Effect of Farmers’ Perceptions of Sustainable Development Value on Their Willingness for Agricultural Land Secured Financing
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The comments are embedded as sticky notes in the manuscript itself. Please see those. Discussion part can be further improved with more logical reasoning and in light of more similar published works. Conclusion should be based on your findings and compact. Please give practical suggestions/recommendations based on your study area. Anyway the work is impressive but on improvement will be an excellent read for the international readers who will really repeat such type of work in their region.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Dear Authors,
your manuscript is presented clearly and fluently.
It is interesting to know a very different reality from the European one.
The literature on the subject should be implemented more, as there is really a lot of it.
Check the bibliography following the rules of the journal.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
- Results presentation is little confusing, this could be mitigated by including separate rows for each of the variables measured in the table. Many of the values seem overlapping and hard to discern. This is recommended for all tables that display results as well.
- For table 5, it would be helpful to add labels of the variable to the Models listed.
- Overall, well written article on the topic of agricultural land financing and different values among farmers.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 4 Report
I thank the authors for giving me the opportunity to read their interesting paper; I only provide some limited suggestions to improve some parts:
1) explain better how the questionnaire was administered (online, interviews, ...)
2) comment on whether the results are extensible, or if the sample is statistically representative or if it represents a type of farm spread across the territory
3) highlight the limits of the work and possible research developments
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors have really done well now and improved the ms excellently. I am elated to your integrity in the work. The ms surely will now be an excellently read for the international readers and also encourage new works based on your present work.
