Next Article in Journal
Correction: Ci et al. Enhanced Delivery of Imatinib into Vaginal Mucosa via a New Positively Charged Nanocrystal-Loaded in Situ Hydrogel Formulation for Treatment of Cervical Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 15
Next Article in Special Issue
3D-Printed Alginate/Pectin-Based Patches Loaded with Olive Leaf Extracts for Wound Healing Applications: Development, Characterization and In Vitro Evaluation of Biological Properties
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Different Glucose Concentrations on the Antiproliferative Activity of Metformin in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Healing Effect of a Nano-Functionalized Medical-Grade Honey for the Treatment of Infected Wounds

by
Jessica Salvo
1,2,
Cristian Sandoval
3,4,
Carolina Schencke
5,*,
Francisca Acevedo
6,7 and
Mariano del Sol
2,6,8,*
1
Escuela de Enfermería, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás, Temuco 4811230, Chile
2
Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Morfológicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile
3
Departamento de Ciencias Preclínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile
4
Escuela de Tecnología Médica, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás, Los Carreras 753, Osorno 5310431, Chile
5
Carrera de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4810101, Chile
6
Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile
7
Núcleo Científico-Tecnológico en Biorecursos (BIOREN-UFRO), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile
8
Centro de Excelencia en Estudios Morfológicos y Quirúrgicos (CEMyQ), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(9), 2187; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092187
Submission received: 3 July 2023 / Revised: 6 August 2023 / Accepted: 8 August 2023 / Published: 24 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer-Based Wound Dressings)

Abstract

:
Based on the qualities of Ulmo honey (Eucryphia cordifolia), a medical-grade honey (Ulmoplus®) has been developed. Relevant to this, the use of copper represents an emerging therapy for the treatment of wounds. Therefore, the aim of this study was to see how this medical-grade honey with copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) helped to heal infected or non-infected wounds. Twenty-four guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) were divided into four groups for phase 1 (without and with infection, U + F1 and U + F2), and two groups for phase 2 (selected formulation, without and with infection, U + F2NI and U + F2I). Bacteriological and histopathological studies, collagen fibers content evaluation, and stereological analysis were performed. The selected formulation displayed the same antibacterial potency as Ulmoplus®, indicating that this medical-grade honey by itself can be used as an antibacterial agent. However, the evaluation of collagen content demonstrated a significant increase in fibroblast and type III collagen fibers for infected and uninfected groups, which correlated with the histopathological study. Therefore, it is correct to affirm that adding CuNPs to Ulmoplus® improved the maturation of collagen fibers. Finally, polymorphonuclear cells presented similar values between experimental groups, which would indicate that the formulation under study was able to regulate the inflammatory process despite their infectious condition.

1. Introduction

Classically, four stages have been described in the healing process: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling, which occur superimposed with external and individual factors that can alter this process, prolonging the healing time of an injury [1,2]. To achieve wound closure, a granulated bed must be completely devoid of sloughed, necrotic, colonized, or infected tissue; therefore, the inflammatory phase of healing is essential for the fulfillment of the cellular and molecular processes, thereby eliminating the tissues and pathogenic microorganisms. Neutrophils and macrophages, especially those that perform debridement through matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) enzymes, move to the site of injury for phagocytosis and release reactive oxygen species (ROS) and proteases at the molecular level, controlling this phase [3], but outside factors, like high levels of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), can cause the inflammatory stage to last longer. This affects fibroblast activity and increases pro-inflammatory cytokines of the extracellular matrix (ECM), such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interferon gamma (IF-γ), as well as the expression of MMP-2, MMP-8, and MMP-9 [4,5]. This results in a chronic wound over time, longer than six weeks, where the riskiest complication is infection. Infection can be reported with subtle signs such as tissue hypergranulation, bleeding, epithelial bridging, rupture, and enlargement of the wound, as well as the classic signs of infection: erythema, local heat, volume increase, pus, delayed healing, pain, and a bad smell [6,7,8,9]. Parallel to the inflammatory stage, angiogenesis stands out, simultaneous with the proliferation of endothelial cells in the proliferative stage, to form a mature ECM [10]. During the remodeling or maturation phase, the lesion epithelizes and shrinks. Keratinocytes and myofibroblasts are differentiated, collagen is remodeled from type III to type I, and the wound fully closes [11].
Today, the use of advanced dressings based on natural compounds is a trend that includes the scientific development of the use of honey. Due to its inherent properties, honey has been used for wound care for thousands of years as a natural bio-based material [12]. In fact, honey contains lipids, carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins, amino acids, and minerals that have a significant impact on the healing process [13]. Due to its high osmolality, acidity, non-peroxidic factors, and phenols, honey has wound-healing properties [12]. Honey is effective in eliminating microbial infection, reducing ROS, promoting wound debridement, and speeding the healing process [14,15]. In addition, the presence of honey positively influences the cell responses of fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and keratinocytes. As a result, honey accelerates reepithelialization and wound healing [16,17,18].
In fact, Ulmo honey (Eucryphia cordifolia) decreases the inflammatory phase, removes dead tissue, speeds up the formation of granular tissue, increases the expression of FGF-β, and lowers the risk of infection, among other things [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Acidic pH, high concentrations of antioxidants, high osmolarity, low humidity, and antibacterial ability against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), the main strains that cause wounds and skin infections [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27], all contribute to these characteristics [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. So, a medical-grade clinical honey called Ulmoplus® has been made. This honey increases the scar’s tensile strength and stimulates the production of collagen in the lesion at both the dermal and epidermal levels [20].
Likewise, the use of gold, silver, and copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) represents an emerging therapy for the treatment of wounds. Copper (Cu2+) plays an important function in healing under controlled conditions by increasing the expression of extracellular matrix molecules, such as fibrinogen, collagen formation, and integrins. These are the principal molecules that facilitate cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix. Although copper has powerful biocidal properties as well, the human body is more capable of metabolizing copper than silver. Therefore, the combination of these two qualities makes Cu2+ an attractive material to improve the well-being of the skin [28].
Copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) are widely replacing silver-containing dressings for wound healing due to their toxicity. In fact, the different concentrations of CuNPs (200, 100, 50, 20, and 10 µg/mL) have shown low toxicity, promoting cell proliferation and the treatment of infections [29,30,31], where low copper concentrations (0.3–3 µM) stimulate MMP and serine protease activity in the healing process, while high concentrations (1–100 µM) stimulate the expression of MMPs in fibroblasts [32,33].
The slow and constant release of copper ions improves healing and angiogenesis; therefore, associating it with different materials that promote this behavior makes copper a useful element in the healing of all types of wounds [34]. In general, copper-containing nanoparticles produce reactive oxygen species, degrade cell membranes, and cell walls, and react with proteins and DNA [35]. Metal-based NPs and their leached metal ions are positively charged, while gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial surfaces are negatively charged. Therefore, metal-based NPs will be adsorbed onto the surface of bacteria through electrostatic interaction and form strong bonding links for the disintegration of the cell wall. This process increases cell permeability and facilitates the entry of metal-based NPs into cells [36]. In addition, copper ions can combine with negatively charged regions of the cell membrane to diminish the potential difference and induce depolarization. When the potential difference reaches zero, membrane leakage or rupture, exposure of cellular components, and, ultimately, bacterial death will occur [37]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that copper exposure directly affects the cell membrane [38,39].
In addition, copper toxicity is attributed to the Fenton-like reaction, which leads to the formation of ROS in close spatial proximity to copper ions [40], which are responsible for the degradation of lipids and proteins [40]. During these reactions, copper accepts and sheds an electron as it cycles between the Cu+ and Cu2+ oxidation states. This makes O2 and hydroxyl OH, which are highly reactive and have a high damage potential, causing lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA damage [41,42,43]. In addition, sustained copper activity has been observed under anoxic conditions via a ROS-independent mechanism that is sufficient to competitively disrupt cytoplasmic iron–sulfur enzymes (such as intracellular dehydratases) [44,45,46]. However, metallothioneins, glutathione, and Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase in the cytoplasm of mammalian cells provide partial protection [47,48].
In this sense, the antimicrobial activity of Cu, specifically the copper ions Cu2+, acts as a bacteriostatic agent in low concentrations (25 to 150 µM) or a bactericide in higher concentrations. The Cu2+ stops the microorganism from developing key processes that are necessary for its survival. The Cu2+ acts by (1) stopping or changing protein synthesis, (2) changing the microorganism’s cell membrane and causing peroxidation by damaging lipids that are important in the exchange of molecules between the inside and outside of the cell, and (3) changing or destroying nucleic acids by joining DNA and RNA chains. Therefore, the bactericidal and antibacterial roles of CuNPs are rapid and long-lasting due to their rough structural surface, which facilitates their union with the bacterial membrane [49,50,51]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of nano-functionalized medical-grade honey (Ulmoplus®) with CuNPs in the healing process of infected or non-infected wounds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Model

Twenty-four guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) of both sexes, with an average weight of between 500 and 700 g, were used as an animal model [20,21,22,23]. Guinea pigs were used due to their ascorbic acid-dependent metabolism and because they are a good model for experimental studies on wound healing since their skin maintains a constant thickness [52,53]. The animals were kept in the Animal Facility of the Center of Excellence in Morphological and Surgical Studies of the Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile. They were fed pellets fortified with vitamin C, vegetables, and water on demand, with a controlled environmental temperature between 20 and 22 °C and a cycle of 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness. Experiments were carried out in accordance with the Protocol for the Daily Supervision of Animals from the Guide to Bioethical Aspects of Animal Experiments [54,55]. In fact, the pain, hypersensitivity reactions, diseases, injuries, and the animals’ behavior were assessed according to the protocol previously described [56,57]. The Scientific Ethics Committee of the Universidad de La Frontera approved the experimental protocol (N°050/22). The sample size was calculated with the objective of achieving statistical validity, considering the low number of animals for both phases 1 and 2 of the experiment. The sample size, both for phase 1 and phase 2, was calculated using the GRANMO software, version 7.0, of the Hospital del Mar Institute for Medical Research [58]. A total of four experimental groups were considered for phase 1 and two experimental groups for phase 2, considering the following variables: a standard deviation of 0.3 and a minimum difference to detect between two groups of 0.5 [59]. Therefore, a minimum of four animals per group was adhered to, considering a p < 0.05 and a power greater than 80% [60]. The experimental groups were identified using distribution cages and alphanumeric codes on their respective data sheets and labeled.

2.2. Preparation of Formulations for Topical Use

For the treatment of heat injuries in an animal model, with and without infection, two formulations for topical use (F1 and F2) were tested, containing medical-grade clinical honey, Ulmoplus® (Andes Nutraclinic, Santiago, Chile), enhanced with copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) in concentrations within the range of 5 to 200 µg/mL (U + F1 and U + F2). The CuNPs were in a solid state at 98% purity (Nanotec Chile, Santiago, Chile).

2.3. Determination of the Antibacterial Activity of Formulations for Topical Use

From a classical point of view, the bacteria most often found in chronic wounds are Staphylococcus aureus, including multi-resistant bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter spp., and coagulase-negative staphylococci [61]. Ulmoplus® and Ulmoplus® with CuNPs (U + F1 or U + F2) were tested against three strains of bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25923). Bacterial strains were grown on Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Ulmoplus® and Ulmoplus® with CuNPs (U + F1 or U + F2) samples were performed according to Sherlock et al. [62]. The MICs defined as the lowest concentration of Ulmoplus® and Ulmoplus® with CuNPs (U + F1 or U + F2) required to inhibit microbial growth were determined in sterile 96-well round-bottomed polystyrene microtiter plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Briefly, eight serial dilutions of the formulations were prepared aseptically for the MIC assay, reaching a concentration range of 50% v/v to 0.39% v/v in MHB. Bacterial cultures were prepared at a 0.5 McFarland standard (1 × 108 CFU/mL) and then diluted 1:10 in MHB. For each concentration, 5 μL of McFarland standardized culture (1 × 107 CFU/mL) was added to 95 μL of samples at each concentration in each well (four replicates per dilution, eight dilutions tested). Control wells contained only broth (negative control) or bacteria and broth (positive control). The plates were incubated in the dark at 37 °C for 24 h. The optical density was determined at 600 nm just prior to (T0) and after 24 h of incubation (T24).

2.4. Protocol of Injury, Induction of Infection and Treatment

The work was conducted under intraperitoneal anesthesia, using a mixture of ketamine (40 mg/kg), xylazine (5 mg/kg), and atropine (0.05 mg/kg). Once anesthetized, a trichotomy of the right paravertebral dorsal area was made, at the scapular level. Then, the cleaning and skin antisepsis were made with 2% soapy chlorhexidine and 0.5% tincture topical chlorhexidine. The burn injury was produced according to the protocol described by Schencke et al. [20,21,22,23].
Recovery from anesthesia was monitored in a rest unit with a 26–28 °C ambient temperature, with monitoring of cardiac activity and reflexes until full recovery of the animal. After 24 h of resting the lesion, the inflammatory process was established. This was valid for all study groups, with and without induced infection, using gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs (U + F1 or U + F2).
Before the infection, the animals of the infected group were separated in their cages for seven days, with daily supervision to avoid possible septic foci. Twenty-four hours post-injury, the animals were inoculated with 5 µL on the escharotomy lesion to cause infection of the wound. An inoculum of 5 µL was applied, equivalent to 5 × 105 CFU, calculated in exponential growth, of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria in suspension in brain–heart infusion broth at 37 °C. After 48 h post-inoculum, the local infectious signs were verified [63,64]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was selected due to its importance and impact on morbidity and mortality from wound infections in hospital centers. This gram-negative bacterium has developed strains that are multi-resistant to antibiotics and hospital-acquired diseases, which has led to the search for new treatments to combat it [65]. The inoculated bacteria were obtained from the CEMT-UFRO authorized strain collection, which was prepared under exponential growth under microbiological conditions 30 min before inoculation. The animals were subjected to treatment for 10 days. Surgical debridement, with anatomical forceps and a scalpel blade, was in accordance with the need for spontaneous detachment of necrotic tissue (eschar). The burns were treated by the application of gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs (U + F1 or U + F2), respectively, and fixation was performed with a semi-elastic cotton bandage. The healing procedure, animal protocol, and photographic controls were recorded in the individual clinical records for each animal. As a positive control, the results obtained in previous studies were used, using the same experimental design [20,21,22,23,24]. The preparation of bacterial strains and the management of the infected animal were carried out in a biological safety cabinet with appropriate personal protective equipment (ABSL-2).
In phase 1 of the experiment, gauze treated with Ulmoplus® and CuNPs (U + F1 or U + F2) was used to treat burn wounds without infection (U + F1NI or U + F2NI) and with infection (U + F1I or U + F2I). Then, the histological changes in burn-wound healing and the quantification of collagen fibers in scar tissue were performed as described below. The formulation with the best performance was chosen and used in Phase 2 of the experiment.
For Phase 2 of the experiment, the application of gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs (U + F2) was chosen. Next, U + F2 was applied in experimental tests in burn wounds without infection (U + F2NI) and with infection (U + F2I). Then, collagen fiber content evaluation and stereological analysis were performed.

2.5. Processing of Biopsies and Staining

Biopsies were performed with a puncher 1 cm in diameter (for healthy wound margins) to reach the deep dermis. On the day of the biopsy (day 10 of treatment), local subcutaneous anesthesia and 2% lidocaine were used to obtain them. The samples were washed with 0.9% NaCl, fixed in buffered formalin at 10% for 48 h (1.27 mol/L of formaldehyde in a phosphate 0.1 M buffer pH 7.2), dehydrated, and immersed in Paraplast Plus (Sigma-Aldrich Company, St. Louis, MO, USA). Following the block obtention, each block was subjected to a series of five-millimeter-thick cuts. Five random sections were made and H&E- and Sirius Red-stained for subsequent stereological analysis and collagen fiber content evaluation, respectively. Type I collagen fibers were compact, birefringent, red, or yellow, whereas type III collagen fibers were sparse, birefringent, and green [66]. Semiquantitative histological analysis was performed according to the burn-wound healing scale described by Hazrati et al. and Mehrabani et al. [18,67]. Table 1 shows the parameters evaluated.

2.6. Collagen Fiber Content Evaluation

A total of 125 fields by group were observed, five fields by cut [68]. The quantification was made using a lower and upper filter (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), as has been previously described [64]. Images were captured on an optical microscope (Leica® ICC50 HD, Wetzlar, Germany) and analyzed using a software (Image-Pro Premier 9.1, Media Cybernetics, Warrendale, PA, USA). The collagen content of each image was calculated as the area (A) inhabited by types I and III collagen fibers in scar tissue (in m2).

2.7. Stereological Analysis

A total of 125 fields by group were observed, including five fields by cut [68]. Images were captured on an optical microscope with a 100× objective zoom lens (Leica® ICC50 HD, Wetzlar, Germany) and presented on a monitor. The stereology was made using the M42 multipurpose testing system. On scar tissue, we measured in polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) the following parameters: the number density per area (NA) and volume density (VV), and in fibroblasts, we measured the following parameters: the number density per area, volume density, and surface density (SV). The number density per unit area of PMN (NA PMN) was calculated using the following formula: NA PMN = N/AT, where N is the number of observations in each area when forbidden lines are considered, AT is the total system area (36.36 × d2), and d is the length of the test line system that is known. Using the following equation, the PMN volume density (VV PMN) was calculated using the next equation: VV PMN = PP PMN/PT (100%) where PP PMN is the number of points contacting PMN and PT is the system’s total number of points. As previously described, the number density per area (NA Fibroblasts) and the volume density of fibroblasts (VV Fibroblasts) were also determined. The surface density of fibroblasts (SV Fibroblasts) was calculated using the next equation SV Fibroblasts = 2 I/LT where I is the number of intersections touching the structure and LT is the total line length of the M42 system [68].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using IBM’s SPSS Statistic 21© software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), and assumptions were verified through the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (data normality test) and Levene’s test (homoscedasticity analysis). For Phase 1 of the experiment, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s HSD or Dunnett’s T3 post hoc tests were used to analyze the differences between groups (p < 0.05). For Phase 2 of the experiment, a student’s t was performed. The p < 0.05 (*) was considered significant, and the p < 0.025 (**) was very significant.

3. Results

3.1. Phase 1 of the Experiment

3.1.1. Antibacterial Activity of Formulations for Topical Use

The results of the MIC plate assay demonstrated that Ulmoplus® and Ulmoplus® with CuNPs (U + F1 or U + F2) inhibited the growth of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922). A lower MIC was observed for the medical-grade honey, U + F1, and U + F2 (6.25%, v/v) for Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25,923 in comparison with P. aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. Equivalent MICs were found for P. aeruginosa in the three samples (12.5%, v/v). In the case of Escherichia coli, the minimum inhibitory activity of Ulmoplus® (12.5%, v/v) was higher than that of U + F1 and U + F2 (25%, v/v). A summary of MICs for experimental groups are shown in Table 2.

3.1.2. Selection of the Definitive Prototype Based on the F1 and F2 CuNPs Formulations in Uninfected and Infected Lesions

Ulmoplus® with CuNPs formulations (U + F1 or U + F2), studied in lesions without and with infection, showed the following characteristics:

Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, Formulation 1 (U + F1)

At 24 h after the injury, both groups of animals had a compact eschar of full skin thickness and 1 cm in diameter. This eschar fell off between days 6 and 7 of healing in the group without infection, leaving behind granulation tissue that was partially epithelialized on the day of the biopsy (day 10 of treatment). Based on histopathologic analysis, an early proliferative stage was observed, with incomplete epithelialization and poor epidermal organization in ≥60% of the tissue. The dermal layer presented a late inflammatory stage, with immature and inflammatory tissue in ≥60% of the tissue. At the dermal level, the presence of 4–7 inflammatory cells per histological field was observed. At the level of the blood vessels, a scarce development of angiogenesis was observed, with an average of 1–2 vessels per histological field and the presence of congestion, hemorrhage, and edema (Figure 1A,B).
In lesions from infected animals, eschar detachment occurred on day 7, with a more advanced epithelialization process on the day of biopsy. In this group, 48 h after the injury, there were subtle and classic signs of local infection: an erythematous halo, a volume increase, and local tenderness. At the histopathological level, the lesion with the infection presented an initial proliferative stage and a late inflammatory phase. However, epidermal regeneration reached 80% of the tissue, with poor epidermal organization and a state of differentiation. The scarred dermis presented a thick granulation layer and well-formed collagen matrix in ≥60% of the tissue, presenting an average of 1–4 inflammatory cells per histological field. A mild fibroblastic reaction, proliferation of collagen fibers, and presence of angiogenesis, with more than seven vessels per site arranged vertically towards the epithelial surface, were found (Figure 1C,D).

Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, Formulation 2 (U + F2)

At 24 h after the injury, both groups of animals had a thick, compact eschar that was 1 cm in diameter. This eschar fell off between days 5 and 6 in the group that did not get an infection, leaving behind granulation tissue that had reached an advanced epithelium on the day of the biopsy. According to histopathological analysis, this group presented an initial proliferative fibroblastic stage, still observing acute inflammatory elements with complete epidermal remodeling in ≥80% of the tissue. The dermis presented moderate remodeling in ≥40% of the tissue, with an average of 4–7 inflammatory cells per histological field and a mild fibroblastic reaction and proliferation of collagen fibers. Low levels of angiogenesis, congestion, hemorrhage, and edema were found. The collagen fibers were regularly arranged and differentiated from the hypodermis, forming thick bundles (Figure 2A,B).
In the lesions of infected animals, the detachment of the eschar occurred on day 5 of healing, with epithelium on the day of the biopsy. According to the histopathological analysis, the tissue presented an initial proliferative stage with epithelialization. On day 10 of healing, the epidermis had almost completely grown back in 80% of the tissue, which had a stratum corneum, different layers, and a clear basement membrane. The dermal layer presented a proliferative stage, with moderate dermal remodeling in ≥60% of the tissue and the presence of 4–7 inflammatory cells per histological field. A total of 5–6 vessels per site were observed. Epidermal regeneration was observed at the edges of the wound (Figure 2C,D).

3.2. Phase II of the Experiment

3.2.1. Experimental Study with Selected Prototype

After the preliminary tests, formulation 2 (F2) of CuNPs was chosen (U + F2) due to histological analysis and the results of the quantification of collagen fibers in scar tissue (Figure 3). Then, gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with the chosen CuNPs formulation (U + F2) was used, and the histopathological procedures and quantification of type I and III collagen fibers were repeated. In addition, stereological procedures of fibroblasts and PMN were measured.

3.2.2. Ulmoplus ® with F2 CuNPs, without Infection (U + F2NI)

The group without infection began its healing 24 h after the injury; macroscopically, it showed the detachment of the eschar on day 6 of healing, giving way to 100% granulated tissue, which reached epithelialization in 80% of the animals in the group. The biopsies taken from the treated area presented a proliferative stage with moderate epithelialization in ≥60% of the tissue on day 10 of treatment, mostly with the presence of stratum corneum, differentiated layers, and an evident basement membrane. The dermal area presented moderate remodeling in ≥60% of the tissue, where the presence of 4–7 inflammatory cells per histological field was observed. At the level of the blood vessels, there was an abundant presence of blood vessels, with more than seven vessels per field arranged vertically towards the epithelial surface (Table 3, Figure 4).

3.2.3. Ulmoplus® with F2 CuNPs, with Infection (U + F2I)

This group showed small signs of infection 24 h after the bacterial inoculation, such as increased heat, volume, and erythema around the edges. The fall of the eschar, with passage to the granulation tissue, was maintained for an average of seven days, reaching day 10 of treatment with partial visualization of the epithelium. Histopathological analysis of biopsies taken from the infected area and treated with gauze and formulation 2 showed that the infection was in an advanced proliferative stage, and on day 10 of treatment, the remodeling stage began. Epidermal regeneration reached 100% of the tissue, with good epidermal organization, a state of differentiation, and the presence of a basal lamina. The scarred dermis presented complete tissue organization in ≥80% of the tissue with no evident inflammation, presenting an average of 1–4 inflammatory cells per histological field. A fibroblastic reaction and proliferation of collagen fibers were observed. At the level of the superficial dermis, numerous blood vessels and abundant small capillaries were observed, with more than seven vessels per field arranged vertically towards the epithelial surface (Table 3, Figure 5 and Figure 6).
The presence and type of collagen fibers in the dermal scar can be seen in Figure 7. The results show variations in type I and III collagen fibers content for each group (p < 0.05). The type I collagen content in the dermal scar was higher in the U + F2NI group compared to the U + F2I group (p = 0.051). Both groups presented a high production of type III collagen fibers. In relation to the type I collagen fibers content, the production of type III collagen fibers being higher in the U + F2NI group (p = 0.004).

3.2.4. Stereological Analysis

In the scar dermis, both the U + F2NI group and the U + F2I group showed a proliferative phase. NA, VV, and SV values for fibroblasts were slightly higher in the U + F2I group compared to the U + F2NI group. The NA and VV for PMN were slightly higher in the group with infection (U + F2I), as observed in Table 4. Post hoc tests showed statistically significant differences in VV Fibroblasts and SV Fibroblasts between the U + F2NI and U + F2I groups (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

Wound healing is one of the most complex processes in the human body. It involves the spatial and temporal synchronization of a variety of cell types with distinct roles in the phases of hemostasis, inflammation, growth, re-epithelialization, and remodeling. The healing properties of honey have been evaluated in various investigations, both in humans and animals, antibiotics against bacteria with previously acquired resistance [69,70,71], debridement and stimulant benefits in vascularization [71,72,73,74]. Furthermore, the wound-healing ability of honey is also related to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity, as well as its capacity to promote re-epithelialization, angiogenesis, skin regeneration, and immune cell stimulation [75,76]. In this sense, ascorbic acid improves the healing process, promotes neovascularization and fibroblast maturation, as well as collagen deposition, improving the conversion of procollagen to collagen [77,78,79]; also, it switches on the prolyl-hydroxylase enzyme, which speeds up the hydroxylation of proline [80]. This is necessary to keep the triple helix of the collagen molecule stable. In addition, ascorbic acid raises the level of mRNA for collagen I and III generation in fibroblasts [81]. Therefore, the use of medical-grade Ulmo honey supplemented with ascorbic acid, commercially called Ulmoplus®, has been studied and developed in previous research, achieving effective, rapid, good-quality healing, boosting the healing and contraction effects on burn wounds, and regulating the angiogenesis and re-epithelization processes mediated by FGF-2 [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
CuNPs have recently been recognized as antimicrobial agents [82]. In fact, CuNPs have recently been recognized as antimicrobial agents [82]. In fact, CuNPs demonstrate that after just 2 h of contact, they were able to reduce more than 98% of all tested strains at high CuNPs concentration (E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus and C. albicans) [82]. Also, the antibacterial activity of CuNPs against Staphylococcus epidermidis, E. coli, and Staphylococcus aureus has been reported [83], where CuNPs are more effective against P. aeruginosa than Staphylococcus aureus [84].
Previous studies have also described that copper, in its different forms, participates in the angiogenic regulation of healing. For example, several case reports by Melamed et al. [28] demonstrate that copper oxide-containing wound dressings not only safeguard the wound and dressing from microbial contamination, but also, and more importantly, promote skin regeneration and wound recovery. Likewise, it has been described that the addition of Cu++ to dressings increases blood vessels and improves wound closure in diabetic mice, promoting cell proliferation and angiogenesis [85]. In fact, CuS NPs may accelerate wound healing through both angiogenesis and antibacterial activity [46,86,87]. Moreover, NPs with a concentration of 200 μg/mL significantly promote cell proliferation in in vitro and in vivo models [88]. In this study, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were sensitive at moderate (6.25%, v/v) or higher (12.5%, v/v) concentrations of Ulmoplus® and Ulmoplus® with CuNPs (U + F1 or U + F2) and displayed the same antibacterial potency as Ulmo honey (Table 2) [26]. These results confirm the strong inhibitory activity of Ulmoplus® and Ulmoplus® with CuNPs (U + F1 or U + F2) against most pathogenic microorganisms generally found in wounds and ulcers [89]. In addition, the antibacterial activity of Ulmoplus® against Escherichia coli was the same as that of Ulmo 90 and Manuka honey [62]. These results indicate that Ulmoplus® by itself can be used as a therapeutic agent to treat bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli (Table 2). Due to the aforementioned, the addition of CuNPs to medical-grade honey seems to be a feasible alternative to improve the healing process in infected and uninfected wounds.
When Ulmoplus® with CuNPs (U + F2) was used the semiquantitative histological analysis showed that there was an initial proliferative stage, with tissue epithelization, fibroblastic reaction, and the growth of collagen fibers. This meant that the speed of the healing process was incteased. These results suggest that U + F2 could be a good option for the healing process in animals infected with P. aeruginosa, a common cause of nosocomial infections that include pneumonia, infections at the surgical site, infections of the urinary tract, and bacteremia. In fact, P. aeruginosa is estimated to be responsible for 7.1–7.3% of all healthcare-associated infections [1,2]. Due to its importance and impact on public health, P. aeruginosa was chosen to be inoculated in the infected group.
Collagens I and III are major collagens in the connective tissue of the skin, accounting for at least 95% of all collagen content. The amount of collagen III made affects the diameter of the new collagen fibers, the structure of the granulation tissue, the stability of the wound, and the way the dermis will appear in the future [90]. In this sense, the evaluation of collagen fiber content in the treated group (U + F2) demonstrated a significant increase in the production of type III collagen fibers compared to type I collagen fibers for the U + F2NI and U + F2I groups. This intense production of collagen III observed in U + F2NI and U + F2I groups is a necessary step for cell migration and regulation of type I collagen in the processes of wound repair and regeneration [81,91].
This correlates with the histopathological results of both formulations. In fact, the high production values of type III collagen fibers are comparatively higher in our study when the results are compared with the Ulmo honey group for wound healing, which is described as a high purity Ulmo honey (>90% purity) [22]. Regarding collagen fiber content, the early appearance of type III collagen is associated with an increase in collagen synthesis and may function to provide the initial structure of the wound, acting as a support for a better quality of healing [92]. In addition, previous findings suggest that the increase in type III collagen content can be attributed to honey because it contains essential amino acids such as arginine and glutamic acid, which help supply the proline precursor for collagen synthesis; to the sugar content, which provides the energy necessary for the metabolism of fibroblasts and collagen synthesis; and to iron, copper, and ascorbic acid, which are essential for prolyl and lysyl hydroxylase enzymes, promoting hydroxylation and fiber crossing [93,94].
The high values of type I and III collagen obtained for the U + F2NI group are related to the state of collagen maturation. This group was not exposed to an infectious process, as it was for the U + F2I group, by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, the collagen content values were high in relation to the gold standard. Therefore, it is correct to affirm that adding CuNPS to Ulmoplus® (U + F2) improved the maturation of collagen fibers. Indeed, previous studies have shown that lesions treated with CuNPs modulate multiple cytokine and growth factor action pathways and are fundamentally associated with all phases of wound healing [95]. In fact, Cu enhances the synthesis of extracellular matrix compounds such as fibrinogen, collagen formation, and integrins, which are the primary mediators of cell attachment to the extracellular matrix [28,51].
Burn wounds treated with honey have been evaluated in previous research [3,28,96,97]. Despite this, there are not many morpho-quantitative assays with reliable information addressing morphological changes in wound healing. So, in this investigation the utilization of quantitative techniques, including stereology, is helpful. Analyses of PMN and fibroblasts in scar tissue revealed a significant correlation with previously reported histological characteristics, facilitating comprehension of the observations. In the inflammatory phase, polymorphonuclear cells are essential and swiftly diminish, resulting in the proliferation of fibroblasts and epithelial cells at the wound site [21]. On day 10 of treatment, PMN presented similar values, between infected and uninfected groups despite their infectious conditions which would indicate a balance between both groups. If we compare these results with those obtained by Schencke et al. [22], for NA (756.876 ± 196.620 mm−2) and VV (2.700 ± 1.370%) values of PMN in the Ulmo honey group, it can be determined which formulation under study (U + F2) was able to regulate the inflammatory process. However, fibroblast content presented higher NA (2250.825 ± 433.992 mm−2), VV (15.238 ± 3.861%), and SV (91.505 ± 23.791 mm−1) values in the U + F2I group, which suggests an advanced proliferative stage. These results coincide with what was indicated in previous investigations, where fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition are, typically, found at this stage during wound healing [98]. Possible explanations are related to CuNP ability to stimulate angiogenesis by affecting the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1α) and regulation of the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and decreasing the timing of wound healing even in infected tissue [50]. More importantly, our results found that CuNPs promote rapid wound healing via acceleration of proliferation and neovascularization when collagen fiber content and stereological analysis were performed.

5. Limitations

The purpose of this study was to see how medical-grade honey (Ulmoplus®) with CuNPs helped heal chronic wounds that were infected or not. Although our findings are related to what is described in the literature and allow an assertive morphological evaluation of the components used, future research should involve the analysis of, for example, growth factors involved in the healing process.
Since this is an experimental and preclinical study of a nano-functionalized medical-grade honey for the treatment of infected wounds, the stability studies of the formulation through chemical–pharmaceutical and analytical tests will be carried out later. These studies must include useful life periods and effective and safe storage conditions for the formulated product.

6. Conclusions

The use of NPs is increasing due to their unique characteristics, which have led to their widespread utilization in different branches of industry and medicine as they can be optimized for drug delivery in a more personalized manner. Drug-delivery systems facilitated by nanoparticles have a prodigious potential to influence medicine and the pharmaceutical sector, because researchers can deliver the drugs for a longer timeframe with reduced dosing frequency and improved accuracy and entrance to hard-to-reach tissues where the molecular size, shape, and surface properties of the nanoparticles are controlled. This nanotechnology can improve a patient’s quality of life in a drastic manner, reducing disease severity, and improving the clinical outcome.
We created an Ulmoplus® gel loaded with copper nanoparticles due to the beneficial properties of each of them in infection control and wound healing. The results suggest that the nanofunctionalized Ulmoplus® with copper (Ulmoplus® + CuNPs) has synergistic effects on the production of dermal collagen fibers probably due to the lipids, carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins, amino acids, and minerals of honey; and the lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA damage in various bacteria. These results are relevant not only because the wounds heal in shorter time but also because the development of fibrosis and hypertrophic scars is reduced. These results are positively correlated with the semiquantitative histopathological analysis, demonstrating that Ulmoplus® + CuNPs improved healing, both at the dermal and epidermal levels, achieving good contraction of wounds caused by burns, validating the synergy between the two compounds.
Future studies of the stability of the formulation under storage conditions should include samples of the formulation at predetermined time intervals to measure the following aspects: copper nanoparticles concentration; viscosity; pH; antioxidant capacity; antimicrobial activity; ascorbic acid concentration; and formulations toxicity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S., C.S. (Carolina Schencke) and M.d.S.; methodology J.S., C.S. (Carolina Schencke) and M.d.S.; validation, J.S., C.S. (Carolina Schencke) and M.d.S.; formal analysis, J.S., C.S. (Cristian Sandoval), C.S. (Carolina Schencke), F.A. and M.d.S.; investigation, J.S., C.S. (Cristian Sandoval), C.S. (Carolina Schencke), F.A. and M.d.S.; resources, C.S. (Carolina Schencke) and M.d.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S., C.S. (Cristian Sandoval) and C.S. (Carolina Schencke); writing—review and editing, J.S., C.S. (Cristian Sandoval) and C.S. (Carolina Schencke); supervision, C.S. (Carolina Schencke) and M.d.S.; project administration, M.d.S.; funding acquisition, M.d.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Universidad de La Frontera (number: DI22-0063) and ANID-PFCHA/Doctorado Nacional/2019-21190160.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Scientific Ethics Committee of the Universidad de La Frontera (number: 050/22).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available by request due to licensing reasons.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shariati, A.; Moradabadi, A.; Azimi, T.; Ghaznavi-Rad, E. Wound healing properties and antimicrobial activity of platelet-derived biomaterials. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dev, S.K.; Choudhury, P.; Srivastava, R.; Sharma, M. Antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and wound healing activity of polyherbal formulation. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 111, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Landén, N.X.; Li, D.; Ståhle, M. Transition from inflammation to proliferation: A critical step during wound healing. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 3861–3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lohana, P.; Suryaprawira, A.; Woods, E.L.; Dally, J.; Gait-Carr, E.; Alaidaroos, N.Y.A.; Heard, C.M.; Lee, K.Y.; Ruge, F.; Farrier, J.N.; et al. Role of Enzymic Antioxidants in Mediating Oxidative Stress and Contrasting Wound Healing Capabilities in Oral Mucosal/Skin Fibroblasts and Tissues. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Verbanic, S.; Shen, Y.; Lee, J.; Deacon, J.M.; Chen, I.A. Microbial predictors of healing and short-term effect of debridement on the microbiome of chronic wounds. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2020, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kirker, K.R.; James, G.A. In vitro studies evaluating the effects of biofilms on wound-healing cells: A review. Apmis 2017, 125, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Haesler, E.; Swanson, T.; Ousey, K.; Carville, K. Clinical indicators of wound infection and biofilm: Reaching international consensus. J. Wound Care 2019, 28, s4–s12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, S.; Renick, P.; Senkowsky, J.; Nair, A.; Tang, L. Diagnostics for Wound Infections. Adv. Wound Care 2021, 10, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lorenzo, M.; Hernández, R.; Soria, M. Chronic wounds treated in an emergency service of primary health care. Enferm. Glob. 2014, 13, 23–31. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kosaraju, R.; Rennert, R.C.; Maan, Z.N.; Duscher, D.; Barrera, J.; Whittam, A.J.; Januszyk, M.; Rajadas, J.; Rodrigues, M.; Gurtner, G.C. Adipose-derived stem cell-seeded hydrogelsincrease endogenous progenitor cell recruitment and neovascularization in wounds. Tissue Eng. Part A 2016, 22, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qiang, L.; Sample, A.; Liu, H.; Wu, X.; He, Y.-Y. Epidermal SIRT1 regulates inflammation, cell migration, and wound healing. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yilmaz, A.C.; Aygin, D. Honey dressing in wound treatment: A systematic review. Complement Ther. Med. 2020, 51, 102388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Meo, S.A.; Al-Asiri, S.A.; Mahesar, A.L.; Ansari, M.J. Role of honey in modern medicine. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 975–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Schencke, C.; Vásquez, B.; Sandoval, C.; del Sol, M. El Rol de la Miel en los Procesos Morfofisiológicos de Reparación de Heridas. Int. J. Morphol. 2016, 34, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lotfinia, F.; Norouzi, M.R.; Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L.; Naeimirad, M. Anthocyanin/Honey-Incorporated Alginate Hydrogel as a Bio-Based pH-Responsive/Antibacterial/Antioxidant Wound Dressing. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, C.; Guo, M.; Zhang, N.; Wang, G. Effectiveness of honey dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2019, 34, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Robson, V.; Dodd, S.; Thomas, S. Standardized antibacterial honey (Medihoney™) with standard therapy in wound care: Randomized clinical trial. J. Adv. Nurs. 2009, 65, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hazrati, M.; Mehrabani, D.; Japoni, A.; Montasery, H.; Azarpira, N.; Hamidian-Shirazi, A.; Tanideh, N. Effect of Honey on Healing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infected Burn Wounds in Rat. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2010, 37, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schencke, C.; Salvo, J.; Veuthey, C.; Hidalgo, A.; del Sol, M. Cicatrización en quemaduras tipo AB-B utilizando miel de ulmo asociada a vitamina C oral. Int. J. Morphol. 2011, 29, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schencke, C.; Vasconcellos, A.; Salvo, J.; Veuthey, C.; del Sol, M. Efecto Cicatrizante de la Miel de Ulmo (Eucryphia cordifolia) Suplementada con Ácido Ascórbico como Tratamiento en Quemaduras. Int. J. Morphol. 2015, 33, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schencke, C.; Vasconcellos, A.; Sandoval, C.; Torres, P.; Acevedo, F.; del Sol, M. Morphometric evaluation of wound healing in burns treated with Ulmo (Eucryphia cordifolia) honey alone and supplemented with ascorbic acid in guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). Burn. Trauma 2016, 3, 4–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schencke, C.; Sandoval, C.; Vásquez, B.; Sol, M.D. Quantitative analysis of dermal scars in deep skin burns treated with Ulmo honey supplemented with ascorbic acid. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2018, 11, 2422–2429. [Google Scholar]
  23. Salvo Arias, J.; Schencke Figueroa, C.; Arias Bustamante, A.; Otzen Hernández, T.; del Sol Calderón, M. Validación clínica de enfermería en cicatrización de úlceras venosas con miel nativa chilena suplementada. Rev. Urug. Enferm. 2020, 15, 13. [Google Scholar]
  24. Schencke, C.; Salvo, J.; Vasconcellos, A.; del Sol, M. Estudio Comparativo de la Cicatrización en Quemaduras con Tratamiento en Base a Miel de Ulmo (Eucryphia cordifolia) y Vitamina C oral versus Hidrogel en Cobayos (Cavia porcellus). Int. J. Morphol. 2013, 31, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. del Sol Calderon, M.; Schencke Figueroa, C.; Salvo Arias, J.; Hidalgo Sandoval, A.; Ocharan Torre, F. Combined therapy of Ulmo honey (Eucryphia cordifolia) and ascorbic acid to treat venous ulcers. Rev. Lat.-Am. Enferm. 2015, 23, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Acevedo, F.; Torres, P.; Oomah, B.D.; de Alencar, S.M.; Massarioli, A.P.; Martín-Venegas, R.; Albarral-Ávila, V.; Burgos-Díaz, C.; Ferrer, R.; Rubilar, M. Volatile and non-volatile/semi-volatile compounds and in vitro bioactive properties of Chilean Ulmo (Eucryphia cordifolia Cav.) honey. Food Res. Int. 2017, 94, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schencke, C.; Vásquez, B.; Sandoval, C.; del Sol, M. Ulmoplus® Increases FGF-2 Expression and Promote Burn Wound Healing. Int. J. Morphol. 2021, 39, 1701–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Melamed, E.; Kiambi, P.; Okoth, D.; Honigber, I.; Tamir, E.; Borkow, G. Healing of Chronic Wounds by Copper Oxide-Impregnated Wound Dressings—Case Series. Medicina 2021, 57, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Salvo, J.; Sandoval, C. Role of copper nanoparticles in wound healing for chronic wounds: Literature review. Burn. Trauma 2022, 10, tkab047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Barroso, A.; Mestre, H.; Ascenso, A.; Simões, S.; Reis, C. Nanomaterials in wound healing: From material sciences to wound healing applications. Nano Sel. 2020, 1, 443–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, X.; Chang, J.; Wu, C. Bioactive inorganic/organic nanocomposites for wound healing. Appl. Mater. Today 2018, 11, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Michopoulou, A.; Rousselle, P. How do epidermal matrix metalloproteinases support re-epithelialization during skin healing. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2015, 25, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Philips, N.; Hwang, H.; Chauhan, S.; Leonardi, D.; Gonzalez, S. Stimulation of Cell Proliferation and Expression of Matrixmetalloproteinase-1 and Interluekin-8 Genes in Dermal Fibroblasts by Copper. Connect. Tissue Res. 2010, 51, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Borkow, G. Using Copper to Improve the Well-Being of the Skin. Curr. Chem. Biol. 2014, 8, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, L.; Hu, C.; Shao, L. The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: Present situation and prospects for the future. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 1227–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sánchez-López, E.; Gomes, D.; Esteruelas, G.; Bonilla, L.; Lopez-Machado, A.L.; Galindo, R.; Cano, A.; Espina, M.; Ettcheto, M.; Camins, A.; et al. Metal-Based Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agents: An Overview. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mitra, D.; Kang, E.-T.; Neoh, K.G. Antimicrobial Copper-Based Materials and Coatings: Potential Multifaceted Biomedical Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 12, 21159–21182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Santo, C.E.; Lam, E.W.; Elowsky, C.G.; Quaranta, D.; Domaille, D.W.; Chang, C.J.; Grass, G. Bacterial Killing by Dry Metallic Copper Surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 77, 794–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Warnes, S.L.; Caves, V.; Keevil, C.W. Mechanism of copper surface toxicity in Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella involves immediate membrane depolarization followed by slower rate of DNA destruction which differs from that observed for Gram-positive bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 14, 1730–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Grass, G.; Rensing, C.; Solioz, M. Metallic copper as an antimicrobial surface. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 1541–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Walger, E.; Marlin, N.; Mortha, G.; Molton, F.; Duboc, C. Hydroxyl Radical Generation by the H2O2/CuII/Phenanthroline System under Both Neutral and Alkaline Conditions: An EPR/Spin-Trapping Investigation. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 687. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ezraty, B.; Gennaris, A.; Barras, F.; Collet, J.-F. Oxidative stress, protein damage and repair in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Cheloni, G.; Marti, E.; Slaveykova, V.I. Interactive effects of copper oxide nanoparticles and light to green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Aquat. Toxicol. 2016, 170, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Xiong, Q.; Hornburg, D.; Tao, W.; Farokhzad, O.C. Nano–bio interactions in cancer: From therapeutics delivery to early detection. Accounts Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Macomber, L.; Imlay, J.A. The iron-sulfur clusters of dehydratases are primary intracellular targets of copper toxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 8344–8349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Peng, Y.; He, D.; Ge, X.; Lu, Y.; Chai, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Mao, Z.; Luo, G.; Deng, J.; Zhang, Y. Construction of heparin-based hydrogel incorporated with Cu5.4O ultrasmall nanozymes for wound healing and inflammation inhibition. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 3109–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hatori, Y.; Clasen, S.; Hasan, N.M.; Barry, A.N.; Lutsenko, S. Functional partnership of the copper export machinery and glutathione balance in human cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 26678–26687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Babula, P.; Masarik, M.; Adam, V.; Eckschlager, T.; Stiborova, M.; Trnkova, L.; Skutkova, H.; Provaznik, I.; Hubalek, J.; Kizek, R. Mammalian metallothioneins: Properties and functions. Metallomics 2012, 4, 739–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Febré, N.; Silva, V.; Báez, A.; Palza, H.; Delgado, K.; Aburto, I.; Silva, V. Comportamiento antibacteriano de partículas de cobre frente a microorganismos obtenidos de úlceras crónicas infectadas y su relación con la resistencia a antimicrobianos de uso común. Rev. Med. Chile 2016, 144, 1523–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, E.; Li, F.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, C.; Li, M.; Yang, K. A new antibacterial titanium–copper sintered alloy: Preparation and antibacterial property. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2013, 33, 4280–4287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sandoval, C.; Ríos, G.; Sepúlveda, N.; Salvo, J.; Souza-Mello, V.; Farías, J. Effectiveness of Copper Nanoparticles in Wound Healing Process Using In Vivo and In Vitro Studies: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Søgaard, D.; Lindblad, M.M.; Paidi, M.D.; Hasselholt, S.; Lykkesfeldt, J.; Tveden-Nyborg, P. In vivo vitamin C deficiency in guinea pigs increases ascorbate transporters in liver but not kidney and brain. Nutr. Res. 2014, 34, 639–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Todo, H. Transdermal Permeation of Drugs in Various Animal Species. Pharmaceutics 2017, 9, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals; Institute for Laboratory Animal Research; Division on Earth and Life Studies; National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th ed.; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  55. Aular, Y. Aspectos bioéticos del uso de animales de experimentación en investigación científica: Legislación y comités de bioética animal. Revista Arjé 2018, 12, 94–103. [Google Scholar]
  56. Salvo, J.; Schencke, C.; Pavez, M.; Veuthey, C.; del Sol, M. Thermal injury protocol to study healing, with and without infection, in Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) model. Int. J. Morphol. 2023, 41, 1053–1057. [Google Scholar]
  57. Mathews, K.; Kronen, P.W.; Lascelles, D.; Nolan, A.; Robertson, S.; Steagall, P.V.; Wright, B.; Yamashita, K. Guidelines for recognition, assessment and treatment of pain. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2014, 55, E10–E68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Institut Municipal d’Investigació Mèdica. Calculadora de Grandària Mostral GRANMO. Version 7.12. Barcelona, Spain. Available online: https://www.imim.es/ofertadeserveis/software-public/granmo/ (accessed on 28 May 2022).
  59. Althubaiti, A. Sample size determination: A practical guide for health researchers. J. Gen. Fam. Med. 2022, 24, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pérez-Olvera, O.; Arellano, B.S.; Rodríguez, M.H.A. Overview of Stereological Methods and their Applications for Cell Biology. Patol. Rev. Latinoam. 2012, 50, 63–71. [Google Scholar]
  61. Rahim, K.; Saleha, S.; Zhu, X.; Huo, L.; Basit, A.; Franco, O.L. Bacterial Contribution in Chronicity of Wounds. Microb. Ecol. 2017, 73, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sherlock, O.; Dolan, A.; Athman, R.; Power, A.; Gethin, G.; Cowman, S.; Humphreys, H. Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of Ulmo honey from Chile and Manuka honey against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2010, 21, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Masson-Meyers, D.S.; Andrade, T.A.M.; Caetano, G.F.; Guimaraes, F.R.; Leite, M.N.; Leite, S.N.; Frade, M.A.C. Experimental models and methods for cutaneous wound healing assessment. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2020, 101, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Serra, R.; Grande, R.; Butrico, L.; Rossi, A.; Settimio, U.F.; Caroleo, B.; Amato, B.; Gallelli, L.; de Franciscis, S. Chronic wound infections: The role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 2015, 13, 605–613. [Google Scholar]
  65. Vries, C.R.d.; Sweere, J.M.; Ishak, H.; Sunkari, V.; Bach, M.S.; Liu, D.; Manasherob, R.; Bollyky, P.L. A Delayed Inoculation Model of Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Wound Infection. J. Vis. Exp. 2020, 156, e60599. [Google Scholar]
  66. López De Padilla, C.M.; Coenen, M.J.; Tovar, A.; De la Vega, R.E.; Evans, C.H.; Müller, S.A. Picrosirius Red Staining: Revisiting Its Application to the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Collagen Type I and Type III in Tendon. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2021, 69, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Fallah Huseini, H.; Abdolghaffari, A.H.; Ahwazi, M.; Jasemi, E.; Yaghoobi, M.; Ziaee, M. Topical Application of Teucrium polium Can Improve Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats. Int. J. Low. Extrem. Wounds 2020, 19, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Mandarim-de-Lacerda, C.A.; del Sol, M. Tips for Studies with Quantitative Morphology (Morphometry and Stereology). Int. J. Morphol. 2017, 35, 1482–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Combarros-Fuertes, P.; Fresno, J.M.; Estevinho, M.M.; Sousa-Pimenta, M.; Tornadijo, M.E.; Estevinho, L.M. Honey: Another Alternative in the Fight against Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria? Antibiotics 2020, 9, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Campeau, M.E.M.; Patel, R. Antibiofilm Activity of Manuka Honey in Combination with Antibiotics. Int. J. Bacteriol. 2014, 2014, 795281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hayes, G.; Wright, N.; Gardner, S.L.; Telzrow, C.L.; Wommack, A.J.; Vigueira, P.A. Manuka honey and methylglyoxal increase the sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus to linezolid. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 66, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Tashkandi, H. Honey in wound healing: An updated review. Open Life Sci. 2021, 16, 1091–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chopra, H.; Kumar, S.; Safi, S.Z.; Singh, I.; Bin Emran, T. Wound dressings: Recent updates. Int. J. Surg. 2022, 104, 106793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Scepankova, H.; Combarros-Fuertes, P.; Fresno, J.M.; Tornadijo, M.E.; Dias, M.S.; Pinto, C.A.; Saraiva, J.A.; Estevinho, L.M. Role of honey in advanced wound care. Molecules 2021, 26, 4784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. McLoone, P.; Tabys, D.; Fyfe, L. Honey Combination Therapies for Skin and Wound Infections: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2020, 13, 875–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Oryan, A.; Alemzadeh, E.; Moshiri, A. Biological properties and therapeutic activities of honey in wound healing: A narrative review and meta-analysis. J. Tissue Viability 2016, 25, 98–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gunton, J.E.; Girgis, C.M.; Lau, T.; Vicaretti, M.; Begg, L.; Flood, V. Vitamin C improves healing of foot ulcers: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Br. J. Nutr. 2021, 126, 1451–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Mohammed, B.M.; Fisher, B.J.; Kraskauskas, D.; Ward, S.; Wayne, J.S.; Brophy, D.F.; Fowler, A.A.; Yager, D.R.; Natarajan, R. Vitamin C promotes wound healing through novel pleiotropic mechanisms. Int. Wound J. 2016, 13, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vissers, M.C.; Pullar, J.M. Re-opening old wounds—Vitamin C and wound healing deserve a re-examination. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 115, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gemalmaz, H.C.; Sarıyılmaz, K.; Ozkunt, O.; Gurgen, S.G.; Silay, S. Role of a combination dietary supplement containing mucopolysaccharides, vitamin C, and collagen on tendon healing in rats. Acta Orthop. Traumatol. Turc. 2018, 52, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gref, R.; Deloménie, C.; Maksimenko, A.; Gouadon, E.; Percoco, G.; Lati, E.; Desmaële, D.; Zouhiri, F.; Couvreur, P. Vitamin C–squalene bioconjugate promotes epidermal thickening and collagen production in human skin. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bogdanović, U.; Lazić, V.; Vodnik, V.; Budimir, M.; Marković, Z.; Dimitrijević, S. Copper nanoparticles with high antimicrobial activity. Mat. Lett. 2014, 128, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bari, A.; Bloise, N.; Fiorilli, S.; Novajra, G.; Vallet-Regí, M.; Bruni, G.; Torres-Pardo, A.; González-Calbet, J.M.; Visai, L.; Vitale-Brovarone, C. Copper-containing mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles as multifunctional agent for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2017, 55, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Paterson, T.E.; Bari, A.; Bullock, A.J.; Turner, R.; Montalbano, G.; Fiorilli, S.; Vitale-Brovarone, C.; MacNeil, S.; Shepherd, J. Multifunctional Copper-Containing Mesoporous Glass Nanoparticles as Antibacterial and Proangiogenic Agents for Chronic Wounds. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Konerding, M.A.; Ziebart, T.; Wolloscheck, T.; Wellmann, A.; Ackermann, M. Impact of single-dose application of TGF-β, copper peptide, stanozolol and ascorbic acid in hydrogel on midline laparatomy wound healing in a diabetic mouse model. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2012, 30, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, Z.; Zhou, F.; Li, Z.; Lin, S.; Chen, L. Hydrogel cross-linked with dynamic covalent bonding and micellization for pro- moting burn wound healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 25194–25202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Shanmugapriya, K.; Kang, H.W. Engineering pharmaceutical nanocarriers for photodynamic therapy on wound healing: Review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 105, 110110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Zhou, W.; Zi, L.; Cen, Y.; You, C.; Tian, M. Copper sulfide nanoparticles-incorporated hyaluronic acid injectable hydrogel with enhanced angiogenesis to promote wound healing. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mihai, M.M.; Holban, A.M.; Giurcăneanu, C.; Popa, L.G.; Buzea, M.; Filipov, M.; Lazăr, V.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Popa, M.I. Identification and phenotypic characterization of the most frequent bacterial etiologies in chronic skin ulcers. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. 2014, 55, 1401–1408. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  90. Wang, T.; Gu, Q.; Zhao, J.; Mei, J.; Shao, M.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, F. Calcium alginate enhances wound healing by up-regulating the ratio of collagen types I/III in diabetic rats. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 6636–6645. [Google Scholar]
  91. Davison-Kotler, E.; Marshall, W.S.; García-Gareta, E. Sources of collagen for biomaterials in skin wound healing. Bioengineering 2019, 6, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mathew-Steiner, S.S.; Roy, S.; Sen, C.K. Collagen in wound healing. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Alam, F.; Islam, M.A.; Gan, S.H.; Khalil, M.I. Honey: A potential therapeutic agent for managing diabetic wounds. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2014, 2014, 169130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Albaugh, V.L.; Mukherjee, K.; Barbul, A. proline precursors and collagen synthesis: Biochemical challenges of nutrient supplementation and wound healing. J. Nutr. 2017, 147, 2011–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kornblatt, A.P.; Nicoletti, V.G.; Travaglia, A. The neglected role of copper ions in wound healing. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2016, 161, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Abdollahi, Z.; Zare, E.N.; Salimi, F.; Goudarzi, I.; Tay, F.R.; Makvandi, P. Bioactive Carboxymethyl starch-based hydrogels decorated with CuO nanoparticles: Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties and accelerated wound healing in vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Parra, A.; Toro, M.; Jacob, R.; Navarrete, P.; Troncoso, M.; Figueroa, G.; Reyes-Jara, A. Antimicrobial effect of copper surfaces on bacteria isolated from poultry meat. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49 (Suppl. S1), 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Sorushanova, A.; Delgado, L.M.; Wu, Z.; Shologu, N.; Kshirsagar, A.; Raghunath, R.; Mullen, A.M.; Bayon, Y.; Pandit, A.; Raghunath, M.; et al. The collagen suprafamily: From biosynthesis to advanced biomaterial development. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1801651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Biopsy of the healing area of the burn lesion treated with U + F1 on guinea pig skin (Cavia porcellus) after day 10 of treatment: (A,B) non-infected burns of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) and (C,D) infected burns of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). H&E staining.
Figure 1. Biopsy of the healing area of the burn lesion treated with U + F1 on guinea pig skin (Cavia porcellus) after day 10 of treatment: (A,B) non-infected burns of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) and (C,D) infected burns of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). H&E staining.
Pharmaceutics 15 02187 g001
Figure 2. Biopsy of the healing area of the burn lesion treated with U + F2 on guinea pig skin (Cavia porcellus) after day 10 of treatment: (A,B) non-infected burns of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) and (C,D) infected burns of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). H&E staining.
Figure 2. Biopsy of the healing area of the burn lesion treated with U + F2 on guinea pig skin (Cavia porcellus) after day 10 of treatment: (A,B) non-infected burns of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) and (C,D) infected burns of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). H&E staining.
Pharmaceutics 15 02187 g002
Figure 3. Quantification of collagen fibers in scar tissue. Collagen fiber content in the lesion treated with different Ulmoplus® + CuNPs formulations (U + F1 and U + F2), without and with infected burns, in guinea pig (Cavia porcellus), expressed as the area occupied by type I and III collagen fibers (µm2). U + F1NI: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 1 (U + F1), in non-infected burns; U + F1I: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 1 (U + F1), in infected burns; U + F2NI: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 2 (U + F2), in non-infected burns; and U + F2I: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 2 (U + F2), in infected burns. *: p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Quantification of collagen fibers in scar tissue. Collagen fiber content in the lesion treated with different Ulmoplus® + CuNPs formulations (U + F1 and U + F2), without and with infected burns, in guinea pig (Cavia porcellus), expressed as the area occupied by type I and III collagen fibers (µm2). U + F1NI: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 1 (U + F1), in non-infected burns; U + F1I: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 1 (U + F1), in infected burns; U + F2NI: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 2 (U + F2), in non-infected burns; and U + F2I: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 2 (U + F2), in infected burns. *: p < 0.05.
Pharmaceutics 15 02187 g003
Figure 4. Biopsy of the healing area of the burn lesion treated with U + F2NI on guinea pig skin (Cavia porcellus) after day 10 of treatment: (A) H&E staining (10×), (B) van Gieson collagen staining (10×), and (C) van Gieson collagen staining (40×).
Figure 4. Biopsy of the healing area of the burn lesion treated with U + F2NI on guinea pig skin (Cavia porcellus) after day 10 of treatment: (A) H&E staining (10×), (B) van Gieson collagen staining (10×), and (C) van Gieson collagen staining (40×).
Pharmaceutics 15 02187 g004
Figure 5. Biopsy of the healing area of the burn lesion treated with U + F2I on guinea pig skin (Cavia porcellus) after day 10 of treatment: (A) H&E staining (10×) and (B) H&E staining (40×). Epidermal regeneration reached 100% of the tissue, with good epidermal organization. A fibroblastic reaction and proliferation of collagen fibers were observed.
Figure 5. Biopsy of the healing area of the burn lesion treated with U + F2I on guinea pig skin (Cavia porcellus) after day 10 of treatment: (A) H&E staining (10×) and (B) H&E staining (40×). Epidermal regeneration reached 100% of the tissue, with good epidermal organization. A fibroblastic reaction and proliferation of collagen fibers were observed.
Pharmaceutics 15 02187 g005
Figure 6. Biopsy of the healing area of the burn lesion treated with U + F2I on guinea pig skin (Cavia porcellus) after day 10 of treatment: (A) van Gieson collagen staining (10×) and (B) van Gieson collagen staining (40×). Epidermal regeneration reached 100% of the tissue, with good epidermal organization. At the level of the superficial dermis, numerous blood vessels and abundant capillaries were observed.
Figure 6. Biopsy of the healing area of the burn lesion treated with U + F2I on guinea pig skin (Cavia porcellus) after day 10 of treatment: (A) van Gieson collagen staining (10×) and (B) van Gieson collagen staining (40×). Epidermal regeneration reached 100% of the tissue, with good epidermal organization. At the level of the superficial dermis, numerous blood vessels and abundant capillaries were observed.
Pharmaceutics 15 02187 g006
Figure 7. Quantification of collagen fibers in scar tissue. Collagen fiber content in the lesion treated with Ulmoplus® + CuNPs (U + F2), without and with infected burns, in guinea pig (Cavia porcellus), expressed as the area occupied by type I and III collagen fibers (µm2). U + F2NI: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 2 (U + F2), in non-infected burns; and U + F2I: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 2 (U + F2), in infected burns. *: p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Quantification of collagen fibers in scar tissue. Collagen fiber content in the lesion treated with Ulmoplus® + CuNPs (U + F2), without and with infected burns, in guinea pig (Cavia porcellus), expressed as the area occupied by type I and III collagen fibers (µm2). U + F2NI: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 2 (U + F2), in non-infected burns; and U + F2I: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 2 (U + F2), in infected burns. *: p < 0.05.
Pharmaceutics 15 02187 g007
Table 1. The scoring system of the histological changes in burn-wound healing.
Table 1. The scoring system of the histological changes in burn-wound healing.
ScoreRe-EpithelizationGranulationInflammatory CellsAngiogenesis
0Absence of epithelial proliferation in ≥70%
of the tissue
Immature and inflammatory tissue in ≥70% of the tissue13–15 inflammatory cells per
histological field
Absence of angiogenesis,
presence of congestion,
hemorrhage, and edema
1Poor epidermal
organization in ≥60%
of the tissue
Sparse immature and
inflammatory tissue in ≥60% of the tissue
10–13 inflammatory cells per
histological field
1–2 vessels per site,
edema, hemorrhage,
and congestion
2Incomplete epidermal organization in ≥40%
of the tissue
Moderate remodeling
in ≥40% of the tissue
7–10 inflammatory cells per
histological field
3–4 vessels per site,
moderate edema,
and congestion
3Moderate epithelial
proliferation in ≥60%
of the tissue
Layer of coarse granulation and well-formed collagen matrix
in ≥60% of the tissue
4–7 inflammatory cells per
histological field
5–6 vessels per site,
slight edema,
and congestion
4Complete epidermal
remodeling in ≥80%
of the tissue
Complete tissue organization
in ≥80% of the tissue
1–4 inflammatory cells per
histological field
More than seven vessels per
site arranged vertically
toward the epithelial surface
Table 2. Minimum inhibitory concentration (% v/v) of Ulmoplus®, F1, and F2 CuNPs against different pathogen microorganisms.
Table 2. Minimum inhibitory concentration (% v/v) of Ulmoplus®, F1, and F2 CuNPs against different pathogen microorganisms.
Test OrganismsMIC (v/v)
Ulmoplus®U + F1U + F2
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 259236.256.256.25
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 12.512.512.5
Escherichia coli ATCC 2592212.52525
Table 3. Percentage of the histological parameters on the burn-wound healing scale.
Table 3. Percentage of the histological parameters on the burn-wound healing scale.
ParametersScoreGroup Frequency (%)
U + F2NI GroupU + F2I Group
Re-epithelization000
100
200
3800
420100
Granulation000
100
2600
3400
40100
Inflammatory cells000
100
200
36020
44080
Angiogenesis000
100
200
300
4100100
U + F2NI group: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 2 (U + F2), in non-infected burns of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus); U + F2I group: gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® with CuNPs, formulation 2 (U + F2), in infected burns of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). The histological scoring system ranges between 0 and 4, where 4 is the best score for each histological parameter.
Table 4. Stereological analysis in the scar dermal area treated with gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® + CuNPs (U + F2), without and with infection (U + F2NI and U + F2I, respectively).
Table 4. Stereological analysis in the scar dermal area treated with gauze impregnated by Ulmoplus® + CuNPs (U + F2), without and with infection (U + F2NI and U + F2I, respectively).
VariableMean ± SD
U + F2NIU + F2Ip Value
NA Fibroblasts (mm−2)2127.613 ± 484.1642250.825 ± 433.9920.035
VV Fibroblasts (%)12.800 ± 4.16415.238 ± 3.861<0.001
SV Fibroblasts (mm−1)78.324 ± 25.96691.505 ± 23.791<0.001
NA PMN (mm−2)206.821 ± 225.434226.623 ± 181.7090.445
VV PMN (%)1.238 ± 1.6451.143 ± 1.5600.639
NA Fibroblasts: number density per area of fibroblast on scar tissue; VV Fibroblasts: volume density per area of fibroblast on scar tissue; SV Fibroblasts: surface density per area of fibroblast on scar tissue; NA PMN: number density per area of polymorphonuclear cells on scar tissue; and VV PMN: volume density of polymorphonuclear cells on scar tissue.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salvo, J.; Sandoval, C.; Schencke, C.; Acevedo, F.; del Sol, M. Healing Effect of a Nano-Functionalized Medical-Grade Honey for the Treatment of Infected Wounds. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2187. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092187

AMA Style

Salvo J, Sandoval C, Schencke C, Acevedo F, del Sol M. Healing Effect of a Nano-Functionalized Medical-Grade Honey for the Treatment of Infected Wounds. Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(9):2187. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092187

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salvo, Jessica, Cristian Sandoval, Carolina Schencke, Francisca Acevedo, and Mariano del Sol. 2023. "Healing Effect of a Nano-Functionalized Medical-Grade Honey for the Treatment of Infected Wounds" Pharmaceutics 15, no. 9: 2187. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092187

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop