Next Article in Journal
Social-Ecological Resilience as Practice: A Household Perspective from Agua Blanca (Ecuador)
Next Article in Special Issue
Green Procurement in Romanian Construction Projects. A Cluster Analysis of the Barriers and Enablers to Green Procurement in Construction Projects from the Bucharest-Ilfov Region of Romania
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristics and Effects of Conducted Emission from Grid-Connected and Stand-Alone Micro-Inverters in a Nano-Grid Road Lighting System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Public Procurement: The Impact of Ability, Motivation, and Opportunity on the Implementation of Different Types of Sustainable Public Procurement
Open AccessArticle

Sustainable Public Procurement—External Forces and Accountability

Department of Marketing & Supply Management, Open University of the Netherlands, 6419AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(20), 5696; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205696
Received: 8 September 2019 / Revised: 2 October 2019 / Accepted: 12 October 2019 / Published: 15 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Public Procurement for Sustainability)
Public agencies feel the need to advance sustainability and use procurement as an instrument to do so. Many studies focused on internal forces, explaining the limited success of sustainable public procurement. This study focused on how external forces are able to hold municipalities accountable for sustainable procurement. Three mid-sized Dutch municipalities were investigated through an extensive document study and 34 semi-structured interviews. The results show minor legal pressure to enforce sustainable procurement. National legislation, guidelines and principles are considered non-binding, due to a lack of penalties in the case of non-compliance. Real pressure stems from lobbying by branch organizations and political pressure initiated by citizens. In contrast with the New Public Management principles, municipalities appear to place more emphasis on legal and financial accountability, in contrast to performance accountability. Accountants mainly focus on legitimacy and the finance department only monitors spending within budget. The hybrid organization of the procurement function seems to impede sustainability development. Only the larger projects are subject to sustainability requirements, set by centralized purchasing departments. Smaller projects, responsible for 2/3 of the total spend are managed by decentralized groups, remaining under the radar of sustainability policies. View Full-Text
Keywords: public procurement; sustainability; external pressures; legal accountability; financial accountability; performance accountability public procurement; sustainability; external pressures; legal accountability; financial accountability; performance accountability
MDPI and ACS Style

Vluggen, R.; Gelderman, C.J.; Semeijn, J.; van Pelt, M. Sustainable Public Procurement—External Forces and Accountability. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205696

AMA Style

Vluggen R, Gelderman CJ, Semeijn J, van Pelt M. Sustainable Public Procurement—External Forces and Accountability. Sustainability. 2019; 11(20):5696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205696

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vluggen, Rob; Gelderman, Cees J.; Semeijn, Janjaap; van Pelt, Marc. 2019. "Sustainable Public Procurement—External Forces and Accountability" Sustainability 11, no. 20: 5696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205696

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop