Next Article in Journal
Factors Shaping the Recycling Systems for Plastic Packaging Waste—A Comparison between Austria, Germany and The Netherlands
Previous Article in Journal
Inactivation of Algae and Plankton by Ultrasonic Cavitation
 
 
Article

When Bad Becomes Worse: Unethical Corporate Behavior May Hamper Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat

Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Ou Wang
Sustainability 2021, 13(12), 6770; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126770
Received: 28 April 2021 / Revised: 4 June 2021 / Accepted: 7 June 2021 / Published: 15 June 2021
Cultured meat is an emerging food innovation that promises to be a more sustainable alternative to conventional meat. However, despite its potential health, environmental and animal welfare benefits, research suggests that consumer acceptance of cultured meat is not assured. Across two pre-registered experimental studies (N = 456), this article investigates the extent to which two different credence characteristics, namely corporate social responsibility (Study 1) and food safety (Study 2), lead to halo-based inferences that may affect the consumer acceptance of cultured meat. Results indicate that, whereas the halo effect of positive corporate behavior is negligible, negative corporate behavior yields a substantial negative halo effect on consumers’ attitudes towards cultured meat, which in turn decreases acceptance of cultured meat. Findings also reveal that these negative halo-based inferences are heightened among consumers who value highly corporate social responsibility (Study 1) and food safety (Study 2). Overall, this article reveals an asymmetric halo effect by showing that people tend to react strongly to negative, but not to positive, information about a cultured meat company. The implications of the present research are discussed in the conclusion. View Full-Text
Keywords: consumer acceptance; credence characteristics; cultured meat; halo effects; sustainability; corporate behavior consumer acceptance; credence characteristics; cultured meat; halo effects; sustainability; corporate behavior
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Rabl, V.A.; Basso, F. When Bad Becomes Worse: Unethical Corporate Behavior May Hamper Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126770

AMA Style

Rabl VA, Basso F. When Bad Becomes Worse: Unethical Corporate Behavior May Hamper Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat. Sustainability. 2021; 13(12):6770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126770

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rabl, Vincent A., and Frédéric Basso. 2021. "When Bad Becomes Worse: Unethical Corporate Behavior May Hamper Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat" Sustainability 13, no. 12: 6770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126770

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop