Next Article in Journal
Digitalisation of Creative Industries Fostered by Collaborative Governance: Public Innovation Labs in Gipuzkoa
Next Article in Special Issue
Risk Analysis for Short-Term Operation of the Power Generation in Cascade Reservoirs Considering Multivariate Reservoir Inflow Forecast Errors
Previous Article in Journal
Public Administration and Values Oriented to Sustainability: A Systematic Approach to the Literature
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on Runoff Simulations Using Deep-Learning Methods
Article

Meta-Evaluation for the Evaluation of Environmental Management: Standards and Practices

School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, No. 28 Xianning Road West, Xi’an 710049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Pingping Luo
Sustainability 2021, 13(5), 2567; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052567
Received: 25 January 2021 / Revised: 18 February 2021 / Accepted: 23 February 2021 / Published: 27 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Management Based on the Concept of Sustainable Development)
Environmental management plays a key role in the sustainable development of cities. The effectiveness of environmental management is commonly examined through some evaluation schemes, but the effectiveness of such evaluation schemes also needs to be verified. As such, in this study, meta-evaluation was creatively introduced into environmental management to improve the evaluation of environmental management (EEM). Meta-evaluation is the evaluation of an evaluation scheme, and can verify and enhance the evaluation quality. First, a set of new meta-evaluation standards and criteria was proposed based on the unique characteristics of environmental management, which made meta-evaluation standards more adaptable and effective. After that, the efficacy of the proposed meta-evaluation standards was verified through their application to two evaluation schemes used in different fields of EEM. Based on meta-evaluation, suggestions for improving these two EEM schemes were also provided. The major contributions of this study are to introduce meta-evaluation into environmental management, establish new evaluation standards, and examine the efficacy of EEM. The research showed that it is critical to carry out meta-evaluation before and/or after the implementation of EEM. View Full-Text
Keywords: meta-evaluation; evaluation of environmental management; standard; criteria; urban sewage treatment; national key ecological function areas meta-evaluation; evaluation of environmental management; standard; criteria; urban sewage treatment; national key ecological function areas
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, J.; Yin, Z.; Guo, Z. Meta-Evaluation for the Evaluation of Environmental Management: Standards and Practices. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052567

AMA Style

Ma J, Yin Z, Guo Z. Meta-Evaluation for the Evaluation of Environmental Management: Standards and Practices. Sustainability. 2021; 13(5):2567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052567

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Jing, Zhaoyun Yin, and Zhengbing Guo. 2021. "Meta-Evaluation for the Evaluation of Environmental Management: Standards and Practices" Sustainability 13, no. 5: 2567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052567

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop