Next Article in Journal
Genetic Variant ABCC1 rs45511401 Is Associated with Increased Response to Statins in Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Next Article in Special Issue
Do AutoML-Based QSAR Models Fulfill OECD Principles for Regulatory Assessment? A 5-HT1A Receptor Case
Previous Article in Journal
Chitosan-Hyaluronan Nanoparticles for Vinblastine Sulfate Delivery: Characterization and Internalization Studies on K-562 Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Puzzle out Machine Learning Model-Explaining Disintegration Process in ODTs
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Drug-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia Toxicity Prediction Based on Machine Learning

Pharmaceutics 2022, 14(5), 943; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14050943
by Binyou Wang 1,†, Xiaoqiu Tan 2,3,4,†, Jianmin Guo 2, Ting Xiao 2, Yan Jiao 5, Junlin Zhao 1, Jianming Wu 6,7,* and Yiwei Wang 2,3,4,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Pharmaceutics 2022, 14(5), 943; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14050943
Submission received: 30 March 2022 / Revised: 20 April 2022 / Accepted: 22 April 2022 / Published: 26 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Intelligence (CI) Tools in Drug Discovery and Design)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript  “Drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia toxicity prediction based on machine learning” is devoted to a relevant and important problem and can be published in “Pharmaceutics” after taking into account the following comments:

  1. In the introduction, where the authors describe the prospects of in silico methods (lines 75–95), it makes no sense to refer to works [14–22] that are not directly related to this article, it is enough to refer to 1-2 reviews devoted to the QSAR methodology.
  2. The meaning of references [35 – 39] in line 169 is not clear.
  3. It is surprising that the authors did not try to use consensus models built on the basis of the top 5 models (Table 4). This could significantly improve the accuracy of DITP predictions of toxicants.
  4. In the last row of Table 6, the authors erroneously indicate the fragment R-O-, where R is a hydrocarbon radical. It is more correct to indicate N+ - O- (a fragment of the nitro group).

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Article entitled “Drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia toxicity prediction based on machine learning” is about a machine learning-based classification model for recognizing chemicals with DITP toxicity and can be used as an efficient tool in drug design and clinical therapy.  Wang et al., developed a robust predictive model of DITP toxicity using various molecular descriptors and seven classic machine learning-based methods.  This article is interesting and may be considered for publication

Comments

  • Line no 115: The main concern is that the database is old  “(https://www.ouhsc.edu/platelets/) the last update is on 5.4.2015,  
  • Also, no update on DITP data https://ouhsc.edu/platelets/ditp.html after 2018. Suggest adding more data in future
  • No of DITP toxicants is less 93

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

In the manuscript, Wang and co-workers present a machine learning-based method for predicting the toxicity of drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DITP). The authors start with a small dataset of molecules, which they encode as fingerprints, descriptors, and their combinations. They then use multiple machine learning-based models to derive models and finally select a final model with the best predictive performance.

The submitted manuscript reports a very interesting approach and could be published after incorporating some minor changes.

1. Please discuss in more detail how your approach is compatible with classical linear or non-linear QSAR approaches and where you see synergies between them.

2. Your approach uses molecular structures as an input for computing the fingerprints and descriptors. Please comment on the extent to which minor errors in them, such as incorrect tautomeric forms and protonation states, would affect the final prediction result.

3. Such a machine learning based classification model for recognizing chemicals would be an efficient tool for many other systems in drug discovery and toxicology. Please comment in the manuscript on which possible implementations are likely to occur and clearly outline any potential caveats.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

the author has given justification 

Back to TopTop