Next Article in Journal
Targeting S. aureus Extracellular Vesicles: A New Putative Strategy to Counteract Their Pathogenic Potential
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of a Versatile Nanostructured Lipid Carrier (NLC) Using Design of Experiments (DoE)—Part II: Incorporation and Stability of Butamben with Different Surfactants
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Potential Use of Natural Products Together with Alkalization in Cancer Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nanoliposomes Permeability in a Microfluidic Drug Delivery Platform across a 3D Hydrogel
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Formulation and Evaluation of Polysaccharide Microparticles for the Controlled Release of Propranolol Hydrochloride

Pharmaceutics 2024, 16(6), 788; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16060788
by Aneta Stojmenovski 1, Biljana Gatarić 2, Sonja Vučen 3, Maja Railić 3, Veljko Krstonošić 4, Radovan Kukobat 5, Maja Mirjanić 6, Ranko Škrbić 1,7 and Anđelka Račić 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Pharmaceutics 2024, 16(6), 788; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16060788
Submission received: 3 May 2024 / Revised: 27 May 2024 / Accepted: 29 May 2024 / Published: 11 June 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors report an encapsulation system for propranolol hydrochloride to control and prolong its release. Microparticles were prepared using ionotropic gelation method which involves instilling a polymer solution into a solution of gelling ions via the extrusion technique. Physicochemical characterization was conducted by many methods. Chitosan coated microparticles demonstrate favorable properties. The results are very interesting. However, some points of the manuscript should be improved. Specific comments are given below.

1.   The structure of encapsulation system should be further measured by TEM.

2.   The hydrodynamic size and zeta potential should be measured.

3.   The Figure 5. Should be added the standard deviation.

4.   The cytotoxicity of encapsulation system should be measured.

5.   The in vitro drug release from a) uncoated and b) chitosan coated microparticles should be compared with other reports.

6.   More recent published reference should be added in this manuscript.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language required

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Point 1:- As mentioned in line 506-618, that difference between F2 and F6 release is hardly around 60 minutes , is it signicfant factor time. 

Point 2:- in fiigure 6d, the picture represent scaling of microparticles as they have many layers of coating which had been like threads layers rather than smooth coating

Point 3:- invitro release was done on pH1.2 and pH6.8 , do similar effect can be seen in stimulated gastric fluid.

Point 4:- in figure 5, no std deviation used and whether it was done in triplicate or single time 

Point 5:- in table 4, as you had used two different conc of chitosan but in case of HPMC only one concentration used, was it predetermined or randomly done. Did DOE needed to be applied 

Point 6:- Do viscosity play important role in release kinetics and how it was interpreted

Point 7:- in figure 1, what do you mean by P2 and P6 if they denotes formulation then denotes same for all over the manuscirpt 

Point 8:- in figure 5, whether the release mention in pH1.2 or pH 6.8, use different colors for pH based or differentiate them in graph 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have addressed the problem very well, and the manuscript can be accepted in the present form.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language required

Author Response

We sincerely thank the Reviewer #1 for this comment.

The manuscript was read by a native speaker and minor English language corrections were made.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop