Next Article in Journal
A Filtration Based Technique for Simultaneous SEM and TEM Sample Preparation for the Rapid Detection of Pathogens
Previous Article in Journal
Unusual Influenza A Viruses in Bats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection and Identification of the First Viruses in Chia (Salvia hispanica)

by
Marcos G. Celli
1,
Maria C. Perotto
1,2,
Julia A. Martino
2,
Ceferino R. Flores
3,
Vilma C. Conci
1,2,* and
Patricia Rodriguez Pardina
1
1
Instituto de Patología Vegetal (IPAVE – CIAP – INTA) Camino. 60 cuadras Km 5,5, Córdoba, X5020ICA, Argentina
2
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Camino. 60 cuadras Km 5,5, Córdoba, X5020ICA, Argentina
3
Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Yuto (INTA), Ruta Nacional 34 Km 1286, Yuto, 4518, Jujuy, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2014, 6(9), 3450-3457; https://doi.org/10.3390/v6093450
Submission received: 17 July 2014 / Revised: 19 August 2014 / Accepted: 20 August 2014 / Published: 19 September 2014
(This article belongs to the Section Viruses of Plants, Fungi and Protozoa)

Abstract

:
Chia (Salvia hispanica), an herbaceous plant native to Latin America, has become important in the last 20 years due to its beneficial effects on health. Here, we present the first record and identification of two viruses in chia plants. The comparison of the complete nucleotide sequences showed the presence of two viral species with the typical genome organization of bipartite New World begomovirus, identified as Sida mosaic Bolivia virus 2 and Tomato yellow spot virus, according to the ICTV taxonomic criteria for begomovirus classification. DNA-A from Sida mosaic Bolivia virus 2 exhibited 96.1% nucleotide identity with a Bolivian isolate of Sida micrantha, and Tomato yellow spot virus showed 95.3% nucleotide identity with an Argentine bean isolate. This is the first report of begomoviruses infecting chia as well as of the occurrence of Sida mosaic Bolivia virus 2 in Argentina.

1. Introduction

Chia (Salvia hispanica) is an herbaceous plant of the Lamiaceae family, native to mountain areas of South America, from Mexico to Guatemala. Chia, along with corn and bean, was the basis of the diet of indigenous people and was third in economic importance [1]. Chia cultivation was drastically reduced by the Spanish colonizers; however, during the last two decades, the confirmation of its beneficial properties for human health has made chia one of the crops with the highest nutritional profile in Latin America, being commercially produced in Mexico, Bolivia and Argentina [1]. The cultivated area in Argentina was 70,000 ha in 2013, with a return that far exceeded that of soybean [2,3].
Chia seeds are rich in oil, dietary fibers, protein and mucilage. Its oil accounts for 33% of its seed weight, with 68% being α-linolenic acid, the highest percentage recorded in oilseeds [4]. Seed consumption has not shown any of the problems associated with other sources of omega-3 fatty acids, such as fishy taste, weight loss in animals or digestive problems [5,6,7]. Chia contains 25% dietary fiber (10% soluble fiber of very high molecular weight) and 20% content of gluten-free proteins, which makes it suitable for people suffering from celiac disease [4].
To date, several viruses naturally infecting the genus Salvia have been reported, such as Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) in S. uliginosa [8] and S. splendens [9], Broad bean wilt virus 2 in S. officinalis [10], two begomoviruses (Mung bean yellow mosaic virus and Tomato yellow leaf curl virus) in S. splendens [11] and another putative begomovirus, Clerodendron golden mosaic China virus [12].
Up to the present, there has been no information of viruses affecting chia crop. In Argentina, a high percentage of plants with typical symptoms of viral infections, such as mosaic, deformed and stunted leaves and chlorosis, which notably affected crop production, have ben detected in recent crop seasons. The aim of this work was to detect and identify the infections produced by virus in chia plants collected from production areas.

2. Materials and Methods

In 2013, samples of chia plants showing leaf deformation, chlorosis and dwarfing (Figure 1) were collected from production fields located in the north of Salta (23° 13'S, 64° 06'W).
Figure 1. Chia plants showing viral disease symptoms: dwarfism, chlorosis and deformation.
Figure 1. Chia plants showing viral disease symptoms: dwarfism, chlorosis and deformation.
Viruses 06 03450 g001
The symptomatic chia plants were screened for the presence of Alfalfa mosaic virus, Cucumber mosaic virus, Potyvirus genus, Tobacco mosaic virus and Tospovirus group (I, II and III) by double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) [13] using commercial antisera (BIOREBA SRL Latin America, Mar del Plata, Argentina), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were also tested by PCR using the oligonucleotides PAL1v1978/PAR1c496 [14], which amplify a 1,100-1,300 nt fragment corresponding to the 5’region of the Rep gene, the entire common region and the 5’end of the CP gene of begomoviruses.
Total DNA from chia plants was extracted using ZR-96 Plant/Seed DNA Kit™ (ZYMO, Irvine, CA, USA). PCR reactions were prepared in a 25 µL volume containing 5X buffer, 3.5 mM Mg2Cl, 0.25 mM of dNTP mix, 0.75 µM of each primer, 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA) and 1 µL of DNA. PCR cycle parameters were as follows: 94 °C for 2 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 90 s, 72 °C for 90 s, and a final extension of 72 °C for10 min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels and visualized with UV light after ethidium bromide staining.
Total DNA was subsequently used as template to amplify the putative full-length begomovirus genomes by rolling circle amplification (RCA) with Φ 29 DNA polymerase (Templiphi GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) as previously described [15]. To select an enzyme that could cut at a single site in the genome of begomovirus, generating unit-size molecules, the amplified DNA was digested independently with seven different restriction enzymes (EcoRI, EcoRV, XbaI, PstI, KpnI, HindIII and BamHI). Linearized fragments were cloned in pBluescript SK+ [16] digested with the same restriction enzyme, transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α and sequenced at the Genomics Unit of the Biotechnology Institute-INTA (Argentina).
The nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences were compared with those of other begomoviruses available in the GenBank [17]. Database searches were carried out using the Blastn algorithm [18]. The viral sequences showing highest identity were selected for the identity percentage analysis using Lasergene 8.0.2 software package (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI, USA).
A phylogenetic analysis of the sequences was performed with Mega 5.2 software [19] using the Neighbor-Joining maximum likelihood method, GTR (general time reversible) model with G+I (invariant sites and distributed range). The bootstrap consensus tree was inferred from 1000 replicates.

3. Results and Discussion

None of the tested samples reacted with any of the used antisera. PCR products of the expected size (1250 bp) were obtained for two of the five chia plants analyzed, confirming the presence of a begomovirus infection.
Circular DNA genomes amplified by RCA were linearized with the XbaI and KpnI restriction enzymes for SM1 and SM2 clones, respectively, and with BamHI for TO1 and TO2 clones. The sequence analysis of clones SM1 (KJ742421) and TO1 (KJ742419) showed the typical genome organization of DNA-A of bipartite New World begomoviruses, with five open reading frames (ORFs), encoding replication-associated protein (Rep), transcriptional activator protein (TrAP), replication enhancer protein (REn), AC4, and coat protein (CP). Clones SM2 (KJ742422) and TO2 (KJ742420) encoded the movement proteins (MP) and nuclear shuttle proteins (NSP), included in the DNA-B of begomoviruses.
According to the ICTV criteria for differentiation of begomovirus species (89% nucleotide identity) [20], the comparison of the sequences obtained in this work and the geminivirus sequences from the database revealed a mixed infection by two different begomoviruses. The clones SM1 and SM2 showed 96.1% and 93.7% nt identity for DNA-A and DNA-B, respectively, with the sequences of Sida mosaic Bolivia virus 2 (SiMBoV2, HM585443/HM585444) previously detected infecting plants of Sida micrantha in Bolivia [21], therefore, considering it a new isolate of SiMBoV2.
The clone TO1 showed the highest nucleotide identity (95.3%) with DNA-A of an isolate of Tomato yellow spot virus (ToYSV, FJ538207) infecting bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Argentina [22], but also presented nucleotide identity above 89% with three other ToYSV isolates, four isolates of Leonurus mosaic virus (LeMV), and one of Sida micrantha mosaic virus (SimMV), whereas the isolates of Okra mottle virus (OMoV), Sida yellow mosaic virus (SiYMV), Sida mosaic virus (SiMoV) and Sida yellow net virus (SiYNV) showed identity between 80% and 89% (Table 1). The clone TO2 had higher identity with DNA-B of two Brazilian ToYSV isolates: 91.2% with the Leonurus sibiricus isolate (JX513953) [23] and 90.1% with the Lycopersicon esculentum isolate (DQ336351) [24]. Considering that Leonurus mosaic virus might be a strain of ToYSV [25] and that the two highest identity of DNA-A and DNA-B were obtained from the comparison with two ToYSV isolates, we propose that the isolate described here is ToYSV.
Table 1. Nucleotide identity of the DNA-A sequence of Tomato yellow spot virus isolated from chia (clone TO1).
Table 1. Nucleotide identity of the DNA-A sequence of Tomato yellow spot virus isolated from chia (clone TO1).
VirusAcronymOriginGenBank Accession Number% of Identity
Tomato yellow spot virusToYSVArgentinaFJ53820795.3%
Tomato yellow spot virusToYSVBrazilJX51395293.9%
Leonurus mosaic virusLeMVBrazilJX86308293.6%
Leonurus mosaic virusLeMVBrazilJX86308193.5%
Leonurus mosaic virusLeMVBrazilJQ42979193.4%
Leonurus mosaic virusLeMVParaguayKC68337491.6%
Tomato yellow spot virusToYSVBrazilKC70662889.9%
Tomato yellow spot virusToYSVBrazilDQ336350/NC_00772689.8%
Sida micrantha mosaic virusSimMVBrazilAJ55745089.2%
Sida mottle virusSiMoVBrazilAY090555/NC_00463788.9%
Sida micrantha mosaic virusSimMVBrazilFN55752288.6%
Sida mottle virusSiMoVBrazilJX87137888.1%
Sida mottle virusSiMoVBrazilJX87137788.0%
Okra mottle virusOMoVBrazilEU91481787.1%
Okra mottle virusOMoVBrazilEU91481987.1%
Okra mottle virusOMoVBrazilFJ68669587.0%
Sida yellow net virusSiYNVBrazilJX87137686.6%
Sida yellow mosaic virusSiYMVBrazilJX87136983.1%
Sida yellow mosaic virusSiYMVBrazilAY090558/NC_00463983.1%
The phylogenetic tree (Figure 2) was constructed using complete nucleotide sequences of DNA-A and DNA-B of both isolates, sequences published in GenBank that showed more than 80% identity, and those of begomoviruses reported in Argentina. The genome sequences of DNA-A and DNA-B of SiMBoV2 obtained in this work grouped on a monophyletic branch, with 100% bootstrap confidence, with the SiMBoV2 sequence from Bolivia, confirming that these isolates are closely related. The phylogenetic relationship between the DNA-A sequence of ToYSV from Argentina and other begomoviruses (Figure 2) showed that the isolate obtained from the Argentine samples of chia clustered with other sequences of ToYSV and LeMV, but was more closely related to the Argentine isolate from ToYSV (FJ538207), with 99% bootstrap confidence value.
Figure 2. Neighbor-joining trees showing the phylogenetic relationship between DNA-A and DNA-B of the isolates detected in this study and other begomoviruses and from the international database GenBank [17] and using African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV) as an outgroup. Numbers next to the branch points indicate bootstrap values (1,000 replicates) above 50% (0.5). SbBMV, ToYVSV, ToDLV, SPLCV, ToMoWrV, ToRYLCV, ToDLV.
Figure 2. Neighbor-joining trees showing the phylogenetic relationship between DNA-A and DNA-B of the isolates detected in this study and other begomoviruses and from the international database GenBank [17] and using African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV) as an outgroup. Numbers next to the branch points indicate bootstrap values (1,000 replicates) above 50% (0.5). SbBMV, ToYVSV, ToDLV, SPLCV, ToMoWrV, ToRYLCV, ToDLV.
Viruses 06 03450 g002

4. Conclusions

Here, we demonstrate the presence of two bipartite begomovirus infecting Salvia hispanica associated with severe disease symptoms in chia. Possibly, it was transmitted by whiteflies and the presence of these begomovirus in Argentina must be considered as a threat to the chia crop, since whitefly populations are present in the north-western Argentina [26]. This information is relevant for the implementation of control strategies to reduce disease damage. Given the increasing economic importance of this crop as agricultural product in the country [3], more studies are necessary to estimate the damage caused by SiMBo2 and ToYSV.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of viral infection in chia plants, as well as of the presence of Sida mosaic Bolivia virus 2 in Argentina. The latter was previously reported to infect the weed S. micrantha [21], and the present results are the first references to the virus infecting a cultivated species.

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out at IPAVE-CIAP-INTA and was partially supported by INTA and CONICET.

Author Contributions

V.C.C. and P.R.P designed the study; M.G.C, M.C.P and J.A.M. conducted experiments; C.R.F. identified and collection of symptomatic plants. All authors contributed to the analysis of the results and writing the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ayerza, R.; Wayne, C. Chía, redescubriendo un olvidado alimento de los Aztecas, 1st ed.; Del Nuevo Extremo: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2006; p. 232. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lobo Zavalía, R.; Alcocer, M.G.; Fuentes, F.J.; Rodriguez, W.A.; Morandini, M.; Devani, M.R. Desarrollo del cultivo de chía en Tucumán. República Argentina. Av. Agroind. 2011, 32, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  3. La Gaceta. Economía—En el NOA se perdió entre el 70% y el 80% de la producción de chía, debido a la sequía. 2013. Available online: http://www.lagaceta.com.ar (accessed on 16 August 2013).
  4. Ayerza, R. Seed composition of two chía (Salvia hispanica L.) genotypes which differ in seed color. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2013, 25, 495–500. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayerza, R.; Coates, W. Dietary levels of chia: Influence on yolk cholesterol, lipid content and fatty acid composition, for two strains of hens. Poult. Sci. 2000, 78, 724–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ayerza, R.; Coates, W. The omega-3 enriched eggs: The influence of dietary linolenic fatty acid source combination on egg production and composition. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 81, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ayerza, R.; Coates, W.; Lauria, M. Chia seed (Salvia hispanica L.) as an ω-3 fatty acid source for broilers: Influence on fatty acid composition, cholesterol and fat content of white and dark meat, growth performance and sensory characteristics. Poult. Sci. 2002, 81, 826–837. [Google Scholar]
  8. Holcomb, G.E.; Valverde, R.A. Natural Infection of Salvia uliginosa with Cucumber mosaic cucumovirus. HortScience 1998, 33, 1215–1216. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ali, S.; Khan, A.A.; Afreen, B.; Sharma, R.; Jahan, T.; Naqvi, Q.A. Natural occurrence of Cucumber mosaic virus associated with mottling and mosaic disease on Salvia splendens, a new record from India. Australas. Plant Dis. Notes 2008, 3, 118–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mumford, R.A.; Jarvis, B.; Harju, V.; Boonham, N.; Skelton, A. The first report of Broad bean wilt virus 2 in the UK: findings in foxglove and salvia. Plant Pathol. 2006, 55, 819. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ara, M.R.; Masud, M.M.H.; Akanda, A.M. Detection of plant viruses in some ornamental plants that act as alternate hosts. Agriculturists 2012, 10, 46–54. [Google Scholar]
  12. Valverde, R.A.; Singh, R.; Sabanadzovic, S. Detection and identification of Clerodendron golden mosaic China virus in Salvia splendens. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012, 133, 499–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Clark, M.F.; Adams, A.N. Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 1977, 34, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rojas, M.R.; Gilbertson, R.L.; Russell, D.R.; Maxwell, D.P. Use of degenerate primers in the polymerase chain reaction to detect whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses. Plant Dis. 1993, 77, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Inoue-Nagata, A.K.; Albuquerque, L.C.; Rocha, W.B.; Nagata, T. A simple method for cloning the complete begomovirus genome using the bacteriophage phi 29 DNA polymerase. J. Virol. Method 2004, 116, 209–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maniatis, T.; Fritsch, E.F.; Sambrook, J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, New York, NY, USA, 1982; p. 1626. [Google Scholar]
  17. GenBank, National Center for Biotechnology Information – NCBI. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 15 June 2014).
  18. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Brown, J.K.; Fauquet, C.M.; Briddon, R.W.; Zerbini, M.; Moriones, E.; Navas Castillo, J. Geminiviridae. In Virus taxonomy. Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses; King, A.M.Q., Adams, M.J., Carstens, E.B., Lefkowitz, E.J., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press: London, UK, 2012; pp. 351–373. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wyant, P.S.; Gotthardt, D.; Schäfer, B.; Krenz, B.; Jeske, H. The genomes of four novel begomoviruses and a new Sida micrantha mosaic virus strain from Bolivian weeds. Arch. Virol. 2011, 156, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rodríguez Pardina, P.E.; Hanada, K.; Laguna, I.G.; Zerbini, F.M.; Ducasse, D.A. Molecular characterization and relative incidence of bean- and soybean-infecting begomoviruses in northwestern Argentina. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2011, 158, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Barbosa, J.C.; Eckstein, B.; Bergamin Filho, A.; Rezende, J.A.M.; Dallagnol, L.J. First Report of Tomato yellow spot virus Infecting Leonurus sibiricus in Brazil. Plant Dis. 2013, 97, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Calegario, R.F.; Ferreira, S.S.; Andrade, E.C.; Zerbini, F.M. Characterization of Tomato yellow spot virus, a novel tomato-infecting begomovirus in Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 2007, 42, 1335–1343. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fernandes, N.A.N.; Boiteux, L.S.; Fonseca, M.E.N.; Segnana, L.G.; Kitajima, E.W. Report of Tomato yellow spot virus infecting Leonurus sibiricus in Paraguay and within tomato fields in Brazil. Plant Dis. 2013, 97, 289. [Google Scholar]
  26. Alemandri, V.; Rodriguez Pardina, P.; Izaurralde, J.; García Medina, S.; Argüello Caro, E.; Mattio, M.F.; Dumón, A.; Rodriguez, S.M.; Truol, G. Incidence of begomoviruses and climatic characterisation of Bemisia tabaci-geminivirus complex in soybean and bean in Argentina. Agriscientia 2012, 29, 31–39. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Celli, M.G.; Perotto, M.C.; Martino, J.A.; Flores, C.R.; Conci, V.C.; Pardina, P.R. Detection and Identification of the First Viruses in Chia (Salvia hispanica). Viruses 2014, 6, 3450-3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/v6093450

AMA Style

Celli MG, Perotto MC, Martino JA, Flores CR, Conci VC, Pardina PR. Detection and Identification of the First Viruses in Chia (Salvia hispanica). Viruses. 2014; 6(9):3450-3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/v6093450

Chicago/Turabian Style

Celli, Marcos G., Maria C. Perotto, Julia A. Martino, Ceferino R. Flores, Vilma C. Conci, and Patricia Rodriguez Pardina. 2014. "Detection and Identification of the First Viruses in Chia (Salvia hispanica)" Viruses 6, no. 9: 3450-3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/v6093450

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop