Next Article in Journal
Investors’ Aspirations toward Social Impact: A Portfolio-Based Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Security Assessment of Taiwan Solid Wood Product Supply
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Methods of the Sustainable Development for Safety Engineering International Course

School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(9), 5291; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095291
Submission received: 31 March 2021 / Revised: 16 April 2021 / Accepted: 28 April 2021 / Published: 10 May 2021

Abstract

:
To improve the effectiveness of the international course for safety engineering at China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing) (CUMTB), we explored sustainable development methods, co-occurrence analysis, statistical analysis, and questionnaire survey methods in a discussion of the international course’s current state and problems. First, the international course’s research topics and trends were analyzed. Second, other Chinese universities with international courses in safety engineering were counted. Finally, the international courses in safety engineering at CUMTB were analyzed from three aspects: teachers, teaching content, and course effect. The results show that there is a developing trend in international course research focusing on specific disciplines. For the safety engineering international course at CUMTB, foreign university teachers are the first choice for course instruction; however, the language barrier is a primary problem. In terms of teaching content, students are more interested in their intended employment fields and lack an understanding of various research fields. The course meets the students’ expectations but can still be improved. According to the results, we conclude that bilingual teaching by ethnic Chinese university teachers leads to more efficient knowledge acquisition. A guidance course and a survey of students’ employment intentions should be added before the course. Through these measures, the international course’s effectiveness and quality can be improved to better realize sustainable development.

1. Introduction

Course internationalization, fundamentally speaking, requires that teachers have an open mind, schools should have an international awareness, and students should have a broad vision. Course internationalization integrates international and cross-cultural thinking into course objectives and teaching. This involves content reform, curriculum design, teaching mode, and other aspects. Regarding the various types of course internationalization, this research specifically refers to the compulsory international courses for undergraduates majoring in safety engineering taught by foreign teachers. This research explored methods to further improve the effectiveness, quality, and sustainable development of the international safety engineering courses at CUMTB.
International courses have been popularized in Chinese universities. It can not only teach professional knowledge but also bring students international frontier research and international teaching mode. Universities are constantly paying attention to the course effect while students are acquiring knowledge. There have been many kinds of researches on internationalization, talents, and higher education in the field of international courses [1,2,3,4]. However, the internationalization of curriculum in specific disciplines needs to be further explored [5,6,7]. Therefore, this research extracted the influencing factors of international courses for in-depth research based on the previous study. We have also researched ways to continuously improve the course effect. This can both contribute to the study of international courses in safety disciplines and the study of influencing factors of course effect.
In this research, three methods, co-occurrence analysis, statistical analysis, and questionnaire survey, were used to explore the effect of improving safety engineering international course in CUMTB. This research included three sections. Firstly, the research background, topics, and trends of the international course were introduced. Secondly, the universities with safety engineering major in mainland China and their international courses were studied. Finally, the international courses of safety engineering in CUMTB were investigated, and future research directions were proposed.

2. Literature Research on International Courses

This section analyzes the research background, topics, and trends of the international course by the method of keyword co-occurrence analysis. According to the literature analysis, the influencing factors are extracted and classified as the basis of the questionnaire design.
Keyword co-occurrence analysis is to cluster literature with the same keywords and show their relationships through network structure [8]. Explaining the keywords’ co-occurrence as their associations and representational signals, and analyzing these relationships in complex network paradigms, can lead to new perspectives [9]. This research used three search strings, including: “international course,” “internationalization,” and “curriculum,” to explore databases. We selected all the literature databases purchased by CUMTB to obtain more comprehensive literature. The databases include Chinese and other countries’ databases. The former includes CNKI, Wanfang Data, Chaoxing Database, and Chinese Social Science citation database. The latter consist of Web of Science, Engineering Village, ScienceDirect, and IET Electronic Library. Journal papers, dissertations, books, and conference papers in Chinese and English are all included in the search scope.
Given the research’s timeliness, this research collects Chinese and English literature published in 2016–2020 related to international courses. In total, 2737 Chinese studies were selected and analyzed, and 549 English articles were analyzed. The results are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6.
As shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, research on international courses in China focuses on international talent, education internationalization, course innovation, and higher education [10,11,12].
The research topics can also be specific to college English, bilingual courses, finance, and other aspects or disciplines [13,14,15]. The Chinese characteristics of the “Belt and Road Initiative” (B and R) also occupy a certain proportion of international course research [16]. In addition, COVID-19 appears in the research topics. The COVID-19 pandemic in 2019 has likely accelerated the development of international online courses [17]. Among all the research topics related to international courses, higher education is closely related to internationalization. Course internationalization has become a development trend for Chinese universities.
Figure 3 shows that international course research topics in English literature (except work done by Chinese scholars) mainly focus on internationalization, higher education, language, university, and COVID-19 [18,19,20,21,22,23]. Research topics can also focus on a particular discipline, such as international geography courses, civil engineering, and international psychology [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. In addition, there is also research on the development trend of international curriculum [31]. COVID-19 also appears in the research topics, which may be due to the pandemic promoting online teaching development [32,33,34,35].
Concerning research trends in international curricula, it can be seen from Figure 4 and Figure 5 that in the past five years, research on international courses in China has gradually developed from internationalization, education internationalization, and international talent training research to trends focusing on specific disciplines with Chinese characteristics. These currently include basic education, core qualities, teaching reform, innovation, bilingual curricula, traditional culture, and the “B and R” initiative. Research on international courses with innovative characteristics has become a trend in China. In addition, it can be seen from Figure 6 that other countries’ research trends are also gradually focusing on specific aspects or disciplines, such as higher education, language, disease, and risk, with a higher degree of integration with medical disciplines.
Although the research topics of international courses in China and other countries are related to higher education’s internationalization, there are also differences. China pays more attention to talent training, higher education, and curriculum innovation research. Its developmental trends have gradually grown from talent training research to characteristic discipline research. However, most other countries’ research topics are related to the internationalization of universities and higher education. Medical research is closely related to international curriculum research, and research trends have gradually focused on specific disciplines.
From the above analysis, it can be concluded that the relative research is gradually increasing due to the development of international courses. However, there are few studies focus on the safety engineering major. Based on the literature research, we grouped the influencing factors into two categories: teachers and teaching content. We specifically included the type of teacher, teaching mode, learning difficulties, teaching content, and learning purpose, etc. This is the basis for designing the questionnaire to explore the reasons behind the influencing factors. The questionnaire in the third section was designed based on “teachers,” “teaching content,” and “course effect.”

3. Safety Engineering in the Higher Education Institutions of China

This part analyzes the current situation and reasons of safety engineering major and its international courses in China through the statistics data.

3.1. Universities with Safety Engineering Major in China

Safety engineering in China has been developing since the 1950s. The number and trend of universities with safety engineering from 1957 to 2020 is shown in Figure 7 (according to incomplete statistics). The data in Figure 7 are from the website of China Education Online and the official websites of universities.
Although the data in Table 1 may not be completely accurate, it can roughly describe a trend.
It is obvious that the number of universities with the safety engineering major shows a significant growth trend. Especially, the growth was rapid in 1980 and 2000 since China held a conference on science education in 1977 to fully prepare for curriculum reform. After the curriculum reform from 1981 to 1985, curriculum development tended to be standardized [36]. The Ministry of Education established “safety engineering” as an undergraduate major in 1984 [37]. This led to the first significant increase in the number of safety engineering majors since 1985. Then, the Ministry of Education issued 15 policy documents on higher education and 4 documents on the establishment of academic disciplines to promote the development of education in 2000 [38]. Therefore, the number of safety engineering majors increased rapidly again after 2000.
With the expansion of the scale of the safety engineering major, the initial undergraduate education gradually developed to graduate education. In 2011, the Ministry of Education changed the names of master’s and doctoral degrees to “safety science and engineering,” which are still in use today [39]. At present, China has established a complete education system of bachelor’s degrees, master’s degrees, doctoral degrees, and postdoctoral safety disciplines. According to statistics, universities with safety engineering are involved in many fields and industries, including defense, aviation, chemicals, petroleum, mining, civil engineering, transportation, energy, environmental, and economics.
The number of universities with safety engineering (by province) is shown in Figure 8. Universities with safety engineering are widely distributed in Beijing, Hebei, Liaoning, Jiangsu, Shandong, Sichuan, and Henan. In contrast, there are no universities in Tibet, Qinghai, or Hainan offering this major. Among the 164 universities with safety engineering, 38 universities are located in western China, 46 in central China, and 80 in eastern China.
Hence, there are regional differences in the number of universities with safety engineering, as shown in Figure 8. Among the 164 universities with safety engineering, 78% are located in the central and eastern regions, while only 22% are in the western regions. This distribution is related to the general distribution of universities in China, as well as the economic development, population density, and professional demands of the various regions.
To further study the reasons for the changes in the number of universities with the safety engineering major in each province, we counted the data from each province, as shown in Table 1. These data come from the official websites of the school.
According to Table 1, the eastern and central regions have developed the safety engineering majors earlier. The development of safety engineering in the eastern region, central region, and western region is in 1980, 1985 and 2002, respectively. It is related to some factors such as economic, policies, population, etc. From 1960 to 2000, China’s economic, industrial, and population centers of gravity have been concentrated in the central and eastern regions, especially in the east. Therefore, the demands for safety professionals are greater than those of the west region. Universities in these areas are also more likely to absorb advanced safety science concepts and train professionals to promote industrial modernization [40]. Moreover, since 2000, with the support of new policies from the Ministry of Education, the safety engineering major in the western region has also been developed.
Therefore, the economy, policies, population, enterprises, and energy of each province will affect the development of the local safety engineering major.

3.2. International Safety Engineering Courses of Chinese Universities

According to incomplete statistics, public channels (such as course catalogs on official university websites) show that among the 164 universities with safety engineering, 20 universities have set up international courses related to safety disciplines, which account for 11.6% (see Table 2 for details). This research argues that the actual number of universities with international courses related to safety disciplines should be far greater than the statistics in Table 2 indicate. As some universities may not put their course offerings on their official website or other public channels, the statistics may be incomplete.
According to Table 2, 14 of the 20 universities come from the central and eastern regions, accounting for 70%. The regional distribution of safety discipline international courses is consistent with the distribution of universities with safety engineering, which shows that regional factors also have a certain influence on international courses.

4. Methods

This part introduces the survey method for the international course of safety engineering major in CUMTB and explains the design principles of the questionnaire. Through previous literature analysis, the influencing factors were regrouped into two categories: teachers and teaching content. On the basis of being able to adopt sustainable development measures, the influencing factors and their causes are explored in greater depth from a new perspective in this section.
The questionnaire was designed based on the influencing factors summarized in the literature analysis section and then categorized into “teachers,” “teaching content,” and “course effect.” “Teachers” and “teaching content” are used to investigate the factors and reasons. “Course effect” is a separate part to comprehensively examine students’ perceptions of the effect. The questionnaire is shown in Table 3.
This research chose Cronbach’s α reliability coefficient to reflect the validity of the questionnaire. Cronbach’s α is a commonly employed index of test reliability [41]. The higher the α value, the more consistent, stable, and reliable the data. In addition, “Cronbach’s α based on standardized items” is a correction coefficient. It eliminates the errors based on the Cronbach’s α value and makes the results more realistic. In general, if the value of α coefficient does not exceed 0.6, it is generally considered that the internal reliability is insufficient; a value between 0.7 and 0.8 means the scale has considerable reliability; and a value between 0.8–0.9 means a high degree of internal consistency.
The questionnaire is divided into two parts, including eight questions. According to the SPSS analysis, Cronbach’s α for the first part is 0.769, and “Cronbach’s α based on standardized items” is 0.782. The two corresponding values for the second part are both 0.769. All the values are higher than 0.7, indicating that the questionnaire has considerable credibility.
In order to ensure the validity of the questionnaire, this research uses a comprehensive survey method to investigate all undergraduates majoring in safety engineering in CUMTB in 2018 and 2019. At CUMTB, students are enrolled in the international courses during their sophomore year. The total number of undergraduates majoring in safety engineering in CUMTB in 2018 and 2019 separately is 129 and 124.
The survey is divided into two stages: pre-course and after-course. In the first stage, 124 CUMTB safety engineering undergraduates were surveyed before the course in 2019. A total of 122 questionnaires were collected, accounting for 98.4% of the total questionnaires. After invalid sample processing, a total of 122 valid questionnaires were collected, accounting for 100% of the total.
In the second stage, questionnaires were distributed to 253 CUMTB safety engineering undergraduates after the course in 2018 and 2019. Of those distributed, 173 questionnaires were recovered, accounting for 68.4% of the total. After invalid sample processing, 171 valid questionnaires were collected, accounting for 98.8% of the total questionnaires.
It should be noted that the international courses at CUMTB started in 2018. Due to the hasty preparation concerning the first international course class, no questionnaire survey was conducted for the students before the course in 2018. The teaching model in 2018 was classroom teaching, and in 2019, it was changed to online due to the spread of COVID-19.

5. Results and Analysis

This section investigates the international courses for CUMTB’s safety engineering majors in 2018 and 2019 and studies international courses’ effects and problems. The investigation results and analysis are presented.
The investigation and analysis are carried out in three aspects: teachers, teaching content, and course effect.

5.1. Teachers

Questions 1 and 5 investigated students’ expectations for teachers before the international course and their opinions on the teachers after the course, respectively. The results are shown in Table 4. The types of teachers employed for international courses in 2018 and 2019 are shown in Table 5.
The results of Question 1 (from high to low) are: university teachers from abroad, such as Europe and America (37.7%); ethnic Chinese university teachers (30.3%); university teachers with enterprise backgrounds (16.4%); researchers from scientific research institutions (5.7%); enterprise experts (5.7%); and editors of journals (4.1%). This is similar to Fan’s research findings on international courses [42].
In the first stage of the survey, 84.4% of the students chose university teachers before the course. There was no obvious difference between ethnic Chinese university teachers and university teachers from abroad.
According to the results of Question 5, university teachers are still the primary choice after the course. Although we have hired teachers with enterprise backgrounds and other types of teachers in these two international courses, students still prefer university teachers. In addition, the number of enterprise experts, journal editors, and researchers has not changed greatly. However, the number and proportion of those choosing ethnic Chinese teachers after the courses increased significantly. This indicates that students’ recognition of ethnic Chinese teachers has increased. Further research has been carried out through Questions 7 and 8 to determine the reasons for this change. The results are shown in Table 6 and Table 7.
The course learning difficulties were (from high to low): listening difficulties (78.1%); difficulties in understanding professional knowledge (9%); inability to understand the PPT presentation (7.1%); and none (5.7%). Most students experienced listening difficulties. To further explore the causes of listening difficulties, the survey results for Question 8 are shown in Table 8.
The proportion of options (from high to low) is as follows: cannot understand because of speaking too fast or the accent (37.5%); the teaching pace is too fast, and there is too much content to learn (30.7%); unable to communicate with teachers (17.6%); the teaching content is not as expected (14.2%). The results are obvious: 55.1% of the students’ learning difficulties involved language and communication. In other words, their language-level problems lead to learning difficulties. Nearly half of all other difficulties were related to teachers, such as the content and teaching methods.
Therefore, the primary learning difficulty in international courses is language, accounting for 55.1%, with the other 44.9% related to teaching. For language problems, ethnic Chinese teachers must master both Chinese and English. The content that students have difficulty understanding in English can be explained in Chinese afterward, which could greatly reduce comprehension difficulties. This creates a good language environment for students, reduces language barriers, and improves course effects. Therefore, some students changed their thinking after experiencing ethnic Chinese teachers, believing that bilingual teaching is more suitable for their learning.
Based on the above analysis, university teachers are the first choice for students. The main learning difficulty comes from language, and teaching by bilingual ethnic Chinese university teachers can help students learn more efficiently. Therefore, international course teachers should primarily be ethnic Chinese teachers with a combination of different types of teachers. In addition, the course content should be further studied to improve course effects.

5.2. Teaching Content

This part further explores students’ preferences regarding course content. The statistical results of Questions 2 and 3 are shown in Table 8 and Table 9. Table 10 shows the international course contents.
The statistical results of Question 2 (from highest to lowest) are as follows: the latest application achievements (24.9%); the latest theoretical progress (22.2%); accident case analysis (22.2%); research methods (15.8%); and model or software (14.8%).
From high to low, the statistical results of Question 3 are as follows: accident emergencies (13.3%); fire simulation (12.7%); safety culture (11.7%); risk assessment (9.7%); firefighting (9.3%); safety management (9.2%); and behavioral safety (8.8%). Generally, the proportions of the results in Question 3 are relatively similar, and “accident emergencies” accounted for the highest proportion.
That the proportions are similar indicates that students choose many options. However, it indicates that students have no clear preferences and are unfamiliar with various research fields. The students may not have received enough guidance prior to course selection and thus had not formed a comprehensive understanding of the various research fields. Insufficient pre-course guidance would lead to students’ cognitive deviation concerning certain international curriculum aspects [16].
It is also worth noting that CUMTB is a mining-oriented university, but only 6.9% of students are aware of the field of coal mine safety. More students focus on emergencies, firefighting, safety management, and safety culture. This is a contradictory result: students are not interested in the course content characteristic of the school. This may be influenced by other factors, such as the employment situation. Therefore, this research also collected the employment situation of undergraduates majoring in safety engineering at the CUMTB from 2014 to 2018 for further analysis, as shown in Table 11.
According to Table 11, 20% of the working graduates chose the coal mine industry, and most of them were graduates from 2014 to 2016. Only 7.7% graduates chose the coal industry in 2017 and 2018. This is consistent with the survey results.
Based on the above analysis, the two international courses’ actual teaching content is roughly consistent with student expectations. Students are more interested in the course content related to their intended employment industry but lack knowledge and understanding of various research fields. Students think that international course learning provides help for daily courses and future employment through more reasonable course content. This can be used as the basis for improving the effectiveness of the course. However, the course content is only one aspect of the course effect evaluation. Other ways are also needed to evaluate course expectations.

5.3. Course Effect

The students’ expectations of the international course are investigated in Questions 4 and 6. The survey results are shown in Table 12.
The results of Question 4 (from high to low) are: broadened vision and knowledge (27.8%); training new logical thinking ability (25.8%); improving English ability (24.6%); and experiencing a new teaching model (23.2%). Overall, the proportion of most answers is relatively similar. The distribution pattern and characteristics are similar to the results of Question 3. Among them, “broadened vision and knowledge” accounted for the highest proportion.
In the Question 6 results, the proportion of answer options (from high to low) are: broaden vision and knowledge (31%); improve English ability (26%); experience a new teaching model (21.6%); and training new logical thinking ability (21.4%).
The results of the two stages are similar. However, there are some changes in the proportion of options, such as improving English ability. This shows that the international course has delivered rich content and a good language environment. In 5.1 (“Teachers”), although we concluded that language is the biggest learning barrier, some students think that the international course’s language environment can help them improve their language ability. Generally, the effect of the course reached the students’ expectations. This also shows that most students accept both online and classroom teaching and can enhance the course effect by combining the two modes.
This research has drawn conclusions from the deeper causes: The identity of the teacher can affect student learning. More attention should be paid to various aspects of students’ intentions, such as employment intentions, etc. The teacher choice and course content design should be developed based on student needs and intentions. Additionally, taking pre-course guidance measures to address language and other issues can better improve course effect.
Studies related to course effect in other fields involve the influence of various types of factors on course effect, such as teacher factors [42,43,44], teaching modes [45,46,47,48], etc. Some of the findings are consistent with this paper; for example, 95.5% of the people in Xu’s study believed that appropriate course content was helpful for learning and research, and the course effect was related to the level of teachers [44]. This corroborates the findings of this study. Additionally, this research has obtained more findings: In terms of teacher factors, the findings were similar to the results of Fan’s study [42], but we further investigated the pre-course and post-course changes of students and their reasons. Nearly half (45%) of the students in Alqurshi’s study were concerned about the lack of guidance [43], and this study argues that addressing such issues should begin by addressing the deeper teacher factor. And in contrast to Tang’s findings [46], this study argues that the problem of course effect is not only from the teaching model itself but also from whether the teachers, teaching content, and model matches students’ expectations.

6. Conclusions

This research draws the following main conclusions to improve the effectiveness and realize the sustainable development of teaching for the safety engineering international courses at CUMTB.
In terms of teachers, students can study more efficiently by adopting the bilingual teaching of ethnic Chinese college teachers or adding appropriate guidance before all-English teaching.
For the course content, guidance courses should be added ahead of international courses to familiarize students with various research fields. In addition, a survey concerning students’ intended employment industries can be added to the questionnaire before the course to comprehensively consider the course content, which can improve the course effect.
In the field of sustainable development, the influencing factors and reasons of international course effect in safety engineering were studied. Regarding topics for further research, the next step is to continuously investigate the state of CUMTB’s international courses and improve their effectiveness, quality, and sustainability from various aspects, such as more reasonable course content. In addition, as a limitation, there are few samples in this study, and more data samples could be collected to explore these problems in future research. Using data, we can also improve the questionnaire to investigate students’ ideas better and intuitively present them. Through research and teaching practice, we can deepen the understanding of the problems existing in international course development and better achieve sustainable development goals.
Moreover, the initial purpose of the questionnaire survey was to investigate students’ preferences on the course content, enhance student motivation and improve the course effect. Therefore, the questionnaire only surveyed students’ preference for course content before the course began. In the next step, we will investigate the students who have participated in the international course and compare the changes in students’ demand for the course content.
Sustainable development is not an instant fix, but it is one of the most effective long-term ways to improve teaching quality and course effectiveness.

Author Contributions

All authors have contributed to this manuscript. W.J. designed, drafted, and edited the initial manuscript. J.Z. edited the initial manuscript, analyzed the data, and created the figures. Y.G. and Y.W. collected the data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Undergraduate Teaching Education Reform and Research Project of China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing) in 2020 (project number: J200203).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This study has provided all data in the text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Klaasen, R.G. The International University Curriculum: Challenges in English-medium Engineering Education; Delft University of Technology: Delft, The Netherlands, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sample, S.G. Intercultural development and the international curriculum. In Proceedings of the IDI Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 29–30 October 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. Blitz, P.; Hovius, M. Towards international curriculum standards. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2010, 1, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Villar-Onrubia, D.; Rajpal, B. Online international learning: Internationalising the curriculum through virtual mobility at Coventry University. Perspectives 2016, 20, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Veenema, T.G. Disaster Nursing and Emergency Preparedness for Chemical, Biological, and Radiological Terrorism: An International Curriculum for the Twenty-First Century. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2005, 20, 57–s58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cai, J.; Howson, G. Toward an International Mathematics Curriculum. In Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; Volume 27, pp. 949–974. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, J.N.; Pegg, S.; Shively, J.W. Consensus and Divergence in International Studies: Survey Evidence from 140 International Studies Curriculum Programs. Int. Stud. Perspect. 2010, 7, 267–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kosta, A.D.; Tsagarakis, K.P. Introducing the Concept of Organic Products to the Primary School Curriculum. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cech, F. Exploring Emerging Topics in Social Informatics: An Online Real-Time Tool for Keyword Co-Occurrence Analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Informatics, Oxford, UK, 25–28 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lozano, S.; Calzada-Infante, L.; Adenso-Díaz, B.; García, S. Complex network analysis of keywords co-occurrence in the recent efficiency analysis literature. Scientometrics 2019, 120, 609–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fang, Z.; Liu, Y. Undergraduates’ International Training Mode under “Double First-Class” Initiative: Take X College of a University in Beijing as an Example. J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut. 2020, 33, 134–142. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, X.X.; Liu, L.; Zhao, Z.Y. Building an International Curriculum System to Cultivate Engineering Innovative Talents—Take the College of Advanced Engineers in University of Science and Technology Beijing as an example. Beijing Educ. 2017, 24, 34–37. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, Q.Y. Research on the Policy and Implementation of Master’s International Curriculum in H University; Huazhong University of Science and Technology: Wuhan, China, 2019. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang, X.L.; Liu, H.N. On the Restructuring of College English Curricular and Instruction in the Context of Internationalized Higher Education. J. Ningbo Univ. 2016, 38, 116–120. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Peng, H. Exploration and practice of international course construction of Monetary Finance. J. Hubei Univ. Econ. 2016, 13, 198–199. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhou, H.; Wu, X.; Zeng, L.; Yan, X.; Tian, W.; Xiong, K.; Huang, J. The International Teaching and Practice of Cryobiology and Biobankology Course in China. Biopreservation Biobanking 2020, 18, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Cao, J.Y. Research on the Training Mode of Internationalized Talents in Chinese Universities under the Strategy of “One Belt and One Road”; China University of Geosciences: Beijing, China, 2019. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang, Q.; He, Y.J.; Zhu, Y.H.; Dai, M.C.; Pan, M.M.; Wu, J.Q.; Zhang, X.; Gu, Y.E.; Wang, F.F.; Xu, X.R.; et al. The evaluation of online course of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Medical Bachelor, Bachelor of Surgery international students during the COVID-19 epidemic period. Integr. Med. Res. 2020, 9, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zakharova, U.S. Online course production and university internationalization: Correlation analysis. In Lectures on Quantum Statistics; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. Altbach, P.G.; Knight, J. The Internationalization of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities. J. Stud. Int. Educ. 2012, 42, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. De Wit, H. Internationalization of Higher Education in the United States of America and Europe: A Historical, Comparative, and Conceptual Analysis; Greenwood Publishing Group: Westport, CT, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fragouli, E. A critical discussion on issues of higher education: Curriculum internationalization, challenges, and opportunities. Int. J. Educ. Learn. 2020, 2, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Green, W.J.; Whitsed, C. Introducing Critical Perspectives on Internationalising the Curriculum; Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  24. Peter, P. Evaluating the Internationalised Curriculum; Springer: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  25. Glass, M.R. International geography field courses: Practices and challenges. J. Geogr. High. Educ. 2015, 39, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Welker, A.L. The Role of Civil Engineering in Internationalization Efforts at Villanova University. In Proceedings of the Indianapolis: ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 15–18 June 2014; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hogan, J.D. International psychology and the undergraduate curriculum: A personal note. Teach. Psychol. 1996, 23, 44–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fitridge, R.; Quigley, F.; Vicaretti, M. Should we develop a core international curriculum for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery? Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2010, 39, S10–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Reimann, M. From the Law of Nations to Transnational Law: Why We Need a New Basic Course for the International Curriculum. Penn State Int. Law Rev. 2004, 22, 397–415. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sachdev, P.; Mohan, A. An International Curriculum for Neuropsychiatry and Behavioural Neurology. Rev. Colomb. De Psiquiatr. 2017, 46, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Siennema, C.; Aitken, G. Trends in International Curriculum Development; Bloomsbury: London, UK, 2013; pp. 141–164. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sbattella, L. Teaching Soft Skills through Experiential Courses During The Covid-19 Sanitary Emergency. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 6–7 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
  33. Alshudifat, R.M.; Shudifat, R.; Hayajneh, F.; Mahadeen, A. The Effect of International Courses on Nursing Practice at Jordanian Hospitals. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs. 2009, 40, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Do-Vale-Gomes, A.L.; Magalhães, C.; Melo, F.; Inga, R.; Gadelha, S.R. International course on emerging viruses in the Amazon region. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lett, R.; Bola, R.; Boniface, R.; Eamer, G.; Gathecha, G. Conducting an international curriculum review meeting in the age of COVID-19. Can. J. Surg. J. Can. Chir. 2020, 63, E418–E421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jiang, N.X. Talking about the Current Situation of Education—Abstract of Speech at the Forum of the Ministry of Education on 24 July 1980. People’s Educ. 1980, 24, 5–8. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  37. Fu, G.; Qu, D.J.; Fu, L.; Zhao, L.L. The reasons for the listing safety discipline in class I of the discipline classification system. J. Henan Polytech. Univ. 2006, 24, 85–91. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. Educational Events in 2000. Available online: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/moe_364/moe_369/moe_408/tnull_4767.html (accessed on 11 April 2020).
  39. Mao, H.F. Discipline Construction and Knowledge System of “Safety Science and Engineering”. Procedia Eng. 2012, 43, 506–511. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, J.S.; Fu, J.; Hao, H.Y.; Chen, N. Development of safety science in Chinese higher education. Saf. Sci. 2018, 106, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tavakol, M.; Dennick, R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int. J. Med Educ. 2011, 2, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fan, X.T. Summer internationalized courses in the internationalization of higher education—A case study of summer internationalized courses in our university. Educ. Teach. Forum 2015, 7, 3–5. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  43. Alqurshi, A. Investigating the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on pharmaceutical education in Saudi Arabia—A call for a remote teaching contingency strategy. Saudi Pharm. J. 2020, 28, 1075–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, Z.P.; Qiu, J.F.; Yang, B.Y.; Huang, P.; Cai, L.; Chen, L.; Hou, M.; Ji, M.; Wu, G. Evaluation of factors influencing the guide to read biomedical English literature course for Chinese new medical postgraduates—A multiple regression analysis. BMC Med. Educ. 2019, 19, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Jiang, X.Y.; Ning, Q.L. The impact and evaluation of COVID-19 pandemic on the teaching model of medical molecular biology course for undergraduates major in pharmacy. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tang, T.; Abuhmaid, A.M.; Olaimat, M.; Oudat, D.M.; Aldhaeebi, M.; Bamanger, E. Efficiency of flipped classroom with online-based teaching under COVID-19. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Romero-Garcia, C.; de Paz-Lugo, P.; Buzon-Garcia, O.; Navarro-Asencio, E. Evaluation of online training based on the Flipped classroom-based model. Rev. Educ. 2021, 391, 61–88. [Google Scholar]
  48. Li, Y.; Nishimura, N.; Yagami, H.; Park, H.-S. An Empirical Study on Online Learners’ Continuance Intentions in China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Keywords: co-occurrence maps of the Chinese literature.
Figure 1. Keywords: co-occurrence maps of the Chinese literature.
Sustainability 13 05291 g001
Figure 2. Keywords: co-occurrence maps of Chinese scholars in English literature.
Figure 2. Keywords: co-occurrence maps of Chinese scholars in English literature.
Sustainability 13 05291 g002
Figure 3. Keywords: co-occurrence maps of English literature excluding Chinese scholars’ literature.
Figure 3. Keywords: co-occurrence maps of English literature excluding Chinese scholars’ literature.
Sustainability 13 05291 g003
Figure 4. Research trends map in Chinese literature.
Figure 4. Research trends map in Chinese literature.
Sustainability 13 05291 g004
Figure 5. Research trends map of Chinese scholars’ English literature.
Figure 5. Research trends map of Chinese scholars’ English literature.
Sustainability 13 05291 g005
Figure 6. Research trends map in English literature, excluding Chinese scholars.
Figure 6. Research trends map in English literature, excluding Chinese scholars.
Sustainability 13 05291 g006
Figure 7. Changing trends in the number of universities with safety engineering as an undergraduate major.
Figure 7. Changing trends in the number of universities with safety engineering as an undergraduate major.
Sustainability 13 05291 g007
Figure 8. The number of universities with safety engineering in various provinces. Western areas in China consist of 12 provinces: Sichuan, Yunnan, Guizhou, Xizang, Chongqing, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Xinjiang, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia, and Guangxi. Central areas in China consist of 6 provinces: Henan, Anhui, Shanxi, Hunan, Hubei and Jiangxi. East areas in China consist of 13 provinces: Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Liaoning, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Guangdong, and Hainan. (This only refers to the mainland of China.)
Figure 8. The number of universities with safety engineering in various provinces. Western areas in China consist of 12 provinces: Sichuan, Yunnan, Guizhou, Xizang, Chongqing, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Xinjiang, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia, and Guangxi. Central areas in China consist of 6 provinces: Henan, Anhui, Shanxi, Hunan, Hubei and Jiangxi. East areas in China consist of 13 provinces: Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Liaoning, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Guangdong, and Hainan. (This only refers to the mainland of China.)
Sustainability 13 05291 g008
Table 1. Changes in the number of universities with safety engineering major in each province.
Table 1. Changes in the number of universities with safety engineering major in each province.
RegionProvince1960196519701975198019851990199520002005201020152020Total
Eastern areas in ChinaBeijing11111234447101080
Tianjin0000000013344
Hebei00000000267910
Liaoning00000223569912
Shanghai0011111122333
Jiangsu0000033557899
Fujian0000000111112
Shandong000000012591111
Guangdong0000000001134
Jilin0000000002355
Heilongjiang0000000112245
Zhejiang0000000001245
Total1122289162340557280
Central areas in ChinaAnhui000000000257946
Jiangxi0000001111122
Henan00000000056910
Hubei0000001223557
Hunan0000000025888
Shanxi000001112481010
Total00000134720334146
Western areas in ChinaGuangxi000000000122238
Chongqing0000000002344
Sichuan0000000003459
Guizhou0000000001255
Yunnan0000000001113
Shaanxi0000000026899
Gansu0000000000022
Ningxia0000000000001
Xinjiang0000000000011
Inner Mongolia0000000000122
Total00000000214213138
Table 2. Safety discipline international courses in Chinese universities.
Table 2. Safety discipline international courses in Chinese universities.
ProvinceUniversitiesThe Name of International Courses
BeijingChina University of Mining and Technology-BeijingImportant Risk Assessments in Safety Management, Modern Methods and Tools for Occupational Exposure and Safety Factor Assessment, Unconventional Coal Mine Gas and its Influence on Safety and Energy
HebeiHebei GEO UniversityProduction and Operation Management, Prevention and Control of Geological Disasters
ShandongChina University of PetroleumOptical Quantitative Determination Method of Atmospheric Particulate Matter Pollution and Vocs Control Technology, New Exploration and Development Technologies for Unconventional and Conventional Oil and Gas Resources, Remediation and Management of Soil and Groundwater, Water Quality Requirements for Domestic Sewage Treatment
LiaoningNortheastern UniversityExplosion Hazards and Control
Dongbei University of Finance and EconomicsPrinciples of Management
Dalian University of TechnologyPrinciples of Management
ShanghaiShanghai UniversityIntroduction to Organizational Behavior, Introduction to Management Science
East China University of Science and TechnologyIntroduction to Engineering Design, Engineering Physics
JiangsuChina University of Mining and TechnologyOccupational Health and Safety
Nanjing University of Science and TechnologyMethods of Risk Assessment for Chemical Processes
AnhuiUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaInternational Combustion
HubeiWuhan UniversityIntroduction to Management, Introduction to Organizational Behavior, Fundamentals of Psychology
SichuanSichuan UniversityModern Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems, Process Safety Management
University of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaOrganizational Behavior, Introduction to Psychology
ShaanxiNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityEngineering Thermodynamics, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Reliability Engineering
Chang’an UniversityResearch Status and the Scientific Frontier of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, Frontier Knowledge of Environmental Engineering, Explosion Hazards and Prevention
Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityIntroduction to Management, Organizational Behavior
GansuLanzhou UniversityMechanics of Composite Materials
ZhejiangChina Jiliang UniversityEngineering Ethics
Wenzhou UniversityBehavioral Management
Table 3. Questionnaire questions and options in two stages.
Table 3. Questionnaire questions and options in two stages.
The First StageThe Second Stage
No.QuestionOptionsNo.QuestionOptions
1What kind of teachers do you like?A: University teachers from abroad such as Europe, America, etc., B: Ethnic Chinese university teachers, C: University teachers with an enterprise background, D: Enterprise experts, E: Researchers from scientific research institutions, F: Journal editors, G: Others5After the international courses, what kind of teachers do you think are more suitable for you?A: University teachers from abroad such as Europe, America, etc., B: Ethnic Chinese university teachers, C: University teachers with an enterprise background, D: Enterprise experts, E: Researchers from scientific research institutions, F: Journal editors, G: Others
2What are you interested in the course content?A: The latest theoretical progress, B: The latest application achievements, C: Accident case analysis, D: Research methods, E: Modeling or software, F: Others6After studying in international courses, what do you think are the benefits of international courses for future study and work?A: Broaden vision and knowledge, B: Improve your English, C: Training new logical thinking ability, D: Experiencing a new teaching model, E: Others
3Which research direction are you interested in?A: Risk assessment, B: Fire fighting, C: Fire simulation, D: Accident emergencies, E: Safety management, F: Behavioral safety, G: Safety culture, H: Urban public safety, I: Industrial safety, J: Occupational health and safety, K: Coal mine safety, L: Others7What are the difficulties you have encountered in this international course?A: Listening difficulties, B: Difficulties in understanding professional knowledge, C: Inability to understand the PPT presentation, D: None, E: Others
4How do you expect the international course to be helpful to your study and work in the future?A: Broaden vision and knowledge, B: Improve English ability, C: Training new logical thinking ability, D: Experiencing a new teaching model, E: Others8What is your dissatisfaction with the teacher?A: Cannot understand because of speaking too fast or the accent, B: Unable to communicate with teachers, C: The teaching content is not as expected, D: The teaching pace is too fast, and there is too much content is to learn
Questions 1 and 5 are single-choice questions, and the rest are multiple-choice questions.
Table 4. Statistical results of Question 1 and 5.
Table 4. Statistical results of Question 1 and 5.
OptionsQuestion 1Question 5
NumberProportion (%)NumberProportion (%)
A (University teachers from abroad such as Europe, America, etc.)4637.75029.2
B (Ethnic Chinese university teachers)3730.38549.7
C (University teachers with an enterprise background)2016.4169.4
D (Enterprise experts)75.752.9
E (Researchers from scientific research institutions)75.7105.8
F (Journal editors)54.152.9
G (Others)0000
Table 5. Types and number of international course teachers in 2018 and 2019.
Table 5. Types and number of international course teachers in 2018 and 2019.
YearTypes of TeachersNumberTotal Number of Teachers
2018University teacherUniversity teacher from abroad03
Ethnic Chinese university teacher3
University teacher with an enterprise background-
Journal editor-
Researchers from scientific research institutions-
2019University teacherUniversity teacher from abroad24
Ethnic Chinese university teacher2
University teacher with an enterprise background2
Journal editor2
Researchers from scientific research institutions1
Since the teachers may hold multiple positions simultaneously, the table figures’ sum is larger than the total number of teachers. “-” means the item is not counted.
Table 6. Statistical results of Question 7.
Table 6. Statistical results of Question 7.
OptionsNumberProportion (%)
A (Listening difficulties)16478.1
B (Difficulties in understanding professional knowledge)199
C (Inability to understand the PPT presentation)157.1
D (None)125.7
E (Others)00
Table 7. Statistical results of Question 8.
Table 7. Statistical results of Question 8.
OptionsNumberProportion (%)
A (Cannot understand because of speaking too fast or the accent)6637.5
B (Unable to communicate with teachers)3117.6
C (The teaching content is not as expected)2514.2
D (The teaching pace is too fast, and there is too much content to learn)5430.7
Table 8. Statistical results of Question 2.
Table 8. Statistical results of Question 2.
OptionsNumberProportion (%)
A (The latest theoretical progress)9022.2
B (The latest application achievements)10124.9
C (Accident case analysis)9022.2
D (Research methods)6415.8
E (Model or software)6014.8
F (Others)00
Table 9. Statistical results of Question 3.
Table 9. Statistical results of Question 3.
OptionsNumberProportion (%)
A (Risk assessment)679.7
B (Firefighting)659.3
C (Fire simulation)8812.7
D (Accident emergencies)9213.3
E (Safety management)649.2
F (Behavioral safety)618.8
G (Safety culture)8111.7
H (Urban public safety)517.4
I (Industrial safety)405.8
J (Occupational health and safety)365.2
K (Coal mine safety)486.9
L (Others)00
Table 10. The content of 2018 and 2019 international courses.
Table 10. The content of 2018 and 2019 international courses.
YearCourse ContentResearch Field
2018Engineering thermodynamicsThe basic discipline of safety engineering
Machine learning and information fusionSafety engineering information technology
Responsible miningCoal mine safety
2019Importance of risk assessment in safety managementSafety management, risk assessment, and safety culture
Modern methods and tools for the assessment of occupational exposures and safety factorsOccupational health and safety
Unconventional coal mine gas and its implication on safety and energyCoal mine safety, emergencies, and fire fighting
Table 11. Employment status of undergraduates majoring in safety engineering from 2014 to 2018.
Table 11. Employment status of undergraduates majoring in safety engineering from 2014 to 2018.
YearPowerChemicalMineConstructionManufacturingResearch InstituteCivil ServantOtherFurther Education
20142565200237
20153395200233
20160025210652
201710011110467
20180239502381
Total6102035122217270
Table 12. Statistical results of Question 4 and 6.
Table 12. Statistical results of Question 4 and 6.
OptionsQuestion 4Question 6
NumberProportion (%)NumberProportion (%)
A (Broadened vision and knowledge)11527.812931
B (Improving English ability)10224.610826
C (Training new logical thinking ability)10725.88921.4
D (Experiencing a new teaching model)9023.29021.6
E (Others)0000
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, W.; Zhou, J.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Y. Exploring Methods of the Sustainable Development for Safety Engineering International Course. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5291. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095291

AMA Style

Jiang W, Zhou J, Gao Y, Wang Y. Exploring Methods of the Sustainable Development for Safety Engineering International Course. Sustainability. 2021; 13(9):5291. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095291

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Wei, Jiankai Zhou, Yangping Gao, and Yintong Wang. 2021. "Exploring Methods of the Sustainable Development for Safety Engineering International Course" Sustainability 13, no. 9: 5291. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095291

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop