Next Article in Journal
Agroforestry and Biodiversity
Next Article in Special Issue
More than Just Food: Food Insecurity and Resilient Place Making through Community Self-Organising
Previous Article in Journal
Walkability and Resilience: A Qualitative Approach to Design for Risk Reduction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Understanding Transience and Participation in University Student-Led Food Gardens
Article

Collaborative Concession in Food Movement Networks: The Uneven Relations of Resource Mobilization

Department of Sociology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(10), 2881; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102881
Received: 15 February 2019 / Revised: 7 May 2019 / Accepted: 14 May 2019 / Published: 21 May 2019
How do food movements prioritize and work to accomplish their varied and often conflicting social change goals at the city scale? Our study investigates the Denver food movement with a mixed methods social network analysis to understand how organizations navigate differences in power and influence vis-à-vis resource exchange. We refer to this uneven process with the analytical concept of “collaborative concession”. The strategic resource mobilization of money, land, and labor operates through certain collaborative niches, which constitute the priorities of the movement. Among these are poverty alleviation and local food production, which are facilitated by powerful development, education, and health organizations. Therefore, food movement networks do not offer organizations equal opportunity to carry out their priorities. Concession suggests that organizations need to lose something to gain something. Paradoxically, collaboration can produce a resource gain. Our findings provide new insights into the uneven process by which food movement organizations—and city-wide food movements overall—mobilize. View Full-Text
Keywords: food movement; alternative food; local food; social network analysis; social movements; resource mobilization; mixed methods; alliance building food movement; alternative food; local food; social network analysis; social movements; resource mobilization; mixed methods; alliance building
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sbicca, J.; Luxton, I.; Hale, J.; Roeser, K. Collaborative Concession in Food Movement Networks: The Uneven Relations of Resource Mobilization. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2881. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102881

AMA Style

Sbicca J, Luxton I, Hale J, Roeser K. Collaborative Concession in Food Movement Networks: The Uneven Relations of Resource Mobilization. Sustainability. 2019; 11(10):2881. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102881

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sbicca, Joshua, India Luxton, James Hale, and Kassandra Roeser. 2019. "Collaborative Concession in Food Movement Networks: The Uneven Relations of Resource Mobilization" Sustainability 11, no. 10: 2881. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102881

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop