Next Article in Journal
Congenital Hypofibrinogenemia in a Neonate with a Novel Mutation in the FGB Gene
Previous Article in Journal
Acute Pancreatitis as a Complication of Antiepileptic Treatment: Case Series and Review of the Literature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Efficacy of Everolimus Low-Dose Treatment for Cardiac Rhabdomyomas in Neonatal Tuberous Sclerosis: Case Report and Literature Review

1
Pediatric Cardiology Unit, “Vittore Buzzi” Children’s Hospital, 20154 Milano, Italy
2
Department of Pediatrics, “Vittore Buzzi” Children’s Hospital, 20154 Milano, Italy
3
Clinical Genetics Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “V. Buzzi” Children’s Hospital, University of Milano, 20154 Milano, Italy
4
Pediatric Neurology Unit, “V. Buzzi” Children’s Hospital, Milano, 20154 Milano, Italy
5
Neonatal Pathology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, “V. Buzzi” Children’s Hospital, University of Milano, 20154 Milano, Italy
6
Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science “L. Sacco”, University of Milano, 20157 Milano, Italy
7
Pediatric and Adolescent Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors jointly and equally supervised this work.
Pediatr. Rep. 2021, 13(1), 104-112; https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric13010015
Submission received: 14 January 2021 / Revised: 27 January 2021 / Accepted: 25 February 2021 / Published: 1 March 2021

Abstract

:
Background: Cardiac rhabdomyomas (CRs) are the most common cardiac tumors in newborns. Approximately 80–90% of cases are associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). In selective cases, Everolimus has resulted in a remarkable tumoral regression effect in children with TS. The optimal dosage for neonates is still unknown. Case presentation: We describe the use of Everolimus in a neonate with multiple biventricular CRs, causing subaortic obstruction, in which a low-dose treatment (0.1 mg/die), in an effort to maintain serum trough levels of 3–7 ng/mL, was successfully used off-label, without adverse effects. Conclusions: We showed that a low-dose Everolimus regimen may be an effective and safe treatment for CR regression in TS neonates, when the minimum therapeutic range was maintained.

1. Introduction

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disorder, characterized by over-activation of the mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) pathway [1,2]. Recent studies estimate a frequency of 1/6000–1/10,000 of live births and a population prevalence of around 1/20,000 [1,2]. This genetic disorder leads to the growth of hamartomas in multiple organs, such as the skin, central nervous system, angiofibromas, renal angiomyolipoma, and cardiac rhabdomyomas (CRs) [2,3].
CRs account for up to 90% of cardiac tumors in the pediatric population under the age of 1 and are associated with TSC in 60–80% of the cases [3,4].
Everolimus is a serine–threonine kinase mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, which is able to inhibit growth-driven cell proliferation [5,6]. Everolimus is currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency for TSC-associated partial-onset seizures, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, and renal angiomyolipoma in children [7,8]. Everolimus has been successfully used off-label in pediatric case reports of symptomatic CRs associated with TSC [7,8,9]. The optimal dosage for neonates is still unknown and is currently under debate [3,5,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
We described the use of Everolimus in a neonate with multiple biventricular CRs, in which a low-dose treatment was successfully adopted, maintaining a minimum therapeutic range. A literature review of the low-dose drug treatment during the neonatal period was also carried out.

2. Case Presentation

A full-term male infant was born at 40 + 4 gestational weeks, with a birth weight of 4660 g and a normal perinatal adaptation. No remarkable family history for neurologic pathologies or symptoms suggestive of TSC was recorded.
He underwent echocardiography on the first day of life for the presence of a cardiac murmur 3/6 left (L) on the precordium. At the first cardiologic visit, the baby revealed good clinical conditions, with normal blood pressure and heart rate of 142 bpm. ECG readings were normal. The echocardiographic evaluation showed normal biventricular dimensions and systolic function, with multiple highly echogenic cardiac masses. In particular, the following lesions were located: One in the medium-apical portion of the interventricular septum (7 × 2 mm); three multi-lobular shaped lesions on the mitral valve chordae (7 × 3 mm; 8.5 × 3.5 mm; 16 × 4 mm), leading to a mild acceleration of left ventricular output (v max 2.4 m/s); one in the left ventricular apex (8.5 × 2.5 mm); one in the mid-apical segment of the right ventricle area (0.6 cm2, 7 × 8 mm in apical view); and one in the subaortic region (10 × 10 mm, area 0.7 cm2 in apical view), originating from the outlet septum, extending towards the mitral valve, with a tiny 1.5 mm space for blood passage between the mass and the non-coronary aortic cusp, leading to an elevated pressure gradient in the left outflow tract (grad max/medium 60/40 mmHg), Figure 1.
A diagnosis of multiple CRs was made. The baby was transferred to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for continuous cardiac monitoring. In the hypothesis of CRs associated with TSC, a cerebral MRI, abdominal ultrasound, EEG, eye and dermatological examinations were performed, all of which resulted negative. The genetic screening of the proband and parents revealed a de novo pathognomonic mutation in the TSC2 gene.
The baby remained asymptomatic, with excellent weight gain and no feeding difficulties. ECG monitoring revealed no cardiac arrhythmia. Nonetheless, due to the location and number of cardiac tumors, we decided to begin a low-dosage administration of propanolol (1.5 mg/kg/die orally), which was well tolerated.
Due to the severe gradient in the left ventricular outlet, the clinical case was discussed with cardiac surgeons. Considering the high risk of complications, they decided not to perform resection of the subaortic mass.
After a multidisciplinary consultation meeting with cardiologists, neonatologists, a neurologist, and a geneticist, the parents agreed to begin the off-label Everolimus therapy. The baby was given Everolimus, 0.1 mg/die per os, starting at 26 days.
The serum Everolimus level 5 days after the initial dose was 4.5 ng/mL, the baby was well and the intensity of the cardiac murmur had dropped to 1-2/6 L. The CRs had already begun to shrink: The subaortic mass shrank to 6.5 × 9 mm, with a 2.7 mm space between the mass and the aortic wall; the transaortic pressure gradient halved to 24/14 mmHg, with no acceleration of the left ventricular output.
After 1 week, the serum Everolimus level was 4.4 ng/mL. The infant did not suffer any collateral effects, weight gain was steady, ECG was always normal, without arrhythmia. The cardiac masses continued to shrink with only a slightly elevated transaortic gradient (25/11 mmHg), Figure 2. After only 2 weeks, the transaortic velocity was normal. The masses continued to shrink over the next few months, even though the plasmatic dosage of Everolimus was always at the inferior level of around 3 ng/mL. The child suffered no collateral effects (no major infections, no aftae, normal blood cell count) and neurological evaluations were always normal.
After 6 months of therapy, an echocardiogram revealed that the mass in the interventricular septum and the masses attached to the mitral chordae were not visible, the subaortic mass was 5 × 2 mm, blood passage was normal, as were the transaortic gradients. The right intraventricular mass had almost completely disappeared. Thus, the Everolimus therapy was discontinued.
Three weeks later, at the ultrasound evaluation the subaortic mass was found to be stable, with normal gradients. The right intraventricular mass and the ones attached to the mitral chordae were visible, but small and not hemodynamically significant. Therefore, we decided not to begin therapy again and planned a monthly echocardiographic follow-up. The baby was asymptomatic, in good clinical conditions, with normal weight gain, and had never contracted infectious diseases.

3. Discussion

CR is the most common primary cardiac pediatric tumor and is a major criterion for TSC diagnosis [1,3]. Most patients with CRs and TSC are asymptomatic, and tumors slowly and spontaneously regress in the first 2 years of life in half of the cases. Some patients become symptomatic and require treatment, with symptoms ranging from arrhythmia and intracardiac blood flow obstruction to congestive heart failure, depending on the size, number, and location of the tumor/s [1,3].
The current standard therapy for symptomatic patients is supportive care (diuretics, intravenous inotropic drugs, antiarrhythmics) [1,4]. Surgery is recommended in severe cases, for large tumors that obstruct the outflow tracts of the great arteries or for arrhythmias with a very difficult medical management (generated by infiltration of the tumor and which compromise the nervous conduction) [1,4]. Cardiac surgery involves a number of potential complications such as difficulty in resecting all the tumors, long stays in the intensive care unit, and a high risk of mortality. Moreover, in some cases, considering the size, location, and relation with coronary arteries or intracardiac valves, tumors may be inoperable. Patients with multiple and inoperable CRs may be candidates for the Everolimus treatment.
Everolimus, a mammalian target of the rapamycin inhibitor drug, has the ability to reduce hamartomas, correcting the specific molecular defect that causes TSC. Everolimus has demonstrated a remarkable suppression effect in children with TSC at doses of 4.7–5.6 mg/m2/day and serum trough levels of 5–15 ng/mL [22,23].
We described the use of Everolimus in a neonate with multiple biventricular CRs, in which a low-dose drug treatment was successfully adopted, maintaining a minimum therapeutic range.
In the literature, Everolimus therapy in CRs associated with TS has been described in 25 cases occurring in the neonatal period (Table 1). The dosage reported ranged between 0.1–0.5 mg/day although an optimal dosage for neonates is still unknown. As described in Table 1, an initial low dose (0.08–0.1 mg/day) of Everolimus was adopted in only nine neonates. A significant reduction was evident as early as 4 weeks after starting the treatment. Similarly to reports from Chang et al. [15], in our case, the cardiac masses rapidly diminished and after only 5 days of therapy they became clinically insignificant. Of these nine neonates, in seven cases a therapeutic range of 5–15 ng/mL was maintained. In two cases, as in our neonate, a minimum therapeutic range of 3–8 ng/mL was adopted, reducing the risk of toxicity.
Everolimus toxicity occurs in children with TSC less frequently and less severely than in oncologic patients, probably since this drug is a monotherapy for TCS, whereas it is part of a combined treatment for cancer [5].
Adverse events were described in 5/25 (20%) neonates treated with Everolimus, including viral pneumonia (adenovirus and chickenpox) and transient coagulopathy, requiring therapy to be suspended for 1 week in one case. In only one complicated case, a low-dose treatment was used (Table 1). Conversely, our baby was successfully treated, with an absence of any collateral effects, and his weight gain and somatic growth remained within the normal range. On the basis of the literature data and our own experience, a dose of 0.1 mg/kg/day could be a reasonable start for the treatment with Everolimus in neonates.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we show that a low Everolimus dose may be useful to treat CRs in TSC, without any adverse effects and with excellent response to therapy. The extension of Everolimus use for a low-dose treatment of cardiac lesions with a high risk of decompensation, could be considered during the neonatal period.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.F.N., E.A. (Elena Albani), C.C., V.C. and S.M.; investigation, L.F.N., E.A. (Elena Albani), C.C., L.S., E.A. (Enrico Alfei), I.D., G.L. and S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.F.N., E.A. (Elena Albani), C.C., L.S., E.A. (Enrico Alfei), I.D., G.V.Z., G.L., V.C. and S.M.; writing—review and editing L.F.N., E.A. (Elena Albani), C.C., L.S., E.A. (Enrico Alfei), I.D., G.V.Z., G.L., V.C. and S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors received no financial support from public, commercial, or not-for-profit agencies to conduct this.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

The data for this case report were collected in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The patient gave his informed consent to publish his case.

Data Availability Statement

All data are reported in the case.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Sheila McVeigh for the English revision of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wataya-Kaneda, M.; Uemura, M.; Fujita, K.; Hirata, H.; Osuga, K.; Kagitani-Shimono, K.; Nonomura, N. Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Board of Osaka University Hospital. Tuberous sclerosis complex: Recent advances in manifestations and therapy. Int. J. Urol. 2017, 24, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Portocarrero, L.K.L.; Quental, K.N.; Samorano, L.P.; Oliveira, Z.N.P.; Rivitti-Machado, M.C.D.M. Tuberous sclerosis complex: Review based on new diagnostic criteria. Bras Dermatol. 2018, 93, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Castro-Monsalve, J.; Alvarado-Socarras, J.L.; Mantilla, K.A.; Forero, L.; Moreno, A.; Prada, C.E. Cardiac Rhabdomyomas in Tuberous sclerosis complex. J. Pediatr. 2018, 192, 264-e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kwiatkowska, J.; Wałdoch, A.; Meyer-Szary, J.; Potaż, P.; Grzybiak, M. Cardiac tumors in children: A 20-year review of clinical presentation, diagnostics and treatment. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017, 26, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Aw, F.; Goyer, I.; Raboisson, M.J.; Boutin, C.; Major, P.; Dahdah, N. Accelerated Cardiac Rhabdomyoma regression with Everolimus in infants with tuberous sclerosis complex. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2017, 38, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Franz, D.N.; Capal, J.K. mTOR inhibitors in the pharmacologic management of tuberous sclerosis complex and their potential role in other rare neurodevelopmental disorders. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2017, 12, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Bevacqua, M.; Baldo, F.; Pastore, S.; Valencic, E.; Tommasini, A.; Maestro, A.; Rabusin, M.; Arbo, A.; Barbi, E. Off-label use of Sirolimus and Everolimus in a Pediatric Center: A case series and review of the literature. Paediatr. Drugs 2019, 21, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Northrup, H.; Krueger, D.A. Tuberous sclerosis complex diagnostic criteria update: Recommendations of the 2012 International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference. Pediatr. Neurol. 2013, 49, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hinton, R.B.; Prakash, A.; Romp, R.L.; Krueger, D.A.; Knilans, T.K. Cardiovascular manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex and summary of the revised diagnostic criteria and surveillance and management recommendations from the International Tuberous Sclerosis Consensus Group. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2014, 3, e001493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Garg, A.; Gorla, S.R.; Kardon, R.E.; Swaminathan, S. Rapid Involution of Large Cardiac Rhabdomyomas With Everolimus Therapy. World J. Pediatr. Congenit Heart Surg. 2019, 2150135118822711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Goyer, I.; Dahdah, N.; Major, P. Use of mTOR inhibitor everolimus in three neonates for treatment of tumors associated with tuberous sclerosis complex. Pediatr. Neurol. 2015, 52, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dhulipudi, B.; Bhakru, S.; Rajan, S.; Doraiswamy, V.; Koneti, N.R. Symptomatic improvement using everolimus in infants with cardiac rhabdomyoma. Ann. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2019, 12, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  13. Shibata, Y.; Maruyama, H.; Hayashi, T.; Ono, H.; Wada, Y.; Fujinaga, H.; Fujino, S.; Nagasawa, J.; Amari, S.; Tsukamoto, K.; et al. Effect and Complications of Everolimus Use for Giant Cardiac Rhabdomyomas with Neonatal Tuberous Sclerosis. AJP Rep. 2019, 9, e213–e217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Martínez-García, A.; Michel-Macías, C.; Cordero-González, G.; Escamilla-Sánchez, K.I.; Aguinaga-Ríos, M.; Coronado-Zarco, A.; Cardona-Pérez, J.A. Giant left ventricular rhabdomyoma treated successfully with everolimus: Case report and review of literature. Cardiol. Young 2018, 28, 903–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chang, J.S.; Chiou, P.Y.; Yao, S.H.; Chou, I.C.; Lin, C.Y. Regression of Neonatal Cardiac Rhabdomyoma in Two Months Through Low-Dose Everolimus Therapy: A Report of Three Cases. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2017, 38, 1478–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Colaneri, M.; Quarti, A.; Pozzi, M. Everolimus-induced near-resolution of giant cardiac rhabdomyomas and large renal angiomyolipoma in a newborn with tuberous sclerosis complex. Cardiol. Young 2016, 26, 1025–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Choudhry, S.; Nguyen, H.H.; Anwar, S. Rapid resolution of cardiac rhabdomyomas following everolimus therapy. BMJ Case Rep. 2015, 2015, bcr2015212946. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wagner, R.; Riede, F.T.; Seki, H.; Hornemann, F.; Syrbe, S.; Daehnert, I.; Weidenbach, M. Oral Everolimus for Treatment of a Giant Left Ventricular Rhabdomyoma in a Neonate-Rapid Tumor Regression Documented by Real Time 3D Echocardiography. Echocardiography 2015, 32, 1876–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Doğan, V.; Yeşil, Ş.; Kayalı, Ş.; Beken, S.; Özgür, S.; Ertuğrul, İ.; Bozkurt, C.; Örün, U.A.; Karademir, S. Regression of symptomatic multiple cardiac rhabdomyomas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex in a newborn receiving everolimus. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2015, 61, 74–77. [Google Scholar]
  20. Öztunç, F.; Atik, S.U.; Güneş, A.O. Everolimus treatment of a newborn with rhabdomyoma causing severe arrhythmia. Cardiol. Young 2015, 25, 1411–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tiberio, D.; Franz, D.N.; Phillips, J.R. Regression of a cardiac rhabdomyoma in apatient receiving everolimus. Pediatrics 2011, 127, e1335–e1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dahdah, N. Everolimus for the Treatment of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-Related Cardiac Rhabdomyomas in Pediatric Patients. J. Pediatr. 2017, 190, 21–26.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hoshal, S.G.; Samuel, B.P.; Schneider, J.R.; Mammen, L.; Vettukattil, J.J. Regression of massive cardiac rhabdomyoma on everolimus therapy. Pediatr. Int. 2016, 58, 397–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Echocardiogram on the first day of life. Panel (A): Left ventricle rhabdomyomas; Panel (B): Elevated transaortic gradient; Panel (C): Subaortic mass.
Figure 1. Echocardiogram on the first day of life. Panel (A): Left ventricle rhabdomyomas; Panel (B): Elevated transaortic gradient; Panel (C): Subaortic mass.
Pediatrrep 13 00015 g001
Figure 2. Echocardiogram after 1 week of Everolimus treatment. Panel (A): Disappearance of the left ventricle rhabdomyomas; Panel (B): Normal transaortic gradient; Panel (C): Marked reduction of the subaortic mass.
Figure 2. Echocardiogram after 1 week of Everolimus treatment. Panel (A): Disappearance of the left ventricle rhabdomyomas; Panel (B): Normal transaortic gradient; Panel (C): Marked reduction of the subaortic mass.
Pediatrrep 13 00015 g002
Table 1. Characterization of patients with cardiac rhabdomyomas treated with low doses of Everolimus in the neonatal period.
Table 1. Characterization of patients with cardiac rhabdomyomas treated with low doses of Everolimus in the neonatal period.
First Author, YearAge at TreatmentClinical PresentationEchographic Data at DiagnosisEverolimus DoseTarget Drug LevelsReported EvolutionAdverse EffectsFollow Up
LOW-DOSE TREATMENT (≤0.1 mg/die)
Garg A et al., 20194th day of lifePrenatal diagnosis of CRs
At birth: Pre-excitation with ventricular tachycardia
Multiple CRs (major in RV free wall)0.08 mg/die3–7 ng/mLImprovement of ventricular tachycardia after 4 days of treatmentNoneNot reported
Castro-Monsalve J et al., 2018Not reportedCardiac arrestMultiple CRs on interventricular septum with LVOTO0.1 mg/die5–8 ng/mL60% reduction of CR at 31days—resolution at 4 weeksNoneNot reported
Aw F et al., 2016Average: 6.5 days (2–20 days)LVOTO
3rd case: Subependymal lesion
1st case: LVOTO e RVOTO
2nd case: Multiple CRs—major subaortic
3rd case: Multiple CRs
4th case: CRs with LVOTO
0.1 mg/die5–15 ng/mL50% reduction of CRs in 36 daysNot reportedTreatment: Average 73 days (34–138 days)
Goyer I et al., 2015Three cases: First week of lifeLVOTO
In one case: Subependymal astrocytoma
1st case: Multiple CRs (n 6)
2nd case: Multiple CRs with LVOTO
3rd case: Multiple CRs
0.1 mg/die5–15 ng/mLRegression at 1 monthViral infection in one caseCheck Everolimus plasmatic concentration every 4 days at the beginning
DOSE TREATMENT (>0.1 mg/die)
Dhulipudi B et al., 2019Average: 5 days (1–90 days)Five case reports describing cardiovascular failure due to outlet obstruction1st case: CR 24 mm at right outlet
2nd case: CR 13 mm in right atrium with superior vena cava obstruction
3rd case: CR 12 mm with LVOTO
4th and 5th case: Multiple CRs in right ventricle
4.5 mg/m2/week divided in daily doses5–15 ng/mLCR regression in 6.1 +/− 5.1 monthsChickenpox infectionNot reported
Shibata Y et al., 20194th day of lifePrenatal diagnosis of CRMultiple CRs with LVOTOInitial dose: 0.4 mg/die, reduced to 0.1 mg/die at day 105–15 ng/mLReduction of CR after 7 days of therapyCoagulopathy at day 3 of therapyNot reported
Martinez-Garcia A et al., 201836 days of lifePrenatal diagnosis of multiple CRsMultiple CRs—major in left ventricle with LVOTO0.25 mg twice per day—twice per weekNot indicatedImprovement after 2 weeks of treatmentNoneNot reported
Chang JS et al., 2017Not reportedPrenatal diagnosis of CRs
In one case: Seizures
1st case: CRs in both ventricles
2nd case: CR in LV with LVOTO
3rd case: Multiple CRs in left ventricle
0.3–0.67 mg/m2/die3–7 ng/mLRegression in 2 months1st case: Viral pneumonia
3rd case: Growth failure
Not reported
Colaneri M et al., 2016Not reportedPrenatal diagnosis of CRs
At birth: Hypoplastic left heart syndrome
Multiple CRs—major on left ventricle free wall0.25 mg/die5–15 ng/mLAfter 10 weeks: 80% reduction of CRsNoneStop treatment 11 weeks post treatment
Bornaun H et al., 2016Not reportedCardiovascular failure due to LVOTOCR with LVOTO0.5 mg/die twice per week2.6–6.1 ng/mLRegression of lesion in 4 weeksTG and cholesterol levels increased. Change in lymphocyte subgroupsStopped therapy after 7.5 months of treatment
Choudhry S et al., 20152 weeks of lifeCardiac and cerebral lesionsMultiple RCsNot reportedNot reportedCR regression in 1 monthNot reportedNot noted
Wagner R et al., 2015Not reportedAt birth: Heart murmurMultiple CRs—major on LVOTOStarting dose 1.5 mg/m2/die, reduced to 1 mg/m2/die at 4th day5–15 ng/mLProgressive reduction of RCsSlightly elevated triglycerides and transitory lymphopeniaStop therapy at 19 days post treatment
Dogan V et al., 20152 days Heart murmur and cardiovascular failureCRs with LVOTO 0.25 mg twice per day—twice per week5–15 ng/mLProgressive reduction of RCsNot reportedStop therapy at 3 months
Oztunc F et al., 2014First week of lifeSupraventricular tachycardiaMultiple CRs (interventricular sept—anterior wall RV)0.25 mg twice per day—twice per weekNot notedSupraventricular tachycardia resolution on day 8.
Regression of RCs at 15 days
NoneNot reported
CR: Cardiac rhabdomyoma; LVOTO: Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; RVOTO: Right ventricular outflow tract obstruction; RV: Right ventricle.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nespoli, L.F.; Albani, E.; Corti, C.; Spaccini, L.; Alfei, E.; Daniele, I.; Zuccotti, G.V.; Lista, G.; Calcaterra, V.; Mannarino, S. Efficacy of Everolimus Low-Dose Treatment for Cardiac Rhabdomyomas in Neonatal Tuberous Sclerosis: Case Report and Literature Review. Pediatr. Rep. 2021, 13, 104-112. https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric13010015

AMA Style

Nespoli LF, Albani E, Corti C, Spaccini L, Alfei E, Daniele I, Zuccotti GV, Lista G, Calcaterra V, Mannarino S. Efficacy of Everolimus Low-Dose Treatment for Cardiac Rhabdomyomas in Neonatal Tuberous Sclerosis: Case Report and Literature Review. Pediatric Reports. 2021; 13(1):104-112. https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric13010015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nespoli, Luisa Federica, Elena Albani, Carla Corti, Luigina Spaccini, Enrico Alfei, Irene Daniele, Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti, Gianluca Lista, Valeria Calcaterra, and Savina Mannarino. 2021. "Efficacy of Everolimus Low-Dose Treatment for Cardiac Rhabdomyomas in Neonatal Tuberous Sclerosis: Case Report and Literature Review" Pediatric Reports 13, no. 1: 104-112. https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric13010015

APA Style

Nespoli, L. F., Albani, E., Corti, C., Spaccini, L., Alfei, E., Daniele, I., Zuccotti, G. V., Lista, G., Calcaterra, V., & Mannarino, S. (2021). Efficacy of Everolimus Low-Dose Treatment for Cardiac Rhabdomyomas in Neonatal Tuberous Sclerosis: Case Report and Literature Review. Pediatric Reports, 13(1), 104-112. https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric13010015

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop