Next Article in Journal
Environmental Regulation Intensity, Foreign Direct Investment, and Green Technology Spillover—An Empirical Study
Previous Article in Journal
Telecoupled Sustainable Livelihoods in an Era of Rural–Urban Dynamics: The Case of China
Article Menu
Issue 9 (May-1) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

A Data-Driven Approach to Development of a Taxonomy Framework for Triple Bottom Line Metrics

1
Human Technology Group, Department of Electromechanical Engineering and Centre for Mechanical and Aerospace Science and Technology, Universidade da Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
2
Department of Computer Science and Cloud Computing Competence Centre, Universidade da Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
3
Human Factors and Ergonomics Group, Department of Supply Chain and Operations Management, School of Engineering, Jönköping University, 55111 Jönköping, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(9), 2717; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092717
Received: 8 February 2019 / Revised: 12 April 2019 / Accepted: 7 May 2019 / Published: 13 May 2019
  |  
PDF [4731 KB, uploaded 14 May 2019]
  |  

Abstract

This paper proposes a data-driven approach to develop a taxonomy in a data structure on list for triple bottom line (TBL) metrics. The approach is built from the authors reflection on the subject and review of the literature about TBL. The envisaged taxonomy framework grid to be developed through this approach will enable existing metrics to be classified, grouped, and standardized, as well as detect the need for further metrics development in uncovered domains and applications. The approach reported aims at developing a taxonomy structure that can be seen as a bi-dimensional table focusing on feature interrogations and characterizing answers, which will be the basis on which the taxonomy can then be developed. The interrogations column is designed as the stack of the TBL metrics features: What type of metric is it (qualitative, quantitative, or hybrid)? What is the level of complexity of the problems where it is used? What standards does it follow? How is the measurement made, and what are the techniques that it uses? In what kinds of problems, subjects, and domains is the metric used? How is the metric validated? What is the method used in its calculation? The column of characterizing answers results from a categorization of the range of types of answers to the feature interrogations. The approach reported in this paper is based on a screening tool that searches and analyzes information both within abstracts and full-text journal papers. The vision for this future taxonomy is that it will enable locating for any specific context, discern what TBL metrics are used in that context or similar contexts, or whether there is a lack of developed metrics. This meta knowledge will enable a conscious decision to be made between creating a new metric or using one of those that already exists. In this latter case, it would also make it possible to choose, among several metrics, the one that is most appropriate to the context at hand. In addition, this future framework will ease new future literature revisions, when these are viewed as updates of this envisaged taxonomy. This would allow creating a dynamic taxonomy for TBL metrics. This paper presents a computational approach to develop such taxonomy, and reports on the initial steps taken in that direction, by creating a taxonomy framework grid with a computational approach. View Full-Text
Keywords: screening tool; initial development; metrics; framework screening tool; initial development; metrics; framework
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Vieira, F.L.; Vieira, P.A.; Coelho, D.A. A Data-Driven Approach to Development of a Taxonomy Framework for Triple Bottom Line Metrics. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2717.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top