Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Ecosystem Services Value Based on Land Use and Land Cover Changes in the Transboundary Karnali River Basin, Central Himalayas
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Development—A Poorly Communicated Concept by Mass Media. Another Challenge for SDGs?
Review

Green Infrastructure in the Urban Environment: A Systematic Quantitative Review

School of Design and the Build Environment, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(11), 3182; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113182
Received: 19 April 2019 / Revised: 3 June 2019 / Accepted: 3 June 2019 / Published: 6 June 2019
Increased levels of greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere, a legacy of the industrial revolution, population growth pressures, and consumerist lifestyle choices, are the main contributors to human-induced climate change. Climate change is commensurate of warming temperatures, reductions in rainfall, increased frequency of extreme weather events, and contributions toward declining public health trends. Green Infrastructure (GI) presents diverse opportunities to mediate adverse effects, while simultaneously delivering human health, well-being, environmental, economic, and social benefits to contemporary urban dwellers. To identify the current state of GI knowledge, a systematic quantitative literature review of peer-reviewed articles (n = 171) was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) method. Temporal publication trends, geographical and geological information of research efforts, as well as research focus areas were recorded and reported against each article. The findings of this review confirm the research area to be in a state of development in most parts of the world, with the vast majority of the research emerging from the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Cooler climates produced the majority of research, which were found largely to be of a traditional research article format. The GI research area is firmly dominated by foci comprising planning and policy, environmental and ecological, and social content, although modest attempts have also appeared in health and wellbeing, economic, and quality/performance of green infrastructure areas. Knowledge gaps identified by this review as requiring attention for research growth were identified as: (i) the ambiguity of terminology and the limited broad understanding of GI, and (ii) the absence of research produced in the continents of Asia and South America, as well as in regions with warmer climates, which are arguably equally valuable research locations as cooler climate bands. View Full-Text
Keywords: green infrastructure; sustainability; sustainable development; urban; urban development; quantitative literature review; PRISMA green infrastructure; sustainability; sustainable development; urban; urban development; quantitative literature review; PRISMA
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Parker, J.; Zingoni de Baro, M.E. Green Infrastructure in the Urban Environment: A Systematic Quantitative Review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113182

AMA Style

Parker J, Zingoni de Baro ME. Green Infrastructure in the Urban Environment: A Systematic Quantitative Review. Sustainability. 2019; 11(11):3182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113182

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parker, Jackie, and Maria E. Zingoni de Baro 2019. "Green Infrastructure in the Urban Environment: A Systematic Quantitative Review" Sustainability 11, no. 11: 3182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113182

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop