This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Evaluating Optical Coherence Tomography and X-Ray Computed Tomography to Measure Tablet Film Coat Thickness
by
Emily Sanchez
Emily Sanchez 1,*,
Trent Eastman
Trent Eastman 1,*,
Jennifer Potter
Jennifer Potter 2 and
Robert Meyer
Robert Meyer 1
1
Pharmaceutical Commercialization Technology, MMD, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
2
Process Analytical Technology, Animal Health, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2025, 17(9), 1225; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17091225 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 July 2025
/
Revised: 3 September 2025
/
Accepted: 16 September 2025
/
Published: 20 September 2025
Abstract
Background/Objective: Film coatings are vital components of many pharmaceutical products consumed orally in solid dosage form, and the optimization of the film coating unit operation is critical to the success of these products. It is essential to maintain adequate film coat thickness on tablets to ensure the elegance, mechanical integrity, and controlled-release functionality of active pharmaceutical ingredients. We aim to evaluate techniques for measuring the film coat thickness of tablets in the pharmaceutical drug product development space as current research primarily focuses on in-line methods at the manufacturing scale. Methods: A total of four tablet types, varying in size, shape, and coating thickness were assessed using Optical Coherence Tomography and X-ray Computed Tomography. The data was then compared to baseline reference values gathered by examining tablets with a Confocal Microscope. A second trial was performed using an alternative Optical Coherence Tomography instrument to verify the accuracy of the data. The methods were also evaluated on additional criteria utilizing a Pugh Matrix. Results: The initial Optical Coherence Tomography yielded measurements that were inconsistent with the values provided by the control for three of the four tablet types; however, the follow-up study provided values within an acceptable range. The X-ray Computed Tomography also provided accurate measurements but presented challenges for precision in relation to the instrument’s resolution capabilities. Based on the assessment of selected criteria, Optical Coherence Tomography is ideal for all clear-coated tablets, while X-ray Computed Tomography is better suited for small tablets with either opaque or clear coats. Conclusions: Optical Coherence Tomography, X-ray Computed Tomography, and the use of a Confocal Microscope are all viable methods for measuring the film coat thickness of tablets. Method selection is not absolute and depends on factors such as safety, ease of use, adaptability, and tablet characteristics. The results of this study will help provide guidance for selecting the most appropriate method for measuring the film coat thickness of a specific tablet.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Sanchez, E.; Eastman, T.; Potter, J.; Meyer, R.
Evaluating Optical Coherence Tomography and X-Ray Computed Tomography to Measure Tablet Film Coat Thickness. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 1225.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17091225
AMA Style
Sanchez E, Eastman T, Potter J, Meyer R.
Evaluating Optical Coherence Tomography and X-Ray Computed Tomography to Measure Tablet Film Coat Thickness. Pharmaceutics. 2025; 17(9):1225.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17091225
Chicago/Turabian Style
Sanchez, Emily, Trent Eastman, Jennifer Potter, and Robert Meyer.
2025. "Evaluating Optical Coherence Tomography and X-Ray Computed Tomography to Measure Tablet Film Coat Thickness" Pharmaceutics 17, no. 9: 1225.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17091225
APA Style
Sanchez, E., Eastman, T., Potter, J., & Meyer, R.
(2025). Evaluating Optical Coherence Tomography and X-Ray Computed Tomography to Measure Tablet Film Coat Thickness. Pharmaceutics, 17(9), 1225.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17091225
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.