Next Article in Journal
What Factors Affect Commuters’ Utility of Choosing Mobility as a Service? An Empirical Evidence from Seoul
Next Article in Special Issue
Factors Predicting Individuals’ Behavioural Intentions for Choosing Cultural Tourism: A Structural Model
Previous Article in Journal
Are Public Subsidies to Encourage Young Farmers Effective? Case Study of a First-Time Farm Set Up by a Young Female Farmer in the Valencian Region of Spain
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Construction of Placeness in Traditional Handicraft Heritage Sites: A Case Study of Suzhou Embroidery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

From Public Participation to Co-Creation in the Cultural Heritage Management Decision-Making Process

Department of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, North Cyprus via Mersin 10, 99628 Famagusta, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 9321; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169321
Submission received: 22 June 2021 / Revised: 29 July 2021 / Accepted: 14 August 2021 / Published: 19 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development)

Abstract

According to the ongoing discussions of researchers, practitioners, and international legislation, the prioritization of top-down decision-making processes in public participation is questionable due to their ambiguous outcomes in various contexts associated with the management of cultural heritage. The main aim of this paper is to highlight and identify co-creation as a sustainable and significant bottom-up methodology that has a wide range of applications, especially in the domain of Cultural Heritage Management (CHM). It is presented as an alternative to the already existing, less democratic, and passive public participation decision-making processes. Examining the evolution of the terms and the processes, together with the common aspects and differences between public participation and co-creation is another goal of this paper. Based on these aims and goals, after conducting case study analyses in various contexts and comprehensive theoretical reviews of the international charters and ongoing practices associated with both key terms, “public participation” and “co-creation”, this paper introduces results that have the potential to solve the existing problems in public participation models and frameworks and successfully integrate communities into the CHM decision-making process through the implementation of the co-creation methodology.
Keywords: public participation; co-creative methodology; cultural heritage management; sustainable decision making; bottom-up approaches public participation; co-creative methodology; cultural heritage management; sustainable decision making; bottom-up approaches

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grcheva, O.; Oktay Vehbi, B. From Public Participation to Co-Creation in the Cultural Heritage Management Decision-Making Process. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9321. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169321

AMA Style

Grcheva O, Oktay Vehbi B. From Public Participation to Co-Creation in the Cultural Heritage Management Decision-Making Process. Sustainability. 2021; 13(16):9321. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grcheva, Olgica, and Beser Oktay Vehbi. 2021. "From Public Participation to Co-Creation in the Cultural Heritage Management Decision-Making Process" Sustainability 13, no. 16: 9321. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169321

APA Style

Grcheva, O., & Oktay Vehbi, B. (2021). From Public Participation to Co-Creation in the Cultural Heritage Management Decision-Making Process. Sustainability, 13(16), 9321. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169321

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop