Next Article in Journal
Social Overload and Discontinuance Intention on Facebook: A Comparative Study
Previous Article in Journal
Integrating Education for Sustainable Development Competencies in Teacher Education
Previous Article in Special Issue
What Environmental and Personal Factors Determine the Implementation Intensity of Nature-Based Education in Elementary and Lower-Secondary Schools?
Article

What Is Most Desirable for Nature? An Analysis of Azorean Pupils’ Biodiversity Perspectives When Deciding on Ecological Scenarios

1
Interactive Technologies Institute (ITI/LARSyS), Polo Científico e Tecnológico da Madeira, Caminho da Penteada, piso-2, 9020-105 Funchal, Portugal
2
Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Ambientais e Biológicas, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, Rua Rui Barbosa 710, Cruz das Almas 44380-000, BA, Brazil
3
cE3c—Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes/Azorean Biodiversity Group and University of the Azores, Rua Capitão João d’Ávila, 9700-042 Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Academic Editor: Anna Uitto
Sustainability 2021, 13(22), 12554; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212554
Received: 16 June 2021 / Revised: 5 November 2021 / Accepted: 11 November 2021 / Published: 13 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biodiversity Education for Sustainable Development)
Understanding pupils’ biodiversity perspectives is essential to developing educators’ sensitivity to students’ multi-faceted views of the world, thus increasing teaching effectiveness. In this study, we asked 1528 school pupils in the Azores to choose between alternative schemes in three ecological scenarios and to justify their decisions. The study’s objectives were to understand biodiversity perspectives underlying pupils’ choice of the most desirable schemes for nature and to examine whether gender and school level (middle school/high school) influenced their choices. Quantitative (frequency analysis and Chi-square statistics) and qualitative (thematic analysis) methods were applied for data analysis. The majority of pupils made appropriate choices, arguing from different biodiversity perspectives, which were classified in 10 categories and 24 subcategories. High school pupils did not exhibit significant differences among the main arguments employed, and mostly referred to ecological concepts, while middle school pupils exhibited different choices according to gender, emphasizing richness over the threats posed by introduced species. Biodiversity education should thus be strengthened, especially at the middle school level, where different complex issues would benefit from classroom discussion and systematization. The chosen methodological strategy proved to be effective in assessing pupils’ biodiversity perspectives, which may be useful to deal with other ill-structured problems. View Full-Text
Keywords: ill-structured problem; biodiversity components; pupils’ choices; a posteriori category system; Azores ill-structured problem; biodiversity components; pupils’ choices; a posteriori category system; Azores
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Piasentin, F.; Gabriel, R.; Arroz, A.M.; Silva, A.R.; Amorim, I.R. What Is Most Desirable for Nature? An Analysis of Azorean Pupils’ Biodiversity Perspectives When Deciding on Ecological Scenarios. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12554. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212554

AMA Style

Piasentin F, Gabriel R, Arroz AM, Silva AR, Amorim IR. What Is Most Desirable for Nature? An Analysis of Azorean Pupils’ Biodiversity Perspectives When Deciding on Ecological Scenarios. Sustainability. 2021; 13(22):12554. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212554

Chicago/Turabian Style

Piasentin, Flora, Rosalina Gabriel, Ana M. Arroz, Alexandra R. Silva, and Isabel R. Amorim. 2021. "What Is Most Desirable for Nature? An Analysis of Azorean Pupils’ Biodiversity Perspectives When Deciding on Ecological Scenarios" Sustainability 13, no. 22: 12554. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212554

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop