Next Article in Journal
A Sustainable Approach towards the Retrofit of the Public Housing Building Stock: Energy-Architectural Experimental and Numerical Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
The Differentiate Effect of Self-Efficacy, Motivation, and Satisfaction on Pre-Service Teacher Students’ Learning Achievement in a Flipped Classroom: A Case of a Modern Educational Technology Course
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation on the Emission and Diffusion of Hydrogen Sulfide during Landfill Operations: A Case Study in Shenzhen

1
College of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, China
2
College of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, China
3
Fangyuan Construction Group Co., Ltd., Taizhou 318000, China
4
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212000, China
5
Jiangsu Engineering Research Center for Geoenvironmental Disaster Prevention and Remediation, Zhenjiang 212000, China
6
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310000, China
7
Xiaping Municipal Solid Waste Landfill, Shenzhen 518000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(5), 2886; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052886
Submission received: 22 January 2021 / Revised: 27 February 2021 / Accepted: 2 March 2021 / Published: 7 March 2021

Abstract

:
This study investigated the emission and diffusion of hydrogen sulfide (H2S), as one of the odorous gases generated from landfills, in a municipal solid waste landfill of a south Chinese city. To this end, the flux of the H2S emissions in the working area of the landfill and its diffusion in the surrounding area were measured. The diffusion of the H2S was simulated at different wind speeds, wind directions, bare working areas of the landfill, heights of the landfill, and angles between the wind direction and the long side of the working area. The results indicated that the concentration of the H2S around the monitoring point ranged from 0 to 60 µg/m3, and the simulated data were consistent with the measured results. At a uniform wind direction, the pollution range of the H2S was narrow. Furthermore, with an increase in the height of the waste dump, the concentration of the H2S decreased in the working area but rose in the surrounding area. Notably, when the angle between the long side of the working area and the wind direction was 0°, the H2S largely spread along the extension cord of the long side of the working area. When the angle increased to 90°, the influence range of the H2S extended significantly. The working area in the landfill site should be regulated based on the monitored data to reduce the effect of this harmful gas on the living environment, and the health of the landfill staff and nearby residents.

1. Introduction

The emission of odorous gases has become a major concern in both developed and developing countries around the world. In China, particular attention has been paid to the disposal of municipal solid waste (MSW) due to the rapid development of urbanization [1,2,3,4,5]. For its large capacity, low treatment cost, high rate of land utilization, and convenient management, large-scale sanitary landfill is widely employed in China to treat MSW [6]. However, landfill gases (LFGs), which are harmful to the environment, are generated during biochemical reactions in landfills. LFGs are mainly composed of 45–60% methane, 40–60% carbon dioxide, and a small number of odorous gases [7,8]. The formation and diffusion of odorous gases results in significant air pollution in the landfill and its surrounding area, seriously affecting the quality of life and the health of nearby residents [9,10,11].
LFGs are produced during the biochemical degradation of MSW. Although the main components of LFGs are methane and carbon dioxide, other trace toxic and harmful gases are also included, where hydrogen sulfide is one of the essential odorous gases [7,12,13]. Human beings are susceptible to hydrogen sulfide because it has a low olfactory threshold of 0.62 µg/m3, with a typical rotten egg smell. High concentrations of hydrogen sulfide can affect the human nervous and respiratory systems. For instance, it can paralyze the sense of smell at a concentration of more than 7.59 × 104 µg/m3. Moreover, hydrogen sulfide can cause instant death at a concentration of higher than 1.52 × 106 µg/m3. The Chinese National Standard (GBZ2.1-2019) stipulates that the maximum allowable concentration of hydrogen sulfide should be lower than 1.52 × 104 µg/m3.
So far, research into landfill odor has mainly focused on the distribution and diffusion of volatile organic compounds in the landfill and the surrounding area [7,9,10,14], and there are few studies on the diffusion of hydrogen sulfide in the landfill and the surrounding area. Panza and Belgiorno, 2010 [15], found that construction waste with gypsum walls could produce high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide, in the range of 1.06 × 104 µg/m3 to 1.52 × 106 µg/m3. Heaney et al., 2011 [16], studied the relationship between the odor, the concentration of hydrogen sulfide, and the health of the residents living near the landfill. The results show that the stench of the landfill was related to the concentration of hydrogen sulfide when the wind blew from the landfill to the community. Considering the human body’s high sensitivity to hydrogen sulfide, it is worth further field testing and studying the distribution and diffusion of hydrogen sulfide in and around landfills, which is of great significance to the life quality and health of the landfill staff and the residents living in the surrounding area.
An atmospheric diffusion model, based on data of meteorological, terrestrial, and odor emissions, is a practical method to simulate how the odorous gas diffuses into the atmosphere [17,18]. The CALPUFF modeling system is one of the most commonly employed atmospheric diffusion models, which assumes that the concentration distribution in a plume cross-section follows a Gaussian curve. The model has been utilized to simulate the chemical transport and dispersion of pollution from chimneys, landfills, vehicles, and ponds, within a range of tens of kilometers [7,19,20]. According to the results of related research concerning the odorous gas diffusion [9,21,22,23], the effects of odorous gas on the surrounding area are closely related to odor emissions, meteorological and terrestrial conditions, and the distance from the source of pollution. However, the corresponding investigations have mainly focused on the diffusion of volatile organic compounds [24,25,26,27]. Therefore, there is still a lack of comprehensive studies on how hydrogen sulfide distributes and diffuses into the landfill and its surrounding area.
As the MSW in the landfill operation area is exposed to the air during operation, a large amount of odor is discharged from the area. Under such circumstances, it is necessary to determine the emission intensity and the diffusion of hydrogen sulfide during landfill operations. Thus, this study measured and analyzed the emissions and diffusion of hydrogen sulfide in a landfill in south China during landfill operations. The key factors affecting the diffusion of hydrogen sulfide were also discussed. To this end, the static chamber method was employed to measure the flux of the hydrogen sulfide emissions in the working area of the landfill, and the measured flux was then used as the initial intensity of hydrogen sulfide pollution emission source, and input into the CALPUFF model to simulate the diffusion of the hydrogen sulfide. Then, the simulated data were compared with the results measured around the landfill. Furthermore, the impacts of different wind speeds, wind directions, bare working areas of the landfill, heights of the landfill, and angles between the wind direction and the long side of the working area were simulated. Thus, the critical factors affecting the diffusion of the hydrogen sulfide were determined and the underlying mechanism of the diffusion of hydrogen sulfide in the landfill was illuminated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Landfill Description

The landfill as the first modern large-scale sanitary landfill in China is an important infrastructure for the disposal of the local MSW (see Figure 1). It covers a total area of 145 hectares and was launched in October 1997. This landfill is designed with a total storage capacity of 46.93 million m3, and a total service life of more than 30 years. It has an average daily waste disposal capacity of 6800 tons, accounting for about 26% of the city’s total waste. The construction of the landfill includes three phases. The first phase of the project was built in Xiaping valley with an area of 63.4 hectares, a designed capacity of 14.93 million m3, and a service life of 12 years. The second phase of the landfill will be constructed in the upper and lower plateau valley in the upstream section of Xiaping, with an area of 55.8 hectares, a designed capacity of 12 million m3, and a service life of 10 years. The third phase will heighten the upper part of the first and the second phases by 50–60 m, with a design capacity of 20 million m3.
Based on the climatic conditions of the landfill area in 2018, the meteorological data of January, April, July, and October represented the typical meteorological conditions of winter, spring, summer, and autumn, respectively. Thus, the assessment of the hydrogen sulfide diffusion was simplified to four months: January, April, July, and October. Figure 2 represents a wind rose chart composed of the wind direction and wind speed recorded by local weather stations in 2018. As shown in Figure 2, the wind speed and the wind direction in January, July, and October were relatively concentrated, and the wind chiefly blew from the east at a wind speed in the range of 4 to 7 m/s. Notably, the wind speed and the wind direction were unstable in April. In fact, the wind blew from the northeast (approximately 24%) and the southwest (approximately 22%) at a wind speed largely in the range of 4 to 11 m/s. Only the southwesterly wind had a speed greater than 11 m/s. Generally, the wind speed in the studied area ranged from 0.5 to 11 m/s, and the easterly wind was dominant throughout 2018. Therefore, the online monitoring device (Model 450i hydrogen sulfide—sulfur dioxide analyzer, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) for measuring the concentration of the hydrogen sulfide was installed in the northwest area of the landfill (see Figure 1), which was in the downwind direction. The concentration of hydrogen sulfide was measured at hourly intervals, and the data were recorded and uploaded to the background.

2.2. Gas Flux

In this work, the static chamber method was used to measure the flux of the hydrogen sulfide emissions [7]. This method was proposed by Hutchinson and Mosier, 1981 [28], and has been widely employed for the measurement of gas emissions from landfills. The static chamber device used herein was made of plexiglass with a height of 550 mm and a diameter of 400 mm, as depicted in Figure 3. In order to inhibit gas exchange inside and outside of the chamber, it was placed on a metal base buried in the working area to a depth of 10–20 cm, and sealed with water in the contact area during the measurement of the flux of the hydrogen sulfide emissions. A miniature fan was placed inside the chamber to circulate the gas and maintain its uniformity. Through the gas sampling port on the top of the static chamber and the air pump, a gas sample was extracted into Tedlar® air sample bags once every 0.5 h, four consecutive times. The gas sample was then tested for the concentration of hydrogen sulfide using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The flux of the hydrogen sulfide emissions was determined according to Equations (1) and (2):
V C t + Δ t = V C t + j S Δ t
j = V S d C d t
where V is the volume of the static chamber (m3); C t and C t + Δ t represent the concentration of the target gas at time t and t + Δ t respectively (µg/m3); S denotes the bottom area (m2); Δ t stands for the time interval of the test (s); j’ indicates the gas flux (µg·m–2·s–1); and d C d t is the slope of the concentration accumulation curve.
The flux of the hydrogen sulfide emissions measured at ambient temperature, T (K), was calculated by Equation (3):
j = j 273 T

2.3. CALPUFF Model

The CALPUFF model is commonly adopted to simulate the diffusion of specific pollution sources in particular areas under definite meteorological conditions, and is one of the prediction models recommended for environmental impact assessment in China. This model is chiefly composed of three parts. The first part is the meteorological module (Calmet module) which involves the meteorological data and topographic parameters obtained from meteorological stations in a specific region. It combines the topographic and meteorological data organically, divides the grid, and establishes an analysis model. The second part is the simulation computing module (Calpuff module). Based on the meteorological conditions and the analysis model established by the Calmet module, this part simulates the diffusion of specific pollutants. The third part is the post-processing module (Calpost module), through which the simulation results can be output in the form of a table or cloud map as needed. The transport mechanism of pollutants in the CALPUFF model is based on the Lagrangian Gaussian plume model [7,17,18,19].
In order to study the influence of wind speed and wind direction on the diffusion of hydrogen sulfide, the meteorological conditions in different seasons (i.e., January, April, July and October) were selected as the simulation parameters. Meanwhile, the landfill operation area was 4000 m2, the height of working face was 30 m, and the angle between the wind direction and the long side of the working face was 0°. The diffusion of hydrogen sulfide was also simulated under different operation areas (i.e., 4000, 8000, 12,000 and 20,000 m2) to analyze the effect of landfill operation area. The meteorological conditions in January were selected, the height of the working face was 30 m, and the angle between the wind direction and the long side of the working face was 0°. To analyze the impact of landfill height on the diffusion of hydrogen sulfide, landfill heights of 25, 50, 75, and 100 m were selected as simulation parameters. The meteorological conditions in January were selected, the landfill operation area was 4000 m2, and the angle between the wind direction and the long side of the working face was 0°. Moreover, for studying the influence of the angle between wind direction and the long side of working face, the diffusion of hydrogen sulfide at an angle of 0, 45, and 90° between the wind direction and the long side of the working face were simulated respectively. The meteorological conditions in January were selected, the landfill operation area was 4000 m2, and the height of the working face was 30 m.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. H2S Emissions

Figure 4 shows the variation in the concentration of the hydrogen sulfide near the field boundary based on the data measured by the online monitoring points arranged around the landfill in 2018. The concentration of the hydrogen sulfide around the landfill largely ranged from 0 to 60 µg/m3, which exceeded the olfactory threshold, thereby causing an intense obnoxious odor. The concentration of the hydrogen sulfide in the landfill in the first half of the year (around 30 µg/m3) was higher than that in the second half of the year (around 10 µg/m3), which might be associated with the change of the wind speed and the wind direction in the different seasons. The measured results are consistent with other studies [16,29]. Furthermore, the flux of the hydrogen sulfide emissions measured by the static chamber was input to the CALPUFF model as the intensity of hydrogen sulfide pollution emission source. The simulation results of the diffusion of the hydrogen sulfide are presented in Figure 5. The calculated square areas in the figure, such as the red square, all have a side length of 5 km. The different colors represent various concentrations of the hydrogen sulfide, and the data in Figure 5 denote the maximum concentration of the hydrogen sulfide per hour of the year. The results indicate that the concentration of the hydrogen sulfide near the odor monitoring point was 10–40 µg/m3, and the simulation data were consistent with the measured results.

3.2. Influence of Wind Speed and Wind Direction

In order to investigate the influence of the wind speed and wind direction in different seasons on the diffusion range and concentration distribution of the hydrogen sulfide, meteorological conditions in January, April, July, and October were selected as the parameters for analysis. As displayed in Figure 6, the diffusion range of the hydrogen sulfide in the landfill was affected by the wind direction. Due to the influence of the wind, the diffusion range of the hydrogen sulfide was mainly in the downwind direction, while the upwind direction was less affected. It was more likely to cause a bad smell for residents when the wind blew from the landfill to the community [16]. When the wind direction was relatively uniform, the influence range of the hydrogen sulfide was narrow. However, it widened significantly as the wind direction changed greatly. According to the local meteorological data, the wind direction changed significantly and covered nearly 180° in April, and the diffusion area of the hydrogen sulfide was nearly half of the calculated area (Figure 6b). This was consistent with the report of Wang et al., 2019 [7]. Meanwhile, the local meteorological data confirmed that the wind mainly blew from the northeast in October, and the wind direction did not change much. Therefore, the hydrogen sulfide spread over a limited area, accounting for only a quarter of the calculated area (Figure 6d).

3.3. Influence of Bare Working Area of Landfills

As shown in Figure 7, the diffusion of the hydrogen sulfide was simulated by considering working areas of 4000, 8000, 12,000, and 20,000 m2 to study the influence of different working areas on the diffusion range and concentration distribution of the hydrogen sulfide. The results indicate that the diffusion area of the hydrogen sulfide did not increase markedly, but the concentration of the hydrogen sulfide increased significantly with an expansion of the working area. Simultaneously, the influence range of the hydrogen sulfide was almost similar under different working areas, but its concentration value was different. When the working area was 8000, 12,000, or 20,000 m2, the maximum concentrations of the hydrogen sulfide in the center of the working area were equal to 241, 315, and 447 µg/m3 respectively, indicating that the concentration of the hydrogen sulfide in the center of the working area correlated positively with the working area [7,29].

3.4. Influence of Landfill Height

With an increase in the volume of the landfill, the height of the landfill rises continuously. Figure 8 illustrates the simulated diffusion range and concentration distribution of the hydrogen sulfide under different heights of the landfill. Although the height of the MSW varied, the maximum concentration of the hydrogen sulfide in the landfill occurred in the landfill working area [7]. With an increase in the height of the MSW dump, the concentration of the hydrogen sulfide on the landfill surface gradually declined at the same landfill working area, wind speed, and wind direction, while the concentration of the hydrogen sulfide within the surrounding area increased. At an MSW dump height of 25, 50, and 100 m, the maximum concentration of the hydrogen sulfide in the landfill area was 144, 82, and 27 µg/m3 respectively. In addition, the concentration of the hydrogen sulfide in the working area decreased with an increase in the height of the MSW dump, but the area with high concentrations of the hydrogen sulfide expanded remarkably. As shown in Figure 8a, the area with a concentration of the hydrogen sulfide in the range of 10–30 µg/m3 extended remarkably as the height of the MSW dump increased from 25 to 100 m. Indeed, the fluidity of the upper air rose as the height of the MSW dump increased, which caused the hydrogen sulfide in the central area to migrate to the surrounding area. Thus, the diffusion of the hydrogen sulfide was more noticeable.

3.5. Influence of Angle between Wind Direction and Working Area

Figure 9 reveals the diffusion of the hydrogen sulfide at angles of 0, 45, and 90° between the wind direction and the long side of the working area at an identical wind speed, wind direction, bare area of the landfill, and height of the MSW dump. Figure 9a implies the input value of the wind direction and wind speed in the landfill area. The red area in the left corner of Figure 9b–d represents the landfill working area with the dimensions 100 m × 40 m, and the arrow indicates the wind direction. It can be seen in Figure 9 that the angle between the long side of the working area and the wind direction affected the diffusion of the hydrogen sulfide. In fact, at an angle of 0° (see Figure 9b), the hydrogen sulfide largely diffused along the extension cord of the long side of the working area and thus accumulated in the downwind area significantly [16]. Hence, the influence of the hydrogen sulfide on both sides of the upwind area was negligible. Nevertheless, at an angle of 90° (Figure 9d), the influence of the hydrogen sulfide increased considerably, especially on both sides of the working area. However, at this time, the maximum concentration of the hydrogen sulfide was 40.2 µg/m3, which was lower than the concentration of the hydrogen sulfide at an angle of 0° (65.1 µg/m3). Notably, the influence range of the hydrogen sulfide was larger at an angle of 45° (Figure 9c) than at an angle of 0 and 90°. The highest concentration of the hydrogen sulfide in the center of the working area was also measured at an angle of 45°. Indeed, when the angle between the long side of the working area and the wind direction was 90°, the hydrogen sulfide in the center of the landfill working area was more likely to be affected by the wind. Thus, the hydrogen sulfide was not able to accumulate in the center of the working area.

4. Conclusions

This study employed the field static chamber method to measure the flux of the hydrogen sulfide emissions during landfill operations. The CALPUFF model was utilized to simulate the diffusion of the hydrogen sulfide into the landfill and the surrounding area according to the measured flux of the hydrogen sulfide emissions. The simulation results were compared with the measured values at the monitoring point of hydrogen sulfide concentration at the field boundary. Moreover, the effects of different wind speeds, wind directions, bare working areas of the landfill, heights of the landfill, and angles between the wind direction and the long side of the working area were simulated. The main conclusions drawn from the current work can be summarized as follows:
  • The concentration of the hydrogen sulfide around the landfill exceeded the olfactory threshold and ranged from 0 to 60 µg/m3 near the boundary of the landfill. When the flux of the hydrogen sulfide emissions in the working area measured by the static chamber method was input to the CALPUFF model as the initial intensity of hydrogen sulfide pollution emission source, the simulation data was consistent with the measured results, indicating that this model was suitable for the analysis of the diffusion of the hydrogen sulfide.
  • The diffusion range of the hydrogen sulfide was largely on the downwind side under the influence of the wind, while the upwind direction was less affected. At a relatively uniform wind direction, the influence range of the hydrogen sulfide was limited, but it widened significantly as the wind direction changed remarkably.
  • At a similar bare working area of the landfill, wind speed, and wind direction, enlarging the height of the MSW dump did not considerably increase the diffusion area of the hydrogen sulfide. Moreover, the concentration of the hydrogen sulfide declined gradually in the central area of the working area but rose in the surrounding area.
  • When the angle between the long side of the working area and the wind direction was 0°, the hydrogen sulfide largely diffused along the extension cord of the long side of the working area. Additionally, the influence range of the hydrogen sulfide noticeably extended, especially to the areas on both sides of the working area, when the angle increased to 90°.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.H. and T.W.; Methodology, H.H. and T.W.; Software, H.H., T.W., H.X., Z.Q. and X.W.; Validation, H.H., T.W. and X.W.; Formal Analysis, H.H.; Investigation, Y.L. and P.Z.; Resources, H.H., X.W., Y.L. and P.Z.; Data Curation, H.H., T.W. and H.X.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, H.H.; Writing—Review and Editing, T.W. and H.X.; Visualization, Z.Q.; Supervision, T.W.; Project Administration, H.H. and T.W.; Funding Acquisition, H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the key projects of the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LCZ19E080001), the science and technology project of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (2020-K-026), the exploration project of the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ21E080003), the Taizhou science and technology project (1902gy18), and the science and technology project of the Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of Zhejiang Province (2020-K-164).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, Y.M. A fundamental theory of environmental geotechnics and its application. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2014, 36, 1–46. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shen, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhan, L.; Xie, H.; Bouazza, A.; He, F.; Zuo, X. Methane hotspot localization and visualization at a large-scale Xi’an landfill in China: Effective tool for landfill gas management. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 225, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tang, Q.; Katsumi, T.; Inui, T.; Li, Z. Influence of pH on the membrane behavior of bentonite amended Fukakusa clay. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 141, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Gu, F. Use of cement-chelated, solidified, municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) fly ash for pavement material: Mechanical and environmental evaluations. Can. Geotech. J. 2017, 54, 1553–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tang, Q.; Gu, F.; Chen, H.; Lu, C.; Zhang, Y. Mechanical evaluation of bottom ash from municipal solid waste incineration used in roadbase. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, PRC. GB51220-2017 Technical Specification for Sanitary Landfill Site Closure of Household Garbage; China Planning Press: Beijing, China, 2017.
  7. Wang, Q.; Zuo, X.; Xia, M.; Xie, H.; He, F.; Shen, S.; Bouazza, A.; Zhu, L. Field investigation of temporal variation of volatile organic compounds at a landfill in Hangzhou, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 18162–18180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhan, L.T.; Wu, T.; Feng, S.; Li, G.Y.; He, H.J.; Lan, J.W.; Chen, Y.M. Full-scale experimental study of methane emission in a loess-gravel capillary barrier cover under different seasons. Waste Manag. 2020, 107, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Tan, H.; Liu, Y.; Lu, W.; Wang, H. Parameter sensitivity to concentrations and transport distance of odorous compounds from solid waste facilities. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 651, 2158–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liu, Y.; Yang, H.; Lu, W. VOCs released from municipal solid waste at the initial decomposition stage: Emission characteristics and an odor impact assessment. J. Environ. Sci. 2020, 98, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Shen, S.L.; Wu, B.H.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Z.Y. Assessment of Landfill Odorous Gas Effect on Surrounding Environment. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ferrero, E.; Oettl, D. An evaluation of a Lagrangian stochastic model for the assessment of odors. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 206, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shen, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhan, L. Methane hotspot localization and visualization at a large-scale Xi an landfill in China Effective tool for landfill gas management. Am. J. Perinat. 2018, 107, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  14. Komilis, D.P.; Ham, R.K.; Park, J.K. Emission of volatile organic compounds during composting of municipal solid wastes. Water Res. 2004, 38, 1707–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Panza, D.; Belgiorno, V. Hydrogen sulphide removal from landfill gas. Process Saf. Environ. 2010, 88, 420–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Heaney, C.D.; Wing, S.; Campbell, R.L.; Caldwell, D.; Hopkins, B.; Richardson, D.; Yeatts, K. Relation between malodor, ambient hydrogen sulfide, and health in a community bordering a landfill. Environ. Res. 2011, 111, 847–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Capelli, L.; Sironi, S.; Del Rosso, R.; Guillot, J.-M. Measuring odors in the environment vs. dispersion modeling: A review. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 79, 731–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, H.; Yu, Z.; Lague, C. Livestock Odor Dispersion Modeling: A Review. In Proceedings of the ASAE Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, USA, 16–19 July 2006. [Google Scholar]
  19. Conti, C.; Guarino, M.; Bacenetti, J. Measurements techniques and models to assess odor annoyance: A review. Environ. Int. 2019, 134, 105261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, L.; Parker, D.B.; Parnell, C.B.; Lacey, R.E.; Shaw, B.W. Comparison of CALPUFF and ISCST3 models for predicting downwind odor and source emission rates. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 4663–4669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Capelli, L.; Sironi, S.; Rosso, R.D.; Céntola, P.; Austeri, C. Odor impact assessment in urban areas: Case study of the city of Terni. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Naddeo, V.; Zarra, T.; Oliva, G.; Chiavola, A.; Vivarelli, A. Environmental odour impact assessment of landfill expansion scenarios: Case study of Borgo Montello (Italy). Chem. Eng. Trans. 2016, 54, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sheridan, B.A.; Hayes, E.T.; Curran, T.P.; Dodd, V.A. A dispersion modelling approach to determine the odour impact of intensive poultry production units in Ireland. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 91, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Agapiou, A.; Vamvakari, J.P.; Andrianopoulos, A.; Pappa, A. Volatile emissions during storing of green food waste under different aeration conditions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 8890–8901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chiriac, R.; Morais, J.D.A.; Carre, J.; Bayard, R.; Chovelon, J.M.; Gourdon, R. Study of the VOC emissions from a municipal solid waste storage pilot-scale cell: Comparison with biogases from municipal waste landfill site. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 2294–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gallego, E.; Perales, J.F.; Roca, F.J.; Guardino, X. Surface emission determination of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from a closed industrial waste landfill using a self-designed static flux chamber. Sci Total. Environ. 2014, 470, 587–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gonzalez, R.N.; Bjoerklund, E.; Forteza, R.; Cerda, V. Volatile organic compounds in landfill odorant emissions on the island of Mallorca. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2013, 93, 434–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hutchinson, G.L.; Mosier, A.R. Improved soil cover method for field measurement of nitrous oxide fluxes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1981, 45, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ko, J.H.; Xu, Q.; Jang, Y.C. Emissions and control of hydrogen sulfide at landfills: A review. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Technol. 2015, 45, 2043–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A satellite image of the landfill.
Figure 1. A satellite image of the landfill.
Sustainability 13 02886 g001
Figure 2. Wind roses of the landfill site in the four seasons: (a) January; (b) April; (c) July; (d) October.
Figure 2. Wind roses of the landfill site in the four seasons: (a) January; (b) April; (c) July; (d) October.
Sustainability 13 02886 g002
Figure 3. The static chamber buried in the field test.
Figure 3. The static chamber buried in the field test.
Sustainability 13 02886 g003
Figure 4. The variation in the concentration of hydrogen sulfide with time at the monitoring point.
Figure 4. The variation in the concentration of hydrogen sulfide with time at the monitoring point.
Sustainability 13 02886 g004
Figure 5. The diffusion diagram of the hydrogen sulfide based on the measured diffusion flux.
Figure 5. The diffusion diagram of the hydrogen sulfide based on the measured diffusion flux.
Sustainability 13 02886 g005
Figure 6. Plume trajectories of the hydrogen sulfide under different wind speeds and wind directions in different seasons: (a) January; (b) April; (c) July; (d) October.
Figure 6. Plume trajectories of the hydrogen sulfide under different wind speeds and wind directions in different seasons: (a) January; (b) April; (c) July; (d) October.
Sustainability 13 02886 g006
Figure 7. Plume trajectories of the hydrogen sulfide under different working areas: (a) 4000 m2 working area; (b) 8000 m2 working area; (c) 12,000 m2 working area; (d) 20,000 m2 working area.
Figure 7. Plume trajectories of the hydrogen sulfide under different working areas: (a) 4000 m2 working area; (b) 8000 m2 working area; (c) 12,000 m2 working area; (d) 20,000 m2 working area.
Sustainability 13 02886 g007
Figure 8. Plume trajectories of the hydrogen sulfide under different heights of the MSW dump: (a) 25 m; (b) 50 m; (c) 75 m; (d) 100 m.
Figure 8. Plume trajectories of the hydrogen sulfide under different heights of the MSW dump: (a) 25 m; (b) 50 m; (c) 75 m; (d) 100 m.
Sustainability 13 02886 g008
Figure 9. Plume trajectories of the hydrogen sulfide at different angles between the wind direction and the long side of the working area: (a) wind rose; (b) an angle of 0 degrees; (c) an angle of 45 degrees; (d) an angle of 90 degrees.
Figure 9. Plume trajectories of the hydrogen sulfide at different angles between the wind direction and the long side of the working area: (a) wind rose; (b) an angle of 0 degrees; (c) an angle of 45 degrees; (d) an angle of 90 degrees.
Sustainability 13 02886 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, H.; Wu, T.; Xu, H.; Lu, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, P. Investigation on the Emission and Diffusion of Hydrogen Sulfide during Landfill Operations: A Case Study in Shenzhen. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052886

AMA Style

He H, Wu T, Xu H, Lu Y, Qiu Z, Wang X, Zhang P. Investigation on the Emission and Diffusion of Hydrogen Sulfide during Landfill Operations: A Case Study in Shenzhen. Sustainability. 2021; 13(5):2886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052886

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Haijie, Tao Wu, Hui Xu, Yuhua Lu, Zhanhong Qiu, Xiaogang Wang, and Pan Zhang. 2021. "Investigation on the Emission and Diffusion of Hydrogen Sulfide during Landfill Operations: A Case Study in Shenzhen" Sustainability 13, no. 5: 2886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052886

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop