Next Article in Journal
A Tug of War: Pseudorabies Virus and Host Antiviral Innate Immunity
Previous Article in Journal
Early Genomic, Epidemiological, and Clinical Description of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant in Mexico City
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/v14030546
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Restriction-Assembly: A Solution to Construct Novel Adenovirus Vector

by
Xiaojuan Guo
1,
Yangyang Sun
1,2,
Juan Chen
1,3,
Xiaohui Zou
1,
Wenzhe Hou
1,
Wenjie Tan
1,*,
Tao Hung
1 and
Zhuozhuang Lu
1,4,*
1
NHC Key Laboratory of Medical Virology and Viral Diseases, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100052, China
2
School of Laboratory Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, China
3
School of Public Health, Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014040, China
4
Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention–Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Joint Research Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases and Biosafety, Wuhan 430071, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2022, 14(3), 546; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14030546
Submission received: 24 January 2022 / Revised: 24 February 2022 / Accepted: 1 March 2022 / Published: 6 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Viral Immunology, Vaccines, and Antivirals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gene therapy and vaccine development need more novel adenovirus vectors. Here, we attempt to provide strategies to construct adenovirus vectors based on restriction-assembly for researchers with little experience in this field. Restriction-assembly is a combined method of restriction digestion and Gibson assembly, by which the major part of the obtained plasmid comes from digested DNA fragments instead of PCR products. We demonstrated the capability of restriction-assembly in manipulating the genome of simian adenovirus 1 (SAdV-1) in this study. A PCR product of the plasmid backbone was combined with SAdV-1 genomic DNA to construct an infectious clone, plasmid pKSAV1, by Gibson assembly. Restriction-assembly was performed repeatedly in the steps of intermediate plasmid isolation, modification, and restoration. The generated adenoviral plasmid was linearized by restriction enzyme digestion and transfected into packaging 293 cells to rescue E3-deleted replication-competent SAdV1XE3-CGA virus. Interestingly, SAdV1XE3-CGA could propagate in human chronic myelogenous leukemia K562 cells. The E1 region was similarly modified to generate E1/E3-deleted replication-defective virus SAdV1-EG. SAdV1-EG had a moderate gene transfer ability to adherent mammalian cells, and it could efficiently transduce suspension cells when compared with the human adenovirus 5 control vector. Restriction-assembly is easy to use and can be performed without special experimental materials and instruments. It is highly effective with verifiable outcomes at each step. More importantly, restriction-assembly makes the established vector system modifiable, upgradable and under sustainable development, and it can serve as the instructive method or strategy for the synthetic biology of adenoviruses.

1. Introduction

Adenoviruses are non-enveloped viruses with an icosahedral nucleocapsid, which packs a genome of linear double-stranded DNA of 26−48 kb. Adenoviridae is divided into five genera, of which Masteradenovirus infects mammals [1]. Adenoviruses have been isolated from many mammals, such as humans, monkeys, bovines, and mice. Human adenoviruses contain more than 100 types (http://hadvwg.gmu.edu/, accessed on 5 February 2022), which belong to seven species (HAdV-A to -G) [1,2]. HAdV-5, as a prototype of HAdV-C, has been intensively studied and reconstructed as gene transfer vectors. Adenoviral vectors have special properties when compared with other viral vectors [3,4]. Adenoviruses have a mid-sized genome of linear double-stranded DNA which is manipulable and genetically stable. These viruses can grow efficiently in packaging cells and the virion has no envelope, which facilitates vector amplification and purification. They can infect both dividing and non-dividing cells, and many copies of the viral genome can be delivered to the nucleus of the target cell when the viruses are used at a high multiplicity of infection (MOI), resulting in high expression of the transgene. Finally, adenoviruses are non-integrating viruses and are genetically safe for the host. The main disadvantage is that adenoviruses are highly antigenic and will elicit a strong immune response against the vector in the host, which hampers re-use of the same type of adenoviral vectors in gene therapy and vaccine administration [5,6].
HAdV-5-based vectors have been widely used in basic science, gene therapy, and vaccine development. However, their application in vivo is impaired in the presence of pre-existing serum neutralizing antibodies (NAb). The seroprevalence of HAdV-5 NAb was reported to be 50–90% in healthy adults, which fluctuates slightly according to different geographic locations and ages [7,8]. Although recently HAdV-5-vectored vaccines against Ebola or SARS-CoV-2 have shown their efficacy in clinical trials, scientists are inclined to develop adenoviral vectors based on other serotypes [9,10,11,12]. Simian adenoviruses have attracted more interest because of the high biological similarity and low serum cross-reaction to their human analogs. However, efforts to develop more adenoviral vectors have been hindered by the lack of easy-to-use techniques for adenoviral genome modification.
The vector construction technique can be defined from three aspects: a technique to establish an adenovirus vector system from a wild-type virus, a technique to modify an existing vector system, or a technique used to load a transgene to an existing vector system. The principles behind these techniques can be the same, because, intrinsically, they are methods to manipulate adenovirus genomic DNA. Therefore, these techniques are not distinguished according to these applications and are non-specifically called adenovirus construction methods [13,14,15].
The homologous recombination method in bacterial cells is frequently used to construct novel adenoviral vectors. Recombinase-positive bacterial strains are an indispensable resource for this method. Such bacteria are often relatively inefficient with plasmid transformation or amplification, and some of them are commercially unavailable [16,17]. Nowadays, DNA assembly techniques are utilized to construct adenoviral vectors [11,18,19,20]. The success ratio could be low when directly assembling many long PCR products into a plasmid larger than 30 kb [20]; and it is more difficult to detect or correct point mutations introduced by PCR or DNA assembly in a plasmid of such size.
Recently, we combined the advantages of restriction enzyme digestion and Gibson assembly and simplified the procedures of introducing site-directed mutations to the adenoviral genome [21]. For convenience, we called this strategy restriction-assembly. The essence of this method is to use long restriction-digested fragments and short PCR products in a DNA assembly reaction. At the same time, the number of included DNA fragments is kept as low as possible. Restriction-assembly can be generalized as an all-purpose technique for adenovirus vector construction and modification. Here, we attempt to exemplify the versatile application of this method in the construction of E1- or E1/E3-deleted vectors based on simian adenovirus 1 (SAdV-1).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cells, Virus, Plasmids and Oligonucleotides

293 (ATCC CRL-1573), HEp-2 (ATCC CCL-23), Caco-2 (ATCC no. HTB-37), VeroE6 (ATCC CRL-1586), and 293TE32 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) at 37 °C under a humidified atmosphere supplemented with 5% CO2, and regularly split every 3–4 days. Suspension cells of human leukemic cell lines U937 (promonocytic leukemia), K562 (chronic myelogenous leukemia), Jurkat (T-cell leukemia), and HL-60 (acute myelogenous leukemia) were cultured similarly except that RPMI-1640 medium was used instead of DMEM. 293TE32 cells were previously established by transfecting 293 cells with a eukaryotic expression plasmid carrying the HAdV-41 E1B55K gene [22].
Simian adenovirus 1 (SAdV-1; ATCC VR-195; GenBank accession No. AY771780) was amplified in 293 cells [23], and the virus genomic DNA was extracted using the modified Hirt’s method [24]. HAdV5-EG and HAdV5-GFP were E1/E3-deleted HAdV-5 vectors carrying human EF1a promoter- or CMV promoter-controlled GFP expression cassettes, respectively [25,26].
pKFAV4GFP is an adenoviral plasmid based on fowl adenovirus 4 (FAdV-4), which carries the CMV promoter-controlled GFP expression cassette [27]. pcDNA3-TF41-11p is a pcDNA3-backboned plasmid with the insertion of the HAdV-41 tripartite leader sequence (TPL) in the multiple cloning sites [22,28]. Bacteria transformation was routinely performed to screen and amplify recombinant plasmid in Escherichia coli TOP10 chemically competent cells with the heat shock procedure according to the manufacturer’s instructions (TIANGEN Biotech, Beijing, China).
Single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were chemically synthesized and used as the primers for polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Information related to these oligonucleotides is summarized in Table 1.

2.2. Construction of E3-Deleted SAdV-1 Vector

PCR was performed to amplify the plasmid backbone containing the kanamycin resistance gene (Kan) and pBR322 origin of replication (Ori) with primer pairs of 2001KSAV1p2/p3, and the diluted PCR product was used as the template for a second round of amplification with primers of 2001KSAV1p1/p4. Such an operation helped add ITR (inverted terminal repeat) overlaps, SwaI, SalI, and AscI sites to the terminals of the PCR product. The PCR product was mixed with SAdV-1 genomic DNA and used as the substrates for the Gibson assembly reaction (NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly Master Mix, Cat. E2621, New England Biolabs). The product was used to transform Escherichia coli TOP10 competent cells. The plasmid with the Kan gene close to the E1 region was screened through restriction analysis and used for the following experiments. This plasmid (pKSAV1) contained the whole genome of SAdV-1 and was an infectious clone of the virus [29].
Overlap extension PCR was performed to amplify a 117 bp linker with primers of 2001KSAV1p5-p8. The linker was mixed with the short fragment (13,656 bp) excised from AscI-digested pKSAV1 and subjected to a DNA assembly reaction to generate an intermediate plasmid pKSAV1-AscI. PacI-E3 and E3-PmeI fragments were amplified by PCR with the template of pKSAV1-AscI; a CMV promoter-controlled GFP expression cassette of CMVp-GFP-pA (CGA) was generated by overlap-extension PCR using the pKFAV4GFP plasmid as the template (Table 1); pKSAV1-AscI was digested with PacI/PmeI and the fragment containing Kan and Ori was recovered from the agarose gel after electrophoresis; these four fragments were combined for DNA assembly to generate modified intermediate plasmid pKSAV1XE3CGA-AscI. The pKSAV1 plasmid was digested with AscI, and the larger fragment was recovered and mixed with PacI-linearized pKSAV1XE3CGA-AscI for DNA assembly to generate E3-deleted adenoviral plasmid pKSAV1XE3-CGA.

2.3. Construction of E1/E3-Deleted SAdV-1 Vector

Plasmid pKSAV1XE3-CGA was digested with SbfI to remove the GFP expression cassette, and the large fragment was self-ligated to generate pKSAV1XE3.
Plasmid pKSAV1XE3 was digested with SalI to recover the fragment containing the E1 region (10,528 bp), the SalI-SalI fragment inside the pTP coding sequence (CDS) was amplified by PCR, the SalI-linker was generated by self-annealing of single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides, and these three fragments were combined for DNA assembly to generate intermediate plasmid pKSAV1-SalI. Fragments of AscI-E1A and E1B-EcoRV were amplified by PCR using pKSAV1 as the template. Human EF1a promoter, GFP CDS, and BGH polyA signal (BGHpA) were generated by PCR and ligated together to generate a fragment of EF1aP-GFP-pA (EG) by overlap extension PCR. pKSAV1-SalI was digested with AscI/EcoRV to recover the fragment containing Kan-Ori, which was mixed with the other three fragments of AscI-E1A, EF1aP-GFP-pA, and E1B-EcoRV for DNA assembly to generate the modified intermediate plasmid pKSAV1XE1EG-SalI. Plasmid pKSAV1XE3 was digested with SalI, and the larger fragment was recovered and mixed with PacI-linearized pKSAV1XE1EG-SalI for DNA assembly to generate E1/E3-deleted adenoviral plasmid pKSAV1-EG0.
Extra repeats in the right ITR (RITR) and deletion in E1B19K were found by restriction analysis during the construction process and confirmed by sequencing, which originated from the genomic DNA of wild-type SAdV-1. Reverse mutation was performed to restore a normal ITR to the right end of the viral genome in pKSAV1-EG0. pKSAV1-EG0 was digested with SphI/SnaBI, diluted, and used directly as the template to amplify fragments of AsiSI-RITR and RITR-AseI (Table 1). Plasmid pKSAV1-EG0 was digested with AsiSI/AseI; the long fragment was recovered and mixed with fragments of AsiSI-RITR and RITR-AseI for DNA assembly to generate the final adenoviral plasmid pKSAV1-EG.

2.4. Rescue, Amplification, Purification and Titration of Recombinant Virus

The adenoviral plasmid was linearized with restriction enzyme SwaI, mixed with jetPRIME reagent, and used to transfect packaging cells according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Cat. 114-15, Polyplus-transfection, Illkirch, France). After the fluorescence foci or plaques were seen under a microscope, the cells, together with the culture medium, were subjected to three freeze–thaw rounds and spun to remove the cell debris. The supernatant was used as a seed virus for virus amplification. When the culture system scaled up to ten 15 cm dishes and after the cytopathic effect (CPE) occurred, most of the culture medium was discarded and the cells were detached with a cell lifter, collected in the remaining culture medium, and transferred to a 15 mL tube. After three freeze–thaw rounds and centrifugation, the virus in the supernatant was purified with the traditional CsCl ultracentrifugation method [30]. After dialysis in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris-Cl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 5% glycerol, the purified virus was aliquoted and preserved at −80 °C. Virus particle titer was determined by measuring the content of genomic DNA where 100 ng of genomic DNA is equivalent to 3.14 × 109 vp (viral particles) since a 31 kb viral genome has a molecular mass of 1.92 × 107. Infectious titer was determined on 293 cells with the limiting dilution assay by counting GFP+ cells 2 days post infection [31].

2.5. Establishment of 293 Cell Lines Stably Expressing SAdV-1 E1B55K Gene

The SAdV-1 E1B55K gene was cloned by nested PCR with primers of 2007SAV1E1Bf/r and 2007TSAV1E1Bf/r using SAdV-1 genomic DNA as the template (Table 1). The PCR product was inserted into the HindIII/XhoI site of pcDNA3-TF41-11p to generate the pcDNA3T-SAV1E1B55K plasmid by DNA assembly. pcDNA3T-SAV1E1B55K was mixed with jetPRIME reagent and used to transfect 293 cells. The cells were selected with a culture medium containing 800 μg/mL G418. G418-resistant colonies were picked out by using the cloning ring technique [32]. The cloned cells (293SE) were proliferated and preserved. Their ability in virus packaging was evaluated by observing the forming and growing of plaques after recombinant SAdV-1 infection.
The genomic DNA was extracted from 293SE cells and used as the template to amplify the SAdV-1 E1B55K expression cassette by PCR with primers of 2101SAV1E1Bs1/2 and 2101SAV1E1Bs3/4 (Table 1). The PCR products were resolved on agarose gel by electrophoresis before sequencing.

2.6. Transduction of Cell Lines

Adherent and suspension cell lines were infected with recombinant viruses to evaluate the gene transfer ability. For adherent cells, exponentially growing cells were seeded in 24 well plates; one day later, cells in 2 wells were detached with trypsin treatment and counted to assess the amount of cells in each well, purified viruses were diluted with culture medium and added to each well in a volume to achieve indicated MOIs, and the infection volume was adjusted to 0.25 mL/well (DMEM containing 2% FBS); the infection system was agitated once every one hour to help virus diffusion to the cell surface; after 4 h of infection, the virus-containing medium was discarded and fresh culture medium plus 2% FBS in 0.5 mL was added to each well; and 2 days post infection, the cells in each well were detached and dispersed in 0.7 mL 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% FBS and 1% paraformaldehyde (pH 7.4), and the expression of GFP was analyzed with flow cytometry. Suspension cells were treated similarly except that exponentially proliferating cells were counted, aliquoted, and infected directly and 0.25 mL of fresh culture medium (RPMI-1640 plus 2% FBS) was added to each well without removal of the virus after 4 h of incubation.

2.7. Adenovirus Neutralization Assay

Adenovirus neutralization assay was performed to determine the titer of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) in human adult sera. Serum samples were from the remnant sera of a survey program held in 2002 and were collected from 60 healthy college students aged 18–22 years in Shanxi, China. The details of this assay are described elsewhere [7]. Briefly, serum samples were 5-, 20-, 80-, and 320-fold diluted in DMEM containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and loaded in a 96-well plate at a volume of 50 μL per well. HAdV5-GFP or SAdV1-EG were diluted in DMEM plus 0.2% BSA to a final concentration of 4.0 × 107 vp/mL or 1.6 × 108 vp/mL, respectively. Diluted virus in a volume of 50 μL was mixed with the serially diluted human sera in each well. After vibration, the mixture was left to stand at room temperature for 1 h. HEp-2 cells were suspended as a single-cell solution and added to each well (2 × 104 cells in 100 μL DMEM plus 4% FBS). The serum samples were finally 20-, 80-, 320-, and 1280-fold diluted because the infection volume increased from 50 μL to 200 μL after the addition of the virus and cells. The cells were cultivated for 40 h, the culture medium was removed, and the cells were fixed in 1% formaldehyde in PBS. GFP fluorescence intensity was determined with a multimode plate reader (INFINITE M1000 PRO, Tecan Austria GmbH, Grödig, Austria). The highest dilution of human serum which could inhibit more than 50% activity of the virus was defined as the NAb titer.

3. Results

3.1. Construction of E3-Deleted SAdV-1 Vector

Plasmids carrying SAdV-1 genomic DNA (pKSAV1) were constructed using a previously established method [29]. Plasmids from 12 bacterial colonies were analyzed by restriction enzyme digestion. The results showed that SAdV-1 genomic DNA was heterogenous and 4 colonies (#6, 7, 8, and 12) demonstrated the correct band pattern (Figure S1). The plasmid extracted from colony #6 was named pKSAV1 and used for the following experiments.
An intermediate plasmid (pKSAV1-AscI) was separated from pKSAV1, which carried the E3 region. The methods of PCR, restriction enzyme digestion, and Gibson assembly were used for intermediate plasmid modification and adenoviral plasmid cloning (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Recombinant virus was rescued from linearized adenoviral plasmid pKSAV1XE3-CGA-transfected 293 cells (Figure 3). The rescued SAdV1XE3-CGA had a deletion in the E3 region (XE3) and carried a CMV promoter and an SV40 polyA signal-controlled EGFP expression cassette (CMVp-GFP-pA, CGA) in the original E3 region. The viral genome was confirmed by restriction analysis (Figure 3C).
The E1, E3, E4, and ITR regions in pKSAV1 were analyzed with Sanger sequencing, and the SAdV1XE3-CGA genomic DNA was further inspected with next-generation sequencing. It was found that the cloned genome had a 660 bp deletion in the E1 region. The C-terminal of E1A and the N-terminal of E1B55K were involved, and the E1B19K coding sequence (CDS) was almost lost. The remaining E1B55K gene was in-frame with E1A CDS, which might result in the expression of an E1A-E1B55K fusion protein (Figure S2A). Repeats of ITR-short (ITRs, 118 bp) and the sequence downstream of the left ITR (65 bp) were found on the right end of the cloned genome. The details are shown in Figure S2B. Wild-type SAdV-1 and SAdV1XE3-CGA could grow in 293 cells, suggesting that such mutations did not inhibit or even enhanced viral replication in the HAdV-5 E1-transformed human cell line. The molecular weights in restriction analyses shown in this study were corrected according to the sequencing result.

3.2. Construction of E1/E3-Deleted SAdV-1 Adenoviral Plasmid

The transgene expression cassette in E3 was removed through SbfI digestion and the remaining fragment was self-ligated to generate E3-deleted plasmid pKSAV1XE3. Another intermediate plasmid (pKSAV1-SalI) was constructed for E1 modification. E1 was deleted and the human EF1a promoter and BGH polyA signal-controlled GFP expression cassette (EF1ap-GFP, EG) were inserted. Adenoviral plasmid pKSAV1-EG0 was finally generated, which was E1/E3 deleted and carried a GFP expression cassette in the original E1 region (Figure 1 and Figure S3).
SwaI-linearized pKSAV1-EG0 was used to transfect 293 or 293 TE32 cells. Small GFP foci could be found under the fluorescence microscope 7 days post transfection; they grew very slowly, and those on 293TE32 cells were relatively bigger. The rescued virus (SAdV1-EG0) was passaged once on 293TE32, and the harvested viruses were used for screening of new packaging cells (see below).

3.3. Establishment of SAdV-1 E1B55K-Integrated 293 Cells

293 cells constitutively express E1A and E1B55K proteins of HAdV-5. However, the function of E1B55K seems to be species specific [22,33,34], which means that E1B55K of HAdV-5 cannot complement the function of SAdV-1 E1B55K and E1-deleted SAdV-1 cannot replicate very well in 293 cells. Based on the previous experience of constructing packaging cells for HAdV-41 recombinant virus [22], we constructed SAdV-1 E1B55K eukaryotic expression plasmid pcDNA3T-SAV1E1B55K and used it to transfect 293 cells (Figure 4A). TPL in the 5′-untranslated region might enhance the expression of the target E1B55K gene and improve the yield of progeny viruses [22]. Twenty G418-resistant colonies (293SE cells) were selected, amplified, and infected with equivalent raw SAdV1-EG0 virus. Three of them (#12, 13, and 18) had superiority in virus propagation by comparing the size of the plaques and the occurrence of the cytopathic effect (CPE). Their capability in virus rescue was further evaluated by linearized pKSAV1-EG transfection (pKSAV1-EG was different from pKSAV1-EG0 in that pKSAV1-EG carried a reversely mutated ITR at the right end of the viral genome). In all three strains of cloned cells, recombinant virus SAdV1-EG could be rescued 4 days post transfection when GFP foci were seen, and rescued viruses formed plaques 6 days post transfection (Figure 4B). Comparatively, 293SE#13 grew the largest plaques. 293SE#13 (293SE13 for short) was used for the following experiments. The integration of SAdV-1 E1B55K in 293SE13 was confirmed by PCR and sequencing of the PCR product (Figure 4C), and the transcription of SAdV-1 E1B55K was detected by RT-PCR (Figure S4).
SAdV1-EG was amplified in 293SE13 cells seeded in nine 15 cm dishes and purified. Finally, a yield of 6.5 × 1011 vp was obtained, the physical titer was 6.4 × 1011 vp/mL and the biological titer was 7.0 × 109 IU/mL (infectious unit per milliliter) when determined on 293 cells. The particle-to-IU ratio was close to 90. The E1/E3-deleted recombinant virus SAdV1-EG was identified by restriction analysis of the genomic DNA (Figure 4D).

3.4. One-Step Growth Curve of SAdV1-EG

We constructed one-step growth curves to evaluate the enhanced replication of SAdV1-EG in 293SE13 cells (Figure 5). The progeny viruses released to the culture media or associated with the cells were collected and titrated, respectively [21]. After cells were infected with a low MOI of 1 vp/cell, the progeny viruses could be detected 1-day post infection, and the virus yield increased rapidly at day 2. The virus yields experienced three waves of growth during the culture period of 10 days. It could be clearly seen that 293SE13 cells produced more progeny viruses than 293 cells at all time points. The difference in virus yields increased to more than two orders of magnitude at day 8. The interval between each growth wave was shorter in 293SE13 than in 293 cells. It was observed that most of the progeny viruses were cell associated. If the cells were infected with a high MOI of 200 vp/cell, which meant synchronized infection of more than 90% cells at the beginning, virus yield reached the peak at day 2 for both cells and decreased gradually. The virus yield in 293SE13 was about one order of magnitude higher than that in 293 cells at all indicated time points. The results illustrated that the expression of SAdV-1 E1B55K significantly improved the replication of E1/E3-deleted SAdV-1 in 293 cells.

3.5. Gene Transduction Efficiency of SAdV1-EG

SAdV1-EG is a novel gene transfer vector, and we evaluated its ability of gene transduction in commonly used adherent and suspension cell lines (Figure 6). For adherent cells, SAdV1-EG obtained a lower gene transduction efficiency than the control virus HAdV5-EG, which similarly carried the human EF1a promoter-controlled GFP expression cassette, or HAdV5-GFP, which used the CMV promoter. SAdV1-EG could transduce more than 90% 293 cells at an MOI of 100 vp/cell, and more than 70% of HEp-2 cells at an MOI of 500 vp/cell. Considering that HAdV-5 is well known for its high gene transduction, the capability of SAdV1-EG was acceptable. For suspension cells, SAdV1-EG was superior to HAdV-5 controls in all tested cell lines. SAdV1-EG transduced 98% of K562 cells at an MOI of 500. Interestingly, SAdV1-EG could transduce HL-60 cells efficiently. More than 70% of HL-60 cells were GFP positive when SAdV1-EG was used at an MOI of 500. As we know, HAdV-11p or HAdV-35 fiber-pseudotyped HAdV-5 could only transduce less than 10% of HL-60 cells when being used as the same MOI [26,35]. SAdV-1 contains two fiber genes in its genome and may express two types of fiber in the virion. The cellular receptors of these fibers, which to date have not been identified, are responsible for the tropism of SAdV-1 [36]. In summary, SAdV1-EG could transduce cell lines with a moderate efficiency, and it had advantages over HAdV-5 in transducing suspension cells. Notably, the transcriptional strength of CMV and EF1a promoters can be very different in hematopoietic cells [37].

3.6. Replication of E3-Deleted SAdV-1 in K562 Cells

Because SAdV1-EG could transduce K562 cells efficiently, it would be interesting to test if E3-deleted SAdV-1 could replicate in K562 cells. K562 cells were infected with SAdV1XE3-CGA at an MOI of 100 vp/cell for 6 h. The cells in 12-well plates were harvested every 24 h post infection, and the progeny viruses were titrated on 293 cells (because uninfected cells kept proliferating, the cells were split to avoid denutrition 3 or 6 days post infection). Transient incubation caused a portion of the cells synchronically infected, and the amount of progeny viruses reached a peak 48 h post infection. After that, the infection caused by progeny viruses was not synchronous but continuous, and the yield of progeny viruses stably increased in the following days (Figure 7A). The expression of GFP was also analyzed by flow cytometry, and it could be seen that the growth of GFP+ cells synchronized with the increase of progeny viruses (Figure 7B). These data indicated that E3-deleted SAdV-1 was replication competent, which propagated and spread in K562 cells.

3.7. Seroprevalence of HAdV-5 and SAdV-1 Neutralizing Antibodies in Healthy Adults

Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in 60 adult serum samples were titrated. NAbs against HAdV-5 were detected in 75% of these samples. In contrast, only one sample was found to possess neutralizing activity against SAdV-1, and the titer value was low (Figure 8). These results suggest that humans lack pre-existing immunity against SAdV-1.

4. Discussion

4.1. There Is a Need to Construct Novel Adenovirus Vectors

Adenoviral vectors have been extensively used in vaccine development and gene therapy. They are used for constructing human vaccines or animal vaccines to prevent the infection of many pathogens such as Ebola, influenza, SARS-CoV-2, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and rabies [12,13,14,38]. Oncolytic adenoviruses are armed with cell-killing or immunity-regulating genes to treat cancers [12,39]. Besides being used as vaccine vectors, helper-dependent adenoviruses are developed to treat single gene inheritance disorders [14]. The sleeping beauty transposon technique is even combined to make adenovirus an integrating vector [40,41].
However, currently available vectors cannot meet the above-mentioned needs because of the following reasons. Pre-existing immunity hampers the use or repeated use of HAdV-based vectors; adenovirus types vary in their immunogenicity ability when carrying antigen genes of pathogens, and such ability of a defined adenovirus cannot be predicted and must be evaluated through experiments [42]; adenovirus types possess different tropism features, and an adenovirus vector cannot efficiently transduce various target cells to meet the requirement of gene therapy [43]; and modifications are often necessary to load other transgenes, change tropism, or avoid pre-existing antibodies. Because of these reasons, it is urgently needed to construct adenovectors based on new serotypes or to modify existing vectors where the adenovirus vector construction techniques play their roles.

4.2. The Application of Restriction-Assembly in Constructing Adenovirus Vectors

Adenovirus construction techniques can be applied in three aspects, including the establishment of novel vector systems based on wild-type adenoviruses, modification of existing vector systems, and loading a transgene to form an adenovirus vector. In this study, we attempted to introduce strategies covering all these aspects (Figure 9).
First, we suggest constructing an infectious clone for the target adenovirus. An infectious clone is a handy and reliable source of the viral genome, individual viral genes, and cis-acting elements. More importantly, it can be used to evaluate if the virus rescue system works, which will provide a firm starting point for the following work. A DNA fragment of the plasmid backbone, including the replication origin and antibiotic-resistance genes, can be amplified by PCR, and this fragment carries overlaps at both ends, which originate from the 5′ terminals of the PCR primers and are homologous to the ITR ends of the target adenovirus. This PCR product is mixed with the genomic DNA of the target adenovirus, and Gibson assembly is conducted to generate a plasmid bearing the viral genome (Figure 9A). Notably, some restriction sites, which are needed for plasmid linearization or following cloning operation, can be deliberately added to the infectious clone by proper PCR primers design.
Second, an intermediate plasmid-based adenovirus vector construction procedure was proposed (Figure 9B) [21,44,45]. Mark the region to be modified in the infectious clone and carefully select unique or dual cutter restriction enzyme sites to divide the plasmid into two fragments and ensure the shorter one carries the region to be modified. If the short fragment already contains a plasmid backbone, a short linker, which carries overlaps and restriction sites for future DNA assembly or plasmid linearization, is chemically synthesized or generated by overlap-extension PCR [46]. When the short fragment does not carry a plasmid backbone, a plasmid backbone carrying overlaps and restriction sites can be amplified by PCR as described in the step of constructing the infectious clone (Figure 9A). DNA assembly can be performed to generate the intermediate plasmid. The intermediate plasmid will be much shorter than the infectious clone. More unique cutter sites can be utilized for site-directed modification by using overlap extension PCR, restriction-ligation cloning, or DNA assembly. The modified intermediate plasmid will be linearized by restriction digestion to release the modified short fragments with overlaps on both ends, which will be mixed with the large fragment from the infectious clone to generate an adenovirus vector by DNA assembly (Figure 2 and Figure 9B). Similarly, this strategy will work for modifying existing vectors if an adenovirus plasmid is used instead of an infectious clone, which was exemplified by the construction of the E1/E3-deleted adenovirus plasmid of pKSAV1-EG0 in this study (Figure S3).
Finally, the restriction-assembly can be used to load a transgene to an adenovirus vector [47]. The adenovirus plasmids constructed based on the restriction-assembly principle will contain unique or dual cutter restriction sites in the transgene cloning region. Digestion with such restriction enzymes will generate a DNA fragment with an exposed cloning site, and a transgene, which can preferably be a PCR product, will be inserted by DNA assembly (Figure 9C).

4.3. Advantages of Restriction-Assembly

Compared to existing methods, restriction-assembly has some advantages.
This strategy can be conveniently implemented in general molecular biology laboratories without any specialized instruments and materials. Indispensable materials include restriction enzymes, PCR reagents, Gibson assembly reagents, chemically competent Escherichia coli cells, bacterial culture media, and plasmid and DNA purification kits, all of which are commercially available. Experimental operation includes restriction digestion, PCR, Gibson assembly, agarose gel electrophoresis, DNA recovery, bacterial transformation, and plasmid extraction. No special professional skills are required. Especially, no recombinase-positive bacterial strain or electroporation is used in these procedures, which excludes the step of change to recombinase-negative host bacteria for efficient plasmid amplification [16,17,48]. Because of these reasons, the restriction-assembly procedure is easy to perform, cost-effective, and time saving.
Restriction-assembly is a highly effective method with a low error rate and easily verifiable outcomes. The Gibson assembly kit is designed for the ligation of 2–6 fragments [49]. In our protocol, we used these kits to ligate two fragments to generate adenoviral plasmids with a size larger than 30 kb. For the construction or modification of an intermediate plasmid, which is much shorter than adenoviral plasmid, less than four fragments are generally used. The success rate is always high because fewer fragments are included in the assembly reaction. Compared to the restriction-ligation method, restriction-assembly is always a directional cloning technique, even in cases where single-restriction digestion is employed. The robustness of this method is also manifested in that contaminated fragments, such as unseparated DNA bands from agarose gel or even digested plasmid without electrophoretic separation, can be directly used in restriction-assembly. The essence of restriction-assembly is to use long fragments from digested plasmids as much as possible. Short PCR products are included to fill gaps or to introduce site-directed mutations. As we all know, PCR can cause unpredictable mutations in the product, and unwanted point mutations can occur at the ligation sites in DNA assembly reactions. Because we always choose to use shorter PCR products and fewer fragments in DNA assembly, unwanted mutations are rarely seen. We went through the experimental notes for constructing the nine plasmids used in this study. Generally, plasmids needed to be extracted from less than 10 colonies of transformed bacteria, and the results of the restriction analysis showed that nearly all the plasmid clones were generated as pre-designed. We often selected one plasmid clone to be sequenced, and no unexpected mutation was found (Table S1). These data indicated that restriction-assembly was highly efficient and accurate.
For the strategy we recommended, the task is broken down into steps and quality control is carried out at separated steps. Defects will be promptly detected and appropriately ameliorated. Only confirmed products are transferred to the next step, and errors will not accumulate in the final product. The construction of the SAdV-1 vector served as an example. The infectious clone was constructed at the first step, and a viable virus could be rescued from the plasmid-transfected 293 cells. That meant that the functional genome had been fixed in the plasmid, which was the prerequisite for vector construction. The intermediate plasmid was confirmed by sequencing the modified E3 region, and the E3-deleted SAdV-1 vector was verified by virus rescue. At the last step, the E3-deleted adenoviral plasmid was used to construct the E1/E3-deleted vector. In contrast, direct assembly will fuse many PCR products to generate a final adenoviral plasmid. If a recombinant virus cannot be rescued, it will be very difficult to find out where the defect comes from. The unwanted mutations can originate from PCR products, DNA assembly, or both. In this situation, you might need to sequence several clones of the whole plasmid, which is costly and time consuming. However, the problem cannot be certainly solved after sequencing because repeating experiments does not ensure an expected adenoviral plasmid without mutations in other sites. It is also possible that deletion in E1 or E3 regions leads to a changed expression of the viral genome, which might interfere with the virus replication. The researcher must determine which reason, gene mutations or improper experimental design, results in the failure of rescuing recombinant virus.
Vector systems established by restriction-assembly meet the requirements of sustainable development. First, intermediate plasmids are useful components of the system. For example, in this study, the intermediate plasmid pKSAV1-AscI was generated to construct pKSAV1XE3CGA-AscI for modification of the SAdV-1 E3 region (Figure 2). After pKSAV1XE3-CGA was successfully constructed, did pKSAV1-AscI or pKSAV1XE3CGA-AscI become useless? Far from that, they could still be used for the modification of any gene or cis-acting elements in them, such as fiber or the genes in the E4 region. The modification could be conveniently transferred into the SAdV-1 genome by restriction-assembly, just as demonstrated in E3 modification. In contrast, a shuttle plasmid in other adenovirus vector systems is constructed for single gene transfer and is often used just once. Second, the adenoviral plasmids are prepared for transgene replacement or further modification. For example, a transgene or transgene expression cassette can be directly inserted to the SpeI or FseI sites in pKSAV1-EG to generate new E1/E3-deleted vectors by restriction-assembly. Similarly, gene elements can also be transferred into the E3 region by using the SbfI site. Interestingly, we can envision an oncolytic SAdV-1 that is generated by restoring tumor-specific promoter-controlled E1 genes to the FseI site in pKSAV1-EG. As mentioned earlier, the E1/E3/E4 genes can be easily modified by using the intermediate plasmids. Obviously, modification of other parts in the genome, such as penton and hexon, can also be realized through constructing other intermediate plasmids according to the principle of restriction-assembly. On the contrary, the adenovirus plasmids constructed by other methods are often dead ends and can only be used to rescue recombinant viruses.
Based on the above analysis, it can be seen that restriction-assembly is an ideal strategy for the synthetic biology of adenoviruses [50]. Unique or dual restriction enzyme cut sites are selected from or artificially placed on an adenoviral plasmid. They provide entrances or access points in the viral genome for replacement or insertion of DNA fragments by restriction-assembly. The DNA fragments can be PCR products or from digested intermediate plasmids. Modularity is the most important feature of synthetic biology. The modularity of the adenovirus vector can be realized if the principle of restriction-assembly is applied and adhered to. Taking the SAdV-1 vector system as an example, the transgene module can be assembled to the E1 region (SpeI or FseI sites) or E3 region (SbfI site), while the modification of E3/E4 regions can be implemented with the help of intermediate plasmid pKSAV1-AscI at the AscI-AscI module (the short fragment between dual AscI sites in the adenoviral plasmid). It can be expected that the functions of the system will be enhanced, specialized, or expanded by continuous improvement.
Conclusively, based on others’ work and our experience [11,21,27,44,47], we present restriction-assembly as an all-purpose method for the construction of novel adenovirus vectors or modification of existing adenovector systems. This strategy possesses many advantages and will benefit the synthetic biology of adenoviruses.

5. Patents

A patent application has been filed on this work by the National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v14030546/s1, Figure S1: Restriction analysis of simian adenovirus 1 (SAdV-1) infectious clones, Figure S2: The mutations of SAdV-1 genome in infectious clone pKSAV1 when compared to the reported one in GenBank (accession no. AY771780), Figure S3: Schematic diagram of constructing adenoviral plasmid pKSAV1-EG0, Figure S4: Detect the transcription of SAdV-1 E1B55K in 293SE13 cells by semi-quantity PCR. Table S1: Summary data of plasmid construction. Reference [51] was cited in the supplementary materials

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.L.; methodology, Z.L. and X.Z.; validation, X.Z.; formal analysis, X.G. and Z.L.; investigation, X.G., Y.S., J.C. and W.H.; resources, Z.L., W.T. and T.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.L.; writing—review and editing, Z.L.; visualization, X.G. and Z.L.; supervision, Z.L. and W.T.; project administration, X.Z.; funding acquisition, Z.L. and W.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 82161138001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (protocol code 20200904045 and date of approval September 4, 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. King, A.M.Q.; Adams, M.J.; Carstens, E.B.; Lefkowitz, E.J. Virus Taxonomy; Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses; Elsevier Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2011; pp. 125–141. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ji, T.; Li, L.; Li, W.; Zheng, X.; Ye, X.; Chen, H.; Zhou, Q.; Jia, H.; Chen, B.; Lin, Z.; et al. Emergence and characterization of a putative novel human adenovirus recombinant HAdV-C104 causing pneumonia in Southern China. Virus Evol. 2021, 7, veab018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Crystal, R.G. Adenovirus: The first effective in vivo gene delivery vector. Hum. Gene Ther. 2014, 25, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Yamamoto, Y.; Nagasato, M.; Yoshida, T.; Aoki, K. Recent advances in genetic modification of adenovirus vectors for cancer treatment. Cancer Sci. 2017, 108, 831–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Buchbinder, S.P.; Mehrotra, D.V.; Duerr, A.; Fitzgerald, D.W.; Mogg, R.; Li, D.; Gilbert, P.B.; Lama, J.R.; Marmor, M.; Del Rio, C.; et al. Efficacy assessment of a cell-mediated immunity HIV-1 vaccine (the Step Study): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, test-of-concept trial. Lancet 2008, 372, 1881–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Fausther-Bovendo, H.; Kobinger, G.P. Pre-existing immunity against Ad vectors: Humoral, cellular, and innate response, what’s important? Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2014, 10, 2875–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yang, W.X.; Zou, X.H.; Jiang, S.Y.; Lu, N.N.; Han, M.; Zhao, J.H.; Guo, X.J.; Zhao, S.C.; Lu, Z.Z. Prevalence of serum neutralizing antibodies to adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) and 41 (Ad41) in children is associated with age and sanitary conditions. Vaccine 2016, 34, 5579–5586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mennechet, F.J.D.; Paris, O.; Ouoba, A.R.; Salazar Arenas, S.; Sirima, S.B.; Takoudjou Dzomo, G.R.; Diarra, A.; Traore, I.T.; Kania, D.; Eichholz, K.; et al. A review of 65 years of human adenovirus seroprevalence. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2019, 18, 597–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lopez-Gordo, E.; Podgorski, I.I.; Downes, N.; Alemany, R. Circumventing antivector immunity: Potential use of nonhuman adenoviral vectors. Hum. Gene Ther. 2014, 25, 285–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Vitelli, A.; Folgori, A.; Scarselli, E.; Colloca, S.; Capone, S.; Nicosia, A. Chimpanzee adenoviral vectors as vaccines—challenges to move the technology into the fast lane. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2017, 16, 1241–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abbink, P.; Kirilova, M.; Boyd, M.; Mercado, N.; Li, Z.; Nityanandam, R.; Nanayakkara, O.; Peterson, R.; Larocca, R.A.; Aid, M.; et al. Rapid Cloning of Novel Rhesus Adenoviral Vaccine Vectors. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e01924-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Sasso, E.; D’Alise, A.M.; Zambrano, N.; Scarselli, E.; Folgori, A.; Nicosia, A. New viral vectors for infectious diseases and cancer. Semin. Immunol. 2020, 50, 101430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chang, J. Adenovirus Vectors: Excellent Tools for Vaccine Development. Immune Netw. 2021, 21, e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gao, J.; Mese, K.; Bunz, O.; Ehrhardt, A. State-of-the-art human adenovirus vectorology for therapeutic approaches. FEBS Lett. 2019, 593, 3609–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kanerva, A.; Hemminki, A. Modified adenoviruses for cancer gene therapy. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 110, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Muck-Hausl, M.; Solanki, M.; Zhang, W.; Ruzsics, Z.; Ehrhardt, A. Ad 2.0: A novel recombineering platform for high-throughput generation of tailored adenoviruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chartier, C.; Degryse, E.; Gantzer, M.; Dieterle, A.; Pavirani, A.; Mehtali, M. Efficient generation of recombinant adenovirus vectors by homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 4805–4810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Guo, J.; Mondal, M.; Zhou, D. Development of novel vaccine vectors: Chimpanzee adenoviral vectors. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2018, 14, 1679–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Yang, Y.; Chi, Y.; Tang, X.; Ertl, H.C.J.; Zhou, D. Rapid, Efficient, and Modular Generation of Adenoviral Vectors via Isothermal Assembly. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2016, 113, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Luo, S.; Zhang, P.; Ma, X.; Wang, Q.; Lu, J.; Liu, B.; Zhao, W.; Allain, J.P.; Li, C.; Li, T. A rapid strategy for constructing novel simian adenovirus vectors with high viral titer and expressing highly antigenic proteins applicable for vaccine development. Virus Res. 2019, 268, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, X.; Mei, L.; Yan, B.; Zou, X.; Hung, T.; Lu, Z. Site-directed modification of adenoviral vector with combined DNA assembly and restriction-ligation cloning. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 307, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zou, X.H.; Xiao, X.; Chen, D.L.; Li, Z.L.; Song, J.D.; Wang, M.; Qu, J.G.; Lu, Z.Z.; Hung, T. An improved HAdV-41 E1B55K-expressing 293 cell line for packaging fastidious adenovirus. J. Virol. Methods 2011, 175, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kovacs, G.M.; Harrach, B.; Zakhartchouk, A.N.; Davison, A.J. Complete genome sequence of simian adenovirus 1: An Old World monkey adenovirus with two fiber genes. J. Gen. Virol. 2005, 86, 1681–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Arad, U. Modified Hirt procedure for rapid purification of extrachromosomal DNA from mammalian cells. BioTechniques 1998, 24, 760–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lu, Z.Z.; Zou, X.H.; Dong, L.X.; Qu, J.G.; Song, J.D.; Wang, M.; Guo, L.; Hung, T. Novel recombinant adenovirus type 41 vector and its biological properties. J. Gene Med. 2009, 11, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lv, Y.; Xiao, F.J.; Wang, Y.; Zou, X.H.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.Y.; Wang, L.S.; Lu, Z.Z. Efficient gene transfer into T lymphocytes by fiber-modified human adenovirus 5. BMC Biotechnol. 2019, 19, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yan, B.; Zou, X.; Liu, X.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, W.; Guo, X.; Wang, M.; Lv, Y.; Lu, Z. User-Friendly Reverse Genetics System for Modification of the Right End of Fowl Adenovirus 4 Genome. Viruses 2020, 12, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zou, X.; Rong, Y.; Guo, X.; Hou, W.; Yan, B.; Hung, T.; Lu, Z. Fiber1, but not fiber2, is the essential fiber gene for fowl adenovirus 4 (FAdV-4). J. Gen. Virol. 2021, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zou, X.H.; Bi, Z.X.; Guo, X.J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhu, Y.L.; Jie, H.Y.; Yu, Y.; Hung, T.; et al. DNA assembly technique simplifies the construction of infectious clone of fowl adenovirus. J. Virol. Methods 2018, 257, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Davis, A.R.; Wivel, N.A.; Palladino, J.L.; Tao, L.; Wilson, J.M. Construction of adenoviral vectors. Methods Mol. Biol. 2000, 135, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, D.L.; Dong, L.X.; Li, M.; Guo, X.J.; Wang, M.; Liu, X.F.; Lu, Z.Z.; Hung, T. Construction of an infectious clone of human adenovirus type 41. Arch. Virol. 2012, 157, 1313–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. McFarland, D.C. Preparation of pure cell cultures by cloning. Methods Cell Sci. 2000, 22, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vogels, R.; Zuijdgeest, D.; van Rijnsoever, R.; Hartkoorn, E.; Damen, I.; de Bethune, M.P.; Kostense, S.; Penders, G.; Helmus, N.; Koudstaal, W.; et al. Replication-deficient human adenovirus type 35 vectors for gene transfer and vaccination: Efficient human cell infection and bypass of preexisting adenovirus immunity. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 8263–8271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Holterman, L.; Vogels, R.; van der Vlugt, R.; Sieuwerts, M.; Grimbergen, J.; Kaspers, J.; Geelen, E.; van der Helm, E.; Lemckert, A.; Gillissen, G.; et al. Novel replication-incompetent vector derived from adenovirus type 11 (Ad11) for vaccination and gene therapy: Low seroprevalence and non-cross-reactivity with Ad5. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 13207–13215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Lu, Z.Z.; Ni, F.; Hu, Z.B.; Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Q.W.; Huang, W.R.; Wu, C.T.; Wang, L.S. Efficient gene transfer into hematopoietic cells by a retargeting adenoviral vector system with a chimeric fiber of adenovirus serotype 5 and 11p. Exp. Hematol. 2006, 34, 1171–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Arnberg, N. Adenovirus receptors: Implications for targeting of viral vectors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2012, 33, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Weber, E.L.; Cannon, P.M. Promoter choice for retroviral vectors: Transcriptional strength versus trans-activation potential. Hum. Gene Ther. 2007, 18, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Greber, U.F.; Gomez-Gonzalez, A. Adenovirus—A blueprint for gene delivery. Curr. Opin Virol. 2021, 48, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gao, J.; Zhang, W.; Ehrhardt, A. Expanding the Spectrum of Adenoviral Vectors for Cancer Therapy. Cancers 2020, 12, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, H.; Liu, Z.; Li, C.; Gil, S.; Papayannopoulou, T.; Doering, C.B.; Lieber, A. High-level protein production in erythroid cells derived from in vivo transduced hematopoietic stem cells. Blood Adv. 2019, 3, 2883–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hausl, M.; Zhang, W.; Voigtlander, R.; Muther, N.; Rauschhuber, C.; Ehrhardt, A. Development of adenovirus hybrid vectors for Sleeping Beauty transposition in large mammals. Curr. Gene Ther. 2011, 11, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Coughlan, L. Factors Which Contribute to the Immunogenicity of Non-replicating Adenoviral Vectored Vaccines. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Arnberg, N. Adenovirus receptors: Implications for tropism, treatment and targeting. Rev. Med. Virol. 2009, 19, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Francois, A.; Eterradossi, N.; Delmas, B.; Payet, V.; Langlois, P. Construction of avian adenovirus CELO recombinants in cosmids. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 5288–5301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Nilsson, M.; Ljungberg, J.; Richter, J.; Kiefer, T.; Magnusson, M.; Lieber, A.; Widegren, B.; Karlsson, S.; Fan, X. Development of an adenoviral vector system with adenovirus serotype 35 tropism; efficient transient gene transfer into primary malignant hematopoietic cells. J. Gene Med. 2004, 6, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xiong, A.S.; Yao, Q.H.; Peng, R.H.; Li, X.; Fan, H.Q.; Cheng, Z.M.; Li, Y. A simple, rapid, high-fidelity and cost-effective PCR-based two-step DNA synthesis method for long gene sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, e98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Liu, H.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Guo, X.; Mei, L.; Zou, X.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, M.; Hung, T. Single Plasmid-Based, Upgradable, and Backward-Compatible Adenoviral Vector Systems. Hum. Gene Ther. 2019, 30, 777–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. He, T.C.; Zhou, S.; da Costa, L.T.; Yu, J.; Kinzler, K.W.; Vogelstein, B. A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 2509–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gibson, D.G.; Young, L.; Chuang, R.Y.; Venter, J.C.; Hutchison, C.A., 3rd; Smith, H.O. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 343–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Collins, L.T.; Curiel, D.T. Synthetic Biology Approaches for Engineering Next-Generation Adenoviral Gene Therapies. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 13970–13979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kinoshita, T.; Imamura, J.; Nagai, H.; Shimotohno, K. Quantification of gene expression over a wide range by the polymerase chain reaction. Anal. Biochem. 1992, 206, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Viruses 14 00546 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram for constructing E3-deleted and E1/E3-deleted SAdV-1 adenoviral vectors. The construction procedure was divided into 3 steps: separate a small intermediate plasmid from the large adenoviral plasmid; modify the intermediate plasmid by deleting some viral genes and inserting transgenes; and restore the modified intermediate plasmid to the original plasmid to generate final adenoviral plasmids. Because the DNA fragments were mainly generated by restriction enzyme digestion and Gibson assembly reagent instead of DNA ligase was routinely used in our procedure, we called this method restriction-assembly for convenience. The adenoviral plasmids, such as pKSAV1XE3-CGA and pKSAV1-CG0, can be linearized with SwaI digestion and used to transfect packaging cells for recombinant virus rescue. On the other hand, the adenoviral plasmid is the starting material for constructing recombinant vectors carrying other transgenes: the existing transgene can be removed by restriction digestion (SbfI, SpeI, or FseI in this case), and the new transgene can be inserted by restriction-ligation cloning or restriction-assembly. Generally, a shuttle plasmid is dispensable, a transgene fragment can be amplified by PCR, and only one adenoviral plasmid is needed for vector construction, so we called it single plasmid-based adenoviral vector system.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram for constructing E3-deleted and E1/E3-deleted SAdV-1 adenoviral vectors. The construction procedure was divided into 3 steps: separate a small intermediate plasmid from the large adenoviral plasmid; modify the intermediate plasmid by deleting some viral genes and inserting transgenes; and restore the modified intermediate plasmid to the original plasmid to generate final adenoviral plasmids. Because the DNA fragments were mainly generated by restriction enzyme digestion and Gibson assembly reagent instead of DNA ligase was routinely used in our procedure, we called this method restriction-assembly for convenience. The adenoviral plasmids, such as pKSAV1XE3-CGA and pKSAV1-CG0, can be linearized with SwaI digestion and used to transfect packaging cells for recombinant virus rescue. On the other hand, the adenoviral plasmid is the starting material for constructing recombinant vectors carrying other transgenes: the existing transgene can be removed by restriction digestion (SbfI, SpeI, or FseI in this case), and the new transgene can be inserted by restriction-ligation cloning or restriction-assembly. Generally, a shuttle plasmid is dispensable, a transgene fragment can be amplified by PCR, and only one adenoviral plasmid is needed for vector construction, so we called it single plasmid-based adenoviral vector system.
Viruses 14 00546 g001
Viruses 14 00546 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of constructing adenoviral plasmid pKSAV1XE3-CGA.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of constructing adenoviral plasmid pKSAV1XE3-CGA.
Viruses 14 00546 g002
Viruses 14 00546 g003 550
Figure 3. Rescue and identification of E3-deleted SAdV-1 vector. (A) Restriction analysis of E3-deleted adenoviral plasmid pKSAV1XE3-CGA (CGA). Plasmids were extracted from 4 bacterial colonies (#1–#4). Plasmid pKSAV1 (SV) was used as a control. The predicted molecular weights (bp) of digested fragments of CGA were 4797, 5313, 5541, 6428, and 13,707 for BsrGI; and 564, 1639, 1732, 5245, 6868, 9542 and 10,196 for EcoRV. The predicted molecular weights (bp) of digested fragments of SV were 5313, 5541, 6428, and 19,375 for BsrGI; and 564, 1639, 1732, 5178, 5235, 5245, 6868, and 10,196 for EcoRV. (B) Rescue of recombinant simian adenovirus SAdV1XE3-CGA in 293 cells. SwaI-linearized pKSAV1XE3-CGA was used to transfect 293 cells, and foci formed by GFP-positive cells could be observed under a fluorescence microscope 7 days post transfection. (C) Identification of SAdV1XE3-CGA by restriction analysis of the viral genomic DNA. The predicted molecular weights (bp) of digested fragments of virus genomic DNA (V) were 1392, 1648, 4797, 5313, 6428, and 13,707 for BsrGI; 564, 1504, 1639, 1732, 2863, 5245, 9542, and 10,196 for EcoRV; and 3613, 8038, 9222 and 12,412 for EcoRI. The predicted molecular weights (bp) of digested fragments of pKSAV1XE3-CGA plasmid (P) were 8038, 12,412, and 15,336 for EcoRI.
Figure 3. Rescue and identification of E3-deleted SAdV-1 vector. (A) Restriction analysis of E3-deleted adenoviral plasmid pKSAV1XE3-CGA (CGA). Plasmids were extracted from 4 bacterial colonies (#1–#4). Plasmid pKSAV1 (SV) was used as a control. The predicted molecular weights (bp) of digested fragments of CGA were 4797, 5313, 5541, 6428, and 13,707 for BsrGI; and 564, 1639, 1732, 5245, 6868, 9542 and 10,196 for EcoRV. The predicted molecular weights (bp) of digested fragments of SV were 5313, 5541, 6428, and 19,375 for BsrGI; and 564, 1639, 1732, 5178, 5235, 5245, 6868, and 10,196 for EcoRV. (B) Rescue of recombinant simian adenovirus SAdV1XE3-CGA in 293 cells. SwaI-linearized pKSAV1XE3-CGA was used to transfect 293 cells, and foci formed by GFP-positive cells could be observed under a fluorescence microscope 7 days post transfection. (C) Identification of SAdV1XE3-CGA by restriction analysis of the viral genomic DNA. The predicted molecular weights (bp) of digested fragments of virus genomic DNA (V) were 1392, 1648, 4797, 5313, 6428, and 13,707 for BsrGI; 564, 1504, 1639, 1732, 2863, 5245, 9542, and 10,196 for EcoRV; and 3613, 8038, 9222 and 12,412 for EcoRI. The predicted molecular weights (bp) of digested fragments of pKSAV1XE3-CGA plasmid (P) were 8038, 12,412, and 15,336 for EcoRI.
Viruses 14 00546 g003
Viruses 14 00546 g004 550
Figure 4. Establishment of SAdV-1 E1B55K-integrated cell lines for recombinant virus packaging. (A) Plasmid map of pcDNA3T-SAV1E1B55K. HAdV-41 tripartite leader sequence (TPL41) and SAdV-1 E1B55K coding sequence (CDS) were inserted into the multiple cloning site of pcDNA3 eukaryotic expression plasmid (between HindIII/XhoI sites). CMVp: CMV promoter; pA: polyA signal. (B) Evaluation of the ability of selected cell colonies for virus packaging. Twenty G418-resistant pcDNA3T-SAV1E1B55K-transfected 293 cell colonies were firstly screened by observing the formation of plaques and cytopathic effect (CPE) after being infected with SAdV1-EG0 virus. Three colonies (293SE#12, 13, and 18) could grow more and bigger plaques and demonstrated CPE more rapidly. The virus rescue and propagation ability were further assessed by transfecting linearized pKSAV1-EG into these 3 strains of cloned cells. 293 and 293TE32 cells were used as controls. The results of the transfection experiments are shown. Small GFP+ foci could be seen on 293SE#12 and #13 cells 3 days post transfection. Plaques were found on all colonies while relatively bigger plaques were formed on 293SE#13. Small GFP foci but no plaques were observed on control cells. 293SE#13 (293SE13 for short) was used for the following experiments. (C) Identification of the integration of SAdV-1 E1B55K in 293SE13 cells. After 293SE13 cells were passaged 16 times, genomic DNA was extracted and used as the template for amplifying SAdV-1 E1B55K expression cassette with primers located inside the CMV promoter and CDS region. PCR products with the expected molecular weight were recovered from agarose gel after electrophoresis and further confirmed by sequencing. No corresponding bands could be amplified when using genomic DNA of 293 cells as the template. (D) Identification of SAdV1-EG virus. Virus genomic DNA was extracted from SAdV1-EG-infected 293SE13 cells and digested with restriction enzymes. The products were resolved on agarose gel. Plasmid DNA of pKSAV1-EG was treated similarly and served as a control.
Figure 4. Establishment of SAdV-1 E1B55K-integrated cell lines for recombinant virus packaging. (A) Plasmid map of pcDNA3T-SAV1E1B55K. HAdV-41 tripartite leader sequence (TPL41) and SAdV-1 E1B55K coding sequence (CDS) were inserted into the multiple cloning site of pcDNA3 eukaryotic expression plasmid (between HindIII/XhoI sites). CMVp: CMV promoter; pA: polyA signal. (B) Evaluation of the ability of selected cell colonies for virus packaging. Twenty G418-resistant pcDNA3T-SAV1E1B55K-transfected 293 cell colonies were firstly screened by observing the formation of plaques and cytopathic effect (CPE) after being infected with SAdV1-EG0 virus. Three colonies (293SE#12, 13, and 18) could grow more and bigger plaques and demonstrated CPE more rapidly. The virus rescue and propagation ability were further assessed by transfecting linearized pKSAV1-EG into these 3 strains of cloned cells. 293 and 293TE32 cells were used as controls. The results of the transfection experiments are shown. Small GFP+ foci could be seen on 293SE#12 and #13 cells 3 days post transfection. Plaques were found on all colonies while relatively bigger plaques were formed on 293SE#13. Small GFP foci but no plaques were observed on control cells. 293SE#13 (293SE13 for short) was used for the following experiments. (C) Identification of the integration of SAdV-1 E1B55K in 293SE13 cells. After 293SE13 cells were passaged 16 times, genomic DNA was extracted and used as the template for amplifying SAdV-1 E1B55K expression cassette with primers located inside the CMV promoter and CDS region. PCR products with the expected molecular weight were recovered from agarose gel after electrophoresis and further confirmed by sequencing. No corresponding bands could be amplified when using genomic DNA of 293 cells as the template. (D) Identification of SAdV1-EG virus. Virus genomic DNA was extracted from SAdV1-EG-infected 293SE13 cells and digested with restriction enzymes. The products were resolved on agarose gel. Plasmid DNA of pKSAV1-EG was treated similarly and served as a control.
Viruses 14 00546 g004
Viruses 14 00546 g005 550
Figure 5. One-step growth curves of SAdV1-EG in 293 or 293SE13 cells. Cells were seeded in 12-well plates and infected with purified SAdV1-EG at an MOI of 1 or 200 vp/cell for 2 h. Cells and the culture media were collected separately at indicated time points post infection. After titration, the yields in each well were calculated and used to construct the growth curves.
Figure 5. One-step growth curves of SAdV1-EG in 293 or 293SE13 cells. Cells were seeded in 12-well plates and infected with purified SAdV1-EG at an MOI of 1 or 200 vp/cell for 2 h. Cells and the culture media were collected separately at indicated time points post infection. After titration, the yields in each well were calculated and used to construct the growth curves.
Viruses 14 00546 g005
Viruses 14 00546 g006 550
Figure 6. Gene transduction efficiency of SAdV1-EG on adherent (A) or suspension cell lines (B). Cells were infected with SAdV1-EG at an MOI of 20, 100, or 500 vp/cell. The percentage of GFP+ cells was determined by flow cytometry 2 days post infection. HAdV5-GFP and HAdV5-EG viruses served as controls, which were E1/E3-deleted HAdV-5 vectors and carried CMV promoter (HAdV5-GFP) or human EF1a promoter (HAdV5-EG) controlled GFP cassette, respectively.
Figure 6. Gene transduction efficiency of SAdV1-EG on adherent (A) or suspension cell lines (B). Cells were infected with SAdV1-EG at an MOI of 20, 100, or 500 vp/cell. The percentage of GFP+ cells was determined by flow cytometry 2 days post infection. HAdV5-GFP and HAdV5-EG viruses served as controls, which were E1/E3-deleted HAdV-5 vectors and carried CMV promoter (HAdV5-GFP) or human EF1a promoter (HAdV5-EG) controlled GFP cassette, respectively.
Viruses 14 00546 g006
Viruses 14 00546 g007 550
Figure 7. Infection of K562 cells by E3-deleted SAdV-1 vector. K562 cells were infected by SAdV1XE3-CGA at an MOI of 100 vp/cell for 6 h. The unadsorbed viruses in the media were removed by centrifugation, and the cells were washed once, suspended in RPMI-1640 media plus 2% FBS, and aliquoted into each well of 12-well plates. Three or 6 days post infection, 2 mL fresh culture media was added to each well to reach a final volume of 3 mL, and the cells were suspended by aspiration and aliquoted into 3 wells of new 12-well plates to avoid denutrition. At each time point post infection, cells together with the culture media were harvested, subjected to 3 freeze–thaw rounds, and centrifuged to remove cellular debris, and the viruses in the supernatant were titrated on 293 cells (A). Cells were also collected to analyze GFP expression by flow cytometry assay (B).
Figure 7. Infection of K562 cells by E3-deleted SAdV-1 vector. K562 cells were infected by SAdV1XE3-CGA at an MOI of 100 vp/cell for 6 h. The unadsorbed viruses in the media were removed by centrifugation, and the cells were washed once, suspended in RPMI-1640 media plus 2% FBS, and aliquoted into each well of 12-well plates. Three or 6 days post infection, 2 mL fresh culture media was added to each well to reach a final volume of 3 mL, and the cells were suspended by aspiration and aliquoted into 3 wells of new 12-well plates to avoid denutrition. At each time point post infection, cells together with the culture media were harvested, subjected to 3 freeze–thaw rounds, and centrifuged to remove cellular debris, and the viruses in the supernatant were titrated on 293 cells (A). Cells were also collected to analyze GFP expression by flow cytometry assay (B).
Viruses 14 00546 g007
Viruses 14 00546 g008 550
Figure 8. Overall distributions of adult serum samples according to neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers (n = 60). Human sera were serially diluted, and the highest dilution of serum which could inhibit more than 50% activity of the virus was defined as the NAb titer. A titer of <20 was defined as negative. The y-axis represented the number of samples, while the proportions of samples with indicated NAb titer were shown inside each bar.
Figure 8. Overall distributions of adult serum samples according to neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers (n = 60). Human sera were serially diluted, and the highest dilution of serum which could inhibit more than 50% activity of the virus was defined as the NAb titer. A titer of <20 was defined as negative. The y-axis represented the number of samples, while the proportions of samples with indicated NAb titer were shown inside each bar.
Viruses 14 00546 g008
Viruses 14 00546 g009 550
Figure 9. Strategies for adenovirus vector construction and modification. (A) Construction of an adenovirus infectious clone. (B) Construction or modification of a novel adenovirus vector system by the method of restriction-assembly. Intrinsically, it is an intermediate plasmid-based strategy to modify adenoviral genome where restriction-assembly simplifies the construction procedure. When adenovirus plasmid-1 is the infectious clone of a new serotype adenovirus, a novel vector system can be established by this strategy. If adenovirus plasmid-1 belongs to an existing vector system, it will generate a modified one. (C) Load a transgene to an adenovirus vector using the restriction-assembly method. The prerequisite of this procedure is that the start adenovirus plasmid (adenovirus plasmid-1) is constructed in advance to satisfy the requirement of restriction-assembly: a unique cutter site (RE2) is placed as the entrance for insertion of exogenous DNA. If RE2 sites are saved to flank the transgene-1, the product plasmid (adenovirus plasmid-2) can be re-used for loading other transgenes just as adenovirus plasmid-1 does. The RE2 site can be removed, if necessary, as shown by the dotted branch. Overlaps for Gibson assembly are shown in red. Kan-Ori: kanamycin-resistance gene and pBR322 origin of replication (plasmid backbone); RE: restriction enzyme.
Figure 9. Strategies for adenovirus vector construction and modification. (A) Construction of an adenovirus infectious clone. (B) Construction or modification of a novel adenovirus vector system by the method of restriction-assembly. Intrinsically, it is an intermediate plasmid-based strategy to modify adenoviral genome where restriction-assembly simplifies the construction procedure. When adenovirus plasmid-1 is the infectious clone of a new serotype adenovirus, a novel vector system can be established by this strategy. If adenovirus plasmid-1 belongs to an existing vector system, it will generate a modified one. (C) Load a transgene to an adenovirus vector using the restriction-assembly method. The prerequisite of this procedure is that the start adenovirus plasmid (adenovirus plasmid-1) is constructed in advance to satisfy the requirement of restriction-assembly: a unique cutter site (RE2) is placed as the entrance for insertion of exogenous DNA. If RE2 sites are saved to flank the transgene-1, the product plasmid (adenovirus plasmid-2) can be re-used for loading other transgenes just as adenovirus plasmid-1 does. The RE2 site can be removed, if necessary, as shown by the dotted branch. Overlaps for Gibson assembly are shown in red. Kan-Ori: kanamycin-resistance gene and pBR322 origin of replication (plasmid backbone); RE: restriction enzyme.
Viruses 14 00546 g009
Table
Table 1. Summary information of oligonucleotides.
Table 1. Summary information of oligonucleotides.
FragmentOligo NameSequenceTemplateProduct (bp)Restriction
Enzyme
Kan-Ori2001KSAV1p1gtttccagaa taaggtatat tattgatgat gatttaaatc caagtcgacpKFAV4GFP2514SwaI, SalI
2001KSAV1p2tgatgatgat ttaaatccaa gtcgacgatc ccgagcggta tcagctc
2001KSAV1p3tgatgattta aatggttggc gcgcctggaa caacactcaa ccctatcg2563
2001KSAV1p4gtttccagaa taaggtatat tattgatgat gatttaaatg gttggcgcgc cSwaI, AscI
AscI-linker2001KSAV1p5gatagggttg agtgttgttc caggcgcgcc aaccatttaa atcatcat 117AscI, SwaI
2001KSAV1p6gcgcgccaac catttaaatc atcatcaata atatacctta attaagacself-annealSwaI, PacI
2001KSAV1p7cgccgctggc ggcagaggag tttgtcttaa ttaaggtata ttattgat PacI
2001KSAV1p8cgctgaaacc ggaccacagg gcgcgccgct ggcggcagag gagtttgt AscI
PacI-E32001KSAV1p9cgcgccaacc atttaaatca tcatcaataa tataccttpKSAV1-ASCI2680
2001KSAV1p10gttatgtaac gcctgcagga tgtaatccgg gcgtggggca gSbfI
CMVp-GFP-pA2001KSAV1p11ggattacatc ctgcaggcgt tacataactt acggtaaatgpKFAV4GFP568SbfI
2001KSAV1p12accatggtgg ctagctctag cggatctgac ggttcactaa ac
2001KSAV1p13gatccgctag agctagccac catggtgagc aagggcg 770
2001KSAV1p14caataaacaa gttagctagc ttagagtccg gacttgtaca gctcgtcc
2001KSAV1p15gtccggactc taagctagct aacttgttta ttgcagctta taatggttac 163
2001KSAV1p16ccttaaaaat atccctgcag gtaagataca ttgatgagtt tggacaaacc ac 1442SbfI
E3-PmeI2001KSAV1p17catcaatgta tcttacctgc agggatattt ttaaggtgta aatcaataat aaacttaccpKSAV1-ASCI1522HindIII
2001KSAV1p18cattttgcgt agtaatggga tctctgtagt ttaagcttaa cactccaagt gg
SalI-SalI2001KSAV1p19gacgctccat ggcctcgtag aagtccacgg cgaagttgaa aaattgpKSAV1529PacI
2001KSAV1p20aatcatcatc aataatatac cttattaatt aacgctttcc tagagaagtt ctcggatc
SalI-linker2001KSAV1p21gcgttaatta ataaggtata ttattgatga tgatttaaat ccaagtcgacself-anneal73
2001KSAV1p22gtgagctgat accgctcggg atcgtcgact tggatttaaa tcatcatcaa
AscI-E1A2001KSAV1p23cgcgataggg ttgagtgttg ttccaggpKSAV1530
2001KSAV1p24gagcggccgg cccgcggcag cgcggaggag aaaacFseI
EF1ap-GFP-pA2001KSAV1p25cgctgccgcg ggccggccgc tccggtgccc gtcagtgggpCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-copGFP566FseI
2001KSAV1p26catggtggc actagtgtag gcgccggtca cSpeI
2003SAV1EGFPfgtgaccggcg cctacactag tgccaccatg gtgagcaagg gpKSAV1E3CGA794SpeI
2003SAV2EGFPrggtcaaggaa ggcacggggg agactagttt agagtccgga cttgtacagc tcSpeI
2001KSAV1p29gactctaaac tagtctcccc cgtgccttcc ttgaccpcDNA3151SpeI
2001KSAV1p30ggatacaacc tcggccggcc accccacccc ccagaataga atgFseI
E1B-EcoRV2001KSAV1p31ggtggccggc cgaggttgta tcctgtaacc ctgaacgtpKSAV1579FseI
2001KSAV1p32tctgaagcgg tatcggggtt agcttgggat
AsiSI-RITR2010SAdV1RITR1taacagaccc aggtcaggtt gctctcpKSAV1-EG0/SphI-SnaBI997
2010SAdV1RITR2cgagggcggg cgggcgaagg gcgtgtgtgg gaaag
RITR-AseI2010SAdV1RITR3ccttcgcccg cccgccctcg cgccaccccg cgtcapKSAV1-EG0/SphI-SnaBI1324
2010SAdV1RITR4cgaactactt actctagctt cccggcaaca
SAdV1-E1B55K2007SAV1E1Bfgctgccttta ttacctatat tttggSAdV-1 genome1489
2007SAV1E1Brcctcatgccc ctttataccc tt
2007TSAV1E1Bftcgagccaat cacagtcgca agatggagca acagcgacag cc1466
2007TSAV1E1Bragggccctct agatgcatgc tcgagtcact cctcatcgct ggattcat
CMVp-TPL2101SAV1E1Bs1gatagcggtt tgactcacgg293SE13 genome594
2101SAV1E1Bs2gttctcctcc accactcggt
SAV1E1B55K2101SAV1E1Bs3tggagcaaca gcgacagcc293SE13 genome811
2101SAV1E1Bs4accgccttcc agcaaccat
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, X.; Sun, Y.; Chen, J.; Zou, X.; Hou, W.; Tan, W.; Hung, T.; Lu, Z. Restriction-Assembly: A Solution to Construct Novel Adenovirus Vector. Viruses 2022, 14, 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14030546

AMA Style

Guo X, Sun Y, Chen J, Zou X, Hou W, Tan W, Hung T, Lu Z. Restriction-Assembly: A Solution to Construct Novel Adenovirus Vector. Viruses. 2022; 14(3):546. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14030546

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Xiaojuan, Yangyang Sun, Juan Chen, Xiaohui Zou, Wenzhe Hou, Wenjie Tan, Tao Hung, and Zhuozhuang Lu. 2022. "Restriction-Assembly: A Solution to Construct Novel Adenovirus Vector" Viruses 14, no. 3: 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14030546

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop