Sustainable BIM-Based Construction Engineering Education Curriculum for Practice-Oriented Training
Abstract
:1. Introductions
2. Methodology
- Product model: behavioral objectives model, interested in products of curriculum (e.g., Tyler and Bloom model)
- Process model: focus on teacher activities and roles, student activities, emphasis on means rather than ends (e.g., Stenhouse)
3. Systematic Development of the BIM-Based Construction Engineering Education Curriculum to Develop Problem-Solving Talent
3.1. Preparation Stage of BIM Curriculum Development
- Goals, advantages, and obstacles in BIM implementation for the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry
- Purpose of BIM education for the construction industry
- Status, limitation, and problems of BIM education in existing construction programs
- Difference of importance of BIM skills and knowledge between original construction tasks and BIM-based new tasks, as well as importance of new BIM-based construction engineering curriculum
- The relationship between BIM and construction engineering tasks in companies
- Areas of BIM implementation in the construction industry and in companies, as well as BIM knowledge and skills required for new employees
- Other fields that converge with BIM, such as smart construction technologies
- Importance of knowledge and theories of BIM-based construction engineering and management
- Priority of BIM education in companies
3.2. Development Stage of BIM Curriculum Development: Overview
3.3. Development Stage of BIM Curriculum Development: Setting the Learning Goals
3.4. Development Stage of BIM Curriculum Development: Choosing Learning Topics
3.5. Development Stage of BIM Curriculum Development: Organizing Learning Topics
- The curriculum should be aimed at cultivating the capabilities necessary for employability in a construction company, which can be quantitatively evaluated by the company. Upon completion of the curriculum, the students should be equipped to such a level that they can immediately work on actual tasks within a company.
- The newly-established department has a three-year course. After one year of full-time study, two years of contract employment and part-time study are mandatory so that the subjects reflect the student’s capabilities.
- It should reflect the current trends in Korea’s construction industry and the BIM response strategies of construction companies.
- Learning topics and contents should be directly related to goals and objectives, and subjects should be organized to reflect theories and practices.
- Subjects based on learning topics should be organized according to the three-year course procedure, making it easy for students to understand and develop their competence levels.
- Construct curriculum contents that reflect all the learning goals, objectives, and topics, which are established during the development stage (Section 3.3, Section 3.4 and Section 3.5). Since the final purpose of this research was to apply the proposed curriculum directly to the newly opened departments, several brainstorm meetings and discussions were held to organize the curriculum contents with school officials and industry experts. The curriculum table was completed in consideration of the subjects students must take in each semester, difficulty level of each grade, and appropriateness of the curriculum arrangement. The curriculum of major institutes such as Associated General Contractors of America (AGC) and American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) were also studied. Subject syllabuses of universities in Korea, education contents of private organizations, papers on BIM technology research and education, and cases of BIM implementation in construction companies were considered. By selecting subjects appropriate for the three-year course, the students participating in the curriculum could acquire in-depth knowledge of the BIM technology and gain substantial construction engineering and construction management understanding. In addition, to maximize achievement of the learning objectives for each subject, the subject operation method (in other words, the lecture method) was selected and presented [44].
3.6. Improvement Stage of BIM Curriculum Development
- Assessment of the overall framework of the proposed BIM-based construction engineering curriculum;
- Learning goals and objectives;
- Assessment of the relevance of learning topics and their association with learning goals and objectives;
- Assessment of the subject, procedure, and lecture method of the curriculum organization table.
4. Implementation Stage of BIM Curriculum Development
5. Summaries and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zwikael, O.; Cohen, Y.; Sadeh, A. Non-delay scheduling as a managerial approach for managing projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2006, 24, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mu, S.; Cheng, H.; Chohr, M.; Peng, W. Assessing risk management capability of contractors in subway projects in mainland China. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2014, 32, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasun, N.; Janaka, Y. Carpentry workers issues and efficiencies related to construction productivity in commercial construction projects in Alberta. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2006, 33, 1075–1089. [Google Scholar]
- Han, Z.; Froese, T. Project Information Management in Mega Oil Sands Projects, Building a Sustainable Future. In Proceedings of the 2009 Construction Research Congress, Seattle, WA, USA, 5–7 April 2009; pp. 5–7. [Google Scholar]
- John, E.; Rodney, T.; Ralf, M. Maximizing strategic value from megaprojects: The influence of information-feed on decision-making by the project manager. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2012, 30, 639–651. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
- Wing, Z.; Lieyun, D.; Xiangyu, W.; Martijn, T.; Hanbin, L. Applicability of 4D modeling for resource allocation in mega liquefied natural gas plant construction. Autom. Constr. 2015, 50, 50–63. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.S.; Kim, B.; Ahn, Y.H. Building Information Modeling (BIM) Technology Education for the Needs of Industry in Developing Countries. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 2019, 359, 126–141. [Google Scholar]
- Sacks, R.; Eastman, C.M.; Lee, G. Parametric 3D modeling in building construction with examples from precast concrete. Automat. Constr. 2004, 13, 291–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eastman, C.M.; Teicholz, P.; Sacks, R.; Liston, K. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Architects, Engineers, Contractors, and Fabricators; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Ahn, Y.H.; Cho, C.S.; Lee, N.H. Building Information Modeling: Systematic course development for undergraduate construction students. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2013, 149, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Associated General Contractors of America (AGC). The Contractors’ Guide to BIM; AGC publication: Arlington, VA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Azhar, S. Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 2011, 11, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azhar, S.; Hein, M.; Sketo, B. Building information modeling (BIM): Benefits, risks and challenges. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Associated Schools of Construction, Windsor, CO, USA, 6–9 April 2008; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Barlish, K.; Sullivan, K. How to measure the benefits of BIM—A case study approach. Automat. Constr. 2012, 24, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooperative Research Center for Construction Innovation. Adopting BIM for Facilities Management: Solutions for Managing the Sydney Opera House; PANDORA electronic collection: Brisbane, Australia, 2007.
- Gu, N.; London, K. Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Automat. Constr. 2010, 19, 988–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hergunsel, M.F. Benefits of Building Information Modeling for Construction Managers. Masters’ Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.J.; Zhang, J.P.; Chau, K.W.; Anson, M. 4D dynamic management for construction planning and resource utilization. Automat. Constr. 2004, 13, 575–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Galiano-Garrigós, A.; García-Figueroa, A.; Rizo-Maestre, C.; González-Avilés, Á. Evaluation of BIM energy performance and CO2 emissions assessment tools: A case study in warm weather. Build. Inf. 2019, 47, 787–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Autodesk White Paper. Improving Building Industry Results through Integrated Project Delivery and Building Information Modeling. 2008. Available online: https://damassets.autodesk.net/ content/dam/autodesk/files/bim_and_ipd_whitepaper.pdf (accessed on 14 August 2019).
- Kent, D.C.; Becerik-Gerber, B. Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2010, 136, 815–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sacks, R.; Barak, R. Teaching building information modeling as an integral part of freshman year civil engineering education. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2010, 136, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, K.A.; Wong, K.F.; Nadeem, A. Building information modelling for tertiary construction education in Hong Kong. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2011, 16, 467–476. [Google Scholar]
- Becerik-Gerber, B.; Gerber, D.J.; Ku, K. The pace of technological innovation in architectural, engineering, and construction education: Integrating recent trends into the curricula. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2011, 16, 411–431. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, C.; Jiang, S.; Skibniewski, M.J.; Man, Q.; Shen, L. A literature review of the factors limiting the application of BIM in the construction industry. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2017, 23, 764–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samad, M.E.S.; Steven, R.D. Construction technology adoption cube: An investigation on process, factors, barriers, drivers and decision makers using NVivo and AHP analysis. Buildings 2018, 8, 74. [Google Scholar]
- Cook, C. Scaling the building information mountain. AEC Mag. 2004, 17. [Google Scholar]
- Harmann, T.; Fischer, M. Applications of BIM and Hurdles for Widespread Adoption of BIM; 2007 AISC-ACCL eConstruction Roundtable Event Rep.; Stanford Univ.: Stanford, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Goodrum, P.M.; Zhai, D.; Yasin, M.F. Relationship between changes in material technology and construction productivity. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2009, 135, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sardroud, J. Perceptions of automated data collection technology use in the construction industry. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2014, 21, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skibniewski, M.J. Information technology applications in construction safety assurance. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2014, 20, 778–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samad, M.E.S.; Martin, L.; Steven, R.D. Conceptualising information and equipment technology adoption in construction: A critical review of existing research. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2016, 23, 158–176. [Google Scholar]
- Samad, M.E.S.; Steven, R.D.; Heng, L.; Xianrui, L. Modeling the implementation process for new construction technologies: Thematic analysis based on Australian and US practices. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 05018005. [Google Scholar]
- Lai, K.S.; Yusof, N.A.; Kamal, E.M. Innovation orientation in architectural firms. Constr. Innov. 2016, 16, 425–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samad, M.E.S.; Steven, R.D.; Martin, L. Dissemination practices of construction sites’ technology vendors in technology exhibitions. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 04018038. [Google Scholar]
- Benner, J.; McArthur, J.J. Data-Driven Design as a Vehicle for BIM and Sustainability Education. Buildings 2019, 9, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olatunji, O.A. Promoting student commitment to BIM in construction education. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2019, 26, 1240–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donaldson, J. The Maker Movement and the Rebirth of Constructionism. Hybrid Pedag. 2014. Available online: https://hybridpedagogy.org/constructionism-reborn/ (accessed on 21 October 2019).
- Ahn, Y.H.; Pearce, A.R.; Kwon, H.S.; Wells, J. The systematic course development process: Building a course in sustainable construction for students in the USA. J. Green Build. 2009, 4, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Neill, G. Overview of Curriculum Models. 2010. Available online: https://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/UCDTLP00631.pdf (accessed on 14 August 2019).
- Neary, M. Curriculum Concepts and Research; Nelson Thornes: Cheltenham, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Ornstein, A.; Hunkins, F. Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues; Allyn and Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Tyler, R.W. Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1949. [Google Scholar]
- McKimm, J. Curriculum Design and Development. Available online: https://faculty.londondeanery.ac.uk/e-learning/setting-learning-objectives/Curriculum_design_and_development.pdf (accessed on 11 August 2019).
- Bloom, B.S.; David, R.K. Taxonomy of Education Objectives: The Classification of Education Goals; Longmans: New York, NY, USA, 1956. [Google Scholar]
- Oliva, P.F. Developing the Curriculum; Little, Brown and Company: Boston, MA, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
Institute | Curriculum | Course Description |
---|---|---|
University A | BIM-based construction information management |
|
University B | BIM and IPD (Integrated Project Delivery) |
|
University C | Construction technologies |
|
Institute A | BIM expert training course |
|
Institute B | BIM expert Training course |
|
Institute C | Beginner course |
|
Manager course |
| |
Expert course |
|
Learning Goals | No. | Learning Objectives | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Understand the BIM knowledge (concept and theories) | 1 2 3 |
| Cognitive Cognitive Cognitive |
Understand and implement BIM in construction processes | 4 | - BIM implementation methodologies and strategies | Cognitive |
5 | - Identify the BIM implementation areas in the construction process | Cognitive | |
BIM-based design (architecture, structure, MEP, etc.) Design quality control using clash detection between disciplines BIM-based quantity take-off and cost estimation Documentation for design phase Scheduling and sequence planning Constructability review using construction BIM model and 4D simulation Visualization and communication Spatial trade coordination BIM-based field layout management and construction management Building safety and quality management using BIM and as-built model Documentation for construction phase | |||
6 | - Distinguish importance and stakeholders’ roles in BIM application | Cognitive | |
Become familiar with BIM software | 7 8 |
| Psychomotor Cognitive and Psychomotor |
Expand the BIM skills into BIM-related software and construction engineering | 9 10 11 12 13 |
| Psychomotor Psychomotor Cognitive Affective Psychomotor |
Become practical BIM professional for industry | 14 15 16 |
| Affective Affective Cognitive |
Learning Topics | Subtopic | Related Objectives | Learning Period (Year) |
---|---|---|---|
Background knowledge of BIM |
| 1, 3, 6, 2, 3, 8 1, 3, 5 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 | 1 1 1 1, 2, 3 |
BIM adoption in construction Industry |
| 3, 4, 5, 6 5, 6 5, 6 5, 8, 11, 12, 13 4, 5, 11, 12, 13 | 1 1 2, 3 2, 3 2, 3 |
BIM software operating skills |
| 3, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13 3, 5, 8, 11, 12, 13 9, 11, 12, 13 | 1, 2 1, 2, 3 2 |
Smart construction and IT technologies |
| 5, 6, 8, 10 5, 6, 7, 10 10, 14, 15, 16 | 2 3 3 |
Practical construction engineering and management capability |
| 11, 12, 13 11, 12, 13, 14 13, 14, 15 14, 15, 16 | 1, 2, 3 3 1, 2, 3 2, 3 |
Year/Semester | Subject Name | Education Method | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | O | F | L | P | C | ||
1/1 |
| V | V V V V V | V | V | ||
1/Summer |
| V V V | V V V | ||||
1/2 |
| V V | V V V V V | V V | V V | ||
1/Winter |
| V V | V V V | V V | V V | ||
2/1 |
| V V | V V V V | V V V V | V | ||
2/Summer | - BIM prototyping project 1 | V | V | V | |||
2/2 |
| V | V V | V V V V | V V V | V | |
2/Winter | - BIM prototyping project 2 | V | V | V | |||
3/1 |
| V | V V | V V V | V V | V | |
3/Summer | - BIM management practice | V | V | V | V | ||
3/2 |
| V V | V V | V V V | V | V V | |
3/Winter | - Graduation project | V | V | V |
Field | Interviewees | BIM Experience (Years) | Position | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Academic | Universities | Interviewee a | 12 years | Assistant professor |
Interviewee b | 15 years | Associate professor | ||
Interviewee c | 10 years | Assistant professor | ||
Education institutes | Interviewee d | 7 years | Lecturer | |
Interviewee e | 6 years | Lecturer | ||
Industry | Interviewee f | 10 years | BIM manager (construction company) | |
Interviewee g | 7 years | BIM manager (BIM company) | ||
Interviewee h | 10 years | BIM deputy manager (construction company) | ||
Interviewee i | 12 years | CEO (BIM company) | ||
Interviewee j | 15 years | CEO (BIM company) |
Expert | Comments |
---|---|
Expert a |
|
Expert b |
|
Expert c |
|
Expert d |
|
Expert e |
|
Expert f |
|
Expert g |
|
Expert h |
|
Expert i |
|
Expert j | - Some subjects, such as BIM, API, and BIM–ICT, are thought to be related to the essential skills and qualities required for BIM professionals, and subjects similar to these should be added. |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lee, S.; Lee, J.; Ahn, Y. Sustainable BIM-Based Construction Engineering Education Curriculum for Practice-Oriented Training. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216120
Lee S, Lee J, Ahn Y. Sustainable BIM-Based Construction Engineering Education Curriculum for Practice-Oriented Training. Sustainability. 2019; 11(21):6120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216120
Chicago/Turabian StyleLee, Sanghyo, Joosung Lee, and Yonghan Ahn. 2019. "Sustainable BIM-Based Construction Engineering Education Curriculum for Practice-Oriented Training" Sustainability 11, no. 21: 6120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216120
APA StyleLee, S., Lee, J., & Ahn, Y. (2019). Sustainable BIM-Based Construction Engineering Education Curriculum for Practice-Oriented Training. Sustainability, 11(21), 6120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216120