Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease: A Bacteria-Based Colorimetric Assay for Screening Natural Antiviral Inhibitors
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. De novo Assembly and Sequence Verification of Codon-Optimized SARS-CoV-2 Mpro Gene
2.2. Plasmid Construction
2.3. Bacterial Strain, Transformation, and Expression Conditions
2.4. SDS–PAGE Analysis of Mpro Expression
2.5. Preparation of Plant Juices
2.6. Design and Functional Basis of the Colorimetric Screening Assay
2.7. Assay Setup and Inhibitor Treatment (Plant Juices)
2.8. Quantification of Color Development
2.9. Statistical Analysis and Assay Quality Evaluation
3. Results
3.1. Verification of the Assembled Genetic Components of the Assay
3.2. Expression Validation of Mpro Protein in E. coli DH5α
3.3. Functional Validation of the Assay in Living Cells
3.4. Proof-of-Concept Application of the Screening Assay Using Pomegranate and Guelder Rose Juices
3.5. Application of the Assay to Additional Edible Plant Juices
3.6. Internal Controls Validation and Assay Reliability
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, 3CLpro, Nsp5 | The main protease of novel coronavirus, or 3C-like protease, or non-structural protein 5 |
| E. Coli | Escherichia coli |
| IPTG | isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside |
| v/v | Volume to volume ratio |
Appendix A
- ATGTCTGGTTTCCGTAAGATGGCTTTCCCATCTGGTAAAGTTGAGGGTTGTATGGTACAAGTTACCTGCGGTACCACTGCACTGAATGGCCTGTGGCTGGACGATGTTGTTTACTGTCCACGTCATGTTATTTGTACGTCTGAAGATATGCTGAACCCAAACTACGAGGATCTGCTGATTCGTAAGTCTAACCATAACTTTTTAGTTCAAGCAGGTAATGTACAACTGCGTGTTATTGGCCATTCTATGCAAAATTGTGTTCTGAAACTGAAAGTTGATACTGCCAATCCAAAGACTCCTAAATATAAGTTTGTGCGTATTCAACCAGGTCAAACTTTTTCTGTGCTGGCCTGCTATAATGGTTCTCCATCTGGTGTTTACCAATGTGCTATGCGTCCAAATTTTACTATTAAAGGTTCTTTCCTGAATGGTTCTTGTGGTTCTGTTGGTTTTAATATTGATTATGATTGTGTTAGTTTTTGCTATATGCATCATATGGAACTGCCAACAGGTGTTCATGCTGGTACAGATCTGGAGGGTAACTTCTACGGCCCATTTGTTGATCGTCAAACTGCTCAAGCTGCTGGTACTGATACAACAATCACGGTTAACGTGCTGGCTTGGCTGTATGCCGCCGTTATCAATGGTGATCGTTGGTTCCTGAATCGTTTTACAACCACACTGAACGACTTTAATCTGGTCGCCATGAAATATAATTATGAACCTCTGACTCAAGATCATGTTGATATTCTGGGTCCACTGTCTGCACAAACTGGTATCGCCGTTCTGGATATGTGTGCTTCTCTGAAAGAACTGCTGCAAAATGGCATGAACGGTCGTACTATTCTGGGTAGTGCTCTGCTGGAAGATGAATTTACACCATTTGATGTTGTCCGTCAATGTAGTGGCGTCACTTTCCAG



References
- Gevorgyan, S.; Khachatryan, H.; Shavina, A.; Gharaghani, S.; Zakaryan, H. Targeting SARS-CoV-2 main protease: A comprehensive approach using advanced virtual screening, molecular dynamics, and in vitro validation. Virol. J. 2024, 21, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, Q.; Xiong, Y.; Zhu, G.H.; Zhang, Y.N.; Zhang, Y.W.; Huang, P.; Ge, G.B. The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (M(pro)): Structure, function, and emerging therapies for COVID-19. MedComm 2022, 3, e151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miltner, N.; Kalló, G.; Csősz, É.; Miczi, M.; Nagy, T.; Mahdi, M.; Mótyán, J.A.; Tőzsér, J. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (Mpro) Cleavage Sites Using Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis and In Silico Cleavage Site Prediction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, Z.; Du, X.; Xu, Y.; Deng, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Peng, C.; et al. Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature 2020, 582, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Issa, S.S.; Sokornova, S.V.; Zhidkin, R.R.; Matveeva, T.V. The Main Protease of SARS-CoV-2 as a Target for Phytochemicals against Coronavirus. Plants 2022, 11, 1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahhamzehei, N.; Abdelfatah, S.; Efferth, T. In Silico and In Vitro Identification of Pan-Coronaviral Main Protease Inhibitors from a Large Natural Product Library. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toigo, L.; Dos Santos Teodoro, E.I.; Guidi, A.C.; Gancedo, N.C.; Petruco, M.V.; Melo, E.B.; Tonin, F.S.; Fernandez-Llimos, F.; Chierrito, D.; de Mello, J.C.P.; et al. Flavonoid as possible therapeutic targets against COVID-19: A scoping review of in silico studies. Daru J. Fac. Pharm. Tehran Univ. Med. Sci. 2023, 31, 51–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mushebenge, A.G.; Ugbaja, S.C.; Mbatha, N.A.; Khan, R.B.; Kumalo, H.M. Assessing the Potential Contribution of In Silico Studies in Discovering Drug Candidates That Interact with Various SARS-CoV-2 Receptors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tognolini, M.; Lodola, A.; Giorgio, C. Drug discovery: In silico dry data can bypass biological wet data? Br. J. Pharmacol. 2024, 181, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Wu, F.; Yang, N.; Zhan, X.; Liao, J.; Mai, S.; Huang, Z. In silico Methods for Identification of Potential Therapeutic Targets. Interdiscip. Sci. Comput. Life Sci. 2022, 14, 285–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, M.; Zhang, C.; Yan, W.; Chen, L.; He, B.; Li, Y. Development of Fluorescence-Based Assays for Key Viral Proteins in the SARS-CoV-2 Infection Process and Lifecycle. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamshidi-Kia, F.; Lorigooini, Z.; Amini-Khoei, H. Medicinal plants: Past history and future perspective. J. Herbmed Pharmacol. 2017, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaachouay, N.; Zidane, L.J.D.; Candidates, D. Plant-derived natural products: A source for drug discovery and development. Drugs Drug Candidates 2024, 3, 184–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altaf, M.M.; Ahmad Khan, M.S.; Ahmad, I. Chapter 2—Diversity of Bioactive Compounds and Their Therapeutic Potential. In New Look to Phytomedicine; Ahmad Khan, M.S., Ahmad, I., Chattopadhyay, D., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 15–34. [Google Scholar]
- Rust, P.; Ekmekcioglu, C. The Role of Diet and Specific Nutrients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: What Have We Learned over the Last Three Years? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tassakos, A.; Kloppman, A.; Louie, J.C.Y. The Impact of Diet Quality on COVID-19 Severity and Outcomes—A Scoping Review. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2025, 14, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ponomarenko, S.V. Dietary factors influencing the COVID-19 epidemic process. Farmakoekon. Mod. Pharmacoecon. Pharmacoepidemiol. 2022, 15, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S.; Di Castelnuovo, A.; Cerletti, C.; Donati, M.B.; de Gaetano, G.; Iacoviello, L.; Bonaccio, M. Diet Quality and Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection or COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies. Adv. Nutr. 2023, 14, 1596–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Issa, S.S.; Matveeva, T.V. Exploring Plant-Derived Nutraceuticals as Potential SARS CoV-2 Mpro Inhibitors. Food Chem. Int. 2025, 1, 492–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, W.; Xu, M.; Chen, C.Z.; Guo, H.; Shen, M.; Hu, X.; Shinn, P.; Klumpp-Thomas, C.; Michael, S.G.; Zheng, W. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 3CL Protease Inhibitors by a Quantitative High-Throughput Screening. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 2020, 3, 1008–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmud, S.; Hasan, M.R.; Biswas, S.; Paul, G.K.; Afrose, S.; Mita, M.A.; Sultana Shimu, M.S.; Promi, M.M.; Hani, U.; Rahamathulla, M.; et al. Screening of Potent Phytochemical Inhibitors Against SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease: An Integrative Computational Approach. Front. Bioinform. 2021, 1, 717141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TFS, Inc. DH5α Competent Cells. Available online: https://www.thermofisher.com/rs/en/home/life-science/cloning/competent-cells-for-transformation/competent-cells-strains/dh5a-competent-cells.html (accessed on 1 June 2025).
- Green, M.R.; Sambrook, J. Screening Bacterial Colonies Using X-Gal and IPTG: α-Complementation. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2019, 2019, pdb-rot3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.H.; Chung, T.D.; Oldenburg, K.R. A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays. J. Biomol. Screen. 1999, 4, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, R.; Yuan, S.; Zhou, Y.; Wei, Y.; Li, F.; Wang, M.; Chen, B.; Yu, H. Strategies to overcome the challenges of low or no expression of heterologous proteins in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Adv. 2024, 75, 108417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexova, R.; Alexandrova, S.; Dragomanova, S.; Kalfin, R.; Solak, A.; Mehan, S.; Petralia, M.C.; Fagone, P.; Mangano, K.; Nicoletti, F.; et al. Anti-COVID-19 Potential of Ellagic Acid and Polyphenols of Punica granatum L. Molecules 2023, 28, 3772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; Ma, C.; Hao, P.; Peng, L.; Zhang, S.Y.; Zhao, Q. Phenolic Components and Biological Activity of Pomegranate. Chem. Biodivers. 2025, 22, e202402301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kajszczak, D.; Zakłos-Szyda, M.; Podsędek, A. Viburnum opulus L.—A Review of Phytochemistry and Biological Effects. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duke, J.A. Punica granatum L. (Punicaceae). 1992–2016. Available online: https://phytochem.nal.usda.gov/plant-punica-granatum (accessed on 9 November 2025).
- Duke, J.A. Viburnum opulus (Adoxaceae). 1992–2016. Available online: https://phytochem.nal.usda.gov/plant-viburnum-opulus (accessed on 16 November 2025).
- Gligorijevic, N.; Radomirovic, M.; Nedic, O.; Stojadinovic, M.; Khulal, U.; Stanic-Vucinic, D.; Cirkovic Velickovic, T. Molecular Mechanisms of Possible Action of Phenolic Compounds in COVID-19 Protection and Prevention. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Control | Genetic Composition | LB Additives | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| LB-only control | No bacteria, only LB medium | Antibiotic. | Serves as a contamination control and spectrophotometric blank. |
| Reporter-only control | Cells carrying only the modified reporter (lacZα with inserted Mpro cleavage site) | Antibiotic + IPTG + X-gal. | Expected to turn blue; confirms baseline β-galactosidase activity. |
| Vehicle control | Cells carrying the full construct (lacZα + Mpro) | Antibiotic + IPTG + X-gal + solvent (e.g., DMSO) or NaOH (10 N) used for pH adjustment. | Expected to remain white; rules out effects of solvent or pH adjustment on bacterial growth or reporter function. |
| Untreated control | Cells carrying the full construct (lacZα + Mpro) | Antibiotic + IPTG + X-gal. | Expected to remain white; confirms baseline Mpro activity in the absence of inhibition. |
| Tested-juice-only control (no X-gal) | Cells carrying the full construct (lacZα + Mpro) | Antibiotic + IPTG + plant juice (premixed with concentrated LB for ≥10% v/v). No X-gal. | Should show only the natural pigment of the tested juice; used to rule out interference of plant pigmentation with visual or spectrophotometric readout. |
| Reporter-only + Plant juice control | Cells carrying only the modified reporter (lacZα with inserted Mpro cleavage site) | Antibiotic + IPTG + X-gal + plant juice (premixed with concentrated LB for ≥10% v/v). | Expected to remain blue; assesses plant-derived effects on the reporter alone. Later considered redundant since both lacZα and Mpro share the same regulatory elements, but potentially useful for color reference when comparing juice coloration with blue signal. |
| Plant Juice | Observed Outcome (Blue Coloration 1) at a Range of Tested Concentrations | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Concentration | 2nd Concentration | 3rd Concentration | 4th Concentration | |
| Green rhubarb (Rheum × hybridum) | 11.25% | 22.5% | 45% | |
| − | + | + | ||
| Black grapes (Vitis vinifera) | 2% | 5% | 10% | 20% |
| – | – | – | – | |
| Red currant (Ribes rubrum) | 2% | 5% | 15% | 30% |
| – | – | – | – | |
| Black currant (Ribes nigrum) | 2% | 5% | 15% | 30% |
| – | – | + | + | |
| Control | Observed Outcome |
|---|---|
| LB-only control | No signal or growth, indicating a clean background. |
| Reporter-only control | Strong blue coloration, confirming β-galactosidase activity (positive baseline). |
| Vehicle control | No effect on color or growth, confirming solvent neutrality. |
| Untreated control | No coloration observed with X-gal, confirming Mpro activity. |
| Tested-juice-only control (no X-gal) | Only native plant pigment observed; no blue coloration (negative baseline). |
| Reporter-only + Plant juice control | Blue coloration mixed with natural pigment, serving as color reference for positive inhibition effects. |
| Approach | Key Features | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| In silico (computational docking, molecular dynamics) | Virtual prediction of binding affinities based on Mpro structure | Fast, inexpensive, suitable for large-scale screening | Lacks biological context; no data on cellular uptake, solubility, or toxicity |
| E. coli-based colorimetric reporter assay (present study) | Mpro activity linked to β-galactosidase reporter within living bacterial cells | Simple visual and semi-quantitative readout, biosafe, cost-effective, compatible with complex natural matrices, enables first-pass functional prioritization under standard laboratory conditions, adaptable for large-scale screening and for other proteases/mutants | Limited by bacterial permeability and potential interference from highly colored extracts, intracellular environment differs from mammalian host cells |
| Biochemical (cell-free enzyme assays, fluorescence/luminescence readouts) | Recombinant purified Mpro tested with substrates in vitro | Quantitative, high specificity, allows kinetic analysis and IC50 determination | Requires protein purification and specialized equipment, ignores cellular uptake, limited compatibility with complex mixtures |
| Mammalian cell-based models | Mpro expression or viral replication assays in human cell lines | Physiologically relevant, integrates host metabolism | Expensive, time-consuming, requires high-biosafety facilities and expertise, potential safety risks |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Issa, S.S.; Zelinsky, A.A.; Fayoud, H.J.; Zhidkin, R.R.; Matveeva, T.V. Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease: A Bacteria-Based Colorimetric Assay for Screening Natural Antiviral Inhibitors. Viruses 2026, 18, 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18020178
Issa SS, Zelinsky AA, Fayoud HJ, Zhidkin RR, Matveeva TV. Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease: A Bacteria-Based Colorimetric Assay for Screening Natural Antiviral Inhibitors. Viruses. 2026; 18(2):178. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18020178
Chicago/Turabian StyleIssa, Shaza S., Andrew A. Zelinsky, Haidar J. Fayoud, Roman R. Zhidkin, and Tatiana V. Matveeva. 2026. "Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease: A Bacteria-Based Colorimetric Assay for Screening Natural Antiviral Inhibitors" Viruses 18, no. 2: 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18020178
APA StyleIssa, S. S., Zelinsky, A. A., Fayoud, H. J., Zhidkin, R. R., & Matveeva, T. V. (2026). Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease: A Bacteria-Based Colorimetric Assay for Screening Natural Antiviral Inhibitors. Viruses, 18(2), 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/v18020178

