Next Article in Journal
Consumers’ Attitudes for Sustainable Mountain Cheese
Next Article in Special Issue
Air Quality and Key Variables in High-Density Housing
Previous Article in Journal
A Model of Waste Price in a Symbiotic Supply Chain Based on Stackelberg Algorithm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Can Green Building Promote Pro-Environmental Behaviours? The Psychological Model and Design Strategy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/su13041742
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Planning Walkable Neighborhoods for “Aging in Place”: Lessons from Five Aging-Friendly Districts in Singapore

by
Yiqi Tao
1,
Wei Zhang
2,
Zhonghua Gou
3,*,
Boya Jiang
4 and
Yi Qi
1
1
Department of Architecture, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
2
Department of Architecture, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117356, Singapore
3
School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
4
Department of Architecture, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211800, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(4), 1742; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041742
Submission received: 2 December 2020 / Revised: 26 January 2021 / Accepted: 28 January 2021 / Published: 5 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reviving Drivers for Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design—Ecology and Energy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Today, “walkability” is considered a critical component of an aging-friendly neighborhood. This study examined the relationships between the neighborhood physical environment, walkability, and physical activity levels of older residents in Singapore. Five neighborhoods notable for their “aging in place” strategies were selected for a site survey. A questionnaire focusing on the evaluation of neighborhood walkability was administered to older adults in these neighborhoods. The questionnaire included three sections: neighborhood satisfaction, walkability, and the daily physical activity of older adults. The results indicated that adequate physical facilities and connectivity to the city were critical to older adults’ satisfaction with their neighborhoods. The mean walking time significantly dropped as the number of nearby facilities increased, and the number of facilities was negatively correlated with the daily activity levels of older adults. Thus, planners should attempt to calibrate the provision of neighborhood facilities to maintain the physical activity levels of older adults.

1. Introduction

1.1. Aging in Place: A Walkable Environment

With rapid population aging around the world, both policy makers and the elderly themselves are promoting the concept of “aging in place”, which allows older adults to remain in a familiar environment for as long as possible [1,2]. Research has shown that late life residential environments represent a critical context for aging [3]. Neighborhoods, in which older adults spend most of their time, are an important target of research on ways of ensuring aging-friendly environments [4,5,6].
One of the most critical tasks in creating aging-friendly neighborhoods for older residents is to ensure walkability, because walking, a moderate form of physical activity, is regarded as having the potential to maintain the health of older adults [4,7,8]. The connections between walkability, the built environment, and the well-being of older adults have begun to attract considerable interest from scholars [9,10,11]. Studies have revealed that promoting walking in neighborhoods is an important way to ensure the continued health of older adults, especially their mental health [8,12,13,14,15], because they spend more time than youngsters in the local environment [16]. Other research has indicated that the perceived pedestrian infrastructure, street connectivity, land-use mix access, and safety are all associated with the physical activity levels of residents. They have highlighted that the accessibility of areas for social interaction and stores are associated with the walking time of older adults [15,17,18]. Based on these findings, scholars have made recommendations for healthy neighborhood planning, such as the idea of a “15-min walkable neighborhood” [19].
Recently, thousands of healthcare workers have been infected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in hospitals and aged care facilities. Studies have shown that coronavirus droplets can travel farther than two meters [20,21], making it especially important to create a healthy outdoor environment. Moreover, it has been highlighted that older adults are at high risk of contracting COVID-19 due to their relatively weak immune systems [22]. Aging in place could reduce the number of seniors and thus the workload of health workers in aged care facilities, while increasing the opportunities available for older adults to engage in outdoor exercise and breathe fresh air, as a healthy outdoor lifestyle is an efficient method of avoiding cross-infection in these indoor facilities.

1.2. Neighborhoods Promoting Aging in Place in Singapore

Singapore is situated in Southeast Asia. It has a population of 5.7 million and a population density of 7766/km2 [23]. Based on the latest 2019 Population Trend Report of Singapore, the percentage of the elderly population has increased from 6.0% to 13.7% over the last 30 years, and the proportion of the resident population aged 65 years and over was as high as 14.4% in 2019 (Figure 1).
Singapore’s government places significant emphasis on urban greening in its approach to development, based on the assumption that extensive and high-quality urban greenery and green infrastructure can support human health and create livable cities [24,25]. In Singapore, as a “Garden City”, many strategies to promote daily outdoor activities among citizens have been implemented by the government, such as street planting and the creation of parks and open spaces, courtyards, sky terraces, and roof sky decks on public housing estates and in public buildings [24,26].
In addition to urban greenery, the Singaporean government has introduced an action plan for successful aging [27], which includes many ways of fostering aging-friendly neighborhoods. Among them are initiatives specifically targeting the enhancement of the physical environment for senior-friendly communities in Singapore. The government also offers social and health services and programs for the elderly in communities. It has developed three initiatives encouraging community participation to provide bottom–up and mutual help for the elderly. These initiatives cover 21 aging-friendly community programs conducted in Singapore (see Table A1).
All of these programs relating to the physical environment and social health services have been effectively designed to promote aging-friendly neighborhoods. However, the utilization of the relevant facilities and demand from residents have not yet been examined. Therefore, the authors of this paper sought to examine the relationships between the top–down strategies implemented by the Singaporean government and the real needs of older residents, especially in terms of walkability-related infrastructure construction.

1.3. Research Objective

To date, few studies have focused on how the environment may influence the walking and other activity levels of older adults in urban areas [13]. In addition, Singapore’s aging friendly neighborhoods have rarely been evaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the relationships between the physical environment, neighborhood walkability, and the daily physical levels of elderly people in Singapore.

2. Methods

2.1. Site Selection

To ensure that the cases were representative enough to allow the conclusions to be generalized to a larger population, three main criteria were used for site selection: initiatives promoting senior-friendly communities in Singapore, town planning models, and demographic aging rate. First, the cases covered 21 aging-friendly community programs conducted in Singapore (see Table A1). Second, the cases included neighborhoods with all kinds of spatial planning models. Reflecting on the spatial planning models, the Housing Development Board (HDB) [28] divides 23 towns and three estates into three categories: mature towns/estates that were developed before the 1980s, middle-aged towns/estates that were built in the 1980s or early 1990s, and young towns that were developed in the 1990s and afterwards (see Table A2). Considering towns’ structural models and residential areas, Hee and Heng [29] classified the development of new towns into five stages. Third, the cases covered a full spectrum of demographic aging rates. According to the United Nations, societies can be classified by aging rate as non-aging, aging, aged, or super-aged, based on whether their proportion of residents aged 65 or over is below 7%, between 7% and 14%, between 14% and 21%, or over 21%, respectively. Consequently, five neighborhoods defined by administrative boundaries were selected: Henderson Hill, Marine Parade, Yuhua East, Woodlands East, and Waterway East (Figure 2).

2.1.1. Henderson Hill

Henderson Hill (Figure 3) is a subzone of Bukit Merah, which was constructed during the first stage of new town development (see [29] for details of new town typologies). It is located in the center of Singapore. The size of this area is 59.54 ha. It has 11,870 residents, and 22.83% of the population are aged 65 or over. A community garden and a therapeutic garden are located in the east of this area. Henderson Hill is a hilly area with a large number of rental flats. Residents’ low economic status encourages them to use the local services and facilities, especially as they lack the money to travel frequently beyond their local area to enjoy public spaces and services.

2.1.2. Marine Parade

Marine Parade (Figure 4) is a mature estate located in the central region of Singapore. Its construction commenced in 1972, and most of its buildings had been leased by 1975. The area is characterized by flexible building arrangements, evenly distributed open spaces, and hierarchical commercial centers. Car parks represent the largest proportion of the open spaces. As its neighborhoods were established at roughly the same time and have a similar layout, Marine Parade represents the second stage of the new town typology, which is based on a town center–neighborhood center–subcenter prototype [30]. The residential population of Marine Parade is aging, with 19.58% of its population over 65 years old. The most important reason for selecting Marine Parade is that it was the first pilot case in City for All Ages (CFAA), which is a ground-up initiative run by grassroots leaders and residents in Singapore with cooperation by the government, communities, and the wider public [31]. This first CFAA pilot case featured more elderly-friendly fitness corners, larger block numbering, leveled void decks, and a longer “green man time” for traffic light crossings. The initiative also identified seniors living alone, launched a new senior activity center, and built a Befriending Network of 40 volunteers—the youngest being 53 years old and the oldest being 84 years old [31].

2.1.3. Yuhua East

Yuhua East (Figure 5), located in the town of Jurong East, represents the third stage in the new town development typology. It is characterized by the precinct concept and the commercial use of the first level of public housing flats. Yuhua East is found in western Singapore. Its construction began in 1979. From this stage, the planning of new towns in Singapore began to follow a town center–neighborhood center–precinct structural model [29]. A precinct is “a cluster of 4 hectares, or sometimes half the size, serving 400–800 families housed in four to eight apartment buildings” [29]. The use of precincts encourages social interactions via the communal use of space [29]. Yuhua East is an aging neighborhood, with 15.07% of its population over 65 years old. Although Yuhua East is not part of the CFAA initiative, it hosts the smart HDB (“HDB” refers to public housing estates in Singapore). The Home @ Yuhua project is the first pilot case of smart homes in Singapore. This project equipped homes with elderly monitoring [32], tele-rehab, and tele-video consultation [33] systems.

2.1.4. Woodlands East

Woodlands East (Figure 6) is located in Woodlands, in the north of Singapore. It belongs to the middle-aged town demographic and the fourth stage of the new town development typology, featuring a semi-public space enclosed by buildings and an integrated multi-story carpark [29]. It is now close to being classified as an aging neighborhood, with 6.05% of its population over 65 years old. This site includes Kampung Admiralty, the first one-stop integrated elderly care complex. It integrates housing for the elderly with a wide range of social, healthcare, communal, commercial, and retail facilities, which are distinct from the scattered care facilities in other cases.

2.1.5. Waterway East

Waterway East (Figure 7) is located in Punggol in northeastern Singapore, which represents the fifth stage in the new town development typology. It has a grid-like system complemented by mass rapid transit (MRT) and light-rail transit (LRT) systems [29]. At this stage, the previous town center is represented by a large-scale shopping mall, which was integrated with MRT or LRT. Oasis Terraces, a new generation of the neighborhood center, has also been unveiled in Waterway East to provide an integrated “live–work–play–learn” environment with a new design concept [34]. The precinct has been moved from the road level to the top of the multi-story carpark [34]. Waterway East has a young population, with only 5.83% of its population over 65 years old. It is not part of the CFAA initiative.
Basic information on the neighborhood facilities in the five selected aging districts is provided in Table 1.
The participants in this study were all volunteers aged 55 or over, with 25 recruited from each selected neighborhood.

2.2. Questionnaire

The background part of the questionnaire covered basic socio-demographic and situational variables, such as gender, age, ethnicity, number of adults sharing one’s home, years of living in the neighborhood, and number of blocks. The main part of the questionnaire comprised three sections: neighborhood satisfaction, perceived walkability, and physical activity of elderly people. Both English and Chinese versions of the questionnaire were provided to meet the respondents’ different demands. The survey was conducted by 7 investigators, whose mother language was Chinese. One investigator’s undergraduate degree was completed in English, and two of the investigators had International English Language Testing System (IELTS) scores of 6.5 and 7, respectively. In the first section, the questionnaire used a 5-point satisfaction scale (from −2 to 2) to measure the respondents’ satisfaction with the number of different neighborhood facilities, such as parks, stops, hawker centers, and clinics. Hawker centers are typically located in public housing estates; they house many stalls that sell a variety of Singaporean and other Asian cuisines. The mean walking time from home to each facility was also indicated by the participants. Respondents who used a walking stick were excluded from the research. In addition, the number of blocks between home and each facility was recorded to double check the reported walking time to each facility [35]. In the second section, questions related to walkability were selected from the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale—Abbreviated (NEWS-A). Categories including service, street, place, surroundings, and environment were evaluated. Questions were selected from NEWS-A to provide a succinct measure of various aspects of the built environment that related to walking. The validity of this set of questionnaire items had already been confirmed [36]. The third section of the questionnaire was adapted from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Elderly (IPAQ-E), using four questions to evaluate the daily activities of the participating older adults. This questionnaire is one of the most popularly used to assess the physical activity levels of the elderly, and the IPAQ-E has been shown to have acceptable validity with an elderly sample [37]. The full questionnaire was approved by the National University of Singapore Institutional Review Board, with reference code S-18-312E. Each questionnaire took approximately 15 min to complete, and incentives such as paper fans were handed out to the respondents at the end of the survey.

2.3. Data Analysis

Correlation analysis and regression analysis were applied to determine the relationships between each neighborhood’s attributes and the occupants’ satisfaction with its walkability. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM).

3. Findings and Results

3.1. Basic Information on Participants

A total of 125 older adults were surveyed, with 25 recruited from each selected aging zone. After the interviews, 123 valid questionnaires were selected for analysis. Basic information on the surveyed participants is provided in Table 2. The survey sample comprised 83 males and 41 females, all of whom were aged 55 or above. Those aged 55 to 65, 65 to 74, and 75 and above made up 34%, 37%, and 29% of the sample, respectively. The majority of the participants were Chinese, and most lived with one (35%) or two (22%) family members. The majority of the respondents had lived in their neighborhoods for more than 10 years (70%), and 35% of them had lived there for more than 30 years. As a result, they were generally very familiar with their residential districts.

3.2. Neighborhood Satisfaction

Details of neighborhood satisfaction and the mean walking time from home to each facility are listed in Table 3. Overall neighborhood satisfaction was positive, receiving a score of 1.0. This indicated that the respondents were satisfied with the neighborhood facilities. Transportation received the highest score, 1.4, which was followed by supermarkets and hawker centers, each of which received a satisfaction score of 1.0. The satisfaction votes for parks, ground floor commercial use, clinics, and residents’ committees ranged from 0.5 to 0.8, and the satisfaction score for elderly care facilities was 0.2.
To evaluate the relationship between the mean walking time and satisfaction, walking time from home was also recorded in the questionnaire. The results showed that transportation stops had the shortest walking times, with a mean value of five minutes. The walking time to ground floor commercial buildings, hawker centers, elderly facilities, supermarkets, and residents’ committees was within ten minutes. The walking time to parks and community gardens was around ten minutes, and the longest walking time was that between home and clinics, at thirteen minutes.
The correlations between the physical environment, satisfaction votes, and average walking time were examined (Table 4). The results showed that the number and size of parks and water bodies, the number of community gardens, and the number of elderly care facilities were positively correlated with satisfaction. The respondents seemed quite satisfied with the provision of nature scenery in the neighborhood. The mean walking time significantly dropped with an increase in the number of nearby parks and water bodies, supermarkets, residents’ committees, community gardens, and clinics. The result indicated that the provision of appropriate physical facilities could increase the satisfaction vote and decrease the mean walking time of the elderly people.

3.3. Neighborhood Walkability

The respondents’ satisfaction with five categories of neighborhood environment, namely services, street conditions, place, surroundings, and environment, was evaluated on a 4-point scale: disagree (1), slightly disagree (2), slightly agree (3), and agree (4). The first four categories were selected from NEWS, and the last category was developed based on Singapore’s climate characteristics, such as its hot temperature and rainy season.
Regarding service provision (Table 5), the respondents agreed that many services were within walking distance, such as stores and transit stops. They also reported that it was easy to park in local shopping areas. Moreover, the street conditions (in terms of even surfaces and a lack of obstacles) in the neighborhoods were rated positively. Three main aspects of the street were evaluated to assess walkability, namely dead-end roads, distance between intersections, and alternative routes. The majority of the participants agreed that the streets showed good connectivity, and intersections and alternative routes even received mean votes of 3 and above, which is rather positive. As for the sidewalks, the selected neighborhoods were adequate for pedestrian use and had enough greenery. All of the respondents except those from Yuhua East reported that their neighborhoods offered attractive natural views and buildings. The questions relating to environment focused on sunshade and rainfall in the tropics. Most of the respondents agreed that their neighborhoods provided enough shelter and canopy cover, which influenced their willingness to engage in outdoor activities.

3.4. Neighborhood Environment and Physical Activity Levels of Older Adults

This study revealed that the neighborhoods’ weather environment influenced the physical activity of the older adults. In IPAQ-E, weekly physical activity level is calculated as “low”, “moderate”, or “high”. The results also indicated that a negative correlation existed between the number of hawker centers (providing food) and the daily activity levels of the elderly adults (sig. = −0.229, p = 0.05). No other correlation existed between neighborhood environment attributes and the physical activity levels of the elderly people.

4. Discussion

Many studies have reported that key neighborhood characteristics (street connectivity, density, etc.) are significantly associated with the life satisfaction [38,39,40], social interaction [41], and health status of residents [42]. In this study, of all neighborhood facilities, transportation received the highest overall satisfaction vote and had the smallest mean walking time. This indicates that connectivity to the city is a critical determinant of residents’ satisfaction with their neighborhood. Adequate physical facilities also had a positive correlation with the neighborhood satisfaction vote and a negative correlation with walking time. The mean walking time significantly dropped with an increase in the number of nearby parks and water bodies, supermarkets, residents’ committees, community gardens, and clinics. These results suggest that the provision of appropriate physical facilities is a critical factor in neighborhood design, as it can enhance both the satisfaction and the daily life walking patterns of older adults.
Previous studies have found that perceived walkability is associated with both participation in and duration of physical activity [17], especially among older adults [38]. At the surveyed five sites, the respondents were satisfied with most of the neighborhood conditions regarding walkability. Site 5 received a low score for attractive surroundings, because the neighborhood was constructed in 1970s, and its design and facilities seemed old-fashioned. In the future, to develop aging-friendly neighborhoods, modern design elements could be included to enhance the vitality and satisfaction of their older residents.
The outdoor environment has a large impact on the behavior of residents. Research has pointed out that poor neighborhood conditions are associated with lower levels of physical activity among older adults [43]. One study examined the effect of food retail on the physical activity of adolescents and found that the availability of food stores within walking distance increased their physical activity levels [44]. In contrast, the current study found a negative correlation between the number of hawker centers and older adults’ physical activity. The availability of hawker centers does not appear to increase older adults’ physical activity. A possible explanation is that compared with youngsters, older adults are much more reliant on the convenience of neighborhood facilities and less willing to walk far for shopping and dining. In short, the convenience of neighborhood facilities reduces physical activity levels among elderly people. Similar findings have been reported by other researchers [18]. Based on this interesting finding, the authors believe that the density of the neighborhood facilities should be properly designed, such as by reducing the number of hawker centers, to encourage older adults to maintain suitable levels of daily physical activity.

5. Conclusions

This study identified connectivity to a city as a critical factor determining the satisfaction of older residents with their neighborhoods. In addition, the presence of adequate physical facilities was positively correlated with neighborhood satisfaction scores and negatively correlated with walking time. Moreover, the convenience of neighborhood facilities was found to reduce the physical activity levels of elderly people.
Indeed, neighborhood environments are important contexts for aging. The government should provide appropriate facilities, improve accessibility, and increase walkability to enhance the satisfaction of older adults with their local environments. Planners, architects, and landscape designers should create more attractive surroundings to enhance the vitality and satisfaction of older residents. The density of the facilities should also be carefully evaluated, as this factor directly influences the daily activity levels of older adults. The number of neighborhood facilities and the physical activity levels of elderly people must be carefully balanced. Better insights into the role of walkability in creating aging-friendly neighborhoods will be beneficial to governments, architects, and urban planners.
It should be pointed out that the proportions of the participants surveyed in this study were inconsistent with the demographic breakdown of Singapore’s population, which comprises approximately 70% Chinese, 15% Malay, and 10% Indian. This inconsistency may have prevented the data in this study from fully reflecting the behavioral habits of average elderly people in Singapore. The ethnic proportions obtained in this study are related to two main factors. First, some of the older participants were illiterate and only understood their mother tongues; therefore, the investigators needed to ask the questions verbally in the participants’ mother tongues. Second, the investigators in this study were Chinese–English bilingual. In the future, researchers should also recruit Malay- and Tamil-speaking investigators. In addition, environmental elements such as air temperature, humidity, and air velocity should be evaluated to determine the correlation between levels of outdoor comfort and neighborhood walkability in the tropical context. The data collected from the selected cases have been aggregated for the analysis, while future studies will focus on individual case to have more in-depth understanding of the specific facilities and built environment features. This paper would like to testify to the correlation between the provision of neighborhood facilities and the physical activity level of the respondents. Since the correlation did not show statistical significance, the result of this part was not elaborated. With more detailed data, hopefully, there will be significant correlation coming out.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.T. and W.Z.; methodology, Y.T. and W.Z.; software, Y.T.; validation, Y.T. and W.Z.; formal analysis, Y.T.; investigation, Y.T. and W.Z.; data curation, Y.T. and W.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.T. and W.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.T., W.Z., Z.G., B.J. and Y.Q.; visualization, W.Z.; project administration, W.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Science Foundation of Shenzhen University (Grant No. 85304-00000261; Grant No. 860-000002110338); National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51708282).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of National University of Singapore (protocol code S-18-312E and date of approval 8 March 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to the agreement between the authors and the Institutional Review Board of National University of Singapore.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the help with the data collection provided by Han Wei, Mao Jingshang, and Zhang Chengjun, which made this research possible. We are also grateful to Yu Pei for helping to input the survey data. We would like to extend our thanks to our colleagues Heng Chye Kiang, Cho Im Sik, Tan Beng Kiang, and Lau Stephen Siu Yu from the National University of Singapore for providing valuable insights into the selection of cases. Last but not least, this paper is dedicated to the many participants who provided the data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Programs for promoting aging-friendly neighborhoods in Singapore.
Table A1. Programs for promoting aging-friendly neighborhoods in Singapore.
CategoryNo.ProgramsIntroductionAgencies in ChargeReference
Physical Environment1Silver ZoneSilver Zones enhance the road safety for the elderly through gateway treatment, pinch point, mountable center dividers, bus-friendly hump, etc.Land Transport AuthorityLTA [45]
2Therapeutic Horticulture ProgramsThe Therapeutic Horticulture Program uses plants and nature-related activities for elderly groups, persons with dementia, and other special needs in the therapeutic gardens to: Promote low intensity exercise and improve motor skills; Stimulate memory; Encourage positive social interactions and connection with nature; and Promote mindfulness.National ParksNParks [46]
3Active Aging Hubs (AAHs)AAHs are one-stop day centers for seniors that can serve a range of needs—from active aging services for ambulant and healthy seniors, to day care and day rehab services for seniors in need of care, as well as volunteer activities.Ministry of Health (MOH); Housing & Development Board (HDB)Gan [47],
KWSH [48], NTUCHealth [49]
4Smart HomeThe smart HDB @ Yuhua project equips homes with an elderly monitoring system (EMS) that allows caregivers to monitor their care recipients through sensors placed in the flat, and it alerts caregivers via text messages.HDBHDB [33]
52-Room Flexi FlatsUnder the 2-room Flexi Scheme, elderly citizens have the flexibility of choosing the length of lease on their 2-room flat, based on their age, needs, and preferences. The 2-room Flexi flats come in 2 sizes: 36sqm and 45sqm, and they are available either on a 99-year lease or short-lease. Grab bars will be installed, and other senior-friendly fittings are optional.HDBHDB [50]
6Rental flatsFlats under the Public Rental Scheme are heavily subsidized to cater to Singapore Citizen (SC) households who have no other housing options, for instance, low-income seniors.HDBHDB [51]
7Enhancement for Active Seniors (EASE)The Enhancement for Active Seniors (EASE) scheme allows homeowners to improve the comfort and enhance the mobility of elderly residents living in HDB flats. EASE offers three types of improvement items regarding elder-friendly fittings, including grab bars within the flats, slip-resistant treatment to floor tiles of two bathrooms, and ramps.HDBHDB [52]
8CFAATown Audits are useful for identifying physical defects and hazards in the neighborhood that might be unsafe for seniors. By walking along routes commonly taken by residents, the volunteers take note of the areas that could be improved to make the environment safer and easier for the seniors’ day-to-day activities.MOHMOH [53]
9Elevated retirement communityKampung Admiralty is a one-stop integrated complex that integrates seniors’ housing, health care, care facilities, hawker centers, and shops amid lush greenery in a bid to be an elevated “modern kampung”.HDBHeng and Chua [54]
10Town and Community PlazasTown and community plazas around Singapore enable residents to gather, enjoy activities with friends and neighbors, and foster community ties in their towns.HDBHDB [55]
11Participatory renewal programsThe involvement of communities started through a series of upgrading programs, such as the Neighborhood Renewal Program (NRP), Building Our Neighborhoods’ Dream (BOND) Program, and most recently, the Remaking Our Heartlands ProgramHDBCho and Križnik [56]
Social and Health Services and Programs12CFAAHealth screenings and functional
screenings; health and wellness programs		MOHMOH [53]
13Eldercare facilitiesSenior Cluster Network (SCN);
Senior Activity Centers;
Day Care centers;
Befriending Service;
Gero-Counseling Service;Sheltered Homes (SHs)		MOH;
Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF)		MOF, MOH [57]
14Community Health Assist Scheme (CHAS) clinicsLower- to middle-income families ($1800 monthly income per person in one household) can qualify for the CHAS, which provides them with subsidies at participating General Practitioners (GPs) and dental clinics in the community.MOH
CHAS		MOH [58], CHAS [59]
15National Silver AcademyNational Silver Academy (NSA) enables seniors to stay cognitively active through learning.NSANSA [60]
16Senior Citizens’ Executive Committees
(SCEC)		SCEC plans and organizes a wide array of activities and courses to enrich the life experiences of senior citizens. There are sports and dance activities that are specially designed to help participants stay fit and healthy. There are also courses that fulfill the pursuit of lifelong learning by offering skills to pick up a new language, improve one’s cooking, and even explore the possibilities of computer technology. It aims to engage and empower seniors to lead active, healthy, and meaningful lives in the community.People’s Association (PA);
Community Club (CC)		PA [61]
17PA Wellness ProgramThe PA Wellness Program offers those aged 50 and above opportunities to take part in activities to help them remain mentally, physically, and socially active.PA, CC, Residents’ Committee (RC) and Neighborhood Committee (NC)PA [61]
18Tele-healthElderly Monitoring Systems, Vital Signs Monitoring, Tele-rehabilitation and Video Consultation, Smart Health Video Consultation (VC) for Healthcare, Smart Health TeleRehabSmart Nation and Digital Government Office (SNDGO)SNDGO [62]
Empowerment of Bottom–Up Caregivers19Community Networks for Seniors (CNS)By combining the strengths and resources of Voluntary Welfare Organization (VWO), grassroots and community groups, as well as government agencies, CNS connect the seniors to different combinations to social and health care services.Agency for Integrated Care (AIC)AIC [63]
20CFAA Social support networks are prompted through various programs. Angel Ambassadors program, ComSA Program, Cooking for A Cause, etc.MOH[53]
21Community Participation, i.e., Community GardensCommunity gardens are common spaces where people of different demographics come together to create, develop, and sustain a gardening space in their locality. Through community gardening, the gardening culture and a greater sense of civic ownership is manifested amongst the public and private estates, schools, and organizations.National Parks Board (Nparks)NParks [64]
Table
Table A2. Towns and estates by category.
Table A2. Towns and estates by category.
Mature Towns/EstatesMiddle-Aged Towns/EstateYoung Towns
Queenstown
Bukit Merah
Toa Payoh
Ang Mo Kio
Bedok
Clementi
Kallang/Whampoa
Geylang
Marine Parade
Central Area 		Bukit Batok
Bukit Panjang
Choa Chu Kang
Jurong East
Jurong West
Bishan
Hougang
Serangoon
Tampines
Pasir Ris
Woodlands
Yishun
Bukit Timah		Punggol
Sengkang
Sembawang

References

  1. Iecovich, E. Aging in Place: From Theory to Practice. Anthropol. Noteb. 2014, 20, 21–32. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wiles, J.L.; Leibing, A.; Guberman, N.; Reeve, J.; Allen, R.E.S. The Meaning of “Aging in Place” to Older People. Gerontologist 2012, 52, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Guo, Y.; Chan, C.H.; Chang, Q.; Liu, T.; Yip, P.S.F. Neighborhood Environment and Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Multilevel Analysis in Hong Kong. Health Place 2019, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yen, I.H.; Michael, Y.L.; Perdue, L. Neighborhood Environment in Studies of Health of Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2009, 37, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Mooney, S.J.; Joshi, S.; Cerdá, M.; Kennedy, G.J.; Beard, J.R.; Rundle, A.G. Neighborhood Disorder and Physical Activity among Older Adults: A Longitudinal Study. J. Urban Health 2017, 94, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cerin, E.; Nathan, A.; Cauwenberg, J.; Barnett, D.W.; Barnett, A. The Neighbourhood Physical Environment and Active Travel in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2017, 14, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Stuck, A.E.; Walthert, J.M.; Nikolaus, T.; Büla, J.; Hohmann, C.; Beck, J.C. Risk Factors for Functional Status Decline in Community-Living Elderly People: A Systematic Literature Review. Soc. Sci. Med. 1999, 48, 445–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Holle, V.; Cauwenberg, J.; Bourdeaudhuij, I.; Deforche, B.; Weghe, N.; Dyck, D. Interactions Between Neighborhood Social Environment and Walkability to Explain Belgian Older Adults’ Physical Activity and Sedentary Time. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Holle, V.; Cauwenberg, J.; Bourdeaudhuij, I.; Deforche, B.; Weghe, N.; Dyck, D. Relationship between Neighborhood Walkability and Older Adults’ Physical Activity: Results from the Belgian Environmental Physical Activity Study in Seniors (BEPAS Seniors). Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2014, 11, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Holle, V.; Cauwenberg, J.; Bourdeaudhuij, I.; Deforche, B.; Weghe, N.; Dyck, D. Do Psychosocial Factors Moderate the Association between Objective Neighborhood Walkability and Older Adults’ Physical Activity? Health Place 2015, 34, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chen, B.I.; Hsueh, M.C.; Rutherford, R.; Park, J.H.; Liao, Y. The Associations between Neighborhood Walkability Attributes and Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Older Adults. PLoS ONE 2019, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lampinen, P.; Heikkinen, R.L.; Kauppinen, M.; Heikkinen, E. Activity as a Predictor of Mental Well-Being among Older Adults. Aging Ment. Health 2006, 10, 454–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Curl, A.; Mason, P. Neighbourhood Perceptions and Older Adults’ Wellbeing: Does Walking Explain the Relationship in Deprived Urban Communities? Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2019, 123, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kerr, J.; Rosenberg, D.; Frank, L. The Role of the Built Environment in Healthy Aging: Community Design, Physical Activity, and Health among Older Adults. J. Plan. Lit. 2012, 27, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, R.; Cheung, O.; Lau, K.; Woo, J. Associations between Perceived Neighborhood Walkability and Walking Time, Wellbeing, and Loneliness in Community-Dwelling Older Chinese People in Hong Kong. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gale, C.R.; Dennison, E.M.; Cooper, C.; Sayer, A.A. Neighbourhood Environment and Positive Mental Health in Older People: The Hertfordshire Cohort Study. Health Place 2011, 17, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Nichani, V.; Vena, J.E.; Friedenreich, C.M.; Christie, C.; Cormack, G.R. A Population-Based Study of The Associations between Neighbourhood Walkability and Different Types of Physical Activity in Canadian Men and Women. Prev. Med. 2019, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koh, P.P.; Leow, B.W.; Wong, Y.D. Mobility of The Elderly in Densely Populated Neighbourhoods in Singapore. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2015, 14, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Weng, M.; Ding, N.; Jin, X.; Xiao, H.; He, Z.; Su, S. The 15-Minute Walkable Neighborhoods: Measurement, Social Inequalities and Implications for Building Healthy Communities in Urban China. J. Transp. Health 2019, 13, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bahl, P.; Doolan, C.; Silva, C.; Chughtai, A.A.; Bourouiba, L.; Intyre, C.R. Airborne or Droplet Precautions for Health Workers Treating COVID-19? J. Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Ng, K.; Poon, B.H.; Puar, T.H.K.; Quah, J.L.S.; Loh, J.W.; Wong, Y.J.; Tan, T.Y.; Raghuram, J. COVID-19 and the Risk to Health Care Workers: A Case Report. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Meng, H.; Xu, Y.; Dai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Yang, H. Analyze the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 among the Elderly Population in China and Make Corresponding Suggestions. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Population Trends 2019. Available online: https://www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/publications/population/population2019.pdf (accessed on 30 April 2019).
  24. Tan, P.Y.; Wang, J.; Sia, A. Perspectives on Five Decades of the Urban Greening of Singapore. Cities 2013, 32, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kumar, P.; Druckman, A.; Gallagher, J.; Gatersleben, B.; Allison, S.; Eisenman, T.S.; Hoang, U.; Hama, S.; Tiwari, A.; Sharma, A. The Nexus between Air Pollution, Green Infrastructure and Human Health. Environ. Int. 2019, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yuen, B.; Hien, N.W. Resident Perceptions and Expectations of Rooftop Gardens in Singapore. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2005, 73, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Action Plan for Successful Ageing. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1525Action_Plan_for_Successful_Aging.pdf (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  28. Public Housing in Singapore: Residents’ Profile, Housing Satisfaction and Preferences (HDB Sample Household Survey 2013). Available online: https://www.hdb.gov.sg/about-us/news-and-publications/publications/hdb-publications (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  29. Hee, L.; Heng, C.K. Transformation of Space: A Retrospective on Public Housing in Singapore. In Suburban Form: An International Perspective; Stanilov, K., Scheer, B.C., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 127–147. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wong, A.K.; Yeh, S.H.K. Housing A Nation: 25 Years of Public Housing in Singapore; Maruzen Asia for Housing & Development Board: Singapore, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  31. Making Singapore A City for All Ages. 2013. Available online: https://www.challenge.gov.sg/print/cover-story/singapore-a-city-for-all-ages (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  32. My Smart HDB Home @ Yuhua. Available online: http://www.hdb.gov.sg/cs/infoweb/about-us/our-role/smart-and-sustainable-living/smart-hdb-town-page/hdb-smart-home-exhibition (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  33. Assistive Technology, Analytics and Robotics for Aging and Healthcare. Available online: https://www.smartnation.sg/initiatives/Health/telehealth-integrated-and-seamless-healthcare-services-at-home (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  34. HDB Unveils New Generation of Neighbourhood Centres. Available online: http://www.hdb.gov.sg/cs/infoweb/press-releases/hdb-unveils-new-generation-of-neighbourhood-centres (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  35. Tao, Y.; Fu, J.; Lau, S.S.Y.; Shi, S.; Chen, X. Aging in Place: Neighborhood Attributes and the Health-related Quality of Life of Elderly People in Hong Kong. Int. J. Aging Soc. 2017, 7, 83–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cerin, E.; Saelens, B.E.; Sallis, J.F.; Frank, L.D. Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: Validity and development of a short form. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2006, 38, 1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Wennlöf, H.A.; Hagströmer, M.; Olsson, L.A. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire modified for the elderly: Aspects of validity and feasibility. Public Health Nutr. 2010, 13, 1847–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Orstad, S.L.; Donough, M.H.; James, P.; Kleonsky, D.B.; Laden, F.; Mattson, M.; Troped, P.J. Neighborhood Walkability and Physical Activity among Older Women: Tests of Mediation by Environmental Perceptions and Moderation by Depressive Symptoms. Prev. Med. 2018, 116, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Leslie, E.; Cerin, E. Are Perceptions of the Local Environment Related to Neighbourhood Satisfaction and Mental Health in Adults? Prev. Med. 2008, 47, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cao, X. How does Neighborhood Design Affect Life Satisfaction? Evidence from Twin Cities. Travel Behav. Soc. 2016, 5, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lim, T.S.Y.; Hassan, N.; Ghaffarianhoseini, A.; Daud, N. The Relationship between Satisfaction towards Neighbourhood Facilities and Social Trust in Urban Villages in Kuala Lumpur. Cities 2017, 67, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, L.; Zhou, S.; Kwan, M.P. A Comparative Analysis of the Impacts of Objective versus Subjective Neighborhood Environment on Physical, Mental, and Social Health. Health Place 2019, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cheval, B.; Rebar, A.L.; Miller, M.W.; Sieber, S.; Orsholits, D.; Baranyi, G.; Courvoisier, D.; Cullati, S.; Sander, D.; Chalabaev, A.; et al. Cognitive Resources Moderate the Adverse Impact of Poor Perceived Neighborhood Conditions on Self-Reported Physical Activity of Older Adults. Prev. Med. 2019, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Johnson, A.M.; Dooley, E.E.; Ganzar, L.A.; Jovanovic, C.E.; Janda, K.M.; Salvo, D. Neighborhood Food Environment and Physical Activity Among U.S. Adolescents. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2019, 57, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Safer Streets for Seniors at 50 Locations Island-Wide by End-2023. Available online: https://www.lta.gov.sg/content/ltagov/en/newsroom/2020/3/news-releases/50-silver-zones-by-2023-to-enhance-road-safety-for-senior-pedest.html (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  46. Therapeutic Horticulture Programmes. Available online: https://www.nparks.gov.sg/gardens-parks-and-nature/therapeutic-gardens/therapeutic-horticulture-programmes (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  47. Better Health, Better Care, Better Life. Available online: https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/pressRoom/speeches_d/2016/speech-by-minister-fo-health--mr-gan-kim-yong--at-the-moh-commit.html (accessed on 13 April 2016).
  48. Official Opening of Kwong Wai Shiu Community Care Centre @ McNair. 2017. Available online: http://www.kwsh.org.sg/en/KWSCCC2017 (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  49. Active Ageing Hub. Available online: https://ntuchealth.sg/active-ageing-hub/ (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  50. 2-Room Flexi Flats. Available online: http://www.hdb.gov.sg/cs/infoweb/residential/buying-a-flat/new/2room-flexi-flats (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  51. Public Rental Scheme. Available online: http://www.hdb.gov.sg/cs/infoweb/residential/renting-a-flat/renting-from-hdb/public-rental-scheme (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  52. Enhancement for Active Seniors (EASE). Available online: http://www.hdb.gov.sg/cs/infoweb/residential/living-in-an-hdb-flat/for-our-seniors/ease (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  53. Creating Senior-Friendly Communities: Tips and Tools from the City for All Ages Project. Available online: https://www.moh.gov.sg/docs/librariesprovider5/resources-statistics/educational-resources/moh-cfaa-guidebook-(final).pdf (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  54. ‘Modern Kampung’ to Launch in July BTO. Available online: http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/housing/modern-kampung-to-launch-in-july-bto (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  55. Town & Community Plazas. Available online: http://www.hdb.gov.sg/cs/infoweb/community/creating-vibrant-places/town/community-plazas (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  56. Cho, I.S.; Križnik, B. Community-Based Urban Development: Evolving Urban Paradigms in Singapore and Seoul; Springer: Singapore, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  57. Integration of Health and Social Services to Support Seniors. Available online: https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/pressRoom/pressRoomItemRelease/2018/integration-of-health-and-social-services-to-support-seniors.html (accessed on 19 February 2018).
  58. Healthcare Financing in Singapore. Available online: https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/medishield-life/resources---faqs/healthcare-financing-in-singapore.html (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  59. What is CHAS? Available online: http://www.chas.sg/content.aspx?id=303 (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  60. National Silver Academy. Available online: http://www.nsa.org.sg/allcourses.php (accessed on 26 November 2017).
  61. Active Ageing. Available online: https://www.pa.gov.sg/our-programmes/active-ageing (accessed on 30 April 2018).
  62. TeleHealth: Integrated and Seamless Healthcare Services at Home. Available online: https://www.smartnation.sg/initiatives/Health/telehealth--integrated-and-seamless-healthcare-services-at-home (accessed on 1 February 2018).
  63. Transforming Community Care in 2030. Available online: https://www.csc.gov.sg/articles/transforming-community-care-in-2030 (accessed on 30 April 2019).
  64. Community Gardens. Available online: https://www.nparks.gov.sg/gardening/community-gardens (accessed on 30 April 2018).
Sustainability 13 01742 g001 550
Figure 1. Singapore: Age structure from 2009 to 2019 (https://www.statista.com/statistics/378566/age-structure-in-singapore/).
Figure 1. Singapore: Age structure from 2009 to 2019 (https://www.statista.com/statistics/378566/age-structure-in-singapore/).
Sustainability 13 01742 g001
Sustainability 13 01742 g002 550
Figure 2. Five selected aging neighborhoods in Singapore.
Figure 2. Five selected aging neighborhoods in Singapore.
Sustainability 13 01742 g002
Sustainability 13 01742 g003 550
Figure 3. Henderson Hill.
Figure 3. Henderson Hill.
Sustainability 13 01742 g003
Sustainability 13 01742 g004 550
Figure 4. Marine Parade.
Figure 4. Marine Parade.
Sustainability 13 01742 g004
Sustainability 13 01742 g005 550
Figure 5. Yuhua East.
Figure 5. Yuhua East.
Sustainability 13 01742 g005
Sustainability 13 01742 g006 550
Figure 6. Woodlands East.
Figure 6. Woodlands East.
Sustainability 13 01742 g006
Sustainability 13 01742 g007 550
Figure 7. Waterway East.
Figure 7. Waterway East.
Sustainability 13 01742 g007
Table
Table 1. Basic information of five selected neighborhoods in Singapore.
Table 1. Basic information of five selected neighborhoods in Singapore.
Henderson HillMarine ParadeYuhua EastWoodlands EastWaterway East
Area (ha)59.5411692.48255.35148.92
Population11,51027,55025,46097,09047,550
Proportion of people aged above 6522.83%19.58%15.07%6.05%5.83%
Number of parks and water bodies11469
Size of water parks and water bodies (m2)29,61414,84433,130105,415222,663
Number of transportation stops1419174623
Number of supermarkets17286
Number of hawker centers12110
Number of residential buildings with commercial at 1st floor1931499450
Number of residents’ committees276134
Number of community clubs01111
Number of community gardens161361
Number of elder care facilities75542
Number of CHAS clinics16875
Number of Silver Zones12000
Data source: Population Trends (2016); Singapore Residents by Subzone and Type of Dwelling, June 2016 (data.gov.sg); number of residential buildings with first-floor commercial use, counted by the author, Zhang Wei; number of Silver Zones obtained from the Land Transport Authority (2016); numbers of other facilities obtained from Onemap, 2018 (www.onemap.sg/main/v2/themes).
Table
Table 2. Sample characteristics.
Table 2. Sample characteristics.
CharacteristicCategoryNumber of PeoplePercentage
Gendermale8367%
female4133%
Age group 55–644234%
65–744637%
>753529%
RaceChinese11895%
Indian11%
Others54%
Number of adults live with02217%
14335%
22722%
32117%
≥4119%
Years of living in the neighborhood1–93730%
10–191815%
20–292520%
>304435%
Table
Table 3. Neighborhood satisfaction and walking time.
Table 3. Neighborhood satisfaction and walking time.
FacilitiesMean (−2 to 2)Walking Time (Minutes)
Parks and water bodies (quantity)0.810
Parks and water bodies (size)0.7
Transportation stops 1.45
Supermarkets1.09
Hawker centers (food)1.08
Residential buildings with commercial at 1/F0.66
Residents’ committees0.59
Community gardens−0.410
Elderly care facilities0.28
CHAS clinics0.613
Overall neighborhood satisfaction 1.0N/A
Table
Table 4. Correlation between environment attributes, satisfaction votes, and walking time.
Table 4. Correlation between environment attributes, satisfaction votes, and walking time.
FacilitiesEnvironment SatisfactionWalking Time
Sig.p ValueSig.p Value
Parks and water bodies (quantity)0.294 **0.001−0.316 **0.001
Parks and water bodies (size)0.293 **0.001−0.1750.072
Transportation stops −0.0160.8620.220 *0.017
Supermarkets−0.0360.692−0.323 **0.001
Hawker centers (food)−0.1060.253−0.0870.373
Residential buildings with commercial at 1/F0.0350.702−0.1980.051
Residents’ committees0.0910.315−0.206 *0.048
Community gardens0.244 **0.006−0.636 **0.000
Elderly care facilities0.217 *0.016−0.0310.799
CHAS clinics0.0370.420−0.452 **0.000
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level. **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
Table
Table 5. Neighborhood environment walkability vote.
Table 5. Neighborhood environment walkability vote.
Selected Items from NEWSHenderson HillMarine ParadeYuhua EastWoodlands EastWaterway East
1.Service
1.1 Stores are within easy walking distance of my home.3.243.523.43.283.63
1.2 Parking is difficult in local shopping areas.2.362.762.1622.00
1.3 There are many places to go within easy walking distance of my home.3.163.563.483.323.58
1.4 It is easy to walk to a transit stop (bus, train) from my home.3.483.723.723.43.63
1.5 The streets in my neighborhood are hilly, making my neighborhood difficult to walk in.2.081.481.61.61.25
1.6 There are major barriers to walking in my local area that make it hard to get from place to place (for example, freeways, railway lines, rivers).1.521.521.61.521.46
2.Street
2.1 The streets in my neighborhood do not have many cul-de-sacs (dead-end streets). 33.442.362.923.13
2.2 The distance between intersections in my neighborhood is usually short (100 yards or less; the length of a football field or less).3.123.63.443.563.50
2.3 There are many alternative routes for getting from place to place in my neighborhood (I don’t have to go the same way every time).3.163.283.523.563.42
3.Place-sidewalks
3.1 There are sidewalks on most of the streets in my neighborhood.3.363.63.523.63.79
3.2 Sidewalks are separated from the road/traffic in my neighborhood by parked cars.2.922.62.482.923.21
3.3 There is a grass/dirt strip that separates the streets from the sidewalks in my neighborhood.3.163.523.563.23.58
4.Surrounding
4.1 There are trees along the streets in my neighborhood.3.363.563.43.363.83
4.2 There are many interesting things to look at while walking in my neighborhood.2.282.521.762.283.00
4.3 There are many attractive natural sights in my neighborhood (such as landscaping, views).2.242.521.842.363.04
4.4 There are attractive buildings/homes in my neighborhood.2.162.481.762.122.83
5.Environment
5.1 Hot temperatures decrease my outdoor activities.2.722.482.122.282.75
5.2 Rainy days decrease my outdoor activities.3.042.522.62.563.13
5.3 Shelter and trees give shade for the sidewalks in my neighborhood.2.883.483.243.123.13
5.4 Shelter protects rainfall for the sidewalks in my neighborhood.2.643.443.23.083.00
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Gou, Z.; Jiang, B.; Qi, Y. Planning Walkable Neighborhoods for “Aging in Place”: Lessons from Five Aging-Friendly Districts in Singapore. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1742. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041742

AMA Style

Tao Y, Zhang W, Gou Z, Jiang B, Qi Y. Planning Walkable Neighborhoods for “Aging in Place”: Lessons from Five Aging-Friendly Districts in Singapore. Sustainability. 2021; 13(4):1742. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041742

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tao, Yiqi, Wei Zhang, Zhonghua Gou, Boya Jiang, and Yi Qi. 2021. "Planning Walkable Neighborhoods for “Aging in Place”: Lessons from Five Aging-Friendly Districts in Singapore" Sustainability 13, no. 4: 1742. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041742

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop