You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Clinics and Practice
  • Clinics and Practice is published by MDPI from Volume 11 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
  • Brief Report
  • Open Access

13 February 2018

Comparison of Cameriere’s and Demirjian’s Methods of Age Estimation among Children in Kerala: A Pilot Study

,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, PMS College of Dental Science and Research, Trivandrum, India
2
Department of Oral Medicine, Metropath, Metro Lab., Trivandrum, India
3
Department of Oral and Maxillo Facial Pathology, PMS College of Dental Science and Research, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

The aim was to compare age estimation using Cameriere’s and Demirjian’s methods to chronologic age in children with mixed dentition in a rural population of Kerala. The present study comprised of 10 subjects of age range 7-12 years. Dental age was assessed using Cameriere’s and Demirjian’s methods and was compared to the chronologic age. Panoramic radiographs were used for assessment of dental age. Data were analysed using paired t-test. The mean of difference obtained was 0.92 and the pvalue was 0.172 which showed insignificant difference between the two methods. Cameriere’s method showed a positive linear correlation (0.6393) with chronologic age and was statistically significant (P=0.0171) , whereas Demirjian’s method showed a negative correlation (–0.7598) and was statistically insignificant (P=0.9967). The present study indicated that Cameriere’s method is reliable for age estimation in our population and is more accurate than Demirjian’s method.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.