Online Sellers’ Reuse Behaviour for Third-Party Logistics Services: An Innovative Model Development and E-Commerce
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development
2.1. SOR Theory
2.2. Reliability
2.3. Satisfaction
2.4. Flexibility
2.5. Reuse Intention
2.6. Price Fairness (Moderator)
2.7. Satisfaction (Mediator)
3. Methodology
Sampling Method
4. Data Analysis
4.1. Common Method Bias
4.2. Measurement Model
4.3. Structural Model
4.4. PLS Predict
5. Discussions and Findings
5.1. Theoretical Implications
5.2. Managerial Implications
5.3. Limitation and Future Research Recommendations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cichosz, M.; Wallenburg, C.M.; Knemeyer, A.M. Digital transformation at logistics service providers: Barriers, success factors and leading practices. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2020, 31, 209–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parvin, M.; Asimiran, S.B.; Ayub, A.F.B.M. Impact of introducing e-commerce on small and medium enterprises—A case on logistics provider. Soc. Bus. Rev. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statistica. Retail E-Commerce Sales Worldwide from 2014 to 2024 (in Billion U.S. Dollars). 2020. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/worldwide-retail-e-commerce-sales/ (accessed on 31 January 2021).
- Businesswire.com. E-Commerce Sales in Asia Pacific to Nearly Double by 2025, Reaching USD 2 Trillion. 2021. Available online: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210524005631/en/E-Commerce-Sales-in-Asia-Pacific-to-Nearly-Double-by-2025-Reaching-USD-2-Trillion (accessed on 24 May 2021).
- Kamal, S.M. Amid Complaints, Pos Malaysia Says Some Issues with “Intermittent System Accessibility” but Tracking Service Fine. Available online: https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/11/07/amid-complaints-pos-malaysia-says-some-issues-with-intermittent-system-acce/1807778 (accessed on 20 January 2021).
- Gidener, N.G.; Deveci, D.A. An Analysis of Service Failures and Recovery Strategies in the Third Party Logistics Service Industry. Trans. Marit. Sci. 2020, 9, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, V.R. As E-Commerce Start to Mature in Asian Market, Retailers Must Rise to a New Challenges. The end of the Beginning of E-Commerce; Asia Pacific Food Industry: Singapore, 2021; pp. 56–57. Available online: https://apfoodonline.com/ebook/AprMay21/html5/index.html?locale=ENG&pn=67&utm_source=APFI+-+FOREIGN&utm_campaign=795274afe2-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2021_04_14_07_17_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_36038dc2f8-795274afe2-10025527 (accessed on 25 May 2021).
- Vu, T.P.; Grant, D.B.; Menachof, D.A. Exploring logistics service quality in Hai Phong, Vietnam. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 2020, 36, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, D.W.; Moori, R.G.; Filho, V.A.V. Logistic service quality as a mediator between logistics capabilities and customer satisfaction. Rev. Gestão 2018, 25, 358–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huma, S.; Ahmed, W.; Ikram, M.; Khawaja, M.I. The effect of logistics service quality on customer loyalty: Case of logistics service industry. South. Asian J. Bus. Stud. 2019, 9, 43–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Yuen, K.F.; Wong, Y.D.; Teo, C.-C. Consumer participation in last-mile logistics service: An investigation on cognitions and affects. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2019, 49, 217–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murfield, M.; Boone, C.A.; Rutner, P.; Thomas, R. Investigating logistics service quality in omni-channel retailing. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2017, 47, 263–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Y.; Xie, G. Determinants of customer perceived online shopping logistics service quality value: An empirical study from China. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2018, 22, 614–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, C.; Sarkis, J. Integrating and extending data and decision tools for sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider selection. Comput. Oper. Res. 2019, 110, 188–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asian, S.; Pool, J.K.; Nazarpour, A.; Tabaeeian, R.A. On the importance of service performance and customer satisfaction in third-party logistics selection. Benchmarking Int. J. 2019, 26, 1550–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jakšič, M.; Budler, M. Environmental-sustainability Aspect in the Outsourcing of Business-logistics Services. In Challenges on the Path toward Sustainability in Europe; Emerald: Somerville, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 147–169. [Google Scholar]
- Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology; MIT Press: Cambridge, UK, 1974; pp. 62–65. [Google Scholar]
- Shah, F.T.; Syed, Z.; Imam, A.; Raza, A. The impact of airline service quality on passengers’ behavioral intentions using passenger satisfaction as a mediator. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2020, 85, 101815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jibril, A.B.; Kwarteng, M.A.; Pilik, M.; Botha, E.; Osakwe, C.N. Towards understanding the initial adoption of online retail stores in a low internet penetration context: An exploratory work in Ghana. Sustainability 2020, 12, 854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xiao, L.; Guo, F.; Yu, F.; Liu, S. The Effects of Online Shopping Context Cues on Consumers’ Purchase Intention for Cross-Border E-Commerce Sustainability. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hung, K.-P.; Peng, N.; Chen, A. Incorporating on-site activity involvement and sense of belonging into the Mehrabian-Russell model—The experiential value of cultural tourism destinations. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2019, 30, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abd Rahman, U.H.; Hafaz Ngah, A.; Gabarre, S. Factors that Influencing Behavioural Towards Voluntourism. Int. J. E-Navig. Maritime Econ. 2019, 12, 32–41. [Google Scholar]
- Luqman, A.; Masood, A.; Weng, Q.; Ali, A.; Rasheed, M.I. Linking Excessive SNS Use, Technological Friction, Strain, and Discontinuance: The Moderating Role of Guilt. Inf. Syst. Manag. 2020, 37, 94–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baghozzi, R.P. Principles of Marketing Management; Science Research Associates, Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, J.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y. Key success factors for the launch of government social media platform: Identifying the formation mechanism of continuance intention. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 55, 750–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngah, A.H.; Kim, H.D.; Hanafiah, R.M.; Salleh, N.H.M.; Jeevan, N.S.J.; Asri, N.M. Willingness to pay for Halal transportation cost: The Stimulus-organism-response model. Int. J. E-Navig. Maritime Eco. 2019, 12, 11–21. [Google Scholar]
- Othman, A.K.; Hamzah, M.I.; Abu Hassan, L.F. Modeling the contingent role of technological optimism on customer satisfaction with self-service technologies. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2020, 33, 559–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parasuraman, A.; Zeithml, V.A.; Berry, L.L. SERVQUAL: A Multi-Item Scale for Measuring Customer Perceptions of Service Quality; Report No. 86-108; Marketing Science Institute: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Zeithaml, V.A.; Parasuraman, A.; Malhorta, A. Service quality delivery through web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge. J. Acade. Mark. Sci. 2002, 30, 362–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nonthapot, S.; Nasoontorn, A. The effect of the service quality on passengers’ satisfaction. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2020, 10, 3717–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer; M.E. Sharpe: Armonk, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Han, H.; Lho, L.; Raposo, A.; Radic, A.; Ngah, A. Halal Food Performance and Its Influence on Patron Retention Process at Tourism Destination. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ngah, A.; Rahimi, A.; Gabarre, S.; Araya-Castillo, L.; Ariza-Montes, A.; Han, H. Fostering Voluntourism Satisfaction and Future Behaviour in Island Destinations. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alalwan, A. Mobile food ordering apps: An empirical study of the factors affecting customer e-satisfaction and continued intention to reuse. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 50, 28–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Vonderembse, M.A.; Lim, J.-S. Value chain flexibility: A dichotomy of competence and capability. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2002, 40, 561–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, S.; Chen, C.-W.; Kuo, Y.-T. Flexibility, collaboration and relationship quality in the logistics service industry. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2018, 30, 555–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chavez, R.; Yu, W.; Jacobs, M.; Feng, M. Data-driven supply chains, manufacturing capability and customer satisfaction. Prod. Plan. Control. 2017, 28, 906–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yu, K.; Cadeaux, J.; Song, H. Flexibility and quality in logistics and relationships. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2017, 62, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, I.E.; De Grahl, A. The Flexibility of Logistics Service Providers and its Impact on Customer Loyalty—An Empirical Study. In Success Factors in Logistics Outsourcing; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 7–51. [Google Scholar]
- Malhotra, N.; Sahadev, S.; Purani, K. Psychological contract violation and customer intention to reuse online retailers: Exploring mediating and moderating mechanisms. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 75, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Konuk, F.A. The influence of perceived food quality, price fairness, perceived value and satisfaction on customers’ revisit and word-of-mouth intentions towards organic food restaurants. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 50, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.; Luo, J.; Cai, S.; Ma, S.; Rong, K. Exploring the service quality in the e-commerce context: A triadic view. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016, 116, 388–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homburg, C.; Koschate, N.; Hoyer, W.D. Institut für Marktorientierte Unternehmensführung Do Satisfied Customers Really Pay More? A Study of the Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay. J. Mark. 2005, 69, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, D.N.; Nguyen, H.T.; Truong, P.H. Port logistics service quality and customer satisfaction: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 2020, 36, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sorkun, M.F.; Hüseyinoğlu, I.Ö.Y.; Börühan, G. Omni-channel capability and customer satisfaction: Mediating roles of flexibility and operational logistics service quality. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2020, 48, 629–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Brown, S.; Hoehle, H. Understanding technology adoption in the household context: A comparison of seven. Euro. Conf. Info. Syst. 2012, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- MacKenzie, S.B.; Podsakoff, P.M. Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies. J. Retail. 2012, 88, 542–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngah, A.H.; Gabarre, S.; Eneizan, B.; Asri, N. Mediated and moderated model of the willingness to pay for halal transportation. J. Islam. Mark. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.; Hollingsworth, C.L.; Randolph, A.B.; Chong, A.Y.L. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017, 117, 442–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Plan. 2013, 46, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngah, A.H.; Thurasamy, R.; Aziz, N.A.; Ali, H.; Khan, M.I. Modelling the adoption of halal warehousing services among halal pharmaceutical and cosmetic manufacturers. J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 2019, 14, 103–116. [Google Scholar]
- Kock, N. Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. Int. J. e-Collab. 2015, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Franke, G.; Sarstedt, M. Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Res. 2019, 29, 430–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngah, A.H.; Ramayah, T.; Ali, M.H.; Khan, M.I. Halal transportation adoption among pharmaceuticals and comestics manufacturers. J. Islam. Mark. 2019, 11, 1619–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diamantopoulos, A.; Siguaw, J.A. Formative Versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration. Br. J. Manag. 2006, 17, 263–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preacher, K.J.; Hayes, A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 2008, 40, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shmueli, G.; Sarstedt, M.; Hair, J.F.; Cheah, J.-H.; Ting, H.; Vaithilingam, S.; Ringle, C.M. Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. Eur. J. Mark. 2019, 53, 2322–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tontini, G.; Söilen, K.S.; Zanchett, R. Nonlinear antecedents of customer satisfaction and loyalty in third-party logistics services (3PL). Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2017, 29, 1116–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, C.; Palvia, P.; Chen, J.-L. Information technology adoption behavior life cycle: Toward a Technology Continuance Theory (TCT). Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2009, 29, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seiders, K.; Voss, G.B.; Grewal, D.; Godfrey, A.L. Do Satisfied Customers Buy More? Examining Moderating Influences in a Retailing Context. J. Mark. 2005, 69, 26–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Flexibility | Price Fairness | RI | Reliability | SATIS |
---|---|---|---|---|
2.565 | 1.841 | 1.879 | 2.221 | 1.819 |
Construct | Item | Loading | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|
Satisfaction (SATIS) | Our company is content in doing business with the current logistics provider. | 0.931 | 0.947 | 0.856 |
Our decision to do business with the current logistics provider was a wise decision. | 0.939 | |||
Our company is satisfied with the performance of the current logistics provider. | 0.904 | |||
Flexibility | The current logistics provider is flexible enough to handle unforeseen problems while handling our products. | 0.822 | 0.830 | 0.556 |
The current logistics provider handles changes well while handling our products. | 0.754 | |||
The current logistics provider can readily adjust their services in accordance with our changing needs. | 0.556 | |||
The current logistics provider is flexible in response to requests our company makes. | 0.819 | |||
Price Fairness | The price of our current logistic services is reasonable. | 0.799 | 0.823 | 0.611 |
The current logistic provider’s price is fair. | 0.670 | |||
The current logistic provider’s price is acceptable. | 0.864 | |||
Reuse Intention (RI) | Our company intends to continue using the current logistics provider in the future. | 0.921 | 0.936 | 0.829 |
Our company will always try to use the current logistics provider in our business. | 0.894 | |||
Our company plans to continue to use current logistics provider services frequently. | 0.916 | |||
Reliability | The current logistics provider always performs the logistics services that are promised. | 0.843 | 0.887 | 0.612 |
The current logistics provider provides genuine concern for addressing any problems. | 0.724 | |||
The current logistics provider is reliable. | 0.795 | |||
The current logistics provider provides the right services at the right time as promised. | 0.811 | |||
The current logistics provider does not make any significant mistakes. | 0.732 |
Construct | Flexibility | Price Fairness | RI | Reliability | SATIS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flexibility | |||||
Price Fairness | 0.739 | ||||
RI | 0.584 | 0.650 | |||
Reliability | 0.788 | 0.357 | 0.621 | ||
SATIS | 0.713 | 0.327 | 0.501 | 0.662 |
Relationship | Beta | Se | T-Value | p-Value | LL | UL | f2 | R2 | VIF | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | Reliability → SATIS | 0.358 | 0.061 | 5.862 | 0.001 | 0.247 | 0.447 | 0.129 | 0.435 | 1.754 |
H2 | Flexibility → SATIS | 0.366 | 0.074 | 4.928 | 0.001 | 0.234 | 0.480 | 0.135 | - | 1.754 |
H3 | Flexibility → RI | 0.036 | 0.138 | 0.265 | 0.396 | −0.159 | 0.299 | - | 0.489 | 2.093 |
H4 | SATIS → RI | 0.328 | 0.096 | 3.410 | 0.001 | 0.179 | 0.476 | 0.131 | - | 1.602 |
H | Relationship | Beta | Se | T-Value | p-Value | LL | UL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H5 | Satis × PF → RI | 0.196 | 0.090 | 2.186 | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.295 |
H6 | Reliability → SATIS → RI | 0.117 | 0.043 | 2.736 | 0.006 | 0.061 | 0.194 |
H7 | Flexibility → SATIS → RI | 0.120 | 0.054 | 2.238 | 0.026 | 0.048 | 0.229 |
Item | PLS RMSE | LM RMSE | PLS-LM | Q2_Predict |
---|---|---|---|---|
RI1 | 1.073 | 1.036 | 0.037 | 0.34 |
RI2 | 0.966 | 0.989 | −0.023 | 0.349 |
RI3 | 1.087 | 1.035 | 0.052 | 0.341 |
CS1 | 0.9 | 1.242 | −0.342 | 0.458 |
CS3 | 0.998 | 1.208 | −0.21 | 0.27 |
CS2 | 0.942 | 1.19 | −0.248 | 0.321 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ngah, A.H.; Anuar, M.M.; Rozar, N.N.; Ariza-Montes, A.; Araya-Castillo, L.; Kim, J.J.; Han, H. Online Sellers’ Reuse Behaviour for Third-Party Logistics Services: An Innovative Model Development and E-Commerce. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147679
Ngah AH, Anuar MM, Rozar NN, Ariza-Montes A, Araya-Castillo L, Kim JJ, Han H. Online Sellers’ Reuse Behaviour for Third-Party Logistics Services: An Innovative Model Development and E-Commerce. Sustainability. 2021; 13(14):7679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147679
Chicago/Turabian StyleNgah, Abdul Hafaz, Marhana Mohamed Anuar, NorLinda Nohd Rozar, Antonio Ariza-Montes, Luis Araya-Castillo, Jinkyung Jenny Kim, and Heesup Han. 2021. "Online Sellers’ Reuse Behaviour for Third-Party Logistics Services: An Innovative Model Development and E-Commerce" Sustainability 13, no. 14: 7679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147679
APA StyleNgah, A. H., Anuar, M. M., Rozar, N. N., Ariza-Montes, A., Araya-Castillo, L., Kim, J. J., & Han, H. (2021). Online Sellers’ Reuse Behaviour for Third-Party Logistics Services: An Innovative Model Development and E-Commerce. Sustainability, 13(14), 7679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147679