Report on the 9th National Congress AICPE (Associazione Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Estetica) Held in Sorrento, Italy, 22–24 April 2022
1. Preface
2. Summary of the Scientific Presentations
2.1. Eyes and Surroundings. Medical and Surgical Techniques for the Upper Half of the Face
2.1.1. Temporal Lifting: A Powerful and Effective Technique for the Rejuvenation of the Upper Third of the Face
Michele Pascali, Italy
2.1.2. The Eyelid Lift: Surgical Approach to Address the Eyelid–Cheek Junction
Francesco P Bernardini, Italy
2.1.3. Midface Medical Lifting versus Midface Surgical Lifting
Antonietta Cimino, Italy
- -
- HA 15 mg/mL, with low hygroscopy and highest adaptability to tissue. It contains a mix of cross-linked HA, free HA and phosphate buffer integrated with 8 amino acids, 3 antioxidants, minerals, and B6 vitamin. It has been used for the treatment of the periorbital (on the periosteum) and temporal areas (into the subcutaneous tissue).
- -
- HA 23 mg/mL, 2 dynamic fillers, with different cross linking (BDDE from 3% to 4%), high strength (high resistance to compression) and good stretch (good resistance to stretching).
- -
- HA 25 mg/mL (BDDE 10%).
- -
- Botulinum toxin.
2.1.4. The Relevance of Volume Preservation in Periorbital Rejuvenation
Fabian Cortinas, Argentina
2.1.5. Secondary Upper Lid Blepharoplasty for Correction of Lateral Hooding
Giacomo Bellinvia, Italy
2.1.6. The Upper Eyelid, between Resection and Filling Approach: Why, When and How
Francesco Romeo, Italy
2.1.7. Complete Periorbitoplasty in One Scar
Pier Luigi Canta, Italy
2.1.8. My 20 Years’ Experience of Mastopexy with a Submuscular Autoprosthesis
Pier Luigi Canta, Italy
2.1.9. Fat Grafting and Lower Blepharoplasty: Personal Experience with the Supraperiosteal Free Fat Graft Method
Gianmario Prinzivalli, Italy
2.1.10. Frontal-Orbital Contouring and Rhinoplasty for Transgender Females: The Importance of Fronto-Nasal Angle in Facial Feminization Surgery
Zabbia Giovanni, Cammarata Emanuele, Maniaci Giuseppe, Speciale Antonino, Rosatti Fernando, Tondini Greta, Maltese Martina and Cordova Adriana, Italy
2.1.11. Holistic Approach to Periorbital Rejuvenation
Alessio Caggiati and Stefania Tenna, Italy
2.1.12. Upper Lid Blepharoplasty in Male Patients with Lateral Hooding
Matteo MAFFEI, Italy
2.2. Complications in Facial Surgery
2.2.1. Fat Injection as an Essential Tool for Lower Eyelid Retraction Management: A Retrospective, Observational, Single Blind, Case Control Study
Alberto Diaspro, Italy
2.2.2. Lower Eyelid Retraction: A Frightening Complication after Blepharoplasty
Michele Pascali, Italy
2.2.3. Surgical Lip Remodeling after Injection of Permanent Filler
Fabrizio Chirico and Raffaele Rauso, Italy
2.3. Fat and Fillers—From Modeling to Regeneration
2.3.1. Hyaluronic Acid Gel Injection for the Treatment of Tear through Deformity: A Multicenter, Observational, Single-Blind Study
Alberto Diaspro, Italy
2.3.2. Restoring the Eyelid–Cheek Junction with Fillers: The GPoint Lift Technique and the Orbicularis Retaining Ligament
Francesco P Bernardini, Italy
2.3.3. Preoperative Analysis, Anatomic Landmarks and Treatment Planning in Lower Eyelid Surgery
Fabian Cortinas, Argentina
2.3.4. Fat Grafting and Face Lifting: Volume, Regeneration and Contour Restoring
Paolo Vittorini, Italy
2.3.5. Comparison of Harvesting and Processing Technique for Adipose Tissue Graft: Evaluation of Cell Viability
Alessandro Gennai, Italy
2.3.6. Evaluation of the Number, Biophysical and Multipotent Characteristics of Adipose Derived Stem Cells Harvested by SEFFI Procedure and Interaction with Different Types of Hyaluronic Acids
Alessandro Gennai, Italy
2.3.7. Buttock Reshape with B.A.F.F.I. Technique
Antonella Quaranta, Italy
2.3.8. An Italian Online Survey Regarding the Use of Hyaluronidase in Previously HA-Injected Noses Looking for Surgical Rhinoplasty
Raffaele Rauso and Samuel Staglianò, Italy
2.3.9. Non-Surgical Facial Progressive Rejuvenation with Fillers: The CPA Method
Francesca De Angelis, Italy
2.3.10. The T.A.R. Autologous Regenerative Therapy in the Treatment of the Imperfections of the Face
Bruno Bovani, Italy
2.3.11. Full Face Approach and Reshaping of Facial Volumes: Fat Graft or Dermal Fillers?
Mattia Siliprandi, Italy
2.3.12. Design Lip Elegance Algorithm for Creating Natural Looking Lips with HA Filler
Andrea Felice Armenti, Italy
2.3.13. Eyes Lypogold Method. Use of Nano Fat for a Periorbital Rejuvenation
Enrico Guarino, Italy
2.3.14. Soft Tissue Contouring of the Upper Face in Facial Feminization Surgery for Transgender Females
Cammarata Emanuele, Zabbia Giovanni, Maniaci Giuseppe, Speciale Antonino, Rosatti Fernando, Tondini Greta, Maltese Martina and Cordova Adriana, Italy
2.3.15. Enzymatic Liposuction and Protein Diet: A Winning Combination
Antonella Montagnese, Italy
2.4. Breast Augmentation. The End of Religions
2.4.1. Relevance of the Inframammary Fold in Breast Augmentation Planning and Surgery
Egidio Riggio, Italy
2.4.2. From an Artistic and Anthropomorphic Approach to the “Sein Restant” Technique for Breast Surgery
Aurélie Fabié Boulard, France
2.4.3. Histological and Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Human Breast Capsules Formed around Five Different Expander Surfaces
Barbara Cagli, Italy
2.4.4. Anatomical Implants and Auto-Augmentation with a Modified Ribeiro Flap
Roberto D’Alessio, Italy
- -
- Stabilization of the implant and its projection.
- -
- Avoiding implant rotation (no implant rotation occurred at maximum follow up).
- -
- Reducing complications such as implant exposure.
- -
- Breast lifting was performed through the anchoring of the Modified Ribeiro flap to either muscle fascia (in sub-fascial technique) or to muscle border (in Dual plane) improving the profile of the breast.
2.4.5. Breast Implant Capsule: Are You Going to Leave It in?
Antonio Guastafierro and Stefano Rosso, Italy
2.4.6. Advantages of the “Bra-Flap” in Breast Augmentation to Expand the Lower Breast Pole, Prevent Double-Bubble and Bottoming-Out
Roberto Bracaglia, Regina Fortunato and Maria C Servillo, Italy
2.4.7. A Cheap and Effective Three Layers Suture for IMF Breast Augmentation
Raffaele Rauso, Italy
2.4.8. Dynamic Breast Deformity (Bad) Correction: An Integrated New Approach (Integrated New Full Undermuscolar Pocket) Using Smooth Implants
Francesca De Angelis, Italy
2.4.9. The Tuberous Breast: Classification and Technical Details
Roberto D’Alessio, Italy
2.4.10. Breast Surgery under Anesthesia with Pecs 1 and Pecs 2 Block
Alfio Scalisi, Maria Grazia Turco, Antonino Urpi, Flavio Trusso and Marco Gerardi, Italy
2.4.11. Versatility of Diagon\Gel 4Two Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Personal Experience
Giuseppe Visconti, Italy
2.4.12. Fat Grafting in Breast Augmentation: “Lead or Extra Actor”?
Michele Riccio, Costanza Binci, Valentina Cecconato and Angelica Aquinati, Italy
2.4.13. Implant Replacement with Dual Plane Technique: One of Our Details
Pietro Lorenzetti, Italy
2.4.14. Lower Pole Expansion after Breast Augmentation with Implants
Avvedimento Stefano and Santorelli Adriano, Italy
2.4.15. Mammoplasty: How to Guide the Choice of Implants
Luca Cravero, Italy
- Lifestyle of the patient. An accurate medical history, not only identifying the state of health, but also the work activity (manual or intellectual) and sports activities (type and frequency), as well as the reliability to follow the postoperative rules.
- Breast and chest anatomy. An accurate measurement of the chest was performed, classifying chest in normal, slender (prevalence of vertical diameters), and compact (prevalence of horizontal diameters). The mammary shape was classified as normal, tuberous and sagging breast.
- Breast tissues. An accurate evaluation and measurement of the breast tissue thickness was performed classifying normal, thin, thick and lax breast tissue.
- The expected achievable result. A simulation of achievable results was carried out and numerous photos of cases with results comparable to their own were presented in order to agree on the achievable result.
- Specifically:
- In patients with a normal chest conformation and normal breast tissue thickness, the choice has been smooth implants, while anatomical polyurethane implants have been utilized only for big implants.
- In patients with a normal chest conformation and thick breast tissue, the choice has been smooth implants, while anatomical implants have been utilized only if the patient clearly prefers an anatomical breast shape.
- In patients with a normal chest conformation and thin breast tissue it is preferable to use smooth implants because they less likely lead to wrinkle. However, for big implants, we choose the anatomical ones, because big round implants seem unnatural with thin coverage.
- In patients with normal chest conformation, with loose breast tissues, the choice has been smooth round implants only for little implants, instead we prefer anatomical polyurethane implants for medium or high volumes, because smooth implants have greater mobility, they often drift to sides (lateral slip) or down and they can stretch lower pole over time (bottoming out). Moreover, waterfall deformity (snoopy deformity), that is more frequent using anatomical polyurethane implants, is simpler to correct than bottoming out.
- In patients with normal chest conformation who perform intense sporting activity for habit or work, or who need to return to manual work quickly, the choice has been smooth round implants with moderate projection at the retrofascial site, for small implants and adequate breast tissue thickness. In all other cases, the anatomical polyurethane implant is chosen.
- In patients with slender or compact chest or tuberous breast our choice has been the anatomical implant because shaped anatomical implants allow different measures in width and height, providing optimal aesthetic results in these kinds of patients. We do not utilize round smooth implants with lipofilling of the superior pole or lateral side because often fat is not easily available enough, very often one session is not enough, the risk of contamination/infection of the prosthesis increases and costs are higher.
2.4.16. Breast Augmentation with Smooth and Opaque Implants. Surgical Strategy and Technique to Offer the Best Quality Result
Paolo Vittorini, Italy
2.4.17. Subfascial Breast Augmentation beyond Myths or Realities: Evidence and Indications
Mauro Rana, Fabrizio Chirico and Luigi Rugge, Italy
2.4.18. The Versatility of the Round Ergonomic Implants for Breast Augmentation
Daniele Cervelli, Italy
2.4.19. Implants Covered in Polyurethane Foam in Breast Augmentation. When to Choose Them and When Not
Valerio Badiali, Italy
2.4.20. Ergonomic Implants in Breast Surgery: Our Experience
Antonello Mele, Italy
2.4.21. Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL) and Breast Implants: The Breast Unit Experience at Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan
Chiara Listorti, Pierfrancesco Cadenelli and Secondo Folli, Italy
2.4.22. Retropectoral Breast Augmentation with Round Implant: Selection Criteria
Adriano Santorelli, Italy
2.5. Body Contouring. Abdomen and Surroundings between Surgery and Technology
2.5.1. 4-HD Liposuction for Men and Women after 50 Years Old, How to Optimize?
Aurélie Fabié Boulard, France
- To obtain results, respecting the natural look.
- To optimize body sculpting, skin tightening and beautification.
- It is part of a hyper-competitive socio-professional dimension.
- It is about maintaining a modern and dynamic image in the professional world.
2.5.2. Is It Time to Rethink Our Approach to DVT Prevention in Abdominoplasty?
Fabian Cortinas, Argentina
2.5.3. Circumferential Abdominoplasty with Adipose Self-Prosthesis and Lipofilling: Three-Dimensional Body Sculpture
Paolo Vittorini, Italy
2.5.4. Abdominoplasty: Surgical Technique Details for Particular Abdominal Issues
Stefano Marianelli, Italy
2.5.5. Diastasis of Recti Abdominis Muscle: A Comprehensive Classification toward Cosmetic or Functional Correction
Alessio Caggiati and Stefania Tenna, Italy
2.5.6. Unconventional Abdominoplasty
Claudio Bernardi, Italy
2.5.7. Evolution of S.A.F.E-Lipoabdominoplasty: Our Personal Approach to the Umbilical Region and Optimization of Results
Alessandro Gallo, Italy
2.5.8. Abdominoplasty
Domenico Riitano, Italy
2.5.9. Circumferential Body Lift, How to Further Improve the Result?
Pietro Lorenzetti, Italy
2.5.10. Push Risk away Technique for High Definition Abdominoplasty
Vincenzo Colabianchi and Matteo Giovannini, Bologna, Italy
2.5.11. Lipoabdominoplasty with Vibration and Laser: A Combination of Technologies for a Better Body Contouring
Daniele Bollero, Italy
2.5.12. Remodeling of the Abdominal Region by Combination of Two Latest Generation of Energy-Based Devices: Ultrasonic Lipoemulsion and the Plasma Argon System
Bruno Bovani, Italy
2.5.13. High-Tech Medical Procedures from Body Tite to Cryolipolysis
Alvaro Pacifici, Italy
2.5.14. Abdomen and Thighs Contouring Use and Advantages of ArgoPlasma-Driven Radiofrequency to Improve Skin Redraping
Sandro Rizzato, Cristina Rogato., Alessandro Casadei, Italy
2.5.15. Power Assisted Lipoplasty of the Legs, Arms, Neck and Other Difficult Areas
Eugenio Gandolfi, Switzerland
2.5.16. Invasive and Non-Invasive Treatment of Localized Fat: Indications, Effectiveness and Limits
Regina Fortunato, Maria Servillo and Roberto Bracaglia, Italy
2.5.17. Submuscular Gluteal Augmentation: Indications, Procedures, and Recommendations of “Hybrid” Technique
Arturo Amoroso, Italy
2.6. Breast Reduction and Mastopexy: The Techniques
2.6.1. The Central-Medial Pedicle in Breast Reduction
Egidio Riggio, Italy
2.6.2. Breast Reduction by Dr Millan: Evolution Respecting Tradition
Claudio Bernardi, Italy
2.6.3. A Simple Way to Perform a Safe Mastopexy Plus Implant
Ernesto Maria Buccheri, Italy
2.6.4. Internal Mastopexy and Breast Augmentation in the Correction of Breast Ptosis: Indications and Limits
Antonio Di Vincenzo, Italy
2.6.5. Vertical Scar Breast Reduction. History of Techniques and Personal Development of Personal Modifications
Elio Caccialanza and Giovanni Turra, Italy
2.6.6. A New “Hammock Flap” in Superomedial Breast Reduction and Mastopexy
Angelica Aquinati, Costanza Binci, Valentina Cecconato and Michele Riccio, Italy
2.6.7. Minimally Invasive Breast Lift: An Alternative Technique for the Correction of Breast Ptosis
Nicola Freda, Italy
2.6.8. The Use of Meshes in Mastopexy: Rationale of Use
Adriano Santorelli, Italy
Conflicts of Interest
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Riggio, E. Report on the 9th National Congress AICPE (Associazione Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Estetica) Held in Sorrento, Italy, 22–24 April 2022. Surg. Tech. Dev. 2022, 11, 4-46. https://doi.org/10.3390/std11010003
Riggio E. Report on the 9th National Congress AICPE (Associazione Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Estetica) Held in Sorrento, Italy, 22–24 April 2022. Surgical Techniques Development. 2022; 11(1):4-46. https://doi.org/10.3390/std11010003
Chicago/Turabian StyleRiggio, Egidio. 2022. "Report on the 9th National Congress AICPE (Associazione Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Estetica) Held in Sorrento, Italy, 22–24 April 2022" Surgical Techniques Development 11, no. 1: 4-46. https://doi.org/10.3390/std11010003
APA StyleRiggio, E. (2022). Report on the 9th National Congress AICPE (Associazione Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Estetica) Held in Sorrento, Italy, 22–24 April 2022. Surgical Techniques Development, 11(1), 4-46. https://doi.org/10.3390/std11010003