Next Article in Journal
Comparison of H2S Gas Sensors: A Sensor Management Procedure for Sewer Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
South Korean Public Acceptance of the Fuel Transition from Coal to Natural Gas in Power Generation
 
 
Review

Conceptual Frameworks for Assessing Climate Change Effects on Urban Areas: A Scoping Review

Department of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund University, August-Schmidt-Straße 10, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Adriana Del Borghi
Sustainability 2021, 13(19), 10794; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910794
Received: 30 August 2021 / Revised: 23 September 2021 / Accepted: 23 September 2021 / Published: 28 September 2021
Urban areas are amongst the most adversely affected regions by current and future climate change effects. One issue when it comes to measuring, for example, impacts, vulnerabilities, and resilience in preparation of adaptation action is the abundance of conceptual frameworks and associated definitions. Frequently, those definitions contradict each other and shift over time. Prominently, in the transition from the IPCC AR (International Panel on Climate Change Assessment Report) 4 to the IPCC AR 5, a number of conceptual understandings have changed. By integrating common concepts, the literature review presented intends to thoroughly investigate frameworks applied to assess climate change effects on urban areas, creating an evidence base for research and politically relevant adaptation. Thereby, questions concerning the temporal development of publication activity, the geographical scopes of studies and authors, and the dominant concepts as applied in the studies are addressed. A total of 50 publications is identified following screening titles, abstracts, and full texts successively based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Major findings derived from our literature corpus include a recently rising trend in the number of publications, a focus on Chinese cities, an imbalance in favor of authors from Europe and North America, a dominance of the concept of vulnerability, and a strong influence of the IPCC publications. However, confusion regarding various understandings remains. Future research should focus on mainstreaming and unifying conceptual frameworks and definitions as well as on conducting comparative studies. View Full-Text
Keywords: climate change adaptation; systematic literature review; urban climate; vulnerability assessment climate change adaptation; systematic literature review; urban climate; vulnerability assessment
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Klopfer, F.; Westerholt, R.; Gruehn, D. Conceptual Frameworks for Assessing Climate Change Effects on Urban Areas: A Scoping Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10794. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910794

AMA Style

Klopfer F, Westerholt R, Gruehn D. Conceptual Frameworks for Assessing Climate Change Effects on Urban Areas: A Scoping Review. Sustainability. 2021; 13(19):10794. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910794

Chicago/Turabian Style

Klopfer, Florian, René Westerholt, and Dietwald Gruehn. 2021. "Conceptual Frameworks for Assessing Climate Change Effects on Urban Areas: A Scoping Review" Sustainability 13, no. 19: 10794. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910794

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop