Next Article in Journal
Elucidating the Relations between Gut Bacterial Composition and the Plasma and Fecal Metabolomes of Antibiotic Treated Wistar Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Food Safety Concerns in “COVID-19 Era”
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Quercetin on Mycorrhizal Synthesis between Tuberborchii and Arbutusunedo L. In Vitro Plants

1
Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESAC, CERNAS, Bencanta, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal
2
GreenClon Lda., R Cruz Dom Pedro S/N, 3060-215 Cantanhede, Portugal
3
Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P., Av. República, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-159 Oeiras, Portugal
4
GREEN-IT Bioresources for Sustainability, ITQB NOVA, Av. da República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
5
MicNatur, Rua Nossa Senhora da Conceição 2, Oliveira do Hospital, 3405-155 Lagares, Portugal
6
Associação BLC3, Campus de Tecnologia e Inovação, Rua Nossa Senhora da Conceição 2, Oliveira do Hospital, 3405-155 Lagares, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microbiol. Res. 2021, 12(1), 69-81; https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres12010007
Submission received: 21 January 2021 / Revised: 15 February 2021 / Accepted: 18 February 2021 / Published: 23 February 2021

Abstract

:
Arbutus unedo L. is a Mediterranean species used for fruit production; it is tolerant to drought and shows regeneration ability following forest fires. Mycorrhizal plants with Tuber borchii add resilience and value. This study aims to test the effect of quercetin on mycorrhizal synthesis between T. borchii and A. unedo. Two genotypes selected for fruit production and hydric stress tolerance, were micropropagated for mycorrhizal synthesis, accomplished during ex vitro rooting in perlite, using lyophilized spores of T. borchii suspended in culture media with different quercetin levels (0–10 µM). Six months after inoculation, plants were transferred to pots and maintained in nursery. Ten and 12 months after inoculation, roots were morphological examined and molecularly characterized using ITS1-5.8SITS2 rDNA region and specific primers. Results showed that mycorrhizae establishment was dependent on studied factors (genotype, quercetin level, and culture medium) and their interaction (genotype X culture medium). Quercetin levels up to 2.0 µM favored mycorrhizae establishment and plant growth, although levels superior to 4 µM showed a toxic effect. Quercetin showed to be an efficient factor on inducing mycorrhiza thriving independent of the genotype. Morphological observations and molecular analysis confirmed the permanence of the fungus association 10 and 12 months after inoculation.

1. Introduction

Arbutus unedo L. (known as Strawberry tree) is a Mediterranean species that can be found across Iberian Peninsula, southern Europe (Mediterranean basin countries), northern Africa, and Ireland [1,2,3]. It is widely spread across Portugal and can grow from 20 to 1000 m in altitude, withstanding drought and degraded soils [4]. It is commonly found on the understory of oaks, particularly Quercus suber on the south and Quercus robur on the north, as well as on pine stands. It is typically a shrub type plant of 1 to 3 m height, although in optimal conditions of water and soil, it can grow up to 15 m [4].
Recently, A. unedo has been recognized as an interesting species for economic and ecological purposes, such as its great ability to survive wildfires, due to sprouting, even if let without a full crown. The lignotubers linked to the stem are a source of new meristems, allowing its resprouting, which is an important survival strategy [5,6]. A. unedo is also considered a valuable species in regards to beekeeping and high-quality honey production [7]. Flowering occurs simultaneously with the ripening and falling of the fruits of the previous year due to its long phenological cycle (1 year). During the fall period, flowers and fruits are simultaneously in the same plant, a trait that is linked to its use for gardening and landscape purposes. The species hermaphrodite blossoms are pollinated by insects, particularly bees, due to its melliferous traits, once it is their main source of food during the winter months [3,7].
For all of these reasons, the A. unedo species has been submitted to a breeding program in order to make pure crops available, aiming for fruit production for fresh fruit consumption, of jams and honey. There is also the traditional income associated with the production of alcoholic beverages [8]. More recently, our group established a protocol for mycorrhizal synthesis between Tuber borchii and Arbutus unedo L. micropropagated plants [9].
The use of artificially inoculated plants in forestry can improve plant potential to withstand environmental pressure, as well as stimulate plant growth, leading to improved crop productivity [10,11]. A. unedo forms mycorrhizae with a wide-ranging group of fungi; ca. 44 taxa were identified in plants growing in an adult Mediterranean forest [12]. The type of mycorrhizae that occurs naturally in species from genus, such as Arbutus and Arctostaphylos, is classified as arbutoid mycorrhizae [13]. They are characterized by the mantle, the well-developed Hartig network, and the development of hyphae at the intercellular level—but only in the first layer of the root cells [11,13,14,15,16,17].
The majority of fungi that form arbutoid mycorrhizae are basidiomycetes; however, some ascomycete fungi (e.g., Tuber sp., which include important edible mushrooms) have been shown to be able to form arbutoid mycorrhiza with A. unedo plants, as first identified by Lancellotti, et al. [18].
Tuber borchii Vittad, commonly called whitish truffle, is a mycorrhizae fungus from the order Pezizales, and produces edible truffles that represent an interesting gastronomic product with high value. Although its economic value is not as great as other truffles, such as Tuber melanosporum [18], T. borchii has a wide distribution range in Europe, from north to south of the continent—from Finland (as one of the coldest region) to Sicily (as one of the southeast regions of the Mediterranean), and from Ireland (in the western edge) to Hungary and Poland (on the eastern side of Europe) [18]. Some considered it as the Tuber species with the broadest ecological extent, allowing to establish truffle production in environments unfit for other truffles, greatly expanding cultivated areas to very varied environmental conditions [17].
It is widely known that mycorrhizal fungi are considered very important symbionts to the majority of plants, whose existence is stimulated under phosphorus deficiency in the soil [19]. The fungi grow from spore germination or hyphae extension (response to root chemical signals). Hyphae then penetrate their host root tissue to form different structures according to the specific type of mycorrhiza (ecto/endomycorrhiza) [19,20,21,22,23]. When this occurs, some of the host plants involved can exudate a substance that stimulates spore germination, as well as hyphae branch growth, leading to root colonization. The exudates have been identified as flavonoids [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Flavonoids are members of one of the most diverse phenolic groups, and their occurrence is widely distributed throughout the Plantae kingdom. These compounds participate in a vast collection of biochemical reactions, as quenchers of free radicals, (reactive oxygen species) and as binders to metallic ions, enhancing their bioavailability [19]. The concentrations of flavonoids as daidzein, coumestrol, and quercetin found in the root were greater than in the seed and showed to be related with the number of entry points and facilitating root colonization in a variety of species, such as soybean, clover, and tomato [20,23].
The aim of this study was to test the effect of different concentrations of the flavonoid quercetin on the mycorrhiza synthesis between in vitro plants of A. unedo and lyophilized spores of T. borchii. For this purpose, micropropagated clones, previously selected from adult plants, according to fruit production and stress hydric tolerance, were used.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal and Inoculum Characterization

Lyophilized spores of Tuber borchii were purchased from Micologia Florestal and Aplicada (Barcelona, Spain). Two suspended solutions of lyophilized spores of T. borchii (3 g L−1, each) were prepared using either Knop medium without P2O5 [25] or tap water. Both suspensions were kept in agitation overnight at room temperature to complete hydration. The number of spores was evaluated by using the Neubauer-ruled bright line-counting chamber, which showed an average of 3200 spores per ml of the inoculum suspension. In both inoculum suspension media, Knop vs. water, different concentrations of quercetin were added: 0.5 µM, 2.0 µM, 4.0 µM, 7.0 µM, and 10.0 µM, to be compared to controls with no quercetin.

2.2. Plant Material

Adult plants of A. unedo from different provenances have been selected, according to fruit production and quality (°Brix, total acidity, reducing sugar, and pH). The selected plants were established in vitro and micropropagated [26]. According to the multiplication and survival rate after subcultures with higher concentrations of sucrose [27], several clones were tested in field to confirm their tolerance to hydric stress and identify their interaction between genotype and environment [28]. From this survey, clone AL1 (101) was chosen together with clone PF1 (401), from the southernmost region of Portugal, as flagged in Figure 1. These clones were from soils of sedimentary rocks of schist and limestone, respectively.
The provenances are, according to the Köppen–Geiger climate classification, under “Mediterranean, hot dry-summer” (classified as Csa) and “Mediterranean, warm dry-summer” (classified as Csb), respectively PF1 (401) and AL1 (101). In the natural environment, the heat stress showed to be related to morphological and functional changes in mycelium and mycorrhizae of different strains of Tuber borchii [29].
Concerning natural conditions, it may be said that clone PF1 (401) is in worse climatic conditions, with a long, hot, and dry summer period, although in a more favorable limestone soil (which promotes water retention), since the presence of calcium is relevant in the establishment of mycorrhiza between truffles and host plant [30].

2.3. Mycorrhizal Synthesis Procedures

The mycorrhizal synthesis procedure was accomplished, promoted once contact occurred of the spore inocula during the ex-vitro rooting of the micropropagated shoots, as previously reported [9].
Inoculum suspensions (of both media tested Knop vs. water), with different levels of quercetin, were added to the substrate. As substrate, 500 mL of perlite was used inside transparent containers of 750 mL volume. The inoculum suspension was added to perlite, in a proportion of 10 % (v/v).
The ex vitro rooting was performed simultaneously with acclimatization, regarding a previously described procedure [31]. In brief, after the multiplication period (1 month), micropropagated shoots (±1.5 cm of length) were dipped in auxin (9.8 mM indole-3-butyric acid/IBA, during 5 s) and straight inserted into the previously inoculated perlite. The containers were maintained in a culture chamber (under temperatures of 25/20 °C and photoperiods of 16/8 h, and keeping the substrate and inoculum in the dark by wrapping the containers with aluminum foil).
For each treatment (2 culture media tested for spore suspensions × 6 quercetin levels), 50 shoots × 2 genotypes from in vitro clones (101 and 401) were tested, a total of 1200 shoots (initial time of the experiment, Figure 2).
The containers were kept for 5 months, closed to preserve high levels of humidity, and during the 6th month, humidity gradually decreased to hardening by gradually opening the containers. Next, plants were transferred to nursery pots (80 cm3) with peat and perlite mix (75:25%; v/v) and placed under controlled conditions with moderate light intensity (50% shadow net) and watering. According to the Timetable of Figure 2, during plant transplant, first morphological observations of the mycorrhizae were registered (6 months). Then, four months later, i.e., 10 months after inoculation, plants were transferred to larger containers (220 cm3) using the same substrate mix (peat and perlite, 75:25%; v/v) for plant development (timetable in Figure 2), where these plants remained until 12 months when the last morphological observations and molecular analyses were performed.

2.4. Morphological and Molecular Identification of Mycorrhizae

Six months after inoculation, during the plant transfer from perlite substrate to the mix of peat and perlite (75:25%; v/v), the following parameters were evaluated: mycorrhizae establishment, shoot length (SL), number of primary roots (NPR), number of leaf pairs, and root length (the length of the longest root/LLR and the length of the smallest root/LsR), as well as root morphological observation.
The mycorrhizae establishment was evaluated using the following notation: 0—absence of fungi, 1—mycelium, 2—baby branch, and 3—mycorrhiza, when a typical cruciform branching was observed.
Morphological observations were performed every time the plants were transferred to a new container, e.g., 6 and 10 months after inoculation and finally 12-month old plants (Figure 2). Arbutoid mycorrhizal roots were carefully examined with the aid of a stereomicroscope. A few samples were prepared using a fresh freezing microtome (Jung AG Heidelberg) and observed under a microscope (Olympus BX41).
For molecular analysis, mycorrhizal branches were collected 10 and 12 months after the inoculation (Figure 2).
Genomic DNA from root branches was extracted using DNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Molecular characterization was based on sequence analysis of the ITS1-5.8SITS2 rDNA region with ITS1F-ITS4 primers [32,33].
PCR reactions contained 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 9.0), 10 mM NaCl, 7.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM for each dNTP, 0.4 µM for each primer, 0.6 μg·µL−1 of bovine serum albumin, and 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase (GoTaq® DNA Polymerase, Promega) and 1 μL of template DNA with approximately 15 ng·μL−1 in a 25 μL volume reaction. Thermal cycling was performed on a T gradient thermal cycler (Biometra GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) with the following conditions: 35 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 55 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 90 s, with an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. Amplicons were resolved by electrophoresis at 5V·cm−1 in 1% of agarose gel with 1× TBE running buffer and visualized with ultraviolet (UV) light after staining with 0.5 μg·mL−1 of ethidium bromide and visualized by VersaDoc Gel Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). PCR product purification was carried out with Ron’s PCR Pure Mini Kit (BIORON GmbH, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Sequencing reactions were performed at STABVIDA (Portugal) on a DNA analyzer ABI PRISM 3730xl (Applied Biosystems). The chromatograms were edited, with FinchTV Version 1.4.0 (Geospiza Inc., Seattle, WA, USA). Consensus sequences for all isolates were compiled and aligned using Clustal X v. 2.0 [34]. When necessary, subsequent manual adjustments were made with BioEdit version 7.0.5.3 (Hall 1999). Consensus sequences were searched using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 1 January 2021)). All sequences generated in this study were deposited in GenBank.
A nested PCR was performed using previous amplification PCR product with T. borchii specific primers, TBA/TBB [35]. PCR reactions were performed as previously described except the addition of 4% DMSO and 1 μL of template DNA (the previously PCR product). Thermal cycler conditions were the following: 40 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 53 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 45 s, with an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 8 min. Amplicons were analyzed as the previous reaction except with 1.5% of agarose gel.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistica 7.0 software; complementary approaches were performed: analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the means were compared using the Duncan test (p < 0.05) and a principal component analysis (PCA). When variables were abnormally distributed, as the assessment of the mycorrhiza establishment variable (as notation 0–3, i.e., non-parametric data), means were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test [36].

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Characterization

Six months after inoculation, when in vitro plants were transferred to nursery pots for the first time, root systems were examined for mycorrhizal formation. It was possible to observe that mycorrhizae had already developed, forming a mantle with visible external hyphae and the typical cruciform appearance, as shown in Figure 3.
The presence of mycorrhizae formed by T. borchii was also confirmed by morphological observation 12 months after inoculation in nursey conditions. Figure 4 shows a completely formed thick mantle and the typical cruciform appearance, as well as highlights the unequivocal presence of Tuber borchii cystidia.

3.2. Plant and Mycorrhizal Evaluation

The plant survival rate observed six months after inoculation treatments, performed during ex vitro rooting, simultaneously with acclimatization, was 95% (1140 plants). However, mainly due to the long period of acclimatization (six months) for mycorrhizae establishment, associated with an inorganic substrate (perlite), only 65.9% showed a good root development; thus, 751 plants were transferred to nursery pots.
During the plant transfers, different parameters were evaluated to conclude about the effects of the main factors (quercetin addition, genotype, media culture for spore suspensions, and ulterior substrate inoculation) or their interactions on the mycorrhiza establishment and plant development. The addition of quercetin showed significant differences on mycorrhizal establishment and plant development (Table 1).
The addition of quercetin allowed a superior mycorrhizal establishment (p < 0.05), when it was added at 2.0 µM concentration, without significant differences, from 4.0 µM. Similar results were observed with the variables shoot length and the number of leaves. These results show that when quercetin was added at 2.0 µM concentration, plants showed a higher level of mycorrhiza establishment and higher growth. No significant differences were observed, due to quercetin treatment, for the number of primary roots and root length (LLR).
When quercetin was added in a concentration equal to or greater than 7.0 µM, a deleterious effect was observed on micropropagated plants: shorter shoot length and lower number of leaves (p < 0.05); a higher number of primary roots, quite thin, without the formation of secondary roots, and consequent mycorrhizae establishment; and a lower survival rate.
Considering the effect of the medium tested for spore suspension on the mycorrhizal establishment, significant differences were also observed. The best results were observed when water was tested compared to the Knop medium (Table 2). However, globally, the plant development (shoot length, number of leaves, root length/LLR) was greater (p < 0.05) with Knop medium.
Considering the effect of the clone/genotype tested on mycorrhizal establishment, significant differences were observed on mycorrhiza establishment, the number of leaves, and number of primary roots, meaning that clones showed a different response to the conditions tested (Table 3).
An interaction between the genotype and suspension culture medium was observed (Figure 5). For clone AL1 (101), the best results were observed when Knop medium was tested, for both variables, the mycorrhiza establishment and leaf number (p < 0.05; 205 plants) compared to water (230 plants). For clone PF1 (401), significantly higher results for mycorrhiza were observed when water was tested (172 plants), although it showed similar growth compared to Knop medium (144 plants). These results show an interaction between the genotype and suspension culture medium for mycorrhizal establishment.
The plant growth, evaluated by the number of primary roots (NPR) followed the same pattern distribution (Leaves No.), but without significant differences, suggesting higher presence of mycorrhiza on secondary roots.
The PCA (Figure 6) shows the interaction among different variables as the mycorrhizal establishment, suspension medium, genotype, quercetin concentration, leaf number, and root length.
The PCA (Figure 6) shows that mycorrhiza is directly related to plant growth, evaluated by leaf number. Moreover, plants showing mycorrhiza also have a superior number of primary roots. On the other hand, the mycorrhiza is also dependent on the genotype tested, as well as of the spore suspension medium.

3.3. Molecular Characterization

Confirming the presence of mycorrhizae formed by T. borchii was possible by using a molecular identification. This study generated sequences in the ITS1-5.8SITS2 rDNA region submitted to the GenBank database (accession numbers: MW115315, MW115316, and MW115317). BLAST results for accession no. MW115315 are query cover: 95%; percent identity: 99.63%; and total scores: 987. The values for accession no. MW115316 are query cover: 96%; percent identity: 99.63%; and total scores: 976; and for accession no. MW115317, query cover: 95%; percent identity: 98.69%; and total scores: 948. All sequence have an e-value of 0.0 when compared with accession no. FJ554490.1, a T. borchii species. In addition, nested PCR showed an expected DNA band of 432 bp characteristic of T. borchii species.

4. Discussion

Six months after inoculation, when in vitro plants were transferred to nursery pots, morphological root observations showed consistent arbutoid mycorrhizae formation with T. borchii analogous to that referred in previous studies with A. unedo [37].
Molecular analysis performed ten and twelve months after inoculation confirmed the presence of a T. borchii species, assuring the persistence of this symbiotic association. Our results are in line with those referred to in previous studies with A. unedo plants [11,18,38,39]. Moreover, the nested PCR showed the predictable DNA band of 432 bp characteristic of T. borchii species as previously referred [35].
The spore suspension culture medium effect on the mycorrhizal establishment showed significant differences. Although globally the best results were observed for water when compared with Knop medium, a strong interaction was observed between suspension culture medium and genotype, showing that the choice of the suspension culture medium should be linked to the genotype to achieve the best mycorrhizal establishment. The effect of the genotype of the donor plants of A. unedo showed to be a relevant factor interfering with the multiplication and rooting. This stresses, once more, generally importance of the genotype [23] and particularly in the case of the A. unedo species [40].
Several authors observed that flavonoids are produced and released into the rhizosphere, in response, modulated to by the colonization process [20,21,22,41], and are linked to the establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, particularly in the early stages of the interaction [20,21,22,23]. In our study, quercetin addition of up to 2.0 µM showed a superior mycorrhizal establishment (p < 0.05). Scervino et al. [23] refer that quercetin is the most widely distributed flavonoid in plants where mycorrhizal symbiosis is present and has a positive effect on germination or hyphal length of arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) spores. The authors showed that quercetin in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) clover roots, stimulated the penetration and root colonization of tomato by Gigaspora. Our results show similar effects of the quercetin on the formation of Arbutoid mycorrhiza on A. unedo plants by T. borchii [23].
Quercetin concentrations above 7.0 µM showed a deleterious effect, reflected on shorter shoot length, less leaf numbers, and a reduced number of secondary roots, seriously compromising the mycorrhiza establishment and the plant survival rate. Flavonoids were shown to be involved in the AM colonization in plant root, but its effect was highly complex, dependent not only on flavonoid concentration, but also on the AM fungal genus (or even species) [23]. However, in our study, within the species of A. unedo, the quercetin effect did not seem to be related to the genotype, as no statistic interaction was observed. Thus, quercetin was shown to be an efficient factor, when it added up to 2.0 µM on the induction of mycorrhiza, thriving independently of the genotype.
Morphological observations and molecular analysis confirmed the permanence of mycorrhizal association 12 months after inoculation in nursery conditions. These plants were established in field trials; further morphological and molecular studies will be performed to confirm the persistence of T. borchii mycorrhizae.

5. Conclusions

This study showed that mycorrhizal development between T. borchii and A. unedo micropropagated clones, maintained in nursery conditions, was dependent on the three main factors studied: genotype, quercetin concentration, and spore suspension culture media, and on their interactions.
Quercetin can be added to the spore suspension culture media in an expedited form during inoculation procedures, with a significant positive effect on the establishment and ulterior development of mycorrhiza, independently of the genotype.
Further studies should be performed to confirm the long-term persistence of mycorrhizae in field trials and evaluate the fungal colonization level required to guarantee mycorrhiza persistence in a natural environment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.G., P.F. and R.S.; Methodology, (1) mycorrhizal synthesis procedures: F.G. and R.S., (2) morphological studies: H.M.; (3) molecular analyses: M.S.; Validation, H.M., M.S., M.V. and F.G.; Formal analysis, F.G., M.V. and H.M.; Investigation, B.G., F.C. and R.S.; Resources, B.G., F.C. and R.S.; Data curation, B.G., F.C. and R.S.; Writing—original draft preparation, B.G. and F.G.; Writing—review and editing, F.G., M.V. and H.M.; Visualization, F.G., M.V. and H.M.; Supervision, F.G. and H.M.; Project administration, F.G.; Funding acquisition, P.F., I.F. and J.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is co-financed by the European Union, through the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, under the partnership agreement Portugal 2020-Rural Development Program, project PDR2020-101-031718 “FitoMicorrizas” Measure-Innovation, Intervention-Operational Groups and PDR2020-784-042742, Genetic Resources, Conservation and Plant Breeding for the strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo L.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all of their colleagues and students (in particular Joana Pereira) for their assistance in the research for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Elwes, H.J.; Henry, A. ARBUTUS. In The Trees of Great Britain and Ireland; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 558–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hileman, L.C.; Vasey, M.C.; Thomas Parker, V. Phylogeny and Biogeography of the Arbutoideae (Ericaceae): Implications for the Madrean-Tethyan Hypothesis. Syst. Bot. 2001, 26, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ulloa, P.A.; Maia, M.; Brigas, A.F. Physicochemical Parameters and Bioactive Compounds of Strawberry Tree (Arbutus unedo L.) Honey. J. Chem. 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Torres, J.A.; Valle, F.; Pinto, C.; García-Fuentes, A.; Salazar, C.; Cano, E. Arbutus unedo L. Communities in Southern Iberian Peninsula Mountains. Plant Ecol. 2002, 160, 207–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Konstantinidis, P.; Tsiourlis, G.; Xofis, P. Effect of Fire Season, Aspect and Pre-Fire Plant Size on the Growth of Arbutus unedo L. (Strawberry tree) Resprouts. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 225, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Quevedo, L.; Arnan, X.; Rodrigo, A. Selective Thinning of Arbutus Unedo Coppices Following Fire: Effects on Growth at the Individual and Plot Level. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 292, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Floris, I.; Satta, A.; Ruiu, L. Honeys of Sardinia (Italy). J. Apic. Res. 2007, 46, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Caldeira, I.; Gomes, F.; Mira, H.; Botelho, G. Distillates Composition Obtained of Fermented Arbutus unedo L. Fruits from Different Seedlings and Clonal Plants. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2019, 64, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Plácito, F.; Ferreira, I.; Clemente, M.; Figueiredo, P.; Barrento, M.J.; Machado, H.; Gomes, F. Mycorrhizal Synthesis between Tuber Borchii and Arbutus unedo L. Seedlings and Micropropagated Plants. Acta Hortic. 2018, 1224, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Simard, S.; Asay, A.; Beiler, K.; Bingham, M.; Deslippe, J.; He, X.; Philip, L.; Song, Y. Experimentally Testing Effects of My-corrhizal Networks on Plant-Plant Interactions and Distinguishing among Mechanisms. Mycorrhizal Netw. 2015, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Machado, H.; Barrento, M.J.; Plácito, F.; Suárez, D.; Clemente, M.; Figueiredo, P.; Gomes, F. Mycorrhizal Synthesis between Lactarius Deliciosus and Arbutus unedo under Nursery Conditions. Acta Hortic. 2017, 1187, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Richard, F.; Millot, S.; Gardes, M.; Selosse, M.A. Diversity and Specificity of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi Retrieved from an Old-Growth Mediterranean Forest Dominated by Quercus Ilex. New Phytol. 2005, 166, 1011–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Massicotte, H.B.; Melville, L.H.; Molina, R.; Peterson, R.L. Structure and Histochemistry of Mycorrhizae Synthesized between Arbutus Menziesii (Ericaceae) and Two Basidiomycetes, Pisolithus Tinctorius (Pisolithaceae) and Piloderma Bicolor (Corticiaceae). Mycorrhiza 1993, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Molina, R.; Trappe, J.M. By Specificity Lack of Mycorrhizal Menziesii Hosts Arbutus the Ericaceous Uva-Ursi and Arctostaphylos. New Phytol. 1982, 90, 495–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mühlmann, O.; Göbl, F. Mycorrhiza of the Host-Specific Lactarius Deterrimus on the Roots of Picea Abies and Arctostaphylos Uva-Ursi. Mycorrhiza 2006, 16, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gomes, F.; Suárez, D.; Santos, R.; Silva, M.; Gaspar, D.; Machado, H. Mycorrhizal Synthesis between Lactarius Deliciosus and Arbutus unedo L. Mycorrhiza 2016, 26, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mello, A.; Zampieri, E.; Zambonelli, A. Truffle Ecology: Genetic Diversity, Soil Interactions and Functioning. In Mycorrhiza—Function, Diversity, State of the Art; Varma, A., Prasad, R., Tuteja, N., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 231–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lancellotti, E.; Iotti, M.; Zambonelli, A.; Franceschini, A. Characterization of Tuber Borchii and Arbutus unedo Mycorrhizas. Mycorrhiza 2014, 24, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hassan, S.; Mathesius, U. The Role of Flavonoids in Root-Rhizosphere Signalling: Opportunities and Challenges for Improving Plant-Microbe Interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3429–3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Antunes, P.M.; Rajcan, I.; Goss, M.J. Specific Flavonoids as Interconnecting Signals in the Tripartite Symbiosis Formed by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Bradyrhizobium Japonicum (Kirchner) Jordan and Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Harrison, M.J. Isoflavonoid Accumulation and Expression of Defense Gene Transcripts during the Establishment of Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Associations in Roots of Medicago Truncatula. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1993, 6, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Larose, G.; Chênevert, R.; Moutoglis, P.; Gagné, S.; Piché, Y.; Vierheilig, H. Flavonoid Levels in Roots of Medicago Sativa Are Modulated by the Developmental Stage of the Symbiosis and the Root Colonizing Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus. J. Plant Physiol. 2002, 159, 1329–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Scervino, J.M.; Ponce, M.A.; Erra-Bassells, R.; Vierheilig, H.; Ocampo, J.A.; Godeas, A. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Colonization of Tomato by Gigaspora and Glomus Species in the Presence of Root Flavonoids. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Davies, F.T.; Calderón, C.M.; Huaman, Z.; Gómez, R. Influence of a Flavonoid (Formononetin) on Mycorrhizal Activity and Potato Crop Productivity in the Highlands of Peru. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2005, 106, 318–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gautheret, R.J. La Culture Des Tissues Végétaux, Techniques et Réalisations; Masson & Cie: Paris, France, 1959. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gomes, F.; Lopes, M.L.; Santos, T.; Canhoto, J.M. Micropropagation of Selected Trees of Arbutus unedo L. Trough Axillary Shoot Proliferation and Somatic Embryogenesis. Acta Hort. 2009, 839, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Duarte, A.; Gomes, F.; Figueiredo, P.; Santos, R.; Clemente, M. Hydric Stress Tolerance of Arbutus Unedo L. Selected Trees. In Program and Abstract, Prague, Czech Republic, 25–29 August 2014; IUFRO, Ed.; IUFRO & Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences: Prague, Czech Republic, 2014; p. 45. ISBN 978-80-213-2471-2478. Available online: https://www.iufro.org/fileadmin/material/publications/proceedings-archive/20402-20207-20211-prague14-abstracts.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2021).
  28. Gomes, F.; Botelho, G.; Franco, J.; Gama, J.; João, C.; Santos, R.; Figueiredo, P. Assessment of Arbutus Unedo L. Clonal Plants in a Field Clonal Trial. In Program and Abstract Book, Proceedings of the IUFRO Forest Tree Breeding Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, 25–29 August 2014; IUFRO, Ed.; IUFRO & Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences: Prague, Czech Republic, 2014; p. 29. ISBN 978-80-213-2471-2478. Available online: https://www.iufro.org/fileadmin/material/publications/proceedings-archive/20402-20207-20211-prague14-abstracts.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2021).
  29. Leonardi, P.; Iotti, M.; Donati Zeppa, S.; Lancellotti, E.; Amicucci, A.; Zambonelli, A. Morphological and Functional Changes in Mycelium and Mycorrhizas of Tuber Borchii Due to Heat Stress. Fungal Ecol. 2017, 29, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zambonelli, A.; Iotti, M.; Hall, I. Current Status of Truffle Cultivation: Recent Results and Future Perspectives. Micol. Ital. 2015, 44, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Figueiredo, P.; Gomes, F.; Santos, R.; Pop, R.L. Rapid Propagation of Arbutus Unedo L. Adult Selected Plants Using Ex Vitro Rooting. In Program and Abstract Book, Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on In Vitro Culture and Horticultural Breeding, Coimbra, Portugal, 2–7 June 2013; Canhoto, J., Correia, S., Eds.; UC & ISHS: Coimbra, Portugal, 2013; p. 157. Available online: https://www.uc.pt/en/congressos/IVCHB2013/ (accessed on 1 January 2021).
  32. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninski, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS Primers with Enhanced Specificity for Basidiomycetes: Application to the Identification of Mycorrhizae and Rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Thompson, J.D.; Gibson, T.J.; Plewniak, F.; Jeanmougin, F.; Higgins, D.G. The CLUSTAL X Windows Interface: Flexible Strategies for Multiple Sequence Alignment Aided by Quality Analysis Tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 4876–4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Mello, A.; Garnero, L.; Bonfante, P. Specific PCR-Primers as a Reliable Tool for the Detection of White Truffles in Mycorrhizal Roots. New Phytol. 1999, 141, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Miller, J.C.M. Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry, 5th ed.; Pearson Education Limited: Edinburgh, Scotland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ori, F.; Leonardi, M.; Faccio, A.; Sillo, F.; Iotti, M.; Pacioni, G.; Balestrini, R. Synthesis and Ultrastructural Observation of Arbutoid Mycorrhizae of Black Truffles (Tuber Melanosporum and T. Aestivum). Mycorrhiza 2020, 30, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gomes, F.; Machado, H.; San Martin, E.; Portugal, A.; Canhoto, J.M. Mycorrhizal Synthesis between Pisolithus Arhizus and Adult Clones of Arbutus Unedo in Vitro and in Nursery. J. For. Res 2013, 24, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. García, A.N.; del Pilar Bañón Árias, S.; Morte, A.; Sánchez-Blanco, M.J. Effects of Nursery Preconditioning through Mycorrhizal Inoculation and Drought in Arbutus Unedo L. Plants. Mycorrhiza 2011, 21, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gomes, F.; Simões, M.; Lopes, M.L.; Canhoto, J.M. Effect of Plant Growth Regulators and Genotype on the Micropropagation of Adult Trees of Arbutus Unedo L. (Strawberry Tree). N. Biotechnol. 2010, 27, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mathesius, U.; Schlaman, H.R.M.; Spaink, H.P.; Sautter, C.; Rolfe, B.G.; Djordjevic, M.A. Auxin Transport Inhibition Precedes Root Nodule Formation in White Clover Roots and Is Regulated by Flavonoids and Derivatives of Chitin Oligosaccharides. Plant J. 1998, 14, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Provenances of the two genotypes tested (the clone AL1(101) from Oleiros, Alvéolos Muradal Mountain and clone PF1 (401) from Faro).
Figure 1. Provenances of the two genotypes tested (the clone AL1(101) from Oleiros, Alvéolos Muradal Mountain and clone PF1 (401) from Faro).
Microbiolres 12 00007 g001
Figure 2. Timeline from inoculation to end of the experiment and final collection of root branches to confirm mycorrhiza establishment.
Figure 2. Timeline from inoculation to end of the experiment and final collection of root branches to confirm mycorrhiza establishment.
Microbiolres 12 00007 g002
Figure 3. Mycorrhizae of Tuber borchii observed at the transfer of in vitro plants to nursery pots, six months after inoculation, using perlite as substrate. Mycorrhizae showed a typical cruciform appearance (a—21×). Cruciform ramifications on secondary roots (b—8×; c—scale bar =1 cm).
Figure 3. Mycorrhizae of Tuber borchii observed at the transfer of in vitro plants to nursery pots, six months after inoculation, using perlite as substrate. Mycorrhizae showed a typical cruciform appearance (a—21×). Cruciform ramifications on secondary roots (b—8×; c—scale bar =1 cm).
Microbiolres 12 00007 g003
Figure 4. Mycorrhizae of Tuber borchii observed twelve months after inoculation, in nursery conditions. Mycorrhizae showed a thick mantle and the typical cruciform appearance. Notice the presence of cystidia (yellow arrows).
Figure 4. Mycorrhizae of Tuber borchii observed twelve months after inoculation, in nursery conditions. Mycorrhizae showed a thick mantle and the typical cruciform appearance. Notice the presence of cystidia (yellow arrows).
Microbiolres 12 00007 g004
Figure 5. Interaction (clone x medium) on mycorrhiza establishment (notation 0–3, represented in columns) and plant growth (leaves No., represented by brown line). Different letters represent significantly different values (p < 0.05; n = 751).
Figure 5. Interaction (clone x medium) on mycorrhiza establishment (notation 0–3, represented in columns) and plant growth (leaves No., represented by brown line). Different letters represent significantly different values (p < 0.05; n = 751).
Microbiolres 12 00007 g005
Figure 6. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the variables, observed 6 months after inoculation. The variables association with factors 1–3 are according to the coefficient factor loadings, on the left table. The highest factor loadings (>0.70) in the red label are relevantly correlated, explaining the total variance expressed by the three factors. Each factor explains a percentage of total variance with a cumulative value of 59.44%. The figure presents the relation between factors 1 and 3, which explains 26.7% and 16.0% of the total variance, respectively.
Figure 6. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the variables, observed 6 months after inoculation. The variables association with factors 1–3 are according to the coefficient factor loadings, on the left table. The highest factor loadings (>0.70) in the red label are relevantly correlated, explaining the total variance expressed by the three factors. Each factor explains a percentage of total variance with a cumulative value of 59.44%. The figure presents the relation between factors 1 and 3, which explains 26.7% and 16.0% of the total variance, respectively.
Microbiolres 12 00007 g006
Table 1. Effect of quercetin treatment on mycorrhiza establishment, shoot length (SL), number of primary roots (NRP), leaf numbers, and the length of the longest and shortest root (LLR, LsR), observed 6 months after inoculation.
Table 1. Effect of quercetin treatment on mycorrhiza establishment, shoot length (SL), number of primary roots (NRP), leaf numbers, and the length of the longest and shortest root (LLR, LsR), observed 6 months after inoculation.
TreatmentNMycorrhiza 1SL (mm)Leaves No.NRPLLR (mm)LsR (mm)
Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE
0 µM1531.95 ± 0.10b21.3 ± 0.63a8.03 ± 0.26a5.90 ± 0.43a58.40 ± 2.80a13.85 ± 0.84b
0.5 µM1301.92 ± 0.11b,c20.91 ± 0.60a8.38 ± 0.27a5.14 ± 0.37a61.18 ± 2.99a15.88 ± 1.22b
2 µM1112.50 ± 0.09a22.22 ± 0.60a8.52 ± 0.29a4.91 ± 0.39a51.81 ± 3.05a15.70 ± 0.94b
4 µM1212.07 ± 0.11ab22.47 ± 0.89a7.75 ± 0.26b,c4.79 ± 0.35a55.44 ± 3.08a15.95 ± 1.03b
7 µM1181.40 ± 0.12c19.04 ± 0.51b7.30 ± 0.27c5.39 ± 0.39a55.72 ± 3.01a19.55 ± 1.47a
10 µM1181.72 ± 0.13b,c18.58 ± 0.69b6.47 ± 0.29d5.78 ± 0.47a59.63 ± 2.60a21.47 ± 1.39a
Total7511.92 ± 0.05 20.78 ± 0.28 7.76 ± 0.11 5.34 ± 0.17 57.20 ± 1.20 16.93 ± 0.48
1 Notation 0–3 (0—absence of fungi; 1—mycelium; 2—baby branch; and 3—mycorrhiza cruciform branching), non-parametric data. Values are mean ± SE (n = 751). Values followed by different letters in columns are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test or Kruskal–Wallis test to non-parametric data.
Table 2. Effect of medium used for spore suspension on mycorrhiza establishment, shoot length (SL), number of primary roots (NRP), leaf numbers, and the length of the longest and shortest roots (LLR, LsR), observed 6 months after inoculation.
Table 2. Effect of medium used for spore suspension on mycorrhiza establishment, shoot length (SL), number of primary roots (NRP), leaf numbers, and the length of the longest and shortest roots (LLR, LsR), observed 6 months after inoculation.
MediumNMycorrhiza 1SL (mm)Leaves No.NRPLLR (mm)LsR (mm)
Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE
H2O4022.15 ± 0.06a19.87 ± 0.38b7.53 ± 0.16b5.17 ± 0.22a53.84 ± 1.55b15.61 ± 0.58b
KNOP3491.66 ± 0.08b21.81 ± 0.40a8.02 ± 0.15a5.54 ± 0.25a61.07 ± 1.84a18.60 ± 0.78a
Total7511.92 ± 0.05 20.78 ± 0.28 7.76 ± 0.11 5.34 ± 0.17 57.20 ± 1.20 16.93 ± 0.48
1 Notation 0–3 (0—absence of fungi; 1—mycelium; 2—baby branch; and 3—mycorrhiza cruciform branching), non-parametric data. Values are mean ± SE (n = 751). Values followed by different letters in columns are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test or Kruskal–Wallis test to non-parametric data.
Table 3. Effect of clone/genotype on mycorrhiza establishment, shoot length (SL), number of primary roots (NRP), leaf numbers, and the length of the longest and shortest roots (LLR, LsR), observed 6 months after inoculation.
Table 3. Effect of clone/genotype on mycorrhiza establishment, shoot length (SL), number of primary roots (NRP), leaf numbers, and the length of the longest and shortest roots (LLR, LsR), observed 6 months after inoculation.
CloneNMycorrhiza 1SL (mm)Leaves No.NRPLLR (mm)LsR (mm)
Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE
AL1(101)4352.27 ± 0.05a20.84 ± 0.38a8.59 ± 0.15a6.00 ± 0.24a51.70 ± 1.23b15.28 ± 0.53b
PF1(401)3161.45 ± 0.08b20.68 ± 0.39a6.62 ± 0.16b4.44 ± 0.20b64.78 ± 2.22a19.32 ± 0.87a
Total7511.92 ± 0.05 20.78 ± 0.28 7.76 ± 0.11 5.34 ± 0.17 57.20 ± 1.20 16.93 ± 0.48
1 Notation 0–3 (0—absence of fungi; 1—mycelium; 2—baby branch; and 3—mycorrhiza cruciform branching), non-parametric data. Values are mean ± SE (n = 751). Values followed by different letters in columns are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test or Kruskal–Wallis test to non-parametric data.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gomes, B.; Castro, F.; Santos, R.; Figueiredo, P.; Silva, M.; Vidal, M.; Ferreira, I.; Nunes, J.; Machado, H.; Gomes, F. Effect of Quercetin on Mycorrhizal Synthesis between Tuberborchii and Arbutusunedo L. In Vitro Plants. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 12, 69-81. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres12010007

AMA Style

Gomes B, Castro F, Santos R, Figueiredo P, Silva M, Vidal M, Ferreira I, Nunes J, Machado H, Gomes F. Effect of Quercetin on Mycorrhizal Synthesis between Tuberborchii and Arbutusunedo L. In Vitro Plants. Microbiology Research. 2021; 12(1):69-81. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres12010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gomes, Bárbara, Fábio Castro, Rita Santos, Patrícia Figueiredo, Márcia Silva, Maria Vidal, Inês Ferreira, João Nunes, Helena Machado, and Filomena Gomes. 2021. "Effect of Quercetin on Mycorrhizal Synthesis between Tuberborchii and Arbutusunedo L. In Vitro Plants" Microbiology Research 12, no. 1: 69-81. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres12010007

APA Style

Gomes, B., Castro, F., Santos, R., Figueiredo, P., Silva, M., Vidal, M., Ferreira, I., Nunes, J., Machado, H., & Gomes, F. (2021). Effect of Quercetin on Mycorrhizal Synthesis between Tuberborchii and Arbutusunedo L. In Vitro Plants. Microbiology Research, 12(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres12010007

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop