Next Article in Journal
Agglomeration, Environmental Policies and Surface Water Quality in China: A Study Based on a Quasi-Natural Experiment
Previous Article in Journal
Scenario Analysis on Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions Reduction Potential in Building Heating Sector at Community Level
Open AccessArticle

Offsetting, Insetting, or Both? Current Trends in Sustainable Palm Oil Certification

1
International Affairs Program, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042, USA
2
Copenhagen Business School, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(19), 5393; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195393
Received: 8 August 2019 / Revised: 23 September 2019 / Accepted: 25 September 2019 / Published: 29 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Economic, Business and Management Aspects of Sustainability)
Private environmental standards attempt, in part, to internalize environmental externalities. Offsetting firms’ environmental externalities by buying credits is one option. Another is insetting, in which firms attempt to address externalities and provide positive benefits within their own supply chain. These two approaches to internalizing externalities can be in tension, leading toward different types of sustainable markets. Firms adopting private standards as way of avoiding reputational risks may be more likely to support insetting than offsetting strategies if their primary goal is to distinguish themselves from the rest of their industry, but these strategies can also risk separating the market into niche, high-quality producers alongside a low-quality majority. These tensions play out in the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), where offsetting and insetting exist side-by-side. Strategic pressures promoting insetting strategies lead firms to exit the system’s offset market, but this comes with the cost of losing some of the flexibility and lowered entry barriers the offset approach offers. New technologies might allow standards to combine the benefits of both approaches, keeping the reputational benefits of insetting and the flexibility of offsetting. View Full-Text
Keywords: palm oil; environmental standards; multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSi); Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO); palm oil; offsetting; insetting; certification palm oil; environmental standards; multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSi); Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO); palm oil; offsetting; insetting; certification
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gallemore, C.; Jespersen, K. Offsetting, Insetting, or Both? Current Trends in Sustainable Palm Oil Certification. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5393.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop