Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Urban Development: Spatial Analyses as Novel Tools for Planning a Universally Designed City
Next Article in Special Issue
How Does a Staggered Board Provision Affect Corporate Strategic Change?—Evidence from China’s Listed Companies
Previous Article in Journal
Climate Change, Agriculture and Migration: A Survey
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nonlinear Effect of Financial Efficiency and Financial Competition on Heterogeneous Firm R&D: A Study on the Combined Perspective of Financial Quantity Expansion and Quality Development
Open AccessArticle

An Empirical Research on Bank Client Credit Assessments

1
Zhongshan Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Zhongshan 528400, China
2
Economics and Management College, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China, [email protected]
3
School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China
4
Department of Finance, Business School, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
5
Research Institute for Guangdong-Taiwan Business Cooperation, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
6
College of Tourism and Service Management, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
7
School of Economics & Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(5), 1406; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051406
Received: 25 January 2018 / Revised: 19 April 2018 / Accepted: 20 April 2018 / Published: 3 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Internet Finance, Green Finance and Sustainability)
Individual microcredit loans involve large quantities and small amounts and necessitate rapid approval, therefore making simple and fast application approvals rather critical. Creditors must evaluate clients’ credit status and default risk within the shortest time when determining whether to approve or decline their applications, preventing overdue responses that negatively impact bank profits and management practices, and could trigger domestic financial crises. This study investigates client credit quality criteria, focusing on the expert opinions of bank managers. The decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory method is adopted to enable a comparison and analysis of the similarities and differences in how banks evaluate their clients’ character, ability, financial capability, and collateral. Based on causality and correlations among the criteria, we also identify the core problems and key improvement criteria in the evaluation system. Through survey results of professional managers from Taiwanese banks, this study uses the DEMATEL method to compare the differences in bank evaluation methods based on the four dimensions of clients’ character, ability, pockets, and collateral, as well as the corresponding 14 criteria. In order to improve the reliability and usefulness in bank client credit risk assessment, the assessment dimensions and indicators of bank client credit risk assessment are first discussed; second, the causal relationship and degree of mutual influence between different dimensions and criteria are researched and assessed; in the end, the paper discusses how to improve the function and the benefits of bank client credit risk assessment. View Full-Text
Keywords: credit assessment; decision making; bank client; finance; sustainability credit assessment; decision making; bank client; finance; sustainability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Q.; Tsai, S.-B.; Zhai, Y.; Chu, C.-C.; Zhou, J.; Li, G.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, J.; Chang, L.-C.; Hsu, C.-F. An Empirical Research on Bank Client Credit Assessments. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1406.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop