Next Article in Journal
Estimating the Preservation Value of Wuyishan National Park from the Perspective of Bounded Rational Decision Making
Previous Article in Journal
Inventory of Locations of Old Mining Works Using LiDAR Data: A Case Study in Slovakia
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Assessing the Impact of Nonprofit Organizations on Multi-Actor Global Governance Initiatives: The Case of the UN Global Compact

Sustainability 2021, 13(13), 6982; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13136982
by Alice Hengevoss
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2021, 13(13), 6982; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13136982
Submission received: 27 May 2021 / Revised: 18 June 2021 / Accepted: 21 June 2021 / Published: 22 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper deals with a very interesting topic and is well constructed. The methodology is adequate and the authors built the tables very well.
However, the paper has one major weakness. The results are explained too succinctly and there is no adequate discussion.

Good luck to the authors. 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Methodology:

Why the author chose to use panel data technique (a detailed rationale is required). Aren't there any other explanatory factors except NPO engagement?  How to confirm validity of analysis with this much low coefficient of determination?  

Result:

The result section presents only statistical output of analysis, which is not sufficient. I suggest author to go for detailed discussion of the result, highlighting the theoretical and empirical support for the presented results. More citations and references are required in this section. 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Author 

Thanks for your hard work on this topic. However, I have two major concerns about your research.

1- What is the main contribution of your study? Need to update in the introduction section. 

2- Please update literature with recent references

3- What is your hypothesis, i suggest to include after literature review

4. I did not see the theoretical contribution. Which theory related with your study?

5. Finding must be discussed with theoretical background.

6. In the last section also need to write the conclusion. 

Good Luck. 

 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Author

I have no further comment. Congratulations

Regards

SAFDAR

Back to TopTop