Next Article in Journal
The Role of Hydrogen in the Ecological Benefits of Ultra Low Sulphur Diesel Production and Use: An LCA Benchmark
Next Article in Special Issue
VisualUVAM: A Decision Support System Addressing the Curse of Dimensionality for the Multi-Scale Assessment of Urban Vulnerability in Spain
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Risk Avoidance and Coordination of Supply Chain Subject Based on Blockchain Technology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Key Factors in the Success of Eco-Communities in Taiwan’s Countryside: The Role of Government, Partner, and Community Group
Article

An Integrated Indicator System and Evaluation Model for Regional Sustainable Development

1
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
2
School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
3
School of Architecture and Built Environment, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(7), 2183; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072183
Received: 13 March 2019 / Revised: 2 April 2019 / Accepted: 4 April 2019 / Published: 11 April 2019
Regional sustainable development has become a worldwide issue in recent years, but there is no single and universally agreed method of choosing indicators for sustainable development assessment. The subjective selection of indicators will affect the results of assessment. Each evaluation method has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the methods used to determine indicator weight also differ. Regional sustainable development is a complex system, which is difficult to evaluate objectively and scientifically using a single method. Therefore, a new integrated indicator system and evaluation model is constructed here to more accurately reflect regional sustainable development level. The indicator system and evaluation model were constructed using a case study of 17 cities in Shandong Province, China. The indicator system includes 4 subsystems, i.e., economy, society, resource, and environment. These indicators were selected through correlation analysis and discrimination analysis. A back propagation neural network was applied to evaluate the respective scores of the 4 subsystems. The comprehensive score for regional sustainable development was evaluated using the analytic hierarchy process with entropy correction. The results show that sustainable development levels in these 17 cities show a gradually decreasing trend from east to west and from coast to inland. Cities with an underdeveloped economy usually display poor levels of social development and serious environmental pollution. Through the improvement of indicator screening, evaluation model, and result correction, the error caused by a single evaluation method can be reduced significantly. This new methodology for indicator selection and comprehensive evaluation provides a new perspective for the assessment of regional sustainable development. View Full-Text
Keywords: regional sustainable development; evaluation; indicator system; back propagation artificial neural network; entropy correction regional sustainable development; evaluation; indicator system; back propagation artificial neural network; entropy correction
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, Y.; Ge, X.; Yuan, X.; Wang, Q.; Kellett, J.; Li, F.; Ba, K. An Integrated Indicator System and Evaluation Model for Regional Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2183. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072183

AMA Style

Shi Y, Ge X, Yuan X, Wang Q, Kellett J, Li F, Ba K. An Integrated Indicator System and Evaluation Model for Regional Sustainable Development. Sustainability. 2019; 11(7):2183. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072183

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Yifei, Xinghang Ge, Xueliang Yuan, Qingsong Wang, Jon Kellett, Fangqiu Li, and Kaiming Ba. 2019. "An Integrated Indicator System and Evaluation Model for Regional Sustainable Development" Sustainability 11, no. 7: 2183. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072183

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop