Next Article in Journal
Out-of-Hospital Noninvasive Ventilation: Epidemiology, Technology and Equipment
Previous Article in Journal
Update on Perioperative Management of the Child with Asthma
 
 
Pediatric Reports is published by MDPI from Volume 12 Issue 3 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure in Children

by
Clara Abadesso
*,
Pedro Nunes
,
Catarina Silvestre
,
Ester Matias
,
Helena Loureiro
and
Helena Almeida
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pediatr. Rep. 2012, 4(2), e16; https://doi.org/10.4081/pr.2012.e16
Submission received: 5 February 2012 / Revised: 5 February 2012 / Accepted: 5 February 2012 / Published: 10 April 2012

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to assess the clinical efficacy of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in avoiding endotracheal intubation (ETI), to demonstrate clinical and gasometric improvement and to identify predictive risk factors associated with NIV failure. An observational prospective clinical study was carried out. Included Patients with acute respiratory disease (ARD) treated with NIV, from November 2006 to January 2010 in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). NIV was used in 151 patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Patients were divided in two groups: NIV success and NIV failure, if ETI was required. Mean age was 7.2±20.3 months (median: 1 min: 0,3 max.: 156). Main diagnoses were bronchiolitis in 102 (67.5%), and pneumonia in 44 (29%) patients. There was a significant improvement in respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), pH, and pCO2 at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours after NIV onset (P<0.05) in both groups. Improvement in pulse oximetric saturation/ fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2/FiO2) was verified at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours after NIV onset in the success group (P<0.001). In the failure group, significant SpO2/FiO2 improvement was only observed in the first 4 hours. NIV failure occurred in 34 patients (22.5%). Risk factors for NIV failure were apnea, prematurity, pneumonia, and bacterial co-infection (P<0.05). Independent risk factors for NIV failure were apneia (P<0.001; odds ratio 15.8; 95% confidence interval: 3.42-71.4) and pneumonia (P<0.001, odds ratio 31.25; 95% confidence interval: 8.33-111.11). There were no major complications related with NIV. In conclusion this study demonstrates the efficacy of NIV as a form of respiratory support for children and infants with ARF, preventing clinical deterioration and avoiding ETI in most of the patients. Risk factors for failure were related with immaturity and severe infection.
Keywords: non-invasive ventilation; acute respiratory failure; child; infant; predictive factors; pediatric intensive care unit non-invasive ventilation; acute respiratory failure; child; infant; predictive factors; pediatric intensive care unit

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abadesso, C.; Nunes, P.; Silvestre, C.; Matias, E.; Loureiro, H.; Almeida, H. Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure in Children. Pediatr. Rep. 2012, 4, e16. https://doi.org/10.4081/pr.2012.e16

AMA Style

Abadesso C, Nunes P, Silvestre C, Matias E, Loureiro H, Almeida H. Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure in Children. Pediatric Reports. 2012; 4(2):e16. https://doi.org/10.4081/pr.2012.e16

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abadesso, Clara, Pedro Nunes, Catarina Silvestre, Ester Matias, Helena Loureiro, and Helena Almeida. 2012. "Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure in Children" Pediatric Reports 4, no. 2: e16. https://doi.org/10.4081/pr.2012.e16

APA Style

Abadesso, C., Nunes, P., Silvestre, C., Matias, E., Loureiro, H., & Almeida, H. (2012). Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure in Children. Pediatric Reports, 4(2), e16. https://doi.org/10.4081/pr.2012.e16

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop