Next Article in Journal
Influent Forecasting for Wastewater Treatment Plants in North America
Next Article in Special Issue
A Path Transition Towards a Bioeconomy—The Crucial Role of Sustainability
Previous Article in Journal
When Is an Innovative Urban Mobility Business Model Sustainable? A Literature Review and Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stakeholders’ Interests and Perceptions of Bioeconomy Monitoring Using a Sustainable Development Goal Framework
Open AccessReview

Straw Utilization in China—Status and Recommendations

by 1, 1 and 2,*
1
School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 15 East Road of North Third Ring, Beijing 100029, China
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Ave., Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(6), 1762; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061762
Received: 31 January 2019 / Revised: 14 March 2019 / Accepted: 19 March 2019 / Published: 23 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Bioeconomy)
As the world’s largest grain producer, China’s straw yield was 700 million tonnes in 2014. With a national utilization rate of 80% in 2015, there is still a large amount of straw burned in open-field, resulting in air pollution and a reduction in the quantity available as a source of bioenergy. This paper conducts a literature review of success stories and major challenges in comprehensive straw utilization in and out of China. It is noted that nationwide long-term feasible and sustainable straw utilization at a high rate is a highly complex operation, involving most societal sectors, many people and facilities often at different regions. Scenarios were analyzed to estimate the energy potential and air emission reductions China would accomplish in 2020 by converting an additional 5 or 10% of straw-yield to biofuel. Currently, the approach to control straw burning in China is primarily administrative, relying heavily on prohibition and penalties, inconsistent across policy areas and geography, and lacking in long-term planning. Consequently, the effectiveness of the current approach is limited. The main cause of burning is a lack of infrastructure, effective preventive measures, and viable alternatives. Recommendations aimed at promoting a circular bio-economy around using crop straw as resources were provided, including improving straw utilization rates and reducing open-field burning. View Full-Text
Keywords: straw; agriculture residues; biomass; bioenergy; bio-economy; circular economy; China straw; agriculture residues; biomass; bioenergy; bio-economy; circular economy; China
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, J.; Yu, P.; Xu, X. Straw Utilization in China—Status and Recommendations. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1762.

AMA Style

Ren J, Yu P, Xu X. Straw Utilization in China—Status and Recommendations. Sustainability. 2019; 11(6):1762.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Jiqin; Yu, Peixian; Xu, Xiaohong. 2019. "Straw Utilization in China—Status and Recommendations" Sustainability 11, no. 6: 1762.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop