Next Article in Journal
Evidence of RedOX Imbalance during Zika Virus Infection Promoting the Formation of Disulfide-Bond-Dependent Oligomers of the Envelope Protein
Next Article in Special Issue
Systemic Neutralizing Antibodies and Local Immune Responses Are Critical for the Control of SARS-CoV-2
Previous Article in Journal
Meeting in Mind and a Smile on the Face: A Tribute to Dr. Randall J Cohrs
Previous Article in Special Issue
The E484K Substitution in a SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Subunit Vaccine Resulted in Limited Cross-Reactive Neutralizing Antibody Responses in Mice
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Characterization of Immune Response Diversity in Rodents Vaccinated with a Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Vectored COVID-19 Vaccine

Viruses 2022, 14(6), 1127; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14061127
by Shen Wang 1,†, Cheng Zhang 1,2,†, Bo Liang 1, Weiqi Wang 1,3, Na Feng 1, Yongkun Zhao 1, Tiecheng Wang 1, Zhendong Guo 1, Feihu Yan 1,*, Songtao Yang 1,* and Xianzhu Xia 1
Reviewer 2:
Viruses 2022, 14(6), 1127; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14061127
Submission received: 6 May 2022 / Revised: 21 May 2022 / Accepted: 23 May 2022 / Published: 24 May 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Shen Wang and col. present an interesting study on a vaccine against SARS-COV 2 based on the vesicular stomatitis virus and the SARS-cov2 spike protein. Although the vaccine approach is not new, they explore intranasal immunization and compare it with intramuscular immunization in BalB/C mice and golden hamsters. The results show that intranasal immunization induces a powerful humoral and cellular response of Th1 character, with respect to the intramuscular route (Th1/Th2). Being also protective against the viral challenge. Another important finding of the work is the susceptibility of golden hamsters to SARS-COV2 infection, something that does not occur in wild mice. Proposing itself as a good model for testing new vaccines.

Mayor comments:

        1) In intranasal immunizations, could the authors measure the presence of IgA in the serum of animals, and how is it compared to intramuscular ones?

Minor comments:

        1) The authors should improve the quality of the image in Figure 1b: Indirect immunofluorescence identification results of  rVSV-ΔG-S/rVSV-ΔG-S-eGFP.

        2) In figure 5, they should indicate what the arrows point to in the images .

Author Response

Please see the attachment, thank you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see the attachment for specific comments.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment, thank you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop