Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Listening Effort in Young Children with Cochlear Implants
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Studies of Listening Effort Using Pupillometry
3. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) of the Brain in Audiology
4. Studies of Listening Effort by EEG
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fallon, J.B.; Irvine, D.R.F.; Shepherd, R.K. Cochlear Implants and Brain Plasticity. Hear. Res. 2008, 238, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarant, J.; Harris, D.; Bennet, L.; Bant, S. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implants in Children. Ear Hear. 2014, 35, 396–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Litovsky, R.Y.; Gordon, K. Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Children: Effects of Auditory Experience and Deprivation on Auditory Perception. Hear. Res. 2016, 338, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pisoni, D.B.; Kronenberger, W.G.; Harris, M.S.; Moberly, A.C. Three Challenges for Future Research on Cochlear Implants. World J. Otorhinolaryngol. -Head Neck Surg. 2017, 3, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kronenberger, W.G.; Pisoni, D.B. Assessing Higher Order Language Processing in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users. Am. J. Speech-Lang. Pathol. 2019, 28, 1537–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winn, M.B.; Won, J.H.; Moon, I.J. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization. Ear Hear. 2016, 37, e377–e390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aronoff, J.M.; Shayman, C.; Prasad, A.; Suneel, D.; Stelmach, J. Unilateral Spectral and Temporal Compression Reduces Binaural Fusion for Normal Hearing Listeners with Cochlear Implant Simulations. Hear. Res. 2015, 320, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Reynolds, S.M.; Gifford, R.H. Effect of Signal Processing Strategy and Stimulation Type on Speech and Auditory Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Int. J. Audiol. 2019, 58, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fu, Q.J.; Nogaki, G. Noise Susceptibility of Cochlear Implant Users: The Role of Spectral Resolution and Smearing. JARO-J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2005, 6, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McGarrigle, R.; Gustafson, S.J.; Hornsby, B.W.Y.; Bess, F.H. Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification. Ear Hear. 2019, 40, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Klatte, M.; Lachmann, T.; Meis, M. Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Speech Perception and Listening Comprehension of Children and Adults in a Classroom-like Setting. Noise Health 2010, 12, 270–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zekveld, A.A.; Kramer, S.E.; Festen, J.M. Cognitive Load During Speech Perception in Noise: The Influence of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognition on the Pupil Response. Ear Hear. 2011, 32, 498–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pichora-Fuller, M.K.; Kramer, S.E.; Eckert, M.A.; Edwards, B.; Hornsby, B.W.Y.; Humes, L.E.; Lemke, U.; Lunner, T.; Matthen, M.; Mackersie, C.L.; et al. Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear Hear. 2016, 37 (Suppl. S1), 5S–27S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hsu, B.C.-L.; Vanpoucke, F.; Langereis, M.; Dierckx, A.; van Wieringen, A. Age-Related Changes in Listening Effort for Children and Teenagers with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants. Ear Hear. 2020, 42, 506–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Erickson, L.C.; Newman, R.S. Influences of Background Noise on Infants and Children. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2017, 26, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohlenforst, B.; Zekveld, A.A.; Jansma, E.P.; Wang, Y.; Naylor, G.; Lorens, A.; Lunner, T.; Kramer, S.E. Effects of Hearing Impairment and Hearing Aid Amplification on Listening Effort: A Systematic Review. Ear Hear. 2017, 38, 267–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Winn, M. Rapid Release From Listening Effort Resulting From Semantic Context, and Effects of Spectral Degradation and Cochlear Implants. Trends Hear. 2016, 20, 2331216516669723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Winn, M.B.; Edwards, J.R.; Litovsky, R.Y. The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation. Ear Hear. 2015, 36, e153–e165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hughes, K.C.; Galvin, K.L. Measuring Listening Effort Expended by Adolescents and Young Adults with a Unilateral or Bilateral Cochlear Implants or Normal Hearing. Cochlear Implant. Int. 2017, 14, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Houston, D.M.; Pisoni, D.B.; Kirk, K.I.; Ying, E.A.; Miyamoto, R.T. Speech Perception Skills of Deaf Infants Following Cochlear Implantation: A First Report. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2003, 67, 479–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Houston, D.M.; Bergeson, T.R. Hearing versus Listening: Attention to Speech and Its Role in Language Acquisition in Deaf Infants with Cochlear Implants. Lingua 2014, 139, 10–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wang, Y.; Bergeson, T.R.; Houston, D.M. Infant-Directed Speech Enhances Attention to Speech in Deaf Infants With Cochlear Implants. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2017, 60, 3321–3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hicks, C.B.; Tharpe, A.M. Listening Effort and Fatigue in School-Age Children with and without Hearing Loss. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2002, 45, 573–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hughes, S.E.; Hutchings, H.A.; Rapport, F.L.; McMahon, C.M.; Boisvert, I. Social Connectedness and Perceived Listening Effort in Adult Cochlear Implant Users: A Grounded Theory to Establish Content Validity for a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure. Ear Hear. 2018, 39, 922–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sarampalis, A.; Kalluri, S.; Edwards, B.; Hafter, E. Objective Measures of Listening Effort: Effects of Background Noise and Noise Reduction. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2009, 52, 1230–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mackersie, C.L.; Cones, H. Subjective and Psychophysiological Indexes of Listening Effort in a Competing-Talker Task. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2011, 22, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Francis, A.L.; MacPherson, M.K.; Chandrasekaran, B.; Alvar, A.M. Autonomic Nervous System Responses during Perception of Masked Speech May Reflect Constructs Other than Subjective Listening Effort. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Giuliani, N.P.; Brown, C.J.; Wu, Y.H. Comparisons of the Sensitivity and Reliability of Multiple Measures of Listening Effort. Ear Hear. 2021, 42, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marsella, P.; Scorpecci, A.; Cartocci, G.; Giannantonio, S.; Maglione, A.G.; Venuti, I.; Brizi, A.; Babiloni, F. EEG Activity as an Objective Measure of Cognitive Load during Effortful Listening: A Study on Pediatric Subjects with Bilateral, Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2017, 99, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saliba, J.; Bortfeld, H.; Levitin, D.J.; Oghalai, J.S. Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for Neuroimaging in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Hear. Res. 2016, 338, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Naylor, G.; Koelewijn, T.; Zekveld, A.A.; Kramer, S.E. The Application of Pupillometry in Hearing Science to Assess Listening Effort. Trends Hear. 2018, 22, 2331216518799437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zekveld, A.A.; Koelewijn, T.; Kramer, S.E. The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge. Trends Hear. 2018, 22, 2331216518777174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathôt, S. Pupillometry: Psychology, Physiology, and Function. J. Cogn. 2018, 1, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirois, S.; Brisson, J. Pupillometry. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 2014, 5, 679–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hochmann, J.-R.; Papeo, L. The Invariance Problem in Infancy: A Pupillometry Study. Psychol. Sci. 2014, 25, 2038–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Otero, S.C.; Weekes, B.S.; Hutton, S.B. Pupil Size Changes during Recognition Memory. Psychophysiology 2011, 48, 1346–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zekveld, A.A.; Kramer, S.E.; Festen, J.M. Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility. Ear Hear. 2010, 31, 480–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koelewijn, T.; Zekveld, A.A.; Festen, J.M.; Kramer, S.E. Pupil Dilation Uncovers Extra Listening Effort in the Presence of a Single-Talker Masker. Ear Hear. 2012, 33, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuchinsky, S.E.; Ahlstrom, J.B.; Vaden, K.I.; Cute, S.L.; Humes, L.E.; Dubno, J.R.; Eckert, M.A. Pupil Size Varies with Word Listening and Response Selection Difficulty in Older Adults with Hearing Loss. Psychophysiology 2013, 50, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Winn, M.B.; Teece, K.H. Listening Effort Is Not the Same as Speech Intelligibility Score. Trends Hear. 2021, 25, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wendt, D.; Hietkamp, R.K.; Lunner, T. Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study. Ear Hear. 2017, 38, 690–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Neagu, M.B.; Dau, T.; Hyvärinen, P.; Bækgaard, P.; Lunner, T.; Wendt, D. Investigating Pupillometry as a Reliable Measure of Individual’s Listening Effort. Proc. Int. Symp. Audit. Audiol. Res. 2019, 7, 365–372. [Google Scholar]
- Winn, M.B.; Moore, A.N. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants. Trends Hear. 2018, 22, 2331216518808962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wetzel, N.; Buttelmann, D.; Schieler, A.; Widmann, A. Infant and Adult Pupil Dilation in Response to Unexpected Sounds. Dev. Psychobiol. 2016, 58, 382–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wetzel, N.; Scharf, F.; Widmann, A. Can’t Ignore—Distraction by Task-Irrelevant Sounds in Early and Middle Childhood. Child Dev. 2019, 90, e819–e830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Flo, A. Evidence of Ordinal Position Encoding of Sequences Extracted from Continuous Speech. Cognition 2021, 213, 104646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tamási, K.; Mckean, C.; Gafos, A.; Fritzsche, T.; Höhle, B. Child Pupillometry Registers Toddlers’ Sensitivity to Degrees of Mispronunciation. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 2017, 153, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tamási, K.; Wewalaarachchi, T.D.; Höhle, B. Measuring Sensitivity to Phonological Detail in Monolingual and Bilingual Infants Using Pupillometry. In Proceedings of the 16th Speech Science and Technology Conference, Sydney, Australia, 7–9 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
- McGarrigle, R.; Dawes, P.; Stewart, A.J.; Kuchinsky, S.E.; Munro, K.J. Measuring Listening-Related Effort and Fatigue in School-Aged Children Using Pupillometry. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 2017, 161, 95–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steel, M.M.; Papsin, B.C.; Gordon, K.A. Binaural Fusion and Listening Effort in Children Who Use Bilateral Cochlear Implants: A Psychoacoustic and Pupillometric Study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tapper, A.; Gonzalez, D.; Nouredanesh, M.; Niechwiej-Szwedo, E. Pupillometry Provides a Psychophysiological Index of Arousal Level and Cognitive Effort during the Performance of a Visual-Auditory Dual-Task in Individuals with a History of Concussion. Vision Res. 2021, 184, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagels, L.; Bastiaanse, R.; Başkent, D.; Wagner, A. Individual Differences in Lexical Access among Cochlear Implant Users. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2020, 63, 286–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, A.E.; Nagels, L.; Toffanin, P.; Opie, J.M.; Baskent, D. Individual Variations in Effort: Assessing Pupillometry for the Hearing Impaired. Trends Hear. 2019, 23, 2331216519845596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jöbsis, F.F. Noninvasive, Infrared Monitoring of Cerebral and Myocardial Oxygen Sufficiency and Circulatory Parameters. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 1977, 198, 1264–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Minagawa-Kawai, Y.; Mori, K.; Hebden, J.C.; Dupoux, E.; Royal, B.P. Optical Imaging of Infants’ Neurocognitive Development: Recent Advances and Perspectives. Dev. Neurobiol. 2007, 68, 712–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagamitsu, S.; Yamashita, Y.; Tanaka, H.; Matsuishi, T. Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Studies in Children. Biopsychosoc. Med. 2012, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lloyd-Fox, S.; Blasi, A.; Elwell, C.E. Illuminating the Developing Brain: The Past, Present and Future of Functional near Infrared Spectroscopy. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34, 269–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sevy, A.B.G.; Bortfeld, H.; Huppert, T.J.; Beauchamp, M.S.; Tonini, R.E.; Oghalai, J.S. Neuroimaging with Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Demonstrates Speech-Evoked Activity in the Auditory Cortex of Deaf Children Following Cochlear Implantation. Hear. Res. 2010, 270, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mushtaq, F.; Wiggins, I.M.; Kitterick, P.T.; Anderson, C.A.; Hartley, D.E.H. The Benefit of Cross-Modal Reorganization on Speech Perception in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients Revealed Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dewey, R.S.; Hartley, D.E.H. Cortical Cross-Modal Plasticity Following Deafness Measured Using Functional near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Hear. Res. 2015, 325, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Durantin, G.; Gagnon, J.; Tremblay, S.; Dehais, F. Using near Infrared Spectroscopy and Heart Rate Variability to Detect Mental Overload. Behav. Brain Res. 2014, 259, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Meidenbauer, K.L.; Choe, K.W.; Cardenas-Iniguez, C.; Huppert, T.J.; Berman, M.G. Load-Dependent Relationships between Frontal FNIRS Activity and Performance: A Data-Driven PLS Approach. Neuroimage 2021, 230, 117795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hosseini, S.M.H.; Bruno, J.L.; Baker, J.M.; Gundran, A.; Harbott, L.K.; Gerdes, J.C.; Reiss, A.L. Neural, Physiological, and Behavioral Correlates of Visuomotor Cognitive Load. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rovetti, J.; Goy, H.; Pichora-Fuller, M.K.; Russo, F.A. Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy as a Measure of Listening Effort in Older Adults Who Use Hearing Aids. Trends Hear. 2019, 23, 2331216519886722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- White, B.E.; Langdon, C. The Cortical Organization of Listening Effort: New Insight from Functional near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Neuroimage 2021, 240, 118324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, L.C.; Puschmann, S.; Debener, S. Increased Cross-Modal Functional Connectivity in Cochlear Implant Users. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Minagawa-Kawai, Y.; Van Der Lely, H.; Ramus, F.; Sato, Y.; Mazuka, R.; Dupoux, E. Optical Brain Imaging Reveals General Auditory and Language-Specific Processing in Early Infant Development. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 21, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cabrera, L.; Gervain, J. Speech Perception at Birth: The Brain Encodes Fast and Slow Temporal Information. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaba7830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benavides-Varela, S.; Gervain, J. Learning Word Order at Birth: A NIRS Study. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2017, 25, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomez, D.M.; Berent, I.; Benavides-Varela, S.; Bion, R.A.H.; Cattarossi, L.; Nespor, M.; Mehler, J. Language Universals at Birth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 5837–5841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chou, P.H.; Lin, W.H.; Li, W.R.; Huang, C.M.; Sun, C.W. Reduced Language Lateralization in First Episode Schizophrenia: A near Infrared Spectroscopy Study. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2017, 78, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butler, L.K.; Kiran, S.; Tager-Flusberg, H. Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in the Study of Speech and Language Impairment Across the Life Span: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Speech-Lang. Pathol. 2020, 29, 1674–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weisz, N.; Hartmann, T.; Müller, N.; Lorenz, I.; Obleser, J. Alpha Rhythms in Audition: Cognitive and Clinical Perspectives. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Miles, K.; McMahon, C.; Boisvert, I.; Ibrahim, R.; de Lissa, P.; Graham, P.; Lyxell, B. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG. Trends Hear. 2017, 21, 2331216517706396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fazli, S.; Mehnert, J.; Steinbrink, J.; Curio, G.; Villringer, A.; Müller, K.R.; Blankertz, B. Enhanced Performance by a Hybrid NIRS-EEG Brain Computer Interface. Neuroimage 2012, 59, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obrig, H.; Mock, J.; Stephan, F.; Richter, M.; Vignotto, M.; Rossi, S. Impact of Associative Word Learning on Phonotactic Processing in 6-Month-Old Infants: A Combined EEG and FNIRS Study. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2017, 25, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Safaie, J.; Grebe, R.; Moghaddam, H.A.; Wallois, F. Toward a Fully Integrated Wireless Wearable EEG-NIRS Bimodal Acquisition System. J. Neural Eng. 2013, 10, 056001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wallois, F.; Patil, A.; Héberlé, C.; Grebe, R. EEG-NIRS in Epilepsy in Children and Neonates. Neurophysiol. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2010, 40, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wallois, F.; Mahmoudzadeh, M.; Patil, A.; Grebe, R. Usefulness of Simultaneous EEG-NIRS Recording in Language Studies. Brain Lang. 2012, 121, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cartocci, G.; Scorpecci, A.; Borghini, G.; Giulio, A.; Maria, B.; Inguscio, S.; Giannantonio, S.; Giorgi, A.; Malerba, P.; Di Rossi, D.; et al. EEG Rhythms Lateralization Patterns in Children with Unilateral Hearing Loss Are Different from the Patterns of Normal Hearing Controls during Speech-in-Noise Listening. Hear. Res. 2019, 379, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bernarding, C.; Strauss, D.J.; Hannemann, R.; Seidler, H.; Corona-Strauss, F.I. Neurodynamic Evaluation of Hearing Aid Features Using EEG Correlates of Listening Effort. Cogn. Neurodyn. 2017, 11, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Saksida, A.; Ghiselli, S.; Bembich, S.; Scorpecci, A.; Giannantonio, S.; Resca, A.; Marsella, P.; Orzan, E. Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Listening Effort in Young Children with Cochlear Implants. Audiol. Res. 2022, 12, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres12010001
Saksida A, Ghiselli S, Bembich S, Scorpecci A, Giannantonio S, Resca A, Marsella P, Orzan E. Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Listening Effort in Young Children with Cochlear Implants. Audiology Research. 2022; 12(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres12010001
Chicago/Turabian StyleSaksida, Amanda, Sara Ghiselli, Stefano Bembich, Alessandro Scorpecci, Sara Giannantonio, Alessandra Resca, Pasquale Marsella, and Eva Orzan. 2022. "Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Listening Effort in Young Children with Cochlear Implants" Audiology Research 12, no. 1: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres12010001