Next Article in Journal
Matching Accessories: Standardization Developments in Electric Vehicle Infrastructure
Previous Article in Journal
Promotion Strategy of Low-Speed Electric Trucks for Wholesale Markets in Taiwan
World Electric Vehicle Journal is published by MDPI from Volume 9 issue 1 (2018). Articles in this Issue were published by The World Electric Vehicle Association (WEVA) and its member the European Association for e-Mobility (AVERE), the Electric Drive Transportation Association (EDTA), and the Electric Vehicle Association of Asia Pacific (EVAAP). They are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with AVERE.
Open AccessArticle

Strategic Selection of Future EV Technology based on the Carbon Payback Period

1
Jane Patterson (corresponding author) Ricardo UK Ltd, Shoreham Technical Centre, Shoreham-by-Sea, West Sussex, BN43 5FG, UK
2
Jaguar Land-Rover, Banbury Road, Gaydon, Warwick, CV35 ORR, UK
3
Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
World Electr. Veh. J. 2012, 5(4), 825-835; https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj5040825
Published: 28 December 2012
The British Low Carbon Vehicle Technology Project (LCVTP) has developed technologies for future plug-in vehicles. Simulation results indicate significantly lower tailpipe CO2 emissions when compared to conventional internal combustion engine technology, but how good are the CO2 savings on a life cycle basis? Do these technologies have higher embedded CO2 from vehicle production? If so, can this be paid back within the lifetime of the vehicle? To help answer these questions, building on work completed within LCVTP, Ricardo conducted a life cycle top-down review of hybrid and EV technology architectures to estimate the CO2 emissions associated with each phase of the vehicle’s life. Results showed that these technologies have the potential to reduce the life cycle CO2 footprint of passenger cars, compared to today’s conventional technology. However, the higher embedded CO2 from vehicle production has to be paid back before these savings can be realised. This carbon payback period is highly dependent on the CO2 emissions resulting from electricity generation and transmission. This implies that the commercial role out of plug-in vehicles must happen in tandem with decarbonisation of the electricity to ensure CO2 emissions are really reduced. Ensuring future low carbon vehicles are truly low carbon will require a shift in focus from tailpipe CO2 to considering the environmental impact of the whole vehicle life cycle and the energy it uses. By adopting a life cycle philosophy and considering the carbon payback, vehicle manufacturers, policy makers and consumers can select the appropriate low carbon technology for their situation.
Keywords: EREV (extended range electric vehicle); EV (electric vehicle); HEV (hybrid electric vehicle); LCA (Life Cycle Assessment); passenger car EREV (extended range electric vehicle); EV (electric vehicle); HEV (hybrid electric vehicle); LCA (Life Cycle Assessment); passenger car
MDPI and ACS Style

Patterson, J.; Gurr, A.; Marion, F.; Williams, G. Strategic Selection of Future EV Technology based on the Carbon Payback Period. World Electr. Veh. J. 2012, 5, 825-835.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop