Review Reports
- Willian-Jesús Martín-Dorta1,*,
- Cristo-Manuel Marrero-González2,* and
- Eva-Lourdes Díaz-Hernández3
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Lynne S. Nemeth Reviewer 2: Solvig Ekblad
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThanks for the opportunity to review this paper. I found it interesting to read, and conceptually sound. The introduction and research aims were clear. The design as a mixed methods study could be enhanced by describing how the methods were mixed and by attending to the use of a reporting guideline such as Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care-the CRISP Statement | EQUATOR Network.
One other suggestion is to comment a bit more on the role of nurses in documenting NANDA diagnoses. This is not as widely implemented in all healthcare settings, so a bit more detail on this practice, and perhaps an additional limitation might be appropriate.
Author Response
Document with responses to reviewer is submitted
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsKindly read the enclosed file
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Document with responses to reviewer is submitted.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf