Next Article in Journal
Preliminary Research on Planning of Decentralizing Ancient Towns in Small-Scale Famous Historic and Cultural Cities with a Case Study of Tingchow County, Fujian Province
Next Article in Special Issue
Prioritizing Elements of Science Education for Sustainable Development with the MCDA-FDEMATEL Method Using the Flipped E-Learning Scheme
Previous Article in Journal
An Overview of Ecopreneurship, Eco-Innovation, and the Ecological Sector
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigating Students’ Sustainability Awareness and the Curriculum of Technology Education in Pakistan
Open AccessReview

Tangible Technologies for Childhood Education: A Systematic Review

1
Department of Computer Engineering and Systems, Faculty of Science, Avda. Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez, s/n, University of La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
2
Department of Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, Psychology and Sports Sciences, Avda. Tres de Marzo s/n, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain
3
Department of Financial Economics, Accounting and Operations Management, Faculty of Business, Campus of «La Merced» Plaza de la Merced, 11, University of Huelva, 21002 Huelva, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(10), 2910; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102910
Received: 20 February 2019 / Revised: 18 May 2019 / Accepted: 20 May 2019 / Published: 22 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Technology & Engineering Education )
This study reviews published scientific literature on the use of tangible technologies in childhood education, in order to (a) identify the what tangible technologies have been used, (b) recognize the educational purposes and uses these technologies of, and (c) present a synthesis of the available empirical evidence on its educational effectiveness. After systematically searching in WoS, 288 relevant articles were located and analyzed using the Science Mapping Analysis Software Tool from 1968 to 2018. Then, 29 relevant papers of the last five years were included in the review study. For each article, we analyze the purpose of the study, the type of tangible technology used, the research method applied, the sample characteristics and the main results observed. The articles reviewed suggest that the main tangible technology used in childhood education is the tablet and literacy (basic and emergent) is the area most studied with promising results. View Full-Text
Keywords: tangible technologies; childhood education; systematic Review tangible technologies; childhood education; systematic Review
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

González-González, C.S.; Guzmán-Franco, M.D.; Infante-Moro, A. Tangible Technologies for Childhood Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102910

AMA Style

González-González CS, Guzmán-Franco MD, Infante-Moro A. Tangible Technologies for Childhood Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2019; 11(10):2910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102910

Chicago/Turabian Style

González-González, Carina S.; Guzmán-Franco, María D.; Infante-Moro, Alfonso. 2019. "Tangible Technologies for Childhood Education: A Systematic Review" Sustainability 11, no. 10: 2910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102910

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop