insufficient amount of public spaces. Such lack of public spaces has been addressed partially through private development, which has exacerbated the lack of public domain for the socially disadvantaged groups. Accordingly, local governments have increasingly sought to solve this problem by developing underutilized underpasses. This study analyzes the development of Social Care Type (SCT) underpasses in Seoul and how they meet the characteristics of sustainable development. The study findings reveal that the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s approach to the development of underpasses forms a virtuous cycle where the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) constituting sustainability—social, economic, and environmental factors—forms a feedback-loop relationship. Based on this systemic review of nine case studies of underpass development in Seoul, this article suggests a new paradigm for underpass space development that could be applied in the future by Seoul and other modern cities.

1. Introduction

1.1. Pedestrian Underpasses in Seoul

In the 1960s, urban development was centered around automobiles as a driver of economic growth. Seoul also began to develop underpasses with the purpose of providing citizens’ passageways and air raid shelters [1,2]. During this process, the underpass became more than a pedestrian passageway, as it incorporated commercial use; underground spaces gradually expanded with the construction of underground shopping malls. Furthermore, the construction of the subway led to the expansion of underpasses connecting subway stations. Thus, underground spaces in Seoul experienced a renaissance.
However, in the 1990s, the Urban Action Network, a civil group, began to fight for a right to walk above the ground again. By 1998, the Seoul Metropolitan Government changed its development paradigm to prioritize pedestrians and vulnerable road users by establishing a “Basic Plan for Walking Environment for Creating a Walkable Seoul” [1].
In this way, the area for and rights of pedestrians were expanded, and the underpass was recognized as a facility that did not consider the convenience of users [3].
By the 2000s, plans for a “people-centered city” were rolled out nationwide, resulting in countless crosswalks being installed or improved throughout downtown Seoul. As a result, urban design in Seoul adopted a more human-centric approach, guarding the citizens’ right to walk above the ground, enabling smooth passages via crosswalks without using underpasses. Over time, underpasses were neglected, as the value of underground spaces declined. These underpasses eventually became campgrounds for people experiencing homelessness and places for teenagers to smoke, drink, and delinquency, which contributed to the negative image of underpasses [1]. Despite this phenomenon, underpasses have various potentials given that they are well-accessible, as they were built to facilitate smooth traffic flow at major traffic intersections in cities [4]. Moreover, they are relatively easy to develop, because they are state-owned public space, and they are less affected by weather problems such as fine dust than land surface facilities [5]. Thus, in recent years, the Seoul Metropolitan Government has increasingly sought to develop underpasses as spaces that contribute to the sustainability of cities and societies.

1.2. Background and Purpose

South Korea has experienced a very rapid, unprecedented economic growth. After the Korean War in the 1950s, the country implemented an industrial growth policy in the 1960s and continued this effort through to the 1990s [6]. Currently, Seoul is a major metropolitan city with a population of roughly ten million (nearly a seven-fold increase from 1.44 million in 1949) [7]. Seoul’s urban policies have heavily focused on economic growth and quantitative expansion, resulting in a significant lack of public spaces compared to that in other developed countries [8]. The city has tended to resolve this lack with private development, such as apartment complexes; however, the exclusive nature of such private spaces has exacerbated polarization in the city [9,10].
Recent policy initiatives have been implemented to alleviate such polarization and create public spaces to promote regional harmony [11]. As a major indicator of sustainable development, the Seoul Metropolitan Government addresses the balanced development of society across three categories: environment, culture, and economy. This has created a trend to expand “the living culture space” so that citizens can directly lead and participate in the development of a sustainable society. Thus, the state’s policy stance has been moving away from the centralized local autonomy centered on bureaucrats, which lasted until 1990, to valuing resident autonomy that considers residents as the main subjects [12].
In response, the Seoul Metropolitan Government is attempting to transform the city’s idle space into a local community space for citizens. As discussed in the previous section, the neglected underpass has value as a highly attractive resource. However, attempts to improve the underpass have not been very successful because, in terms of the method of remodeling the underpass, a plan centered on environmental improvement repeatedly leads to idle spaces [1].
Regarding the public underpass in front of the post office at Seoul Station, the space was divided, and an emergency shelter for the homeless was installed in 2007. An attempt was made to infuse life into the public underpass in front of the post office at Seoul Station, which was old and dark, by installing public artwork on both walls of the public underpass. However, the emergency shelter installed in the public underpass operated only in winter; thus, the public underpass in front of the post office at Seoul Station was full of homeless people in the summer [1]. This caused constant friction between the homeless and other citizens who use the underpass.
As such, the sustainable development of the unused underpass cannot be improved through simple environmental improvement or the introduction of public programs. Accordingly, it is important to consider several factors that create a complex synergistic effect with each other. The recent underpass developed by the Seoul Metropolitan Government is noteworthy in this respect.
This study examines the case of Seoul City where local governments have transformed unused underpasses into community facilities for residents. In doing so, we analyzed the sustainable strategy of Seoul’s Social Care Type (SCT) underground space development and examined the impact of such developed spaces on society.

1.3. Research on Previous Studies and Differentiation

From the perspective of urban regeneration, various studies and thesis data on the development of underground space as three-dimensional city and future space are being published at home and abroad. However, most of these focus on subway station buildings or large-scale underground space development [13,14,15], and the studies on small-scale underpasses for crossing, as covered in this study, primarily focus on revealing the problems related to the underpass based on environmental analysis.
A characteristic common to previous studies addressing urban underpasses is that the use of underpasses is avoided due to safety and sanitation issues, which leads to low utilization. In the UK, Paulo Rui Anciaes (2018) analyzed underpasses as the most inconvenient and least preferred road crossing facility [16]. In India, Udit Gupta (2009) and Shalini Rankavat (2016) showed that the underpass is not heavily used, and pedestrians prefer over-ground crosswalks [17]. These studies showed that for older adults and women, public safety plays an important role in route selection [18].
Similar to overseas studies, pedestrians’ avoidance of underpasses is evident in Korea, which leads to an increase in traffic accidents due to jaywalking. In their study, Bae and Park (2018) stated that underpasses installed for safe pedestrian crossing are a factor that increases the occurrence of jaywalking accidents [19]. In Lee’s (2018) study, statistically, the trespassing accident rate was on average 0.41 cases where there was a crosswalk and 0.65 cases where there was an underground sidewalk without an elevator [3]. Because if there is no escalator or elevator to the underpass, pedestrians who have difficulty using the stairs may jaywalk [19].
The previous studies described above concluded that the underpass is a crossing facility with low utilization and low preference. On the other hand, there are also research claims that, due to the advantage of an underground space, efforts should be made to activate the underpass while maintaining its original function as a major node connecting the city network.
Jianqiang Cui (2016) of China showed that the utilization of urban underground space has the potential to contribute substantially to urban sustainability and suggested improving the pedestrian environment in underpasses by enhancing their visual identity or theme [20]. Chiara Delmastro (2016) of Italy explained that although underpasses are uncommon, they have advantages such as security, good fire protection, limited environmental impact, and protection from damage caused by weather (sun, rain, wind) as well as from terroristic attacks [21]. Hoa Nguyen (2019) examined the case of the Esplanade Underpass in Singapore and stated that despite the country’s weather conditions, which are hot and humid, a pleasant indoor environment is being created by the air-conditioned breeze flowing from the shopping mall; Nguyen also explained that by utilizing the slippery floor and walls, various users such as dancers and skateboarders can utilize an underpass as a public space [22].
Park (2008) presented a platform network to develop underpasses according to the surrounding context [23]. Cho (2015) suggested a potential use for an idle underpass: temporarily operating a program in consideration of the characteristics of the underpass that can be used as an evacuation facility in the event of war [1]. Kim (2017) suggested developing a checklist for underground space improvement by analyzing cases of underpasses that have previously been remodeled [24]. As such, various previous studies have been carried out improvements to underpass space; however, studies focusing on the sustainable aspect of such development are rare.
Underpasses have irreversibility that is difficult to change once developed [25]; thus, they are worth using at the time of their development, but they will likely fail to keep up with the rapidly changing times and will ultimately be eliminated. Therefore, in the development of underpasses, it is important to achieve sustainability by ensuring the ability to self-regulate. Accordingly, this study focused on the sustainable development of idle underground space.

2. Methods

2.1. Sustainability Framework

The term sustainability was first defined as “meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” [26] in the Brundtland Report published by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) in 1987. Since then, it has been widely used as a concept that encompasses conditions that must be sought to avoid short-sightedness and to achieve long-term harmony.
However, the concept of sustainability has existed long before the above definition emerged and drew attention. In 1979, ecologist René Passet argued in his book L’économique et le Vivant that since the economic system is included in the human social system and the human social system is included in the environmental system, the environment should not be harmed for the safety of human activities [27]. He revealed that the economy, environment, and society are closely related, and simultaneously expanded the scope of human activity to a global scale and suggested a balanced path for the development of humanity as a whole [27].
Later, in 1994, British economist John Elkington saw a need for a new language to extend sustainability, which was still largely focused on environmental agendas, to the socio-economic level (as the Brundtland Report had already noted) [28]. Therefore, he coined the term Triple Bottom Line (TBL). The term received much attention and significantly contributed to devising a practical path towards sustainable practices by integrating social, economic, and environmental aspects. As its main analysis framework, this study uses the Brundtland Report; TBL; and the social, economic, and environmental factors identified by Passet and Elkington to define sustainability (Figure 1).

2.2. Case Selection

As discussed above, sustainability should essentially satisfy social, economic, and environmental considerations. Thus, we established the following TBL criteria to select the relevant underpass development projects in Seoul (Table 1).
First, the project must offer programs that address specific social issues in the region. As stated in the Seoul NPO (Non-profit Organization) Support Center’s Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (2016), while profit is the fundamental objective of for-profit businesses, what is most important for non-profit organizations is their inherent purpose to perform, through which society justifies the organization’s existence [29] (Table 1).
Second, the project must have a secure place for the organization with economic independence. In space development projects, sustainability is not simply guaranteed by good planning but requires constant monitoring and professional management. Thus, active organizations must exist to respond to constantly changing regional issues, and they should have a place to conduct their activities (Table 1).
Third, the project must utilize the environmental characteristics of the relevant underpasses. Each underpass is different in terms of region, location, and size. Particularly, underpasses that have long been unused are unlikely to be frequented by residents. Therefore, an area’s sustainability can be improved when the direction for development and the characteristics of the relevant underpass work in synergy and encourage resident participation (Table 1).
According to statistical data on Seoul’s road facilities as of 2021 [30], there were 81 underpasses in Seoul. This study investigated all cases of the development of idle space via programs run by a dual-resident-operating organization (Figure 2). There was a total of 10 development cases, beginning with the Songpa Village Art Factory in 2013, and nine cases were analyzed as in one case, operations were suspended due to COVID-19 (Table 2).
For the above cases we first conducted a literature review using domestic articles and various publicly available government documents. Through this process, we focused on the reason the underpass had become an idle space, the background for developing the space, and the relationship with the local community at the time. Furthermore, through the National Geographic Information Institute, we investigated aerial photos of the target area by year and identified the time of development of the respective underpass as well as the time when it became an idle space. Then, based on the basic data, all nine cases were visited and investigated. Due to the COVID-19 situation, there were restrictions on this field visit; however, we observed the basic form of the underpass and the program in the space. By synthesizing this information, the three factors (TBL) for sustainability of each case is analyzed in Section 3.

3. Case Studies

3.1. Comma

Comma was originally developed in 1978 by removing crosswalks to facilitate smooth vehicle movement. However, it was left unattended after crosswalks were reinstalled in 2014. In 2016, it was transformed into a space for young entrepreneurs. Later, in 2021, it was repurposed for teenagers (Table 3).

3.2. Underland

Underland was developed in 1978, after the crosswalk at the intersection by the Yeouido Hanyang Apartment was removed to improve traffic flow. In 2007, crosswalks were reinstalled at the intersection, which resulted in fewer underpass users, and access to the underpass has been restricted for safety reasons, due to the aging facilities, since 2009. Yeongdeungpo-gu has remodeled this unused space into a recreational space for young people (Table 4).

3.3. The Meet Up Center

The Meet Up Center is another transformed underpass that was originally constructed in 1996 but left unused after the installation of crosswalks above ground. It was turned into a space for young people in 2020. Since 2021, it has been used as a space for local communities (Table 5).

3.4. The Village Art Factory

The underpass where the Village Art Factory is located was constructed in 1996 when the Songpa Station was opened and the crosswalks above the ground were removed. After these crosswalks were installed in 2013, the demand for the underpass decreased; however, it was later converted into a village art space for local residents (Table 6).

3.5. The Hwigyeong Atelier

The Hwigyeong Atelier was built in 1995 along with the removal of crosswalks but was left unattended after the crosswalks above ground were re-installed in 2008 and 2009. In 2018, the space was reorganized as a center for community revitalization; however, it was not in use because of operational issues. Following its reopening in May 2019, the space has been used by the local communities (Table 7).

3.6. The Musical Instrument Library

The underpass where the Musical Instrument Library is located was developed in 1996. Spaces other than the passageways have been used as a district office warehouse, school uniform bank, and silver band practice room. However, there were not many users due to the available ground crosswalks. This underground space has been transformed by the Songpa-gu Office into a place where residents can learn and handle musical instruments (Table 8).

3.7. The Seoul Indie Platform

The Seoul Indie Platform was created in 1997 after the demolition of an overpass nearby. It was used as the Ahyeon branch of the Mapo Health Center (June 1997–August 2002) and the Mapo Cultural Center (September 2002–July 2013). In 2014, as the Mapo Cultural Center was relocated, it was reorganized as a space for independent musicians (Table 9).

3.8. The Seoripul Gallery

The Seoripul Gallery was originally an underpass that was developed in 1989 and that had been unattended after 2000 when the crosswalks were installed above ground. It was remodeled as an exhibition space for local residents and young artists in 2018. This remodeling case won a silver award at the 2019 Awards for Innovation in Government Events (Table 10).

3.9. The Chungmu Startup Cube

The Chungmu Startup Cube was constructed when the overpass in front of Chungmu Elementary School was demolished in 1985. In 2018, Jung-gu District created this space for fostering young entrepreneurs by converting an underpass that had become underused due to the existence of children from nearby elementary schools (Table 11).

4. Results

TBL is considered as the most common analytical framework for evaluating sustainability [31]. However, Elkington was concerned that “the TBL language may sometimes be unhelpful, encouraging parallel activities rather than true integration” [28]. That is, our understanding of sustainability may still be limited to satisfying individual TBL. This is very basic but has a substantial impact, and it thus must be addressed. This is because the public officials or NGOs who have decided to transform the idle urban space into a sustainable space to contribute to the local community may simply wish to satisfy TBL.
At the beginning, this study attempted to analyze how the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s SCT underpass development cases meet each TBL element.
The analysis, however, revealed that TBL is only a minimum standard (bottom line) as its name implies, and the above nine cases are already utilizing a more advanced strategy to transform abandoned underground spaces into sustainable local communities. Here, Passet’s view of understanding each factor within a close interrelationship system is adopted while accepting Elkington’s TBL as a separate practice area in consideration of sustainability (Figure 3).
As shown in Figure 3, the three elements of sustainability (A: Social, B: Economic, and C: Environmental) do not exist in isolation but, rather, in a highly organic relationship with each other. That is, as can be seen from the nine cases of Seoul, ① the social adequacy of the development space was a major factor in ensuring the economic support of the space, ② the satisfaction of economic independence became the basis for achieving environmental soundness, and ③ the strength of the environment in which development took place had a profound influence on the setting of social goals.
The Seoul Metropolitan Government’s underpass development considers TBL elements as organically independent parts of a virtuous cycle instead of considering each as a separate practice area. Hence, it focuses on the connection among the elements. A virtuous cycle occurs when factors are strengthened by a feedback loop relationship [32].
In contrast, development that only satisfies each element individually is also possible. For example, Wolgye Underpass, where the youth space known as the Meet-up Center is located, could have been developed as a youth startup center. It may have been able to receive economic support from local governments temporarily due to its utilization of abandoned environmental elements and its social purpose for local youth.
However, it is unknown whether the youth entrepreneurship support center in this commuter-town area, which is far from the business district, is truly sustainable. This is a limitation of the existing TBL method. The temporary satisfaction of conditions does not necessarily guarantee a lasting virtuous cycle (Figure 4).
As such, sustainability is achieved through a virtuous cycle among all elements rather than individual achievement of TBL. However, the objectivity in this circle may not be secured. Therefore, the feedback loop can be considered an index by which to evaluate it through a shift in perspective from elements to relationships. When the focus is shifted to the relationship between the social element of the youth startup center and the environmental element of the city’s representative commuter town rather than focusing on the element itself, it is possible to predict what type of feedback action occurs in the relationship between the two factors. This process is expected to improve the precision of the prediction of uncertain development results.

5. Discussion

Seoul’s industrial and goal-oriented approach to urban development has shifted to one that values its citizens’ quality of life. Due to this change, citizens’ values have become more diverse [33], and the value expected of urban spaces has progressed from satisfying functions to satisfying emotions. Accordingly, it is time to take a fresh look at underground spaces, which have been actively used as built environments in cities since the modern times. The perception of underground space development in Seoul, however, seems to remain stuck in past tendencies despite all the changes and developments (Table 12).
In the past, Seoul’s development of underground spaces usually aimed to complement the functions of the urban spaces above ground. In fact, most underground spaces that currently exist were planned to facilitate smooth activities above ground, leading to their recognition by citizens as isolated spaces of innovation. Unfortunately, given changing circumstances, underground spaces built for specific purposes may become abandoned when their purpose is no longer relevant [34]. This is well illustrated by the current situation of Seoul’s many unused underground spaces that no longer serve their initial functions.
The SCT underpass development case in Seoul directly responds to the limitations of this existing development method (Table 13). In terms of transforming the underpass into a destination that attracts people rather than a simple means of transportation, it actively reflected the characteristics of Seoul and improved the organic relationship with the city.
What this study focused on through the nine case studies presented here was that the more organic the relationship between the developed space and the city, the more its influence can be extended beyond the sustainability of the development space itself to the sustainability of society.
In response to local youth problems, Comma, Underland, and The Meet Up Center seek to contribute to society’s sustainability by supporting the sound development of adolescents and by facilitating their interaction with the community. Also in the region, the Village Art Factory, the Hwigyeong Atelier, and the Musical Instrument Library create communities, each with its own unique strategies, to help reduce polarization and foster openness in society. Lastly, the Seoul Indie Platform, the Seoripul Gallery, and the Chungmu Startup Cube provide support for vulnerable people in the region and promote the appropriate balance and harmony between the mainstream and the non-mainstream in society. They are expected to have a positive impact on the sustainability of society (Table 14).

6. Conclusions

Seoul’s ground space is currently challenged by poor weather conditions and fine dust as well as a lack of space due to increasing population density. Furthermore, the spatial structure above ground, defined by land prices, has led to extreme polarization in society. In light of this, new development methods must utilize underground spaces to address these problems. Since technology can help overcome such shortcomings, we should no longer focus on merely overcoming them when it comes to the development of underground spaces. Instead, we should focus on maximizing the advantages of underground spaces.
An underground space could be revitalized as a diverse and user-friendly environment suitable for the new era. Regenerating existing unused underground spaces instead of engaging in large-scale development could increase the success of the SCT project. Therefore, underground spaces, currently fragmented and isolated, should be recognized as new livable spaces connected to daily life [35]. To that end, the city’s underground spaces must aim to form an organic relationship with their daily surroundings, thus ensuring their own sustainability.
This study addressed strategies for achieving sustainability in SCT underpass development in Seoul; however, the scope of the study is limited to Seoul underpasses. Seoul has the unique characteristics of being a divided city as well as achieving compressed economic growth in the second half of the 20th century. However, in the sense that each city has its own characteristics, the above case provides a good example of considering the specificity of the city in question.
Nevertheless, it is a limitation of this study that it did not expand the scope and compare and address cases of development in other major cities to those in Seoul. We expected to supplement the deficiencies of this study in a follow-up study by analyzing various cases of underpass development in other countries. Despite these limitations, this study is significant in that it presented a direction that can complement the existing framework by analyzing cases of idle underpass development in an international metropolis, namely, Seoul.
It is hoped that the development strategy of Seoul’s SCT underpasses, designed to eliminate the limitations of being abandoned spaces and to become sustainable underground community facilities, will be used as a model for other cities with similar concerns.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Y.J. and H.J.K.; methodology, D.Y.J. and H.J.K.; validation, D.Y.J.; formal analysis, D.Y.J.; investigation, D.Y.J. and H.J.K.; resources, D.Y.J.; data curation, D.Y.J.; writing—original draft preparation, D.Y.J.; writing—review and editing, H.J.K.; visualization, D.Y.J. and H.J.K.; supervision, H.J.K.; project administration, H.J.K.; funding acquisition, H.J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1G1A1013702).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jo, D.H. Temporary Application Plan of Public Underground Walkway Study of the Resolution Method: Focusing on Seoul’s Idle Public Underground Walkways. Master’s Thesis, University of Seoul, Seoul, Korea, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yun, J.H.R. Bunkers as difficult heritage: Imagining future for underground spaces in Seoul. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 2022, 21, 1211–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lee, T.Y. A Study on Factors of Pedestrian Crossing Accident on Characteristics of Crossing Facilities. Master’s Thesis, University of Seoul, Seoul, Korea, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lee, G.J.; Jung, S.H. Empirical Investigation and Comparative Analysis of Urban Public Underground Space—Focused on the Underground Public Pedestrian Facilities in Busan Metropolitan City. J. Archit. Inst. Korea 2011, 27, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cui, J.; Allan, A.; Taylor, M.; Lin, D. Developing shanghai underground pedestrian system under urbanization: Mobility, functionality and equity. J. Archit. Urban. 2012, 36, 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, J.H.; Nam, J.; Han, J.H. Paradigms of Korean urban policies at each urban growth stage. Korean Hous. Assoc. J. Autumn Acad. Press Conf. 2015, 26, 111–116. [Google Scholar]
  7. The Seoul Research Data Service. Population Change and Population Growth Rate. Available online: https://data.si.re.kr/data/%ED%86%B5%EA%B3%84%EB%A1%9C-%EB%B3%B8-%EC%84%9C%EC%9A%B8-%EC%9D%B8%EA%B5%AC%ED%8E%B8/267 (accessed on 6 May 2022).
  8. Jeong, B.S. Seoul Metropolitan Theory (New Policy Discourses About the Seoul Metropolis); The Seoul Institute: Seoul, Korea, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gelezeau, V. Séoul, Ville Géante, Cités Radieuses, 10th ed.; Humanitasbook: Seoul, Korea, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  10. Moon, G.J. The negative perceptions of apartment culture as represented in Korean films during the 1970s–1990s. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kim, Y.S.; Oh, J.S.; Kim, S.Y. The transition from traditional infrastructure to living SOC and its effectiveness for community sustainability: The case of South Korea. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. You, C.B. The background and challenges of the Seoul community support project: On the occasion of the establishment of the Seoul Community Support Center. Environ. Philos. 2013, 15, 173–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cui, J.; Allan, A.; Taylor, M.; Lin, D. The perception of accessibility and ease of orientation of underground pedestrian systems: A survey in Shanghai. Int. J. Urban Sci. 2012, 16, 301–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Labbé, M. Architecture of underground spaces: From isolated innovations to connected urbanism. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2016, 55, 153–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kishii, T. Utilization of underground space in Japan. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2016, 55, 320–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Anciaes, P.; Jones, P. Estimating preferences for different types of pedestrian crossing facilities. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2018, 52, 222–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gupta, U.; Tiwari, G.; Chatterjee, N.; Fazio, J. Study of Pedestrian Risk Behavior and Survival Analysis. Proc. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 2009, 7, 389–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rankavat, S.; Tiwari, G. Pedestrians perceptions for utilization of pedestrian facilities—Delhi, India. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2016, 42, 495–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bae, M.K.; Park, S.H. A Study on the Street Environmental Characteristics Influencing Jaywalking Traffic Accidents. J. Korean Reg. Dev. Assoc. 2018, 30, 177–191. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cui, J.; Lin, D. Utilisation of underground pedestrian systems for urban sustainability. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2016, 55, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Delmastro, C.; Lavagno, E.; Schranz, L. Underground urbanism: Master Plans and Sectorial Plans. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2016, 55, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nguyen, H. From Pedestrian Thoroughfare to Public Space: The Social Life of the Esplanade Underpass. J. Undergrad. Ethnogr. 2019, 9, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Park, H.S. A Study on The Culture Network Platform Design of The Cumulative City: Focus on The Space of Sidewalk in The Basement. Master’s Thesis, Hongik University, Seoul, Korea, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim, K.N. The Study on The Development of Design Checklist for The Underground Space Remodeling. Master’s Thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sterling, R.; Admiraal, H.; Bobylev, N.; Parker, H.; Godard, J.; Vähäaho, I.; Rogers, C.; Shi, X.; Hanamura, T. Sustainability issues for underground space in urban areas. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plan. 2012, 165, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brundtland Report. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development—Our Common Future; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  27. Passet, R. L’Économique et le Vivant; Payot: Paris, France, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  28. Elkington, J. Enter the triple bottom line. In The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up; Henriques, A., Richardson, J., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2013; pp. 23–38. Available online: https://www.johnelkington.com/archive/TBL-elkington-chapter.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2022).
  29. Seoul NPO Center. NPO Sustainability Reporting Guidelines: 2016. Available online: http://www.snpo.kr/data//file/npo_aca/3546821009_k34HTwIi_16ECA780EC868DEAB080EB8AA5EC84B1EBB3B4EAB3A0_EAB080EC9DB4EB939CEB9DBCEC9DB828ED95A9EBB3B829.pdf?msclkid=d2a8fde7cf5811ecb775608b0dcae7bb (accessed on 1 May 2022).
  30. Road Facilities Division, Seoul Metropolitan City. Seoul Road Facility Statistics. Available online: https://data.seoul.go.kr/dataList/261/S/2/datasetView.do# (accessed on 10 June 2022).
  31. Zaharia, R.; Zaharia, R. Triple Bottom Line. In The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2021; pp. 75–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Webel, C.; Galtung, J. Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies; Routledge: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  33. Han, G.S.; Shin, S.J. A cultural profile of Korean society: From vertical collectivism to horizontal individualism. Korean J. Psychol. 1999, 13, 293–310. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cho, B.S. Utilization of Unused Space in Subway Stations. Available online: https://www.si.re.kr/sites/default/files/2018-CR-01-08_0.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2022).
  35. Han, S.H.; Seo, C.W. A study on the possibilities and institutional burdens of the use of underground space as a substitute of land surface. Korean Real Estate Acad. Rev. 2003, 21, 179–190. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Sustainability by Rene Passet; (b) Sustainability by John Elkington.
Figure 1. (a) Sustainability by Rene Passet; (b) Sustainability by John Elkington.
Sustainability 14 07878 g001
Figure 2. The total number of underpasses and selected cases.
Figure 2. The total number of underpasses and selected cases.
Sustainability 14 07878 g002
Figure 3. The Sustainability Cycle.
Figure 3. The Sustainability Cycle.
Sustainability 14 07878 g003
Figure 4. Self Regulating Sustainability System.
Figure 4. Self Regulating Sustainability System.
Sustainability 14 07878 g004
Table 1. Case selection criteria based on TBL.
Table 1. Case selection criteria based on TBL.
TBLCriteria
(A) SocialIs there a program addressing specific regional issues?
(B) EconomicIs there an independent space in place for the organization to perform its operations?
(C) EnvironmentalAre the environmental characteristics of the underpass utilized?
Table 2. Case study list.
Table 2. Case study list.
No.CategoryRenovation DateProject Name
1Youth2016Comma
22019Underland
32020The Meet Up Center
4Local residents2013The Village Art Factory
52019The Hwigyeong Atelier
62021The Musical Instrument Library
7Vulnerable populations2014The Seoul Indie Platform
82018The Seoripul Gallery
92018The Chungmu Startup Cube
Table 3. Comma overview.
Table 3. Comma overview.
NameComma
Address444-2, Seongsan-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul Sustainability 14 07878 i001
Renovation Date2016
Area524 m2
Main UserYouth (9–24 years old)
Space ProgramRest area, small concert hall, program room, media room,
learning space, etc.
Site History
(Source: National Geographic Information Institute)
Sustainability 14 07878 i002 Sustainability 14 07878 i003 Sustainability 14 07878 i004
197719782014
(a) SocialThis is one of the youth-only spaces in Seodaemun-gu. Here, young people lead the operation. This space strives to communicate with the local residents and offers young people the opportunity to experience several different activities that are not taught in school, such as media production. By providing psychological tests and counseling services to teenagers with concerns, it also serves as a local youth safety net.
(b) EconomicThe Nowon-gu local government supports the budget, and it is operated by Seodaemun Youth Counseling and Welfare Center.
(c) EnvironmentalIn Sinchon, where Comma is located, there are several prestigious universities, making the connection between young people and college students easier. Additionally, since it is a busy street, many young people frequently visit this place. Moreover, it is easily accessible from many areas thanks to its excellent traffic connections.
Photos
(Source: Author)
Sustainability 14 07878 i005 Sustainability 14 07878 i006 Sustainability 14 07878 i007
Table 4. Underland overview.
Table 4. Underland overview.
NameUnderland
Address86, Gukjegeumyung-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul Sustainability 14 07878 i008
Renovation Date2019
Area853.79 m2
Main UserTeenagers
Space ProgramBook café, powder room, camping zone, arcade, playroom, etc.
Site History
(Source: National Geographic Information Institute)
Sustainability 14 07878 i009 Sustainability 14 07878 i010 Sustainability 14 07878 i011
197719782007
(a) SocialDuring a meeting meant to provide young people with a chance to participate in local policies, the young people in Yeongdeungpo-gu selected a youth-only leisure place as the most necessary facility in the region. Underland fulfills such wishes of the local youth by providing public spaces for reading, playing, games, and various other leisure activities that are not available within the traditional institutional education systems.
(b) EconomicAll local governments in Seoul are legally required to support and foster youth activities in accordance with the Framework Act on Youth and Youth Protection Act. Installation and operation of youth facilities are specified in the basic ordinances of local governments. Underland is an independent youth facility in Yeongdeungpo-gu and is operated with the support of local governments.
(c) EnvironmentalLocated in the heart of Yeouido’s residential area, Underland is adjacent to all of Yeouido’s schools (within a 1 km radius). Furthermore, the underground space provides an environment where young people can enjoy various amusement facilities without being too concerned about the surroundings.
Photos
(Source: Author)
Sustainability 14 07878 i012 Sustainability 14 07878 i013 Sustainability 14 07878 i014
Table 5. The Meet Up Center overview.
Table 5. The Meet Up Center overview.
NameThe Meet Up Center
Address11-2, Choansan-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul Sustainability 14 07878 i015
Renovation Date2020
Area672 m2
Main UserLocal youth and residents
Space ProgramComic café, mini-theater, performance practice room,
single media room, etc.
Site History
(Source: National Geographic Information Institute)
Sustainability 14 07878 i016 Sustainability 14 07878 i017 Sustainability 14 07878 i018
199519962009
(a) SocialIn Wolgye-dong, this space was created exclusively as a youth center to promote the growth, happiness, and interaction of the local youth. It offers various growth programs in cooperation with nearby schools. As of 2021, these programs address both the needs of the local youth population and expands to businesses for the revitalization of the local community. The Meet Up Center has been operating as a place where the local youth and residents meet and interact.
(b) EconomicThis place is supported by the local government of Nowon-gu and operated by the Blue Tree Foundation, a non-profit NGO for youth in South Korea.
(c) EnvironmentalThe Meet Up Center is located in an apartment complex near other residences. Moreover, it is characterized by a unique location that is near two universities, six elementary schools, four middle schools, and five high schools (within a 1 km radius), indicating a high population of young people in the area. Moreover, a library and a sports center are located right near the center, with regional characteristics that enable close connections to local resources.
Photos
(Source: Author)
Sustainability 14 07878 i019 Sustainability 14 07878 i020 Sustainability 14 07878 i021
Table 6. The Village Art Factory overview.
Table 6. The Village Art Factory overview.
NameThe Village Art Factory
Address384, Songpa-daero, Songpa-gu, Seoul
Renovation Date2013
Area727 m2
Main UserLocal residents
Space ProgramBook rental space, movie theater, program room, office, etc.
Site History
(Source: National Geographic Information Institute)
Sustainability 14 07878 i022 Sustainability 14 07878 i023 Sustainability 14 07878 i024
199519962013
(a) SocialThe Village Art Factory was created as a space for autonomous cultural and arts activities. It provides club projects, rest areas, various life-education and culture and arts programs for local residents.
(b) EconomicSongpa-gu supports residents’ voluntary art and hobby activities, and the Village Art Factory is operated directly by the district.
(c) EnvironmentalLocated between the Songpa Station and the Seokchon Station, it is easily accessible within the region. Based on this advantage, a variety of art and cultural programs are offered to residents in nearby areas. Furthermore, environmental projects have been implemented in the region by combining environmental movements and living cultures with the object of protecting the environment and nature.
Photos
(Source: Author)
Sustainability 14 07878 i025 Sustainability 14 07878 i026 Sustainability 14 07878 i027
Table 7. The Hwigyeong Atelier overview.
Table 7. The Hwigyeong Atelier overview.
NameThe Hwigyeong Atelier
Address55, Mangu-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul Sustainability 14 07878 i028
Renovation Date2019
Area375 m2
Main UserLocal residents
Space ProgramCafé, program room, office, lecture hall, etc.
Site History
(Source: National Geographic Information Institute)
Sustainability 14 07878 i029 Sustainability 14 07878 i030 Sustainability 14 07878 i031
199120082019
(a) SocialThe Hwigyeong Atelier was built in Dongdaemun-gu as a center for village revitalization. It serves as a hub for community building and supports village activities, providing residents with various life-education programs and rest areas.
(b) EconomicThe village revitalization center project was implemented in accordance with the Seoul Metropolitan Government Ordinance on Support for the Creation of Village Communities. The Hwigyeong Atelier is operated by private consignment by the district.
(c) EnvironmentalThanks to its location on a main street near the Hwigyeong Station, this atelier enjoys good regional access. Thus, efforts have been made to bring various underground programs to the land surface so that they do not remain solely and invisibly underground. By holding a flea market on the main street, which features items donated by the local residents, music performances and busking, the atelier hopes to penetrate the region.
Photos
(Source: Author)
Sustainability 14 07878 i032 Sustainability 14 07878 i033 Sustainability 14 07878 i034
Table 8. The Musical Instrument Library overview.
Table 8. The Musical Instrument Library overview.
NameThe Musical Instrument Library
Address326, Olympic-ro, Songpa-gu, Seoul
Renovation Date2021
Area290 m2
Main UserLocal youth and residents
Space ProgramStudio, music studio, small performance hall,
storage space for musical instruments, etc.
Site History
(Source: National Geographic Information Institute)
Sustainability 14 07878 i035 Sustainability 14 07878 i036 Sustainability 14 07878 i037
199519961997
(a) SocialGenerally, playing a musical instrument ranks high on the list of activities with a high barrier to entry. There is an economic burden involved in all stages, from purchasing the instrument to managing it and taking lessons. To enable residents to learn an instrument, Songpa-gu loans and manages a variety of musical instruments at a very low price. Furthermore, it utilizes relevant human resources in the area and provides space for music practices, making various lessons available.
(b) EconomicAs part of the Songpa-gu specialized education model project, it is operated with local government support. The local residents donate musical instruments to the library, allowing it to own more instruments and to hire music professionals to teach.
(c) EnvironmentalThe old underpass, which was not frequently visited, had become one of the most hideous places in the region. Given the crosswalks above ground, people do not have to use this underpass. On top of providing practical spaces such as libraries and studios, The Music Instrument Library forms a harmonious relationship with the underpass. There is a passageway inside the musical instrument studio, which serves as an extended performance area. Musical instruments for rent are interactively displayed with a hologram that allows citizens to hear the instrument’s sound when they touch the glass. In addition to its original purpose, the Musical Instrument Library adds fun and a sense of aesthetics to the urban environment.
Photos
(Source: Author)
Sustainability 14 07878 i038 Sustainability 14 07878 i039 Sustainability 14 07878 i040
Table 9. The Seoul Indie Platform overview.
Table 9. The Seoul Indie Platform overview.
NameThe Seoul Indie Platform
Address238, Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul Sustainability 14 07878 i041
Renovation Date2014
Area590.8 m2
Main UserIndependent musicians and residents
Space ProgramLive performance hall, studio, workroom,
multipurpose hall, etc.
Site History
(Source: National Geographic Information Institute)
Sustainability 14 07878 i042 Sustainability 14 07878 i043 Sustainability 14 07878 i044
199619972006
(a) SocialIt offers halls for live performances, recording studios, workshops for individuals and bands, and multipurpose halls for various gatherings and events, all at below standard market prices. In addition, various projects are carried out to support the creative activities of independent musicians.
(b) EconomicAs the Mapo Cultural Center was seeking to relocate its facilities, Mapo-gu planned a project to renovate the Ahyeon underpass, which no longer served its function, as a facility for music creation. Accordingly, the space was built as part of a remodeling project for a music creation space and included funding from the Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism and the local government (Mapo-gu). It is currently operated by the Mapo Cultural Foundation.
(c) EnvironmentalMapo-gu’s Hongdae is the district that produces the Korean indie culture; however, when the Seoul Indie Platform was created, independent cultural artists working in Hongdae started to leave because of increasing gentrification. To preserve Mapo-gu’s art culture, the Seoul Indie Platform was established to ensure that musicians do not completely leave their homes. In addition to being equipped with unique locational characteristics that are suitable for indie musicians’ creative activities, the underground space has also become a cultural space that presents performances by independent musicians.
Photos
(Source: Author)
Sustainability 14 07878 i045 Sustainability 14 07878 i046 Sustainability 14 07878 i047
Table 10. The Seoripul Gallery overview.
Table 10. The Seoripul Gallery overview.
NameThe Seoripul Gallery
Address1, Nambusunhwan-ro 323-gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul Sustainability 14 07878 i048
Renovation Date2018
Area522 m2
Main UserYoung artists (aged 19~39) and local residents
Space ProgramExhibition space, multipurpose hall, collaboration space,
office, etc.
Site History
(Source: National Geographic Information Institute)
Sustainability 14 07878 i049 Sustainability 14 07878 i050 Sustainability 14 07878 i051
198819891999
(a) SocialThis space not only provides exhibition opportunities for young artists aged 19 to 39 but also supports various cultural programs (cultural performances, dialogues with artists, art programs, curator talks, etc.) that are linked to the exhibitions. It aims to create various jobs through this process.
(b) EconomicIn 2017, as Seoul’s urban regeneration and job creation projects began in earnest, the Seoripul Gallery was selected for the cooperative job creation project contest. Therefore, it received initial support from the Seoul Metropolitan Government. It is currently operated by local governments in partnership with the Seocho Cultural Foundation.
(c) EnvironmentalThe Seoul Arts Center is Korea’s largest comprehensive arts facility, comprising a concert hall, an opera house, and an art gallery. It was designed to take on a core function for promoting Korean art. Therefore, it is a gathering place for numerous art groups and is frequented by countless visitors interested in experiencing various art activities. The space is in harmony with the local environment; it was created by transforming an underpass, which was a neglected passageway linking to the Seoul Arts Center, into a place where young artists can present their works to visiting citizens.
Photos
(Source: Author)
Sustainability 14 07878 i052 Sustainability 14 07878 i053 Sustainability 14 07878 i054
Table 11. The Chungmu Startup Cube overview.
Table 11. The Chungmu Startup Cube overview.
NameThe Chungmu Startup Cube
Address265, Toegye-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul Sustainability 14 07878 i055
Renovation Date2018
AreaB1 594 m2, B2 567 m2
Main UserYoung entrepreneurs (aged 19–39) and local residents
Space ProgramCafé, shared sample training center, office,
start-up room, etc.
Site History
(Source: National Geographic Information Institute)
Sustainability 14 07878 i056 Sustainability 14 07878 i057 Sustainability 14 07878 i058
198420192020
(a) SocialThe Seoul Metropolitan Government and all autonomous districts have enacted ordinances to support youth startups. In fact, the relevant law requires local governments to come forward and facilitate youth startups and set up support centers. Accordingly, Jung-gu has supported the Chungmu Startup Cube, a center for youth startups.
(b) EconomicThe Chungmu Startup Cube is a local government-run support center that provides various programs for youth startups. It is a project that is fully consistent with local government efforts to support youth start-ups, so legally guaranteed support can be obtained. Creating space in this way increases the sustainability of the project in connection with the region’s local resources from the central business district and the traditional manufacturing streets.
(c) EnvironmentalSeoul’s central business district, Jung-gu, is home to a variety of commercial, social, and cultural transportation facilities. While it provides a good network for business activities, the land prices are high. The Chungmu Startup Cube provides a variety of geographic advantages to break down these barriers and assist startups. Euljiro and Cheonggye-ro near the center are representative areas for manufacturing facilities in Seoul, and various companies are coming to the area to test ideas and prototypes, creating a hub for young startups.
Photos
(Source: Author)
Sustainability 14 07878 i059 Sustainability 14 07878 i060 Sustainability 14 07878 i061
Table 12. Changes in the perception of underground space development.
Table 12. Changes in the perception of underground space development.
OldNew
functionalemotional
supplementaryindependent
new developmentdevelopment of unused spaces
an isolated space of innovationconnected daily spaces
Table 13. The correlation between Seoul’s characteristics and the development of SCT underpasses.
Table 13. The correlation between Seoul’s characteristics and the development of SCT underpasses.
Characteristics of SeoulTBLSCT Underpass Development
Deepening urban polarization due to the lack of public spaces(A) Sociala program to solve regional problems
Promoting local community revitalization policies(B) Economiclocal government support
“Slummized” underpasses(C) EnvironmentalUtilizing the benefits of unused underground resources
Table 14. Each project’s individual and further social value.
Table 14. Each project’s individual and further social value.
No.Project NameProject ValueSocial Value
1CommaSupport for youth in self-governing
activities and counseling
Support the healthy development
of youth
2UnderlandYouth-only leisure facilities
3The Meet Up CenterProvision of education that is
Insufficiently experienced in
institutionalized education
4The Village Art FactoryPromote networking among village
artists and the local community
Create and support local
communities
5The Hwigyeong AtelierCreate and support local communities
6The Musical Instrument LibraryLend and teach how to play
instruments to local residents
7The Seoul Indie PlatformSupport for independent musiciansPromote appropriate balance and harmony between mainstream and non-mainstream
8The Seoripul GallerySupport for young artists
9The Chungmu Startup CubeSupport for young adults’
entrepreneurship
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeong, D.Y.; Kim, H.J. Sustainable Development of Underutilized Pedestrian Underpass in Seoul. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137878

AMA Style

Jeong DY, Kim HJ. Sustainable Development of Underutilized Pedestrian Underpass in Seoul. Sustainability. 2022; 14(13):7878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137878

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeong, Dae Yeong, and Hee Jin Kim. 2022. "Sustainable Development of Underutilized Pedestrian Underpass in Seoul" Sustainability 14, no. 13: 7878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137878

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop