Next Article in Journal
Insufficient Consumption Demand of Chinese Urban Residents: An Explanation of the Consumption Structure Effect from Income Distribution Change
Previous Article in Journal
Supporting Sustainable Maintenance of Substations under Cyber-Threats: An Evaluation Method of Cybersecurity Risk for Power CPS
Article Menu
Issue 4 (February-2) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2019, 11(4), 983; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040983

Entering and Exiting: Productivity Evolution of Energy Supply in China

1
Economic and Technological Research Institute, State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Corporation of China, Hangzhou 310008, China
2
Harvard-China Project, John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
3
School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
4
Birmingham Centre for Energy Storage & School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
5
School of Economics & Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
6
Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 28 December 2018 / Revised: 8 February 2019 / Accepted: 11 February 2019 / Published: 14 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Economic, Business and Management Aspects of Sustainability)
Full-Text   |   PDF [2071 KB, uploaded 14 February 2019]   |  

Abstract

The continuous entry of new firms and exit of old ones might have substantial effects on productivity of energy supply. Since China is the world’s largest energy producer, productivity of energy supply in China is a significant issue, which affects sustainability. As a technical application, this paper investigates the productivity and dynamic changes of Chinese coal mining firms. We find that the total factor productivity (TFP) growth of coal supply in China is largely lagging behind the growth rate of coal production. The entry and exit of non-state-owned enterprise (non-SOE) partially provide explanation for the dynamic change of aggregate TFP. Specifically, non-state owned entrants induced by the coal price boom after 2003, which had negative effects on TFP of energy supply, while the exit of non-SOEs had positive effects. Furthermore, there is regional heterogeneity concerning the effects of entry and exit on energy supply productivity. More entrants induced by coal price boom are concentrated in non-main production region (non-MPR), while more exits are located in MPR due to the government’s enforcement. This provides explanation for the phenomena that productivity of energy supply in MPR gradually surpasses that in non-MPR. We also anticipate our paper to enhance understanding on the energy supply-side, which might further help us make informed decisions on energy planning and environmental policies. View Full-Text
Keywords: productivity; entry and exit; energy supply; China productivity; entry and exit; energy supply; China
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, L.; Li, J.; Dan, Y.; Xie, C.; Long, H.; Liu, H. Entering and Exiting: Productivity Evolution of Energy Supply in China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 983.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top