Next Article in Journal
Deciphering the Role of Macrophages in RSV Infection and Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Pan-Resistant HIV-1 Drug Resistance Among Highly Treated Patients with Virological Failure on Dolutegravir-Based Antiretroviral Therapy in Zimbabwe
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 17
Issue 10
10.3390/v17101349
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Bat Adenovirus Closely Related to Canine Adenoviruses Identified via Fecal Virome Surveillance of Bats in New Mexico, USA, 2020–2021

by
Taylor E. Weary
1,2,
Lawrence H. Zhou
3,
Lauren MacDonald
3,
Daniel Ibañez IV
3,
Chance Jaramillo
3,
Christopher D. Dunn
1,
Timothy F. Wright
3,
Kathryn A. Hanley
3,*,
Tony L. Goldberg
1,* and
Teri J. Orr
3,*
1
Department of Pathobiological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1656 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA
2
Veterinary Services Unit, Wisconsin National Primate Research Center, 1220 Capitol Court, Madison, WI 53715, USA
3
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2025, 17(10), 1349; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17101349
Submission received: 3 September 2025 / Revised: 4 October 2025 / Accepted: 6 October 2025 / Published: 8 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Viruses)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

Bats host a wide range of viruses, including several high-profile pathogens of humans and other animals. The COVID-19 pandemic raised the level of concern regarding the risk of spillover of bat-borne viruses to humans and, conversely, human-borne viruses to bats. From August 2020 to July 2021, we conducted viral surveillance on 254 bats from 10 species across urban, periurban, and rural environments in New Mexico, USA. We used a pan-coronavirus RT-PCR to assay rectal swabs and performed metagenomic sequencing on a representative subset of 14 rectal swabs and colon samples. No coronaviruses were detected by either RT-PCR or metagenomic sequencing. However, four novel viruses were identified: an adenovirus (proposed name lacepfus virus, LCPV), an adeno-associated virus (AAV), an astrovirus (AstV), and a genomovirus (GV). LCPV, detected in a big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus), is more closely related to canine adenoviruses than to other bat adenoviruses, suggesting historical transmission between bats and dogs. All virus-positive bats were either juvenile or adult individuals captured in urban environments; none exhibited obvious clinical signs of disease. Our findings suggest limited or no circulation of enzootic coronaviruses or SARS-CoV-2 in southwestern U.S. bat populations during the study period. The discovery of a genetically distinct adenovirus related to canine adenoviruses highlights the potential for cross-species viral transmission and underscores the value of continued virome surveillance in animals living with and near humans.

1. Introduction

Bats are recognized as important reservoirs for many viruses significant to animal and human health. As the only mammals capable of sustained flight and possessing unique adaptations in both immunity and life histories, bats host an exceptionally high viral diversity, typically without displaying overt signs of disease [1]. These viruses include high-profile zoonotic agents such as rabies virus, filoviruses (Ebola and Marburg), paramyxoviruses (Nipah and Hendra), and multiple coronaviruses (SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2) [2,3]. The frequent emergence of bat-associated viruses underscores the need to understand their ecology and epidemiology around the world, given that bats are found on every continent except Antarctica [4].
For approximately one year (August 2020–July 2021), we conducted a viral surveillance study of bats in the Southwest United States, a region where previous studies have detected a diversity of novel viruses in North American bat species [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Furthermore, because North American bat virus surveillance studies prior to the COVID-19 pandemic often relied on convenience sampling, we aimed to systematically sample bat species with various behavior and life history traits as well as throughout all seasons of the year. Our primary goal in this study was to surveil for coronaviruses, and our secondary goal was to fill important knowledge gaps about North American bat viromes to guide decision-making about human health as well as bat research and conservation activities. Combining data on demography and enzootic virome of target taxa can make bat research safer for both bat populations and people by identifying pertinent risks and best practices to mitigate them [10,11].
While we did not detect any coronavirus infections in the sampled bats, we found some bats infected with several other viruses, notably a novel adenovirus. Among the diverse viral families harbored by bats, adenoviruses (family: Adenoviridae) are relatively understudied, despite their global distribution and ability to infect a wide range of vertebrate hosts. Adenoviruses (AdVs) are non-enveloped, double-stranded DNA viruses that cause a variety of clinical manifestations in their hosts, ranging from asymptomatic infections to severe respiratory, gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and ocular diseases [12]. Although human AdVs have been studied extensively, our understanding of AdVs in wildlife, especially in bats, remains incomplete, despite evidence suggesting zoonotic transmission of some AdVs [13]. Recent viral surveillance studies have begun to uncover the diversity of AdVs in bat populations, suggesting the existence of numerous uncharacterized lineages with varied evolutionary trajectories [14,15,16,17,18,19]. In this study, we report the identification and molecular characterization of a novel AdV detected in a big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site and Sample Collection

Between 3 August 2020, and 28 July 2021, insectivorous bats (n = 254) of at least 10 different species (Antrozous pallidus, Corynorhinus townsendii, Eptesicus fuscus, Lasiurus cinereus, Myotis species (M. californicus, M. ciliolabrum, M. evotis, M. volans, M. yumanensis, or uncharacterized), and Tadarida brasiliensis) were trapped in urban, periurban, and rural locations (Figure 1) around Doña Ana County, New Mexico (Table 1), under New Mexico Department of Game and Fish permit number 3782. All animals were trapped and handled in accordance with the American Society of Mammalogists guidelines for use of wild mammal species in research [20], and animal work was approved by the New Mexico State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (2020-005). An exemption was granted by New Mexico Game and Fish from the 2020 embargo on bat research during the COVID-19 pandemic; all animal handlers wore N95 masks, face shields, and leather bite-resistant gloves for the protection of both personnel and the bats and were regularly tested for COVID-19 prior to work with live bats.
When mist netted, bats were immediately removed from the netting and held in cotton drawstring bags until processing (age, sex, and reproductive status determination, weight and length measurements, and clinical sample collection). Age classes were assigned as described previously [21]. Rectal and oral swabs in RNAlater (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), whole blood, wing punch biopsies, and any ectoparasites were collected and held on frozen cold packs before we released each bat where they were initially trapped. Samples were transferred to a −80 °C freezer at the end of each bout of collection.
Seven bats (three Eptesicus fuscus, three Myotis spp., and one Lasiurus cinereus) required humane euthanasia during handling because of observed injuries or abnormal neurologic behavior. Carcasses were frozen at −20 °C and shipped to the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, where necropsies were performed in a biosafety cabinet. Tissue samples (heart, lung, liver, kidneys, spleen, small intestine, and colon) were collected and placed in RNAlater for molecular diagnostics.
Table 1. North American bats sampled as part of this study by species, sex, age class, and key behavior traits.
Table 1. North American bats sampled as part of this study by species, sex, age class, and key behavior traits.
Species 1 Age Classes
(By Sex)MigratesPeridomesticGroup SizeSexes Cohabit RoostSynchronized BirthsUnknownAdultSubadultJuvenileTotal
Antrozous pallidus [22,23] Yes ModerateFew to >100YesYes1313 35
Female 253 28
Male 6 6
Not recorded 1 1
Corynorhinus townsendii [24,25,26] YesLow40-100YesYes 9 9
Female 8 8
Male 1 1
Eptesicus fuscus [27,28,29,30,31]YesHigh>100YesYes 112 13
Female 62 8
Male 5 5
Lasiurus cinereus [32,33]YesLow1NoNo 3 3
Female 0
Male 3 3
Myotis species 2 [29,34,35,36]YesModerate>100VariesYes 733511119
Female 4816468
Male 2519751
Tadarida brasiliensis [37,38,39,40]MixModerate>1000YesYes26013 75
Female 364 40
Male 249 33
Not recorded 2 2
Total 31875311254
1 All species in family Vespertilionidae except T. brasiliensis (Molossidae). References are for behavior traits listed for each species. 2 Includes M. californicus, M. ciliolabrum, M. evotis, M. volans, M. yumanensis, and uncharacterized Myotis species.

2.2. RNA Extraction

Total viral RNA was extracted from rectal swabs and colon biopsies using previously described methods [41,42,43]. In brief, Dacron swab tips were homogenized with 150 μL RNAlater and 850 μL Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) or 10 mg tissue samples were homogenized with 600 μL HBSS, and samples were centrifuged to clarify. The supernatant was treated with nucleases to digest nucleic acids unencapsidated within viral particles [44]. Nucleic acids were then extracted using the QIamp MinElute Virus Spin Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocol but omitting carrier RNA.

2.3. Pan-Coronavirus RT-PCR

Semi-nested reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) external reactions were performed using 0.4 μM degenerate primers (pan-CoV_outF: 5′- CCAARTTYTAYGGHGGITGG-3′ and pan-CoV_R: 5′- TGTTGIGARCARAAYTCATGIGG-3′), which are broadly reactive consensus primers targeting the ORF1ab RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) of all four known genera of coronaviruses [45] and have been used successfully to detect coronaviruses in bat fecal samples [46,47]. RNA from three coronavirus cell culture isolates (transmissible gastroenteritis virus [TGEV], bovine coronavirus [BCoV], and infectious bronchitis virus [IBV]) and one synthetic RNA standard (SARS-CoV-2) (AcroMetrix COVID-19 RNA Control, Thermo Fisher) were included as positive controls. The limit of detection for this assay was between 20 and 100 viral copies per reaction, as determined by serial dilution using the quantitated SARS-CoV-2 standard (Figure S1).
The external RT-PCR was carried out in 20 μL reactions using the Qiagen OneStep RT-PCR kit and 5 μL of template RNA, according to manufacturer instructions, on a C-1000 thermocycler (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) with the following cycling conditions: 50 °C for 30 min; 95 °C for 15 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C for 40 s, 53.4 °C for 40 s, 72 °C for 1 min; and 72 °C for 10 min. Internal PCR reactions were carried out in 25 μL reactions containing 0.2 μM of each primer (pan-CoV_inF: 5′- GGTTGGGAYTAYCCHAARTGTGA-3′ and pan-CoV_R), 12.5 μL Qiagen 2x HotStarTaq DNA Polymerase, and 1 μL of external PCR product with the following cycling conditions: 95 °C for 15 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 54.5 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min; and 72 °C for 10 min.
Internal PCR products were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel with ethidium bromide and 1 kb plus DNA length standards (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), visualized under UV light to confirm expected band lengths of approximately 600 base pairs (bp), and photographed using a GelDoc XR imager (BioRad). All positive PCR products were excised from gels and purified with the Zymoclean Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), eluted in 6 μL provided elution buffer, and directly sequenced on both strands by using an ABI 3130xl Genetic Analyzer sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Biotechnology Center for confirmation and characterization. We proofread and assembled chromatograms using Sequencher 4.10.1 (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA).

2.4. Metagenomic Sequencing

We performed metagenomic sequencing on a representative subset of 14 samples (eight rectal swabs and six colon biopsies), each from different animals from a diverse range of species and age–sex classes. Extracted RNA was subjected to reverse transcription with the Superscript IV kit (Thermo Fisher) using random hexamer priming. Resulting cDNA was then purified using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) as previously described [43,48,49,50]. Genomic libraries were prepared using the Illumina Nextera XT kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument using 300 × 300 cycle paired-end (V3) chemistry.

2.5. Bioinformatics

Sequences of low quality (Phred score <30) and short length (<50 bp) were trimmed and sequences matching known contaminants and host DNA were discarded using CLC Genomics Workbench v. 20.0.4 (Qiagen). Remaining reads were then subjected to de novo assembly using the metaviral command in SPAdes v. 3.15.2 [51]. The generated contiguous sequences (contigs) were compared to viruses in the NCBI GenBank database at both the nucleotide and amino acid levels using the BLASTn and BLASTx algorithms, respectively [52,53]. Contigs with high similarity to mammalian viruses were retained for further analysis whereas contigs matching viruses of non-mammalian hosts (e.g., phage, fungi, insects, or plants) were removed.

2.6. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic relationships among related adenoviruses were inferred from nucleotide sequences available in NCBI GenBank. The hexon, penton, and polymerase genes of the novel adenovirus and closely related adenoviruses were aligned individually using MAFFT [54]. Positions with ambiguous residues were removed and the resulting alignments were trimmed with trimAl [55]. The aligned, trimmed sequences were then concatenated by hand. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was inferred from the concatenated sequences (18 taxa, 1632 amino acid positions, and 772 variable positions) using IQ-TREE with the model of molecular evolution estimated from the data and 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates [56]. The resulting tree was displayed (outgroup rooted with bovine atadenovirus D) using FigTree 1.4.4 [57].

3. Results

3.1. Coronavirus Surveillance Yielded No Detections

All positive controls (TGEV, BCoV, IBV, and SARS-CoV-2) amplified with the pan-coronavirus RT-PCR. However, no coronavirus nucleic acids were detected in either rectal swabs or colon samples from 254 bats by RT-PCR or metagenomic sequencing (further described below).

3.2. Novel Virus Identification and Genomic Characterization

Following quality trimming and in silico subtraction of host and known contaminant sequences, we retained a total of 23,998,919 sequence reads with an average length of 873 bp for analysis. We successfully assembled one complete adeno-associated virus (AAV) genome of 4298 bp and partial coding sequences of an adenovirus (AdV), astrovirus (AstV), and genomovirus (GV) (Table 2) from rectal swab samples. All assembled sequences and raw reads have been deposited into NCBI GenBank (accession numbers PV983328-PV983331) and the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (accession numbers SRX29156395- SRX29156397), respectively.
The AdV was detected in an adult female big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus), which was likely a geriatric individual due to significant dental wear [21]. Both the AAV and AstV were detected in one juvenile male Myotis species. The GV was detected in a juvenile female Myotis species. All three virus-positive bats were captured in urban environments near Las Cruces, New Mexico, either under a bridge or on a university campus.
The AdV polymerase gene was 70.9% similar at the amino acid level to the closest related virus (canine AdV 2, Genbank accession no. AP_000613). Because this AdV was detected in a new host species and has over 15% dissimilarity in the polymerase amino acid sequence to its closest relative, it is eligible for new species demarcation per ICTV guidelines [12]. Therefore, we have proposed the name lacepfus virus (LCPV), due to its detection in Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA, in a big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus). LCPV is genetically more similar to canine adenoviruses than other published adenoviruses detected in bats to date (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

In this study, we collected rectal swabs from 254 bats in New Mexico, USA, from August 2020 to July 2021. We performed multimodal viral detection, including a pan-coronavirus RT-PCR on all samples and metagenomic sequencing on a subset of 14 samples. We detected no coronaviruses, but we identified four novel viruses, including an AdV, AAV, AstV, and GV, in three individuals. All four viruses were detected in rectal swabs and represented a diversity of genome structures (DNA and RNA, both single- and double-stranded).
The AdV (Adenoviridae), for which we propose the name lacepfus virus (LCPV), is more closely related to canine adenoviruses than to any other adenoviruses detected in bats to date. The first AdV detected in a bat was from a fruit bat (Pteropus dasymallus yayeyamae) [58]. Soon thereafter, researchers postulated that all canine AdVs originated from an AdV of a vespertilionid bat (such as Eptesicus fuscus, the species in which LCPV was detected), either through direct or indirect contact with a canid [59,60]. First discovered in 1930, canine AdV1 and AdV2, which cause hepatitis or tracheobronchitis (“kennel cough”), respectively, are significant pathogens in dogs, with CAdV1 causing mortality rates of 10–30% in unvaccinated animals [61]. Thus, both viruses are included in dog core vaccination series in the U.S. [62]. Although most AdV are host-specific, canine AdVs have been detected in a wide variety of carnivores (Figure 2) and are more severely pathogenic than the majority of AdVs, supporting the hypothesis that a historical interspecies transmission event, possibly from a bat, gave rise to these viruses [59].
AAVs (Parvoviridae) are widespread among vertebrates, including bats, and AAVs isolated from bats exhibit low sequence similarity to primate AAVs [63]. Similarly, AstVs (Astroviridae) have been detected extensively in a wide range of vertebrate hosts, often causing gastroenteritis and diarrhea in young individuals, but are considered zoonotic [64]. GVs (Genomoviridae) have been identified in animal, plant, and environmental samples, and are thought to be passed in bat guano from dietary sources [8,65].
None of the viruses detected in this study are definitively pathogenic in bats. Because these viruses were detected in antemortem rectal swabs, it was not possible to evaluate tropism in bat tissues. Histopathological confirmation of true infection would be useful in future studies. However, a recent study did perform histopathological characterization, providing evidence of AdV-induced enteritis in a juvenile Seba’s short-tailed bat (Carollia perspicillata) in Mexico [66]. Another previous study did not detect any viral or bacterial agents except for a novel AdV in three bats that died of “natural causes”, suggesting the AdV (Figure 2, bat adenovirus 2) may have been the etiologic agent [60]. Each of the virus-positive bats in our study appeared clinically healthy at the time of sample collection. Of note, all virus-positive bats were either juvenile or geriatric, supporting the hypothesis that viral shedding increases in bats, as in other species, during periods of immune system immaturity or senescence [67].
Of note, we did not detect coronavirus nucleic acids in any of the bats. Two recent studies of coronaviruses in bats from Canada [68] and the Yucatán region of Mexico [69] reported CoV prevalences of 1.4% and 5.4%, respectively. Other previous studies have detected enzootic alphacoronaviruses in native bat populations in the U.S. [4,6,7,8,9], Mexico [5], and Canada [70,71]. Our study relied on rectal swab samples, which have yielded the most, and often the only, detections of any sample type in previous studies [4,5,6,70], though it is possible other sample types could have yielded CoV detections. However, we hypothesize that coronavirus prevalence in these bats may have been relatively low due to the very hot, arid climate of our sampling location in the Chihuahua Desert; CoV virions are more stable and readily transmitted in cool, dry conditions [72,73]. If CoV prevalence was 1% in our study population, the probability of not detecting an infected bat (false negative) would have been relatively high at 8% [74]. Moreover, despite our efforts to sample a diverse range of species and age–sex classes frequently through all seasons, it is also possible we did not capture instances of peak shedding for coronaviruses in these species. Viral shedding in bats is known to be affected by seasonal fluctuations in immunity due to factors such as pregnancy, parturition, lactation, weaning, roosting behaviors, and hibernation [67,75,76,77].
The absence of SARS-CoV-2 in our sampled population is not surprising, given similar findings in other recent studies [78,79]. After experimental challenges with SARS-CoV-2, big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) and little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) were resistant to infection [80,81], whereas Old World fruit bats (Rosettus aegypticus) could be infected readily and shed for several days post-inoculation [82]. Experimentally challenged Mexican free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) shed SARS-CoV-2 in saliva for up to 18 days after inoculation but cleared the virus by day 20 [83]. However, none of the virus-positive animals infected co-housed bats, further suggesting that host competence and transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2 in this species remains low [83]. Notably, all bat samples for our study were collected before the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in October 2021, which was associated with significantly higher human-to-human transmission rates and thus viral prevalence compared to previous variants [84]. It is possible that increased transmission among humans could have allowed for more opportunities for SARS-CoV-2 to spill back into native U.S. bat populations after the conclusion of our study. To date, other mammalian species have been susceptible to reverse zoonotic transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and even documented transmission back to humans, including free-ranging white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) [85,86] and farmed mink (Neovison vison) [87].
Detection of LCPV opens new questions about bat–canid viral exchange that should be explored in future viral surveillance studies, especially studies of juvenile and geriatric bats that may yield higher viral detection rates due to immune system vulnerabilities. Bats live in peridomestic habitats, such as the urban sampling locations for this study. In fact, big brown bats and Myotis species, in which novel viruses were detected, are known to be moderately to highly synanthropic, roosting in groups of hundreds of individuals near humans and domestic animals. Dogs live with people and are susceptible to exposure to bat-borne viruses through bites or indirect contact (i.e., sniffing or eating guano). Transmission of histoplasmosis from bats to dogs in the same general area as this study has been documented [88]. It is unclear when the apparent AdV transmission event from bats to dogs occurred, or whether there were intermediary species involved, but such an event underscores the need to conduct viral surveillance in a broad range of animals that live with and near humans to understand bat-borne virus ecology and to evaluate the risk of future spillover.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v17101349/s1, Figure S1: Serial dilution assay for limit of detection for pan-coronavirus RT-PCR. Figure S2: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of adeno-associated viruses. Figure S3: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of astroviruses. Figure S4: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of genomoviruses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.A.H., T.L.G. and T.J.O.; methodology, T.E.W., K.A.H., T.L.G. and T.J.O.; formal analysis, T.E.W.; investigation, T.E.W., L.H.Z., L.M., D.I.I., C.J., C.D.D., T.F.W., K.A.H., T.L.G. and T.J.O.; resources, K.A.H. and T.L.G.; data curation, T.E.W., L.H.Z., L.M. and C.J.; writing—original draft preparation, T.E.W.; writing—review and editing, T.E.W., L.H.Z., L.M., D.I.I., C.J., C.D.D., T.F.W., K.A.H., T.L.G. and T.J.O.; visualization, T.E.W., L.H.Z. and T.L.G.; supervision, K.A.H., T.L.G. and T.J.O.; funding acquisition, K.A.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Science Foundation RAPID Grant 2031816.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Animal work was approved by the New Mexico State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (2020-005). The research was conducted under New Mexico Fish and Game permit 3782; an exemption was granted by New Mexico Game and Fish from the 2020 embargo on bat research during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in the study are openly available in NCBI GenBank (accession numbers PV983328-PV983331).

Acknowledgments

We thank the Jornada Experimental Range, which is administered by the USDA-ARS and is supported by the National Science Foundation Long-Term Ecological Research Program and the USDA Long-Term Agroecosystem Research Network, for granting permission for bat collections on the range. We also thank local property owners, who gave us permission to conduct bat collections on their premises, as well as Ailam Lim from the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory for the coronavirus isolates used for optimizing our PCR protocol. We are grateful to Carlos Campos, Nicole Coomes, Jordan Gass, Reese Gegax, Eduardo Hernandez, Clarissa Rascon, Diego Ruiz, John Waller, Blair Wolf, Nicholas Wright, and Katie Young for their assistance with field work and data collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Olival, K.J.; Cryan, P.M.; Amman, B.R.; Baric, R.S.; Blehert, D.S.; Brook, C.E.; Calisher, C.H.; Castle, K.T.; Coleman, J.T.H.; Daszak, P.; et al. Possibility for reverse zoonotic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to free-ranging wildlife: A case study of bats. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kobayashi, T.; Matsugo, H.; Maruyama, J.; Kamiki, H.; Takada, A.; Maeda, K.; Takenaka-Uema, A.; Tohya, Y.; Murakami, S.; Horimoto, T.; et al. Characterization of a novel species of adenovirus from Japanese microbat and role of CXADR as its entry factor. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Valitutto, M.T.; Aung, O.; Tun, K.Y.N.; Vodzak, M.E.; Zimmerman, D.; Yu, J.H.; Win, Y.T.; Maw, M.T.; Thein, W.Z.; Win, H.H.; et al. Detection of novel coronaviruses in bats in Myanmar. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Donaldson, E.F.; Haskew, A.N.; Gates, J.E.; Huynh, J.; Moore, C.J.; Frieman, M.B. Metagenomic Analysis of the Viromes of Three North American Bat Species: Viral Diversity among Different Bat Species That Share a Common Habitat. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 13004–13018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Anthony, S.J.; Ojeda-Flores, R.; Rico-Chávez, O.; Navarrete-Macias, I.; Zambrana-Torrelio, C.M.; Rostal, M.K.; Epstein, J.H.; Tipps, T.; Liang, E.; Sanchez-Leon, M.; et al. Coronaviruses in bats from Mexico. J. Gen. Virol. 2013, 94, 1028–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dominguez, S.R.; O’Shea, T.J.; Oko, L.M.; Holmes, K.V. Detection of group 1 coronaviruses in bats in North America. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007, 13, 1295–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, L.; Victoria, J.G.; Wang, C.; Jones, M.; Fellers, G.M.; Kunz, T.H.; Delwart, E. Bat guano virome: Predominance of dietary viruses from insects and plants plus novel mammalian viruses. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 6955–6965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y.; Altan, E.; Reyes, G.; Halstead, B.; Deng, X.; Delwart, E. Virome of Bat Guano from Nine Northern California Roosts. J. Virol. 2021, 95, e01713–e01720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Osborne, C.; Cryan, P.M.; O’Shea, T.J.; Oko, L.M.; Ndaluka, C.; Calisher, C.H.; Berglund, A.D.; Klavetter, M.L.; Bowen, R.A.; Holmes, K.V.; et al. Alphacoronaviruses in new World bats: Prevalence, persistence, phylogeny, and potential for interaction with humans. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, 19156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jolliffe, T.; Kepel, A.; Kingston, T.; Leopardi, S.; Mclean, J.; Mendehall, I.H.; Parsons, S.; Russo, D.; Shapiro, J.T.; Viquez-R, L.; et al. IUCN SSC Bat Specialist Group (BSG) Recommendations to Reduce the Risk of Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 From Humans to Bats in Bat Rescue and Rehabilitation Centers; IUCN SSC Bat Specialist Group: Gland, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  11. Shapiro, J.T.; Phelps, K.; Racey, P.; Vicente-Santos, A.; Viquez-R, L.; Walsh, A.; Weinberg, M.; Kingston, T.; Leopardi, S.; Mclean, J.; et al. IUCN SSC BSG Guidelines for Field Hygiene 2024; IUCN SSC Bat Specialist Group: Gland, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Benkő, M.; Aoki, K.; Arnberg, N.; Davison, A.J.; Echavarría, M.; Hess, M.; Jones, M.S.; Kaján, G.L.; Kajon, A.E.; Mittal, S.K.; et al. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Adenoviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2022, 103, 001721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Borkenhagen, L.K.; Fieldhouse, J.K.; Seto, D.; Gray, G.C. Are adenoviruses zoonotic? A systematic review of the evidence. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2019, 8, 1679–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ai, L.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, W.; He, T.; Ke, Y.; Wu, J.; Yin, W.; Zou, X.; Ding, C.; Luo, Y.; et al. Genomic characteristics and pathogenicity of a new bat adenoviruses strains that was isolated in at sites along the southeastern coasts of the P.R. of China from 2015 to 2019. Virus Res. 2022, 308, 198653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Diakoudi, G.; Lanave, G.; Moreno, A.; Chiapponi, C.; Sozzi, E.; Prosperi, A.; Larocca, V.; Losurdo, M.; Decaro, N.; Martella, V.; et al. Surveillance for Adenoviruses in Bats in Italy. Viruses 2019, 11, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dias, B.V.; Lanzarini, N.M.; de Moraes, M.T.B.; Nordgren, J.; Moura, P.E.B.; Moratelli, R.; Novaes, R.L.M.; Costa-Neto, S.F.; Veríssimo, I.; Miagostovich, M.P.; et al. First molecular detection of adenoviruses in bats from an urban Atlantic Forest in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2024, 126, 105687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jansen Van Vuren, P.; Allam, M.; Wiley, M.R.; Ismail, A.; Storm, N.; Birkhead, M.; Markotter, W.; Palacios, G.; Paweska, J.T. A novel adenovirus isolated from the Egyptian fruit bat in South Africa is closely related to recent isolates from China. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Karamendin, K.; Kydyrmanov, A.; Sabyrzhan, T.; Nuralibekov, S.; Kasymbekov, Y.; Khan, Y. Detection and Phylogenetic Characterization of a Novel Adenovirus Found in Lesser Mouse-Eared Bat (Myotis blythii) in South Kazakhstan. Viruses 2023, 15, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, D.N.; Angiel, M. Two novel adenoviruses found in Cave Myotis bats (Myotis velifer) in Oklahoma. Virus Genes 2019, 56, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sikes, R.S. 2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education. J. Mammal. 2016, 97, 663–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wilkinson, G.S.; Brunet-Rossinni, A.K. Methods for age estimation and the study of senescence in bats. In Ecological and Behavioral Methods for the Study of Bats, 2nd ed.; Kunz, T.H., Parsons, S.E., Eds.; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lewis, S.E. Effect of climatic variation on reproduction by pallid bats (Antrozous pallidus). Can. J. Zool. 1993, 71, 1429–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hermanson, J.W.; O’Shea, T.J. Antrozous pallidus. Mamm. Species 1983, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sherwin, R.E.; Stricklan, D.; Rogers, D.S. Roosting Affinities of Townsend’s Big-Eared Bat (Corynorhinus townsendii) in Northern Utah. J. Mammal. 2000, 81, 939–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lucas, J.S.; Loeb, S.C.; Jodice, P.G.R. Roost selection by rafinesque’s big-eared bats (Corynorhinus rafinesquii) in a pristine habitat at three spatial scales. Acta Chiropterologica 2015, 17, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pearson, O.P.; Koford, M.R.; Pearson, A.K. Reproduction of the Lump-Nosed Bat (Corynorhinus rafinesquei) in California. J. Mammal. 1952, 33, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. McGuire, L.P.; Boyle, W.A. Altitudinal migration in bats: Evidence, patterns, and drivers. Biol. Rev. 2013, 88, 767–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Agosta, S.J. Habitat use, diet and roost selection by the Big Brown Bat (Eptesicus fuscus) in North America: A case for conserving an abundant species. Mamm. Rev. 2002, 32, 179–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wilkinson, G.S.; South, J.M. Life history, ecology and longevity in bats. Aging Cell 2002, 1, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wilkinson, L.C.; Barclay, R.M.R. Differences in the foraging behaviour of male and female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) during the reproductive period. Écoscience 1997, 4, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mayrberger, S. Exit/entry Sequences, Roost Fidelity and Transport of Young by Big Brown Bats (Eptesicus fuscus). Master’s Thesis, University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shump, K.A.; Shump, A.U. Lasiurus cinereus. Mamm. Species 1982, 3, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rolseth, S.L.; Koehler, C.E.; Barclay, R.M.R. Differences in the Diets of Juvenile and Adult Hoary Bats, Lasiurus cinereus. J. Mammal. 1994, 75, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Krutzsch, P.H. Notes on the habits of the bat, Myotis californicus. J. Mammal. 1954, 35, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oxberry, B.A. Female reproductive patterns in hibernating bats. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1979, 56, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wimsatt, W.A. An analysis of parturition in Chiroptera, including new observations on Myotis lucifugus. J. Mammal. 1960, 41, 183–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Russell, A.L.; Medellín, R.A.; Mccracken, G.F. Genetic variation and migration in the Mexican free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis mexicana). Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2207–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wilkins, K.T. Tadarida brasiliensis. Mamm. Species 1989, 3, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Altenbach, J.S.; Geluso, K.N.; Wilson, D.E. Population size of Tadarida. Biological Investigations in the Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Texas; National Park Service: Lubbock, TX, USA, 1975; p. 341.
  40. Krutzsch, P.H.; Fleming, T.H.; Crichton, E.G. Reproductive biology of male Mexican free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis mexicana). J. Mammal. 2002, 83, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bennett, A.J.; Bushmaker, T.; Cameron, K.; Ondzie, A.; Niama, F.R.; Parra, H.J.; Mombouli, J.V.; Olson, S.H.; Munster, V.J.; Goldberg, T.L. Diverse RNA viruses of arthropod origin in the blood of fruit bats suggest a link between bat and arthropod viromes. Virology 2019, 528, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bennett, A.J.; Paskey, A.C.; Kuhn, J.H.; Bishop-Lilly, K.A.; Goldberg, T.L. Diversity, Transmission, and Cophylogeny of Ledanteviruses (Rhabdoviridae: Ledantevirus) and Nycteribiid Bat Flies Parasitizing Angolan Soft-Furred Fruit Bats in Bundibugyo District, Uganda. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Goldberg, T.L.; Bennett, A.J.; Kityo, R.; Kuhn, J.H.; Chapman, C.A. Kanyawara Virus: A Novel Rhabdovirus Infecting Newly Discovered Nycteribiid Bat Flies Infesting Previously Unknown Pteropodid Bats in Uganda. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Allander, T.; Emerson, S.U.; Engle, R.E.; Purcell, R.H.; Bukh, J. A virus discovery method incorporating DNase treatment and its application to the identification of two bovine parvovirus species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 11609–11614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xiu, L.; Binder, R.A.; Alarja, N.A.; Kochek, K.; Coleman, K.K.; Than, S.T.; Bailey, E.S.; Bui, V.N.; Toh, T.-H.; Erdmann, D.D.; et al. A RT-PCR assay for the detection of coronaviruses from four genera. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 128, 104391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tan, C.C.S.; Trew, J.; Peacock, T.P.; Mok, K.Y.; Hart, C.; Lau, K.; Ni, D.; Orme, C.D.L.; Ransome, E.; Pearse, W.D.; et al. Genomic screening of 16 UK native bat species through conservationist networks uncovers coronaviruses with zoonotic potential. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Brnić, D.; Lojkić, I.; Krešić, N.; Zrnčić, V.; Ružanović, L.; Mikuletič, T.; Bosilj, M.; Steyer, A.; Keros, T.; Habrun, B.; et al. Circulation of SARS-CoV-Related Coronaviruses and Alphacoronaviruses in Bats from Croatia. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Goldberg, T.L.; Sibley, S.; Pinkerton, M.; Dunn, C.; Long, L.; White, L. Multidecade mortality and a homolog of hepatitis C virus in bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), the national bird of the USA. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Toohey-Kurth, K.; Sibley, S.D.; Goldberg, T.L. Metagenomic assessment of adventitious viruses in commercial bovine sera. Biologicals 2017, 47, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Negrey, J.D.; Mitani, J.C.; Wrangham, R.W.; Otali, E.; Reddy, R.B.; Pappas, T.E.; Grindle, K.A.; Gern, J.E.; Machanda, Z.P.; Muller, M.N.; et al. Viruses associated with ill health in wild chimpanzees. Am. J. Primatol. 2022, 84, e23358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gish, W.; States, D.J. Identification of protein coding regions by database similarity search. Nat. Genet. 1993, 3, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Capella-Gutiérrez, S.; Silla-Martínez, J.M.; Gabaldón, T. trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1972–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Trifinopoulos, J.; Nguyen, L.T.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W232–W235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rambaut, A. FigTree, version 1.4.4; Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh, UK, 2018.
  58. Maeda, K.; Hondo, E.; Terakawa, J.; Kiso, Y.; Nakaichi, N.; Endoh, D.; Sakai, K.; Morikawa, S.; Mizutani, T. Isolation of novel adenovirus from fruit bat (Pteropus dasymallus yayeyamae). Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008, 14, 347–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kohl, C.; Vidovszky, M.Z.; Mühldorfer, K.; Dabrowski, P.W.; Radonić, A.; Nitsche, A.; Wibbelt, G.; Kurth, A.; Harrach, B. Genome Analysis of Bat Adenovirus 2: Indications of Interspecies Transmission. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 1888–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Sonntag, M.; Mühldorfer, K.; Speck, S.; Wibbelt, G.; Kurth, A. New Adenovirus in Bats, Germany. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 2052–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Decaro, N.; Martella, V.; Buonavoglia, C. Canine Adenoviruses and Herpesvirus. Vet. Clin. North. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2008, 38, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ellis, J.; Marziani, E.; Aziz, C.; Brown, C.M.; Cohn, L.A.; Lea, C.; Moore, G.E.; Taneja, N. 2022 AAHA Canine Vaccination Guidelines (2024 Update). J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 2024, 60, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mietzsch, M.; Li, Y.; Kurian, J.; Smith, J.K.; Chipman, P.; McKenna, R.; Yang, L.; Agbandje-McKenna, M. Structural characterization of a bat Adeno-associated virus capsid. J. Struct. Biol. 2020, 211, 107547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Orłowska, A.; Smreczak, M.; Potyrało, P.; Bomba, A.; Trębas, P.; Rola, J. First Detection of Bat Astroviruses (BtAstVs) among Bats in Poland: The Genetic BtAstVs Diversity Reveals Multiple Co-Infection of Bats with Different Strains. Viruses 2021, 13, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Harding, C.; Larsen, B.B.; Otto, H.W.; Potticary, A.L.; Kraberger, S.; Custer, J.M.; Suazo, C.; Upham, N.S.; Worobey, M.; Van Doorslaer, K.; et al. Diverse DNA virus genomes identified in fecal samples of Mexican free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) captured in Chiricahua Mountains of southeast Arizona (USA). Virology 2023, 580, 98–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Trejo-Chávez, A.; Castillo-Velázquez, U.; Méndez-Bernal, A.; Flores-Martínez, K.; Hernández-Vidal, G.; Rodríguez-Tovar, L.E.; Villarreal-Villarreal, J.P. Infection by Adenovirus Type 2 in a Short-Tailed Bat in Mexico. Case Rep. Vet. Med. 2025, 2025, 2431526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Niu, Y.; McKee, C.D. Bat Viral Shedding: A Review of Seasonal Patterns and Risk Factors. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2025, 25, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Simon, A.Y.; Badmalia, M.D.; Paquette, S.J.; Manalaysay, J.; Czekay, D.; Kandel, B.S.; Sultana, A.; Lung, O.; Babuadze, G.G.; Shahhosseini, N. Evolutionary Relationships of Unclassified Coronaviruses in Canadian Bat Species. Viruses 2024, 16, 1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jiménez-Rico, M.A.; Vigueras-Galván, A.L.; Hernández-Villegas, E.N.; Martínez-Duque, P.; Roiz, D.; Falcón, L.I.; Vázquez-Domínguez, E.; Gaona, O.; Arnal, A.; Roche, B.; et al. Bat coronavirus surveillance across different habitats in Yucatán, México. Virology 2025, 603, 110401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Subudhi, S.; Rapin, N.; Bollinger, T.K.; Hill, J.E.; Donaldson, M.E.; Davy, C.M.; Warnecke, L.; Turner, J.M.; Kyle, C.J.; Willis, C.K.R.; et al. A persistently infecting coronavirus in hibernating Myotis lucifugus, the North American little brown bat. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 2297–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Misra, V.; Dumonceaux, T.; Dubois, J.; Willis, C.; Nadin-Davis, S.; Severini, A.; Wandeler, A.; Lindsay, R.; Artsob, H. Detection of polyoma and corona viruses in bats of Canada. J. Gen. Virol. 2009, 90, 2015–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Matson, M.J.; Yinda, C.K.; Seifert, S.N.; Bushmaker, T.; Fischer, R.J.; van Doremalen, N.; Lloyd-Smith, J.O.; Munster, V.J. Effect of Environmental Conditions on SARS-CoV-2 Stability in Human Nasal Mucus and Sputum. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Casanova, L.M.; Jeon, S.; Rutala, W.A.; Weber, D.J.; Sobsey, M.D. Effects of Air Temperature and Relative Humidity on Coronavirus Survival on Surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Flanders, W.D.; Kleinbaum, D.G. Basic Models for Disease Occurrence in Epidemiology. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1995, 24, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Eskew, E.A.; Olival, K.J.; Mazet, J.A.K.; Daszak, P. A global-scale dataset of bat viral detection suggests that pregnancy reduces viral shedding. Proc. R. Soc. B 2025, 292, 20242381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Montecino-Latorre, D.; Goldstein, T.; Gilardi, K.; Wolking, D.; Van Wormer, E.; Kazwala, R.; Ssebide, B.; Nziza, J.; Sijali, Z.; Cranfield, M.; et al. Reproduction of East-African bats may guide risk mitigation for coronavirus spillover. One Health Outlook 2020, 2, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ntumvi, N.F.; Diffo, J.L.D.; Tamoufe, U.; Ndze, V.N.; Takuo, J.M.; Mouiche, M.M.M.; Nwobegahay, J.; Lebreton, M.; Gillis, A.; Rimoin, A.W.; et al. Evaluation of bat adenoviruses suggests co-evolution and host roosting behaviour as drivers for diversity. Microb. Genom. 2021, 7, 000561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cook, J.D.; Grant, E.H.C.; Coleman, J.T.H.; Sleeman, J.M.; Runge, M.C. Risks posed by SARS-CoV-2 to North American bats during winter fieldwork. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2021, 3, e410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Runge, M.C.; Campbell Grant, E.H.; Coleman, J.T.H.; Reichard, J.D.; Gibbs, S.E.J.; Cryan, P.M.; Olival, K.J.; Walsh, D.P.; Blehert, D.S.; Hopkins, M.C.; et al. Assessing the Risks Posed by SARS-CoV-2 in and via North American Bats—Decision Framing and Rapid Risk Assessment; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2020. [CrossRef]
  80. Hall, J.S.; Knowles, S.; Nashold, S.W.; Ip, H.S.; Leon, A.E.; Rocke, T.; Keller, S.; Carossino, M.; Balasuriya, U.; Hofmeister, E. Experimental challenge of a North American bat species, big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus), with SARS-CoV-2. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021, 68, 3443–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Hall, J.S.; Nashold, S.; Hofmeister, E.; Leon, A.E.; Falendysz, E.A.; Ip, H.S.; Malavé, C.M.; Rocke, T.E.; Carossino, M.; Balasuriya, U.; et al. Little Brown Bats (Myotis lucifugus) Are Resistant to SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Wildl. Dis. 2024, 60, 924–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Schlottau, K.; Rissmann, M.; Graaf, A.; Schön, J.; Sehl, J.; Wylezich, C.; Höper, D.; Mettenleiter, T.C.; Balkema-Buschmann, A.; Harder, T.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 in fruit bats, ferrets, pigs, and chickens: An experimental transmission study. Lancet Microbe 2020, 1, e218–e225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hall, J.S.; Hofmeister, E.; Ip, H.S.; Nashold, S.W.; Leon, A.E.; Malavé, C.M.; Falendysz, E.A.; Rocke, T.E.; Carossino, M.; Balasuriya, U.; et al. Experimental Infection of Mexican Free-Tailed Bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) with SARS-CoV-2. mSphere 2023, 8, e00263-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bálint, G.; Vörös-Horváth, B.; Széchenyi, A. Omicron: Increased transmissibility and decreased pathogenicity. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kuchipudi, S.V.; Surendran-Nair, M.; Ruden, R.M.; Yon, M.; Nissly, R.H.; Vandegrift, K.J.; Nelli, R.K.; Li, L.; Jayarao, B.M.; Maranas, C.D.; et al. Multiple spillovers from humans and onward transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in white-tailed deer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2121644119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pickering, B.; Lung, O.; Maguire, F.; Kruczkiewicz, P.; Kotwa, J.D.; Buchanan, T.; Gagnier, M.; Guthrie, J.L.; Jardine, C.M.; Marchard-Austin, A.; et al. Divergent SARS-CoV-2 variant emerges in white-tailed deer with deer-to-human transmission. Nat. Microbiol. 2022, 7, 2011–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Munnink, B.B.O.; Sikkema, R.S.; Nieuwenhuijse, D.F.; Molenaar, R.J.; Munger, E.; Molenkamp, R.; Van Der Spek, A.; Tolsma, P.; Rietveld, A.; Brouwer, M.; et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on mink farms between humans and mink and back to humans. Science 2021, 371, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kabli, S.; Koschmann, J.R.; Robertstad, G.W.; Lawrence, J.; Ajello, L.; Redetzke, K. Endemic canine and feline histoplasmosis in El Paso, Texas. Med. Mycol. 1986, 24, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Viruses 17 01349 g001
Figure 1. Bat sampling sites in New Mexico, USA: (A) Map of New Mexico counties, with sampling sites indicated as red dots. Counties in which sampling took place are labeled. (B) Map sampling sites in Doña Ana County, the most densely sampled county. (C) Representative photo of bridge sampling site in La Llorona Park, Doña Ana County.
Figure 1. Bat sampling sites in New Mexico, USA: (A) Map of New Mexico counties, with sampling sites indicated as red dots. Counties in which sampling took place are labeled. (B) Map sampling sites in Doña Ana County, the most densely sampled county. (C) Representative photo of bridge sampling site in La Llorona Park, Doña Ana County.
Viruses 17 01349 g001
Viruses 17 01349 g002
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of adenoviruses based on aligned, concatenated hexon, penton and polymerase amino acid sequences. The tree is outgroup rooted with bovine atadenovirus D. Taxon names are followed by GenBank accession numbers in parentheses and silhouettes of the host of each virus. The taxon name of the virus identified in this study is in bold. Numbers beside nodes indicate bootstrap values (percent; only values ≥50% are shown); scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site. For ease of reference, virus names reflect those listed in GenBank. Host silhouettes accessed from PhyloPic (phylopic.org) and used under Creative Commons licenses.
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of adenoviruses based on aligned, concatenated hexon, penton and polymerase amino acid sequences. The tree is outgroup rooted with bovine atadenovirus D. Taxon names are followed by GenBank accession numbers in parentheses and silhouettes of the host of each virus. The taxon name of the virus identified in this study is in bold. Numbers beside nodes indicate bootstrap values (percent; only values ≥50% are shown); scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site. For ease of reference, virus names reflect those listed in GenBank. Host silhouettes accessed from PhyloPic (phylopic.org) and used under Creative Commons licenses.
Viruses 17 01349 g002
Table 2. Viruses identified in rectal swabs of free-ranging bats (n = 254) in New Mexico, USA, in August 2020–July 2021.
Table 2. Viruses identified in rectal swabs of free-ranging bats (n = 254) in New Mexico, USA, in August 2020–July 2021.
Host SpeciesAge/SexVirus NameAccessionGenomeSequence Length (nt) 1Closest Match (Source, Location, Year, Accession)% nt Similarity
Eptesicus fuscusGeriatric femaleLacepfus virus (LCPV)PV983329dsDNA31,279Canine mastadenovirus A (feces, Turkey, 2022, OQ596341)87.02
Myotis sp.Juvenile maleBat adeno-associated virus 2259PV983328dsDNA4298Bat adeno-associated virus YNM (rectal swab, China, 2008, GU226971)77.09
Myotis sp.Juvenile maleBat astrovirus 2259PV983331ssRNA(+)951Bat astrovirus BAstV/RB (guano, USA, 2020, MT734809)96.21
Myotis sp.Juvenile femaleBat genomovirus 2252PV983330ssDNA1303Chicken genomovirus mg4_1247 (tracheal swab, USA, 2017, MN379609)95.79
1 nt = nucleotide. All NCBI E-values = 0.00E+00.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Weary, T.E.; Zhou, L.H.; MacDonald, L.; Ibañez IV, D.; Jaramillo, C.; Dunn, C.D.; Wright, T.F.; Hanley, K.A.; Goldberg, T.L.; Orr, T.J. Novel Bat Adenovirus Closely Related to Canine Adenoviruses Identified via Fecal Virome Surveillance of Bats in New Mexico, USA, 2020–2021. Viruses 2025, 17, 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17101349

AMA Style

Weary TE, Zhou LH, MacDonald L, Ibañez IV D, Jaramillo C, Dunn CD, Wright TF, Hanley KA, Goldberg TL, Orr TJ. Novel Bat Adenovirus Closely Related to Canine Adenoviruses Identified via Fecal Virome Surveillance of Bats in New Mexico, USA, 2020–2021. Viruses. 2025; 17(10):1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17101349

Chicago/Turabian Style

Weary, Taylor E., Lawrence H. Zhou, Lauren MacDonald, Daniel Ibañez IV, Chance Jaramillo, Christopher D. Dunn, Timothy F. Wright, Kathryn A. Hanley, Tony L. Goldberg, and Teri J. Orr. 2025. "Novel Bat Adenovirus Closely Related to Canine Adenoviruses Identified via Fecal Virome Surveillance of Bats in New Mexico, USA, 2020–2021" Viruses 17, no. 10: 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17101349

APA Style

Weary, T. E., Zhou, L. H., MacDonald, L., Ibañez IV, D., Jaramillo, C., Dunn, C. D., Wright, T. F., Hanley, K. A., Goldberg, T. L., & Orr, T. J. (2025). Novel Bat Adenovirus Closely Related to Canine Adenoviruses Identified via Fecal Virome Surveillance of Bats in New Mexico, USA, 2020–2021. Viruses, 17(10), 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17101349

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop