Next Article in Journal
Estimation and Forecasts for the Share of Renewable Energy Consumption in Final Energy Consumption by 2020 in the European Union
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluating Gravity-Flow Irrigation with Lessons from Yuma, Arizona, USA
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparison of Vacancy Dynamics between Growing and Shrinking Cities Using the Land Transformation Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Beyond Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing Constitutes Sustainable Agriculture in European Cultural Landscapes
Article Menu
Issue 5 (May) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Sustainability 2018, 10(5), 1514; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051514

Agricultural GMOs—What We Know and Where Scientists Disagree

1
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
2
Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 7 March 2018 / Revised: 21 April 2018 / Accepted: 4 May 2018 / Published: 10 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Agriculture: The State of the Great Debates)
Full-Text   |   PDF [278 KB, uploaded 10 May 2018]

Abstract

Population growth, climate change, and increasing human impact on land and aquatic systems all pose significant challenges for current agricultural practices. Genetic engineering is a tool to speed up breeding for new varieties, which can help farmers and agricultural systems adapt to rapidly changing physical growing conditions, technology, and global markets. We review the current scientific literature and present the potential of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) from the perspectives of various stakeholders. GMOs increase yields, lower costs, and reduce the land and environmental footprint of agriculture. The benefits of this technology are shared among innovators, farmers, and consumers. Developing countries and poor farmers gain substantially from GMOs. Agricultural biotechnology is diverse, with many applications having different potential impacts. Its regulation needs to balance benefits and risks for each application. Excessive precaution prevents significant benefits. Increasing access to the technology and avoidance of excessive regulation will allow it to reach its potential. View Full-Text
Keywords: genetic engineering; biotechnology; intellectual property; sustainability; climate change genetic engineering; biotechnology; intellectual property; sustainability; climate change
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zilberman, D.; Holland, T.G.; Trilnick, I. Agricultural GMOs—What We Know and Where Scientists Disagree. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1514.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top