Next Article in Journal
Multiple Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Infections Are Associated with HSIL and Persistent HPV Infection Status in Korean Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Improved Specificity and Safety of Anti-Hepatitis B Virus TALENs Using Obligate Heterodimeric FokI Nuclease Domains
Previous Article in Journal
The Comparison of Honeybee Viral Loads for Six Honeybee Viruses (ABPV, BQCV, CBPV, DWV, LSV3 and SBV) in Healthy and Clinically Affected Honeybees with TaqMan Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR Assays
Previous Article in Special Issue
Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B: An Update
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/v13071341
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Functional Cure of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Individuals With HIV-Coinfection: A Literature Review

by
Anders Boyd
1,2,*,
Lorenza N. C. Dezanet
3 and
Karine Lacombe
3,4
1
Department of Infectious Diseases, Research and Prevention, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, 1018 WT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2
Stichting HIV Monitoring, 1105 BD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3
Institut Pierre Louis d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, IPLESP, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France
4
APHP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, 75012 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2021, 13(7), 1341; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13071341
Submission received: 28 June 2021 / Revised: 6 July 2021 / Accepted: 8 July 2021 / Published: 11 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Management of Hepatitis B and towards Achieving a HBV Cure)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In individuals infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), the loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is the ultimate therapeutic goal, which defines “functional cure.” For individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), functional cure occurs roughly 2 per 100 person-years during potent anti-HBV containing antiretroviral therapy. Although this rate may be higher than expected in treated HBV mono-infected individuals, rates of functional cure widely vary between studies (0.6–10.5 per 100 person-years). Similar to HBV mono-infection, the phase of HBV infection, HBV (sub-)genotypes and hepatitis B “e” Ag-negative variants are associated with functional cure in treated HIV-HBV co-infection. In specifically HIV-HBV co-infected individuals, strong increases in CD4+ T cell counts after treatment initiation have also been linked to functional cure, yet this finding is inconsistent across studies. Several markers directly or indirectly reflecting HBV activity are being developed to predict functional cure, such as quantification of HBsAg, hepatitis B core-related antigen, HBsAg protein composition, anti-hepatitis B core antibodies and interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10. Few have been assessed during treatment in HIV-HBV co-infected individuals and none have been validated to predict functional cure. Novel therapeutics for HBV cure are essential for individuals with HIV-HBV co-infection and need to be separately evaluated in this population.

1. Introduction

In people living with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) worldwide, roughly 8.4%, or 3.2 million, are thought to be co-infected with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection [1]. Without effective treatment against HBV, the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver-related and overall death are increased in HIV-positive individuals with HBV co-infection [2,3]. The first nucleoside/nucleotide analogue (NA) available with dual antiviral activity against both HIV and HBV replication was lamivudine (LAM). The major drawback of this agent is that HBV strains with LAM resistance rapidly emerge during treatment [4], although LAM-resistance occurs less frequently when HBV DNA and transaminases levels are low [5,6,7]. The NA, tenofovir, and its prodrugs tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) demonstrate more potent anti-HIV and anti-HBV activity with the added advantage of the virtually null risk of developing TDF-resistant HBV variants [8,9]. TDF or TAF is therefore an ideal agent to include as part of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-HBV co-infected individuals. Accordingly, every major therapeutic guideline recommends treating co-infected individuals with TDF-/TAF-containing ART.
Despite the optimal HBV DNA suppression offered by TDF-containing ART, HIV-HBV co-infected individuals do not appear to exhibit the same regression of liver fibrosis as observed in TDF-treated HBV mono-infected individuals [10,11,12] and a small proportion of co-infected individuals still exhibit HCC [3]. These data contend that virological response might not be an adequate marker for improved prognosis and other criteria are needed to assess therapeutic success more adequately.
Indeed, there are several important serological endpoints that are considered important milestones during HBV infection [13]. For individuals with hepatitis B “e” antigen (HBeAg), the loss of HBeAg, which is termed “HBeAg-seroclearance”, confers reduced incidence of HCC and liver-related death so long as transaminase and HBV replication are reduced. For all chronically infected individuals, the loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), which is termed “HBsAg-seroclearance”, usually represents clearance of HBV infection. Of course, the ability to detect HBsAg loss depends on the assay detection limit and ability to detect HBsAg variants, particularly when HBsAg levels are low [14]. Since HBsAg-seroclearance is commonly observed with undetectable HBV DNA in serum and is associated with a very low risk of developing HCC and improved survival, it is an ideal endpoint to define “functional cure” [15]. Functional cure in the context of HBV mono-infection is considered as HBsAg-seroclearance in the absence of treatment. Considering HIV-HBV co-infected patients are highly discouraged to interrupt their treatment regimen [16], functional cure during co-infection is usually based on HBsAg-seroclearance.
Over the past decade, a wide body evidence has examined the rates of functional cure in HIV-HBV co-infected individuals during anti-HBV containing ART. These studies have found several important determinants of functional cure that could be useful for further study. Considering the importance of functional cure, there have been attempts at finding biomarkers that could assist clinicians in more accurately predicting HBsAg-seroclearance and that have been recently examined in HIV-HBV co-infected individuals undergoing long-term treatment with TDF. The aim of this literature review is then to summarize these aspects of HBV functional cure in the context of treated HIV-HBV co-infection.

2. Functional Cure in HIV-HBV Co-Infected Individuals Undergoing Potent Anti-HBV Therapy

Understanding functional cure in the HIV-HBV co-infected population requires some knowledge of how frequently HBeAg- or, more importantly, HBsAg-seroclearance occurs during treatment. Both HBeAg- and HBsAg-seroclearance involve a large immunological component. Given the immunosuppression associated with HIV infection, there is debate as to whether these rates differ between HIV-HBV co-infected versus HBV mono-infected individuals. In this section, we summarize seroclearance rates in individuals with HIV-HBV co-infection and compare them to individuals with HBV mono-infection. The selection of studies is described in Table 1.

2.1. Rates of HBeAg- and HBsAg-Seroclearance in HIV-HBV Co-Infected Individuals

Several studies have examined HBeAg-seroclearance rates in HBeAg-positive co-infected individuals who were either exclusively or almost all treated with ART containing tenofovir and/or LAM [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. These rates are summarized in Figure 1a. Overall, HBeAg-seroclearance occurs at a median rate of 8.4 per 100 person-years and within 5 years of therapy, approximately half of HBeAg-positive individuals should be able to achieve HBeAg-seroclearance. Long-term studies would also suggest that these rates are largely unchanged after 15 years of therapy [26]. Acquiring anti-hepatitis B “e” (anti-HBe) antibodies along with HBeAg-seroclearance, which defines “HBeAg-seroconversion,” is expected to occur at a median rate of 4.1 per 100 person-years [17,18,19,21,22,23,24,25,27]. Nevertheless, anti-HBe antibody serostatus commonly fluctuates between positive and negative status in co-infected individuals, suggesting that HBeAg-seroconversion is not a stable event.
These studies and others have also evaluated HBsAg-seroclearance rates during ART containing an anti-HBV agent [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,27,28,29,30]. These rates are summarized in Figure 1b. HBsAg-seroclearance occurs at a fairly low median rate of 2.39 per 100 person-years and within 5 years of therapy, 8–10% of individuals lose their HBsAg-positive status. The median rate of treated co-infected individuals able to achieve HBsAg-seroclearance and acquire anti-hepatitis B surface (anti-HBs) antibodies, which defines “HBsAg-seroconversion,” is at 0.92 per 100 person-years [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,28,30]. In general, HBsAg-seroclearance will eventually lead to HBsAg-seroconversion in roughly half of co-infected individuals; however, anti-HBs antibodies can take years to develop and when present, are at relatively lower levels than expected after acute HBV infection in HIV-negative individuals or after HBV vaccination [31].

2.2. Rates of HBeAg- and HBsAg-Seroclearance between HBV Mono-Infected and HIV-HBV Co-Infected Individuals

When examining the recently published rates of seroclearance and seroconversion in HBV mono-infected individuals either exclusively or almost all treated with a potent NA, it appears that rates of HBeAg-seroclearance [32,33,34,35,36,37,38] and HBeAg-seroconversion [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42] are comparable, and rates of HBsAg-seroclearance [32,33,34,36,37,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47] and HBsAg-seroconversion [32,34,36,38,41,43,46] lower compared to treated HIV-HBV co-infected individuals (Table 2). For both infection groups, HBsAg-seroclearance occurs infrequently.
Although the range in HBeAg-seroclearance rates between studies is comparable between HBV mono-infected and HIV-HBV co-infected individuals (Figure 1a), the range in HBsAg-seroclearance is much wider in HIV-HBV co-infected than HBV mono-infected individuals. Part of the reason could be due to differences in study populations as HBV mono-infected cohorts generally have a higher proportion of individuals with HBeAg- negative serology, for whom HBsAg-seroclearance is known to occur at a much lower rate [13]. In addition, HBV cohorts more often have regularly collected serological data than large cohorts of HIV-positive individuals with chronic HBV infection, and the large gaps in HBeAg and HBsAg testing could bias rates to be lower. However, several studies in
HIV-HBV co-infected individuals have shown a remarkably fast rate of HBsAg-seroclearance within a very short period after initiating anti-HBV containing ART [19,23,25]. The differences between studies highlight that some subpopulations would appear to have an advantage with respect to functional cure.

3. Determinants of Functional Cure during Treated HIV-HBV Co-Infection

Past research in HBV mono-infected individuals has uncovered a wide range of determinants associated with functional cure during treatment. These include the specific phase of HBV infection, HBV (sub-)genotypes, HBeAg-negative variants, and genetic characteristics of the host. For individuals with HIV-HBV co-infection, this list extends to HIV-related characteristics, such as CD4+ T-cell counts and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining illnesses. In this section, we summarize how the determinants of functional cure in HBV mono-infection relate to HIV-HBV co-infection, while devoting particular attention to the effects of immunosuppression.

3.1. Phase of HBV Infection

Lower baseline HBsAg levels and lower baseline HBV DNA levels have been associated with increased rates of HBsAg-seroclearance in both HBV mono-infected individuals in general [48] and HIV-HBV co-infected individuals initiating anti-HBV containing ART [25,27,49]. The lower levels of these markers are correlated with duration of chronic HBV infection [13], which suggests that the timing of HBV acquisition plays an important role in functional cure. In settings where HBV is endemic (with vertical transmission during birth occurring more frequently in Asia and horizonal transmission between children/youth occurring in Africa), HIV is commonly acquired well after HBV infection, whereas in settings where HBV is non-endemic (with sexual transmission or injecting drug use in Europe, Australia, and North America), HIV and HBV acquisition are commonly acquired at the same time [50]. Accordingly, a large study of treated HIV-HBV co-infected individuals has demonstrated that those of African origin have a much higher probability of being able to clear HBsAg than Caucasians [51]. Older age has also been commonly found to be associated with HBsAg-seroclearance in treated co-infected individuals [52], which might also reflect individuals with longer duration of HBV infection.

3.2. HBV (Sub-)Genotypes and HBeAg-Negative Variants

Certain virological factors of the HBV genome have also been associated with functional cure during therapy with NAs [53]. When harboring mutations on the precore gene, even existing as a minority quasi-species, rates of HBsAg-seroclearance are reduced during treatment [54]. Similar results were observed in HIV-HBV co-infected individuals initiating anti-HBV containing ART in which HBsAg-seroclearance was only observed in those who did not harbor HBV strains with the G-to-A substitution of the 1896 nucleotide on the precore gene [55]. Precore mutations of these kind tend to appear with longer duration of HBV infection [56], suggesting that earlier treatment before these mutations develop might increase the probability of HBsAg-seroclearance. Notably, HBV genotype is closely linked to the presence of precore mutations [57] and the geographic differences in HBV (sub-)genotype distribution (i.e., A1 or E in Sub-Saharan Africa, B or C in Asia [58]) could explain regional variation in the rates of HBsAg-seroclearance.
The “a” determinant of the major hydrophilic region on the S-gene is a major target for neutralizing antibodies, hence mutations in this region have been shown to influence antigenicity and possibly infect vaccinated hosts [59]. It could be hypothesized that mutations of this sort would also influence the HBsAg-seroclerance. Indeed, several studies have demonstrated that decreased genetic complexity, less frequent or specific mutations, and less frequent deletions in the “a” determinant are correlated with clearing HBsAg [60,61,62]. One study has examined the broader spectrum of S-gene mutations in co-infected individuals prior to initiating anti-HBV containing ART, including mutations on the “a” determinant, and failed to find any mutations linked to HBsAg-seroclearance [63]. Hence, S-gene mutations might not affect rates of HBsAg-seroclearance during treatment.

3.3. Genetic Variability of the Host

Several studies have found that genetic variants on the human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-DP gene are associated with HBsAg-seroclearance during the natural history of infection [64] or during treatment with NA [65], which seems to be consistent across different populations [66]. Other polymorphisms on genes linked to immunological function, such as the toll-like receptor 3 [67], interleukin 10 [68], and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing molecule 3 genes [69], have also shown to be linked to the natural progression of HBV infection and are less consistently studied [66]. There have been very few studies examining the role of genetic polymorphisms on HBsAg-seroclearance in HIV-HBV co-infected individuals, apart from the IL28B haplotype showing no association [70]. Another research group found an association with HLA-G 14-bp insertion and deletion polymorphisms with HBsAg-seroclearance in HBV mono-infected, but not HIV-HBV co-infected, individuals [71]. These results would suggest that any effect of genetic polymorphisms on functional cure could be overshadowed by other host factors in co-infected individuals, namely immunosuppression.

3.4. Immunosuppression

It was first noted in the late 2000s that some HIV-HBV co-infected individuals with AIDS-defining illnesses were able to rapidly clear HBeAg/HBsAg shortly after initiating ART. Other studies have also recently shown that higher increases in CD4+ T-cell count during the first years of ART or initiating ART with lower CD4+ T-cell counts, and not necessarily AIDS, were associated with HBsAg-seroclearance [20,30]. Interestingly, many of the studies listed in Figure 1b with noticeably higher HBsAg-seroclerance rates were conducted in individuals with extremely low CD4+ counts who initiated ART. These results together would suggest that an immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS)-type effect is occurring and that the rapid expansion of T-cells in combination with specific inflammatory markers could help usher HBsAg-seroclearance [72]. It remains unknown, however, which specific pathways are responsible for eliciting HBsAg-seroclearance and if known, could provide important information on the potential targets for functional cure.
During HBV mono-infection, HBsAg itself is known to induce a wide range of effects on immune cells (reviewed in [73]). As HBsAg levels decrease, exhausted innate immunity is restored and capacity to activate immune cells involved in both cytolytic and non-cytolytic activity, as well as cells involved in producing neutralizing anti-HBsAg antibodies, is improved. However, when compared to HBV mono-infection, most of these cell populations are much lower in the liver microenvironment of individuals with HIV-HBV co-infection and after initiating anti-HBV containing ART, do not substantially increase over time [74]. These data illustrate that HBsAg-seroclearance may be even impaired in some HIV-HBV co-infected individuals due to poor anti-HBV specific responses. If therapeutic agents targeting immunological pathways are successful in HBV mono-infected individuals, it will need to be determined whether the immune impairments observed in co-infected individuals affects their therapeutic efficacy.

4. Surrogate Markers of HBV Functional Cure in HIV-HBV Co-Infection

The generally accepted marker to evaluate active HBV replication is serum HBV DNA. However, HBV DNA is unable to accurately predict functional cure. There has been a substantial amount of research attempting to find other markers that could bear a higher capacity to predict HBsAg-seroclearance [75]. Many of these new markers are by-products of the HBV replication cycle, secreted from the hepatocytes into circulating blood [76]. These markers directly reflect HBV activity. Other markers have relied on components of the host immune system, such as markers of inflammation or antibody production against the virus. These markers indirectly reflect HBV activity. Both direct and indirect markers have been recently validated in HBV mono-infected individuals to predict disease phase, and viral replication as well as more severe clinical endpoints, such as levels of liver fibrosis and HCC. In this section, we focus on the use of these markers in treated HBV mono-infected individuals compared to treated HIV-HBV co-infected individuals with respect to HBeAg- and HBsAg-seroclearance (Table 3).

4.1. Direct Markers of HBV Activity

4.1.1. Quantification of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen

HBsAg is translated from pre-S1 and S2 messenger RNAs on covalently-closed circular (ccc) HBV DNA (i.e., the viral template needed to express HBV proteins), which are transcribed from the S gene [75]. However, HBsAg can also be produced from integrated HBV DNA. Quantified HBsAg (qHBsAg) levels strongly correlate with ccc-DNA [77] and hence could be used as a potential marker to reflect HBV activity. This activity is likely to wane during antiviral treatment. Accordingly, the capacity of qHBsAg levels to predict serological responses were extensively studied in the early 2010s and when determined at baseline and one-year later, qHBsAg levels were able to rather modestly predict HBeAg- and HBsAg-seroclearance during treatment with pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) [78]. Nevertheless, the major issue with qHBsAg is that levels oftentimes stagnate during prolonged therapy, making it difficult to relate to other replicative parameters (i.e., intrahepatic replication [79]) and clinical outcomes in general [80]. For these reasons, no guidelines recommend its use in routine practice [14].
The use of qHBsAg has been examined during TDF-containing ART [18,28] in HIV-HBV co-infected individuals, and declines in this marker would appear to be comparable to HBV mono-infected individuals on NA. Given the few events in these studies, it was not possible to establish baseline levels or decline in levels predictive of HBsAg-seroclearance. Nevertheless, a group-trajectory modeling approach was used to identify specific profiles of qHBsAg during TDF treatment, demonstrating that HBsAg-seroclearance was linked to substantial and immediate declines in qHBsAg [18].

4.1.2. Quantification of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Protein Composition

HBsAg is composed of large (L), middle (M), and small (S) hepatitis B surface (HBs) cocarboxyterminal glycoproteins that are encoded within the S open reading frame [81]. Recently, it has been found that the proportions of LHBs and MHBs proteins are much lower in individuals with inactive HBV infection and importantly, can predict the phase of HBV infection more accurately than total HBsAg [82]. This finding would make it a potential marker for evaluating HBV activity and thus perhaps serological response to antiviral therapy. Indeed, faster declines in the proportion of LHBs and MHBs were predictive of HBsAg-seroclearance in both NA- and pegylated interferon-treated individuals with HBV mono-infection [83]. The capacity of this marker to predict functional cure in HIV-HBV co-infected individuals has yet to be evaluated.

4.1.3. Quantification of Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen

The hepatitis B core antigen shares a 149-amino acid sequence with HBeAg and when quantified together, is called hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg). Its quantification appears to be unaffected by the presence of precore mutations [84]. Importantly, strong correlations between HBcrAg and intrahepatic ccc-DNA levels have been observed in both HBV mono-infected and HIV-HBV co-infected individuals [85,86]. In terms of on-treatment use, HBcrAg levels have been shown to be a strong predictor of HBeAg- and HBsAg-seroclearance, particularly in HBV mono-infected individuals undergoing treatment with peg-IFN or LAM [84,87]. Another study has suggested that HBcrAg levels at initiation of NA is not independently associated with HBeAg-seroconversion, but higher levels at the time of seroconversion are linked to remission to HBeAg-positive serostatus [88].
Only one study to date has examined both the on-treatment kinetics and predictive capacity of HBcrAg levels on seroclearance in TDF-treated HIV-HBV co-infected individuals [89]. In this study, baseline HBcrAg levels were indeed associated with HBeAg-seroclearance; however, higher sensitivity and specificity were obtained when HBcrAg levels were evaluated at later time-points during TDF therapy (i.e., 24 to 36 months). The low number of HBsAg-seroclearance events precluded any evaluation of this marker on functional cure.

4.1.4. Quantification of HBV RNA

Some virions found in the cytoplasm of the hepatocyte contain pre-genomic (pg) HBV RNA and other forms of RNA (as total HBV RNA), which can be secreted in the blood [76]. Levels of these RNAs, as detected in the serum, have been correlated with other serum markers of HBV replication (i.e., HBV DNA, qHBsAg, and ALT) and are thought to reflect transcriptional activity of ccc-DNA [90,91]. Hence, HBV RNA quantification would be a candidate marker for serological response. The quantification of serum polyadenylated HBV RNA has been shown to more accurately predict HBeAg- and HBsAg-seroconversion than qHBsAg during treatment with peg-IFN and NA in HBeAg-positive HBV mono-infected patients [92,93]. HBV RNA has never been evaluated in the context of co-infection, which poses certain issues. Intrahepatic replication intermediates, including ccc-HBV DNA, are generally higher in patients with more severe levels of past immunosuppression [79]. Given that serum HBV RNA likely originates from these intermediates, their levels could be potentially higher with more severe degrees of immunosuppression, abrogating their predictive capacity.

4.2. Indirect Markers of HBV Activity

4.2.1. Quantification of Interferon-Gamma-Inducible Protein 10

Notwithstanding the wide range of cytokines and chemokines known to be involved in the immune response against HBV infection, interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) has received considerable attention over the past decade. IP-10 is a chemoattractant for T-lymphocytes, monocytes, and natural killer-cells and its levels are associated with circulating markers of HBV activity [94,95]. It was assumed that IP-10 levels could also function as a prognostic tool during treatment. This marker has been able to accurately predict HBeAg- and HBsAg-seroclearance in HBV mono-infected patients treated with either peg-IFN or NA, with some evidence suggesting that is more accurate than qHBsAg in entecavir-treated HBV mono-infected patients after four years of treatment [96,97,98]. Interestingly, this is the only chemokine among a number of serum cytokines [interleukin (IL)-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12, IL-15, IL-21, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor] that was associated with HBsAg-seroclearance in these studies.
IP-10 is intimately linked with HIV infection. HIV-viremia at various stages of both natural and treated infection is strongly and positively correlated with IP-10 [99,100], with evidence suggesting that mainly monocytes and myeloid dendritic cells are responsible for IP-10 production during HIV replication [101]. Only one pilot study to date has looked at serum IP-10 in HIV-HBV co-infected patients after initiating an anti-HBV containing ART regimen, showing substantial declines in this cytokine but no capacity to predict HBeAg-seroconversion [102].

4.2.2. Quantification of Anti-Hepatitis B Core Antibodies

The major drawback of using chemokine or cytokine levels, or any other marker of immune activation (e.g., ALT levels) is that it is unspecific to adaptive anti-HBV immunity. Several research groups have proposed that measuring anti-hepatitis B core (anti-HBc) antibody levels, as reflection of anti-HBc specific immunity, could provide a more specific indication of host immunity against HBV infection [103]. Indeed, this marker has been evaluated with respect to serological response during treatment. Higher levels of anti-HBc antibodies have been shown to predict HBeAg- and HBsAg-seroconversion in a large study population of Asian, HBeAg-positive, HBV mono-infected patients who were treated with either peg-IFN or NA [104].
B cells play a central role in producing anti-HBc antibodies and are known to express higher levels of inhibitory receptors linked to cell exhaustion during HIV-infection [105]. Anti-HBc levels could be consequently attenuated compared to HBV mono-infection, altering the ability of this marker to predict seroclearance. One study in TDF-treated HIV-HBV co-infected individuals has been performed evaluating anti-HBc levels, showing that higher levels of this marker at TDF-treatment initiation were only able to exhibit high specificity in predicting HBeAg-seroclearance [89]. Although this marker did not perform well in predicting HBeAg-seroclearance, its changes during treatment were associated with sudden decreases liver fibrosis levels [106]. No evaluation of this marker has been made on HBsAg-seroclearance in the treated, HIV-HBV co-infected population.

5. Discussion

HBsAg-seroclearance rarely occurs in the majority of studies evaluating HIV-HBV co-infected individuals treated with potent anti-HBV containing ART. Individuals with HBV or HIV-HBV infection share several common determinants of higher rates of HBsAg-seroclearance, such as low HBV DNA and HBsAg levels, lack of precore mutations, and older age, while some studies suggest a role of CD4+ T-cell counts on functional cure. Many of the novel markers demonstrating some capacity to predict HBsAg-seroclearance seem to perform comparably well in HIV-HBV co-infected populations; however, these markers do not seem to outperform more conventional markers, such as quantified HBsAg levels.
Overall, the low rates of HBsAg-seroclearance stress the need for other therapeutic regimens that will be able to induce functional cure. Some of the more recent therapeutic strategies evaluated during HBV mono-infection have included add-on with peg-IFN after exposure to NA [107,108] or interruption of anti-HBV therapy [109]. No beneficial effect of peg-IFN intensification after TDF initiation has been observed in HIV-HBV co-infected patients [110], while treatment interruptions are generally discouraged due to their associated risk of hepatic flares and increased morbidity [16,111]. Since residual ccc-HBV DNA and integrated HBV DNA remain present in the hepatocyte after loss of HBsAg, discontinuation of anti-HBV treatment, particularly under immune suppression, could reactivate HBV [112] and thus anti-HBV-containing ART might be required despite functional cure. Nevertheless, previous studies on discontinuation have been mostly conducted in patients who were highly immunocompromised (i.e., low nadir CD4+ cell count) and it is unknown if these treatment modalities would be beneficial for patients with high CD4+ cell counts and immediate ART initiation.
There are a number of promising antiviral agents currently being evaluated in mostly phase 1 and 2 trials, which include entry inhibitors, transcriptional control inhibitors, post-transcriptional control inhibitors, capsid assembly modulators, and HBsAg release inhibitors (reviewed in [113]). Some agents are also being developed to directly affect production of ccc-HBV DNA. Although these agents are expected to block various steps of the replication cycle, it has been argued that suppression of replication needs to occur in tandem with improved immune responses against HBV [114]. Given the implications of HIV-induced immunosuppression on the replication and pathogenesis of HBV infection [115], these agents must be separately evaluated in co-infected individuals.
It should also be noted that the studies linking HBsAg-seroclearance to clinical improvement are found almost exclusively in HBV mono-infected individuals. There is an urgent need to quantify the risk of liver-related outcomes in HIV-HBV co-infected individuals with HBsAg-seroclearance and whether there are specific groups who might benefit less from functional cure. The immunosuppression associated with HIV-infection combined with the fact that integrated HBV DNA remains even though HBsAg is not expressed [15], could contribute to HCC and extra-hepatic manifestations of disease. These issues need to be explored in larger cohorts.
Functional cure remains an elusive therapeutic goal for co-infected individuals. Nevertheless, noticeably higher rates of HBsAg-seroclearance have been known to occur in individuals with accelerated increases of CD4+ T-cell counts, possibly denoting an IRIS-like elicitation of sudden anti-HBV immune response. Identifying the mechanisms underlying accelerated HBsAg-seroclearance could help usher in the development of agents able to mimic these anti-HBV responses, which could be pivotal for HBV cure research.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v13071341/s1, Supplementary Methods S1: Determining seroclearance and seroconversion rates for the present literature review.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, A.B.; writing—review and editing, L.N.C.D. and K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data and statistical code used to produce the figures can be found on the webpage: https://github.com/boyd0094/INSERM_HBV_functional_cure.

Acknowledgments

A.B. and K.L. received funding from SIDACTION and the France REcherche Nord&sud Sida-hiv Hépatites (ANRS) for much of the work on HIV-HBV co-infection presented in this literature review. L.N.C.D. was awarded a post-doctoral fellowship from the ANRS.

Conflicts of Interest

K.L. has served on advisory boards and received travel grants from Gilead, Abbvie, MSD, ViiVHealthcare, and Janssen. All other authors have no conflicts to declare.

References

  1. Leumi, S.; Bigna, J.J.; Amougou, M.A.; Ngouo, A.; Nyaga, U.F.; Noubiap, J.J. Global burden of hepatitis b infection in people living with human immunodeficiency virus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 2799–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Falade-Nwulia, O.; Seaberg, E.C.; Rinaldo, C.R.; Badri, S.; Witt, M.; Thio, C.L. Comparative risk of liver-related mortality from chronic hepatitis B versus chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 55, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nina Kim, H.; Newcomb, C.W.; Carbonari, D.M.; Roy, J.A.; Torgersen, J.; Althoff, K.N.; Kitahata, M.M.; Rajender Reddy, K.; Lim, J.K.; Silverberg, M.J.; et al. Risk of Hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis B viremia among HIV/hepatitis B virus-coinfected persons in North America. Hepatology 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Matthews, G.V.; Bartholomeusz, A.; Locarnini, S.; Ayres, A.; Sasaduesz, J.; Seaberg, E.; Cooper, D.A.; Lewin, S.; Dore, G.J.; Thio, C.L. Characteristics of drug resistant HBV in an international collaborative study of HIV-HBV-infected individuals on extended lamivudine therapy. AIDS 2006, 20, 863–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Boyd, A.; Moh, R.; Gabillard, D.; le Carrou, J.; Danel, C.; Anglaret, X.; Eholie, S.P.; Maylin, S.; Delaugerre, C.; Zoulim, F.; et al. Low risk of lamivudine-resistant HBV and hepatic flares in treated HIV-HBV-coinfected patients from Cote d’Ivoire. Antivir. Ther. 2015, 20, 643–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Li, Y.; Xie, J.; Han, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhu, T.; Wang, N.; Lv, W.; Guo, F.; Qiu, Z.; Li, Y.; et al. Lamivudine monotherapy-based cART is efficacious for HBV treatment in HIV/HBV coinfection when baseline HBV DNA <20,000 IU/mL. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2016, 72, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Thio, C.L.; Smeaton, L.; Hollabaugh, K.; Saulynas, M.; Hwang, H.; Saravanan, S.; Kulkarni, S.; Hakim, J.; Nyirenda, M.; Iqbal, H.S.; et al. Comparison of HBV-active HAART regimens in an HIV-HBV multinational cohort: Outcomes through 144 weeks. AIDS 2015, 29, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Boyd, A.; Gozlan, J.; Maylin, S.; Delaugerre, C.; Peytavin, G.; Girard, P.M.; Zoulim, F.; Lacombe, K. Persistent viremia in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis B coinfected patients undergoing long-term tenofovir: Virological and clinical implications. Hepatology 2014, 60, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gallant, J.; Brunetta, J.; Crofoot, G.; Benson, P.; Mills, A.; Brinson, C.; Oka, S.; Cheng, A.; Garner, W.; Fordyce, M.; et al. Brief report: Efficacy and safety of switching to a single-tablet regimen of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in HIV-1/hepatitis B-coinfected adults. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2016, 73, 294–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Boyd, A.; Bottero, J.; Miailhes, P.; Lascoux-Combe, C.; Rougier, H.; Girard, P.M.; Serfaty, L.; Lacombe, K. Liver fibrosis regression and progression during controlled hepatitis B virus infection among HIV-HBV patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in France: A prospective cohort study. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 2017, 20, 21426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Marcellin, P.; Gane, E.; Buti, M.; Afdhal, N.; Sievert, W.; Jacobson, I.M.; Washington, M.K.; Germanidis, G.; Flaherty, J.F.; Aguilar Schall, R.; et al. Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: A 5-year open-label follow-up study. Lancet 2013, 381, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sterling, R.K.; King, W.C.; Khalili, M.; Chung, R.T.; Sulkowski, M.; Jain, M.K.; Lisker-Melman, M.; Ghany, M.G.; Wong, D.K.; Hinerman, A.S.; et al. A prospective study evaluating changes in histology, clinical and virologic outcomes in HBV-HIV co-infected adults in North America. Hepatology 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 370–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Servant-Delmas, A.; Mercier-Darty, M.; Ly, T.D.; Wind, F.; Alloui, C.; Sureau, C.; Laperche, S. Variable capacity of 13 hepatitis B virus surface antigen assays for the detection of HBsAg mutants in blood samples. J. Clin. Virol. 2012, 53, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cornberg, M.; Lok, A.S.; Terrault, N.A.; Zoulim, F.; EASL-AASLD HBV Treatment Endpoints Conference Faculty. Guidance for design and endpoints of clinical trials in chronic hepatitis B—Report from the 2019 EASL-AASLD HBV Treatment Endpoints Conference. J. Hepatol. 2020, 72, 539–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Dore, G.J.; Soriano, V.; Rockstroh, J.; Kupfer, B.; Tedaldi, E.; Peters, L.; Neuhaus, J.; Puoti, M.; Klein, M.B.; Mocroft, A.; et al. Frequent hepatitis B virus rebound among HIV-hepatitis B virus-coinfected patients following antiretroviral therapy interruption. AIDS 2010, 24, 857–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Boyd, A.; Maylin, S.; Gozlan, J.; Delaugerre, C.; Simon, F.; Girard, P.M.; Lacombe, K. Use of hepatitis B surface and “e” antigen quantification during extensive treatment with tenofovir in patients co-infected with HIV-HBV. Liver Int. 2015, 35, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boyd, A.; Maylin, S.; Moh, R.; Mahjoub, N.; Gabillard, D.; Eholie, S.P.; Danel, C.; Anglaret, X.; Zoulim, F.; Girard, P.M.; et al. Hepatitis B surface antigen quantification as a predictor of seroclearance during treatment in HIV-hepatitis B virus coinfected patients from Sub-Saharan Africa. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 31, 634–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Chihota, B.V.; Wandeler, G.; Chilengi, R.; Mulenga, L.; Chung, R.T.; Bhattacharya, D.; Egger, M.; Vinikoor, M.J. High rates of hepatitis B virus (HBV) functional cure among human immunodeficiency virus-HBV coinfected patients on antiretroviral therapy in Zambia. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 221, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, Y.S.; Sun, H.Y.; Chang, S.Y.; Chuang, Y.C.; Cheng, A.; Huang, S.H.; Huang, Y.C.; Chen, G.J.; Lin, K.Y.; Su, Y.C.; et al. Long-term virological and serologic responses of chronic hepatitis B virus infection to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-containing regimens in patients with HIV and hepatitis B coinfection. Hepatol. Int. 2019, 13, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kosi, L.; Reiberger, T.; Payer, B.A.; Grabmeier-Pfistershammer, K.; Strassl, R.; Rieger, A.; Peck-Radosavljevic, M. Five-year on-treatment efficacy of lamivudine-, tenofovir- and tenofovir + emtricitabine-based HAART in HBV-HIV-coinfected patients. J. Viral Hepat. 2012, 19, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Martin-Carbonero, L.; Teixeira, T.; Poveda, E.; Plaza, Z.; Vispo, E.; Gonzalez-Lahoz, J.; Soriano, V. Clinical and virological outcomes in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis B on long-term nucleos(t)ide analogues. AIDS 2011, 25, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Matthews, G.V.; Ali, R.J.; Avihingsanon, A.; Amin, J.; Hammond, R.; Bowden, S.; Lewin, S.R.; Sasadeusz, J.; Littlejohn, M.; Locarnini, S.L.; et al. Quantitative HBsAg and HBeAg predict hepatitis B seroconversion after initiation of HAART in HIV-HBV coinfected individuals. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Piroth, L.; Sene, D.; Pol, S.; Goderel, I.; Lacombe, K.; Martha, B.; Rey, D.; Loustau-Ratti, V.; Bergmann, J.F.; Pialoux, G.; et al. Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis B in HIV-infected patients (EPIB 2005 STUDY). AIDS 2007, 21, 1323–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Strassl, R.; Reiberger, T.; Honsig, C.; Payer, B.A.; Mandorfer, M.; Grabmeier-Pfistershammer, K.; Rieger, A.; Kundi, M.; Grundtner, P.; Peck-Radosavljevic, M.; et al. Viral determinants predicting hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance in HIV-/HBV-coinfected patients. J. Viral Hepat. 2014, 21, 508–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dezanet, L.N.C.; Miailhes, P.; Lascoux-Combe, C.; Chas, J.; Maylin, S.; Gabassi, A.; Rougier, H.; Delaugerre, C.; Lacombe, K.; Boyd, A. Persistent HBV replication and serological response during up to fifteen years of tenofovir-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-hepatitis B coinfected patients: A multicenter prospective cohort study. MedRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zoutendijk, R.; Zaaijer, H.L.; de Vries-Sluijs, T.E.; Reijnders, J.G.; Mulder, J.W.; Kroon, F.P.; Richter, C.; van der Eijk, A.A.; Sonneveld, M.J.; Hansen, B.E.; et al. Hepatitis B surface antigen declines and clearance during long-term tenofovir therapy in patients coinfected with HBV and HIV. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 206, 974–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Miailhes, P.; Trabaud, M.A.; Pradat, P.; Lebouche, B.; Chevallier, M.; Chevallier, P.; Zoulim, F.; Trepo, C. Impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on the natural history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HIV coinfection: Relationship between prolonged efficacy of HAART and HBV surface and early antigen seroconversion. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Van Bremen, K.; Hoffmann, C.; Mauss, S.; Lutz, T.; Ingiliz, P.; Spinner, C.D.; Scholten, S.; Schwarze-Zander, C.; Berger, F.; Breitschwerdt, S.; et al. Obstacles to HBV functional cure: Late presentation in HIV and its impact on HBV seroconversion in HIV/HBV coinfection. Liver Int. 2020, 40, 2978–2981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Audsley, J.; Avihingsanon, A.; Littlejohn, M.; Bowden, S.; Matthews, G.V.; Fairley, C.K.; Lewin, S.R.; Sasadeusz, J. Long-term TDF-inclusive ART and Progressive rates of HBsAg loss in HIV-HBV coinfection-lessons for functional HBV cure? J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2020, 84, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Boyd, A.; Canini, L.; Gozlan, J.; Lascoux-Combe, C.; Miailhes, P.; Fonquernie, L.; Girard, P.M.; Lacombe, K. Development of anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) antibodies after HBs antigen loss in HIV-hepatitis B virus co-infected patients. J. Clin. Virol. 2017, 95, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Agarwal, K.; Brunetto, M.; Seto, W.K.; Lim, Y.S.; Fung, S.; Marcellin, P.; Ahn, S.H.; Izumi, N.; Chuang, W.L.; Bae, H.; et al. 96weeks treatment of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 672–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Buti, M.; Tsai, N.; Petersen, J.; Flisiak, R.; Gurel, S.; Krastev, Z.; Aguilar Schall, R.; Flaherty, J.F.; Martins, E.B.; Charuworn, P.; et al. Seven-year efficacy and safety of treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2015, 60, 1457–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Fung, S.; Kwan, P.; Fabri, M.; Horban, A.; Pelemis, M.; Hann, H.W.; Gurel, S.; Caruntu, F.A.; Flaherty, J.F.; Massetto, B.; et al. Randomized comparison of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs. emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 980–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ono, A.; Suzuki, F.; Kawamura, Y.; Sezaki, H.; Hosaka, T.; Akuta, N.; Kobayashi, M.; Suzuki, Y.; Saitou, S.; Arase, Y.; et al. Long-term continuous entecavir therapy in nucleos(t)ide-naive chronic hepatitis B patients. J. Hepatol. 2012, 57, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Preda, C.M.; Baicus, C.; Negreanu, L.; Tugui, L.; Olariu, S.V.; Andrei, A.; Zambatu, I.; Diculescu, M.M. Effectiveness of entecavir treatment and predictive factors for virologic response. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2014, 106, 305–311. [Google Scholar]
  37. Riveiro-Barciela, M.; Tabernero, D.; Calleja, J.L.; Lens, S.; Manzano, M.L.; Rodriguez, F.G.; Crespo, J.; Piqueras, B.; Pascasio, J.M.; Comas, C.; et al. Effectiveness and safety of entecavir or tenofovir in a Spanish cohort of chronic hepatitis B patients: Validation of the page-B score to predict hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2017, 62, 784–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Berg, T.; Zoulim, F.; Moeller, B.; Trinh, H.; Marcellin, P.; Chan, S.; Kitrinos, K.M.; Dinh, P.; Flaherty, J.F., Jr.; McHutchison, J.G.; et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of emtricitabine plus tenofovir DF vs. tenofovir DF monotherapy in adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients. J. Hepatol. 2014, 60, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kim, J.H.; Sinn, D.H.; Kang, W.; Gwak, G.Y.; Paik, Y.H.; Choi, M.S.; Lee, J.H.; Koh, K.C.; Paik, S.W. Low-level viremia and the increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients receiving entecavir treatment. Hepatology 2017, 66, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Chang, T.T.; Lai, C.L.; Kew Yoon, S.; Lee, S.S.; Coelho, H.S.; Carrilho, F.J.; Poordad, F.; Halota, W.; Horsmans, Y.; Tsai, N.; et al. Entecavir treatment for up to 5 years in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2010, 51, 422–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Yokosuka, O.; Takaguchi, K.; Fujioka, S.; Shindo, M.; Chayama, K.; Kobashi, H.; Hayashi, N.; Sato, C.; Kiyosawa, K.; Tanikawa, K.; et al. Long-term use of entecavir in nucleoside-naive Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B infection. J. Hepatol. 2010, 52, 791–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Orito, E.; Hasebe, C.; Kurosaki, M.; Osaki, Y.; Joko, K.; Watanabe, H.; Kimura, H.; Nishijima, N.; Kusakabe, A.; Izumi, N.; et al. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic hepatitis B virus patients during nucleoside/nucleotide analog therapy. Hepatol. Res. 2015, 45, 872–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Buti, M.; Gane, E.; Seto, W.K.; Chan, H.L.; Chuang, W.L.; Stepanova, T.; Hui, A.J.; Lim, Y.S.; Mehta, R.; Janssen, H.L.; et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 1, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kim, G.A.; Lim, Y.S.; An, J.; Lee, D.; Shim, J.H.; Kim, K.M.; Lee, H.C.; Chung, Y.H.; Lee, Y.S.; Suh, D.J. HBsAg seroclearance after nucleoside analogue therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B: Clinical outcomes and durability. Gut 2014, 63, 1325–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Marcellin, P.; Wong, D.K.; Sievert, W.; Buggisch, P.; Petersen, J.; Flisiak, R.; Manns, M.; Kaita, K.; Krastev, Z.; Lee, S.S.; et al. Ten-year efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Liver Int. 2019, 39, 1868–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Marcellin, P.; Zoulim, F.; Hezode, C.; Causse, X.; Roche, B.; Truchi, R.; Pauwels, A.; Ouzan, D.; Dumortier, J.; Pageaux, G.P.; et al. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in chronic hepatitis B: A 3-year, prospective, real-world study in France. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2016, 61, 3072–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Seto, W.K.; Wong, D.K.; Fung, J.; Huang, F.Y.; Lai, C.L.; Yuen, M.F. Reduction of hepatitis B surface antigen levels and hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B patients receiving 10 years of nucleoside analogue therapy. Hepatology 2013, 58, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Taniguchi, H.; Iwasaki, Y.; Aimi, M.; Shimazaki, G.; Moriya, A. Clinical features of chronic hepatitis B patients with low hepatitis B surface antigen levels and determinants of hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance. JGH Open 2020, 4, 698–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Maylin, S.; Boyd, A.; Lavocat, F.; Gozlan, J.; Lascoux-Combe, C.; Miailhes, P.; Lassel, L.; Delaugerre, C.; Girard, P.M.; Zoulim, F.; et al. Kinetics of hepatitis B surface and e antigen and prediction of treatment response to tenofovir in antiretroviral-experienced HIV-hepatitis B virus-infected patients. AIDS 2012, 26, 939–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lacombe, K.; Rockstroh, J. HIV and viral hepatitis coinfections: Advances and challenges. Gut 2012, 61 (Suppl. S1), i47–i58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gantner, P.; Cotte, L.; Allavena, C.; Bani-Sadr, F.; Huleux, T.; Duvivier, C.; Valantin, M.A.; Jacomet, C.; Joly, V.; Cheret, A.; et al. Higher rates of HBsAg clearance with tenofovir-containing therapy in HBV/HIV co-infection. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, R.; Gui, X.; Ke, H.; Xiong, Y.; Gao, S. Long-term observation on hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in therapy experienced HIV/HBV co-infected Chinese. J. Viral Hepat. 2020, 27, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lin, C.L.; Kao, J.H. Hepatitis B virus genotypes and variants. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a021436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Bayliss, J.; Yuen, L.; Rosenberg, G.; Wong, D.; Littlejohn, M.; Jackson, K.; Gaggar, A.; Kitrinos, K.M.; Subramanian, G.M.; Marcellin, P.; et al. Deep sequencing shows that HBV basal core promoter and precore variants reduce the likelihood of HBsAg loss following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Gut 2017, 66, 2013–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Boyd, A.; Moh, R.; Maylin, S.; Abdou Chekaraou, M.; Mahjoub, N.; Gabillard, D.; Anglaret, X.; Eholie, S.P.; Delaugerre, C.; Danel, C.; et al. Precore G1896A mutation is associated with reduced rates of HBsAg seroclearance in treated HIV hepatitis B virus co-infected patients from western Africa. J. Viral Hepat. 2018, 25, 1121–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Cheng, Y.; Guindon, S.; Rodrigo, A.; Wee, L.Y.; Inoue, M.; Thompson, A.J.; Locarnini, S.; Lim, S.G. Cumulative viral evolutionary changes in chronic hepatitis B virus infection precedes hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion. Gut 2013, 62, 1347–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kramvis, A.; Arakawa, K.; Yu, M.C.; Nogueira, R.; Stram, D.O.; Kew, M.C. Relationship of serological subtype, basic core promoter and precore mutations to genotypes/subgenotypes of hepatitis B virus. J. Med. Virol. 2008, 80, 27–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tong, S.; Revill, P. Overview of hepatitis B viral replication and genetic variability. J. Hepatol. 2016, 64, S4–S16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lacombe, K.; Boyd, A.; Gozlan, J.; Lavocat, F.; Girard, P.M.; Zoulim, F. Drug-resistant and immune-escape HBV mutants in HIV-infected hosts. Antivir. Ther. 2010, 15, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Eschlimann, M.; Malve, B.; Velay, A.; Fenaux, H.; Berger, S.; Frippiat, J.P.; Zoulim, F.; Bensenane, M.; Bronowicki, J.P.; Goehringer, F.; et al. The variability of hepatitis B envelope is associated with HBs antigen persistence in either chronic or acute HBV genotype A infection. J. Clin. Virol. 2017, 94, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Velay, A.; Jeulin, H.; Eschlimann, M.; Malve, B.; Goehringer, F.; Bensenane, M.; Frippiat, J.P.; Abraham, P.; Ismail, A.M.; Murray, J.M.; et al. Characterization of hepatitis B virus surface antigen variability and impact on HBs antigen clearance under nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy. J. Viral Hepat. 2016, 23, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, S.; Zhao, K.; Liu, S.; Wu, C.; Yao, Y.; Cao, L.; Hu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Pei, R.; et al. HBsAg sT123N mutation induces stronger antibody responses to HBsAg and HBcAg and accelerates in vivo HBsAg clearance. Virus Res. 2015, 210, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Boyd, A.; Moh, R.; Maylin, S.; Abdou Chekaraou, M.; Mahjoub, N.; Gabillard, D.; Anglaret, X.; Eholie, S.P.; Danel, C.; Delaugerre, C.; et al. Effect of hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface-gene variability on markers of replication during treated human immunodeficiency virus-HBV infection in Western Africa. Liver Int. 2019, 39, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Koukoulioti, E.; Fischer, J.; Schott, E.; Fulop, B.; Heyne, R.; Berg, T.; van Bommel, F. Association of HLA-DPA1 and HLA-DPB1 polymorphisms with spontaneous HBsAg seroclearance in Caucasians. Liver Int. 2019, 39, 646–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hosaka, T.; Suzuki, F.; Kobayashi, M.; Fukushima, T.; Kawamura, Y.; Sezaki, H.; Akuta, N.; Suzuki, Y.; Saitoh, S.; Arase, Y.; et al. HLA-DP genes polymorphisms associate with hepatitis B surface antigen kinetics and seroclearance during nucleot(s)ide analogue therapy. Liver Int. 2015, 35, 1290–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Xu, J.; Zhan, Q.; Fan, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zeng, Z. Human genetic susceptibility to hepatitis B virus infection. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021, 87, 104663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Fischer, J.; Koukoulioti, E.; Schott, E.; Fulop, B.; Heyne, R.; Berg, T.; van Bommel, F. Polymorphisms in the Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) gene are associated with the natural course of hepatitis B virus infection in Caucasian population. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Rybicka, M.; Woziwodzka, A.; Sznarkowska, A.; Romanowski, T.; Stalke, P.; Dreczewski, M.; Verrier, E.R.; Baumert, T.F.; Bielawski, K.P. Genetic variation in IL-10 influences the progression of hepatitis B infection. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 96, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Liao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Liao, Y.; Cai, B.; Chen, J.; Li, L.; Wang, L. Association of T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing molecule 3 (Tim-3) polymorphisms with susceptibility and disease progression of HBV infection. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Martin, M.P.; Qi, Y.; Goedert, J.J.; Hussain, S.K.; Kirk, G.D.; Hoots, W.K.; Buchbinder, S.; Carrington, M.; Thio, C.L. IL28B polymorphism does not determine outcomes of hepatitis B virus or HIV infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 202, 1749–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Michel Wolf, J.; Zingalli Bueno Pereira, V.R.; Zanetti Ballardin Roncato, P.A.; Castagna Wortmann, A.; Stumm, G.Z.; Oliveira da Silva, F.; Lunge, V.R.; Simon, D. The HLA-G 14-bp insertion/deletion polymorphism is associated with chronic hepatitis B in Southern Brazil: A case-control study. Hum. Immunol. 2020, 81, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yoshikawa, S.; Yoshio, S.; Yoshida, Y.; Tsutsui, Y.; Kawai, H.; Yamazoe, T.; Mori, T.; Osawa, Y.; Sugiyama, M.; Iwamoto, M.; et al. Impact of immune reconstitution-induced hepatic flare on HBsAg loss in HBV/HIV-1-coinfected patients. J. Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tout, I.; Loureiro, D.; Mansouri, A.; Soumelis, V.; Boyer, N.; Asselah, T. Hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance: Immune mechanisms, clinical impact, importance for drug development. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 409–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Iser, D.M.; Avihingsanon, A.; Wisedopas, N.; Thompson, A.J.; Boyd, A.; Matthews, G.V.; Locarnini, S.A.; Slavin, J.; Desmond, P.V.; Lewin, S.R. Increased intrahepatic apoptosis but reduced immune activation in HIV-HBV co-infected patients with advanced immunosuppression. AIDS 2011, 25, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Coffin, C.S.; Zhou, K.; Terrault, N.A. New and old biomarkers for diagnosis and management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Charre, C.; Levrero, M.; Zoulim, F.; Scholtes, C. Non-invasive biomarkers for chronic hepatitis B virus infection management. Antivir. Res. 2019, 169, 104553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Thompson, A.J.; Nguyen, T.; Iser, D.; Ayres, A.; Jackson, K.; Littlejohn, M.; Slavin, J.; Bowden, S.; Gane, E.J.; Abbott, W.; et al. Serum hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B e antigen titers: Disease phase influences correlation with viral load and intrahepatic hepatitis B virus markers. Hepatology 2010, 51, 1933–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Janssen, H.L.; Sonneveld, M.J.; Brunetto, M.R. Quantification of serum hepatitis B surface antigen: Is it useful for the management of chronic hepatitis B? Gut 2012, 61, 641–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Boyd, A.; Lacombe, K.; Lavocat, F.; Maylin, S.; Miailhes, P.; Lascoux-Combe, C.; Delaugerre, C.; Girard, P.M.; Zoulim, F. Decay of ccc-DNA marks persistence of intrahepatic viral DNA synthesis under tenofovir in HIV-HBV co-infected patients. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Martinot-Peignoux, M.; Lapalus, M.; Asselah, T.; Marcellin, P. The role of HBsAg quantification for monitoring natural history and treatment outcome. Liver Int. 2013, 33 (Suppl. S1), 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Heermann, K.H.; Goldmann, U.; Schwartz, W.; Seyffarth, T.; Baumgarten, H.; Gerlich, W.H. Large surface proteins of hepatitis B virus containing the pre-s sequence. J. Virol. 1984, 52, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Pfefferkorn, M.; Bohm, S.; Schott, T.; Deichsel, D.; Bremer, C.M.; Schroder, K.; Gerlich, W.H.; Glebe, D.; Berg, T.; van Bommel, F. Quantification of large and middle proteins of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) as a novel tool for the identification of inactive HBV carriers. Gut 2018, 67, 2045–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pfefferkorn, M.; Schott, T.; Bohm, S.; Deichsel, D.; Felkel, C.; Gerlich, W.H.; Glebe, D.; Wat, C.; Pavlovic, V.; Heyne, R.; et al. Composition of HBsAg is predictive of HBsAg loss during treatment in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Rokuhara, A.; Tanaka, E.; Matsumoto, A.; Kimura, T.; Yamaura, T.; Orii, K.; Sun, X.; Yagi, S.; Maki, N.; Kiyosawa, K. Clinical evaluation of a new enzyme immunoassay for hepatitis B virus core-related antigen; a marker distinct from viral DNA for monitoring lamivudine treatment. J. Viral Hepat. 2003, 10, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Testoni, B.; Lebosse, F.; Scholtes, C.; Berby, F.; Miaglia, C.; Subic, M.; Loglio, A.; Facchetti, F.; Lampertico, P.; Levrero, M.; et al. Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) correlates with covalently closed circular DNA transcriptional activity in chronic hepatitis B patients. J. Hepatol. 2019, 70, 615–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Dezanet, L.N.C.; Maylin, S.; Gabassi, A.; Rougier, H.; Miailhes, P.; Lascoux-Combe, C.; Chas, J.; Girard, P.M.; Delaugerre, C.; Zoulim, F.; et al. Correlation of serum hepatitis B core-related antigen with hepatitis B virus total intrahepatic DNA and covalently closed circular-DNA viral load in HIV-hepatitis B coinfection. AIDS 2020, 34, 1943–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Chuaypen, N.; Posuwan, N.; Payungporn, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Shinkai, N.; Poovorawan, Y.; Tangkijvanich, P. Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen as a treatment predictor of pegylated interferon in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int. 2016, 36, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sonneveld, M.J.; van Oord, G.W.; van Campenhout, M.J.; De Man, R.A.; Janssen, H.L.A.; de Knegt, R.J.; Boonstra, A.; van der Eijk, A.A. Relationship between hepatitis B core-related antigen levels and sustained HBeAg seroconversion in patients treated with nucleo(s)tide analogues. J. Viral Hepat. 2019, 26, 828–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Dezanet, L.N.C.; Maylin, S.; Gabassi, A.; Rougier, H.; Miailhes, P.; Lascoux-Combe, C.; Chas, J.; Girard, P.M.; Delaugerre, C.; Lacombe, K.; et al. Kinetics of Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen and Anti-Hepatitis B Core Antibody and Their Association With Serological Response in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Hepatitis B Coinfection. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 221, 1826–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Volz, T.; Lutgehetmann, M.; Wachtler, P.; Jacob, A.; Quaas, A.; Murray, J.M.; Dandri, M.; Petersen, J. Impaired intrahepatic hepatitis B virus productivity contributes to low viremia in most HBeAg-negative patients. Gastroenterology 2007, 133, 843–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Giersch, K.; Allweiss, L.; Volz, T.; Dandri, M.; Lutgehetmann, M. Serum HBV pgRNA as a clinical marker for cccDNA activity. J. Hepatol. 2017, 66, 460–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. van Bommel, F.; Bartens, A.; Mysickova, A.; Hofmann, J.; Kruger, D.H.; Berg, T.; Edelmann, A. Serum hepatitis B virus RNA levels as an early predictor of hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion during treatment with polymerase inhibitors. Hepatology 2015, 61, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Van Bommel, F.; van Bommel, A.; Krauel, A.; Wat, C.; Pavlovic, V.; Yang, L.; Deichsel, D.; Berg, T.; Bohm, S. Serum HBV RNA as a predictor of peginterferon Alfa-2a response in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 218, 1066–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, J.; Zhao, J.H.; Wang, P.P.; Xiang, G.J. Expression of CXC chemokine IP-10 in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2008, 7, 45–50. [Google Scholar]
  95. Bayard, F.; Godon, O.; Nalpas, B.; Costentin, C.; Zhu, R.; Soussan, P.; Vallet-Pichard, A.; Fontaine, H.; Mallet, V.; Pol, S.; et al. T-cell responses to hepatitis B splice-generated protein of hepatitis B virus and inflammatory cytokines/chemokines in chronic hepatitis B patients. ANRS study: HB EP 02 HBSP-FIBRO. J. Viral Hepat. 2012, 19, 872–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sonneveld, M.J.; Arends, P.; Boonstra, A.; Hansen, B.E.; Janssen, H.L. Serum levels of interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10 and response to peginterferon therapy in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. J. Hepatol. 2013, 58, 898–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Wang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, L.; Yu, W.; Shen, C.; Wang, W.; Zhen, Z.; Zhou, J. Predictive value of interferon-gamma inducible protein 10 kD for hepatitis B e antigen clearance and hepatitis B surface antigen decline during pegylated interferon alpha therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients. Antivir. Res. 2014, 103, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Papatheodoridis, G.; Goulis, J.; Manolakopoulos, S.; Margariti, A.; Exarchos, X.; Kokkonis, G.; Hadziyiannis, E.; Papaioannou, C.; Manesis, E.; Pectasides, D.; et al. Changes of HBsAg and interferon-inducible protein 10 serum levels in naive HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients under 4-year entecavir therapy. J. Hepatol. 2014, 60, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Hattab, S.; Guiguet, M.; Carcelain, G.; Fourati, S.; Guihot, A.; Autran, B.; Caby, F.; Marcelin, A.G.; Costagliola, D.; Katlama, C. Soluble biomarkers of immune activation and inflammation in HIV infection: Impact of 2 years of effective first-line combination antiretroviral therapy. HIV Med. 2015, 16, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Noel, N.; Lerolle, N.; Lecuroux, C.; Goujard, C.; Venet, A.; Saez-Cirion, A.; Avettand-Fenoel, V.; Meyer, L.; Boufassa, F.; Lambotte, O.; et al. Immunologic and virologic progression in HIV controllers: The role of viral “Blips” and immune activation in the ANRS CO21 CODEX study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Simmons, R.P.; Scully, E.P.; Groden, E.E.; Arnold, K.B.; Chang, J.J.; Lane, K.; Lifson, J.; Rosenberg, E.; Lauffenburger, D.A.; Altfeld, M. HIV-1 infection induces strong production of IP-10 through TLR7/9-dependent pathways. AIDS 2013, 27, 2505–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Giarda, P.; Avihingsanon, A.; Sasadeusz, J.; Audsley, J.; Marks, P.; Matthews, G.; Ruxrungtham, K.; Lewin, S.R.; Crane, M. CXCL-10, interleukin-12 and interleukin-21 are not immunological predictors of HBeAg seroconversion in HIV-1-HBV coinfection following HBV-active antiretroviral therapy. Antivir. Ther. 2014, 19, 429–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Yuan, Q.; Song, L.W.; Liu, C.J.; Li, Z.; Liu, P.G.; Huang, C.H.; Yan, Y.; Ge, S.X.; Wang, Y.B.; Peng, C.Y.; et al. Quantitative hepatitis B core antibody level may help predict treatment response in chronic hepatitis B patients. Gut 2013, 62, 182–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Fan, R.; Sun, J.; Yuan, Q.; Xie, Q.; Bai, X.; Ning, Q.; Cheng, J.; Yu, Y.; Niu, J.; Shi, G.; et al. Baseline quantitative hepatitis B core antibody titre alone strongly predicts HBeAg seroconversion across chronic hepatitis B patients treated with peginterferon or nucleos(t)ide analogues. Gut 2016, 65, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Kardava, L.; Moir, S.; Wang, W.; Ho, J.; Buckner, C.M.; Posada, J.G.; O’Shea, M.A.; Roby, G.; Chen, J.; Sohn, H.W.; et al. Attenuation of HIV-associated human B cell exhaustion by siRNA downregulation of inhibitory receptors. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 2614–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Cruchet, R.; Dezanet, L.N.C.; Maylin, S.; Gabassi, A.; Rougier, H.; Miailhes, P.; Lascoux-Combe, C.; Chas, J.; Girard, P.M.; Delaugerre, C.; et al. Association of hepatitis B core-related antigen and antihepatitis B core antibody with liver fibrosis evolution in human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis B virus coinfected patients during treatment with tenofovir. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2020, 7, ofaa215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Brouwer, W.P.; Xie, Q.; Sonneveld, M.J.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, Q.; Tabak, F.; Streinu-Cercel, A.; Wang, J.Y.; Idilman, R.; Reesink, H.W.; et al. Adding pegylated interferon to entecavir for hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B: A multicenter randomized trial (ARES study). Hepatology 2015, 61, 1512–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Bourliere, M.; Rabiega, P.; Ganne-Carrie, N.; Serfaty, L.; Marcellin, P.; Barthe, Y.; Thabut, D.; Guyader, D.; Hezode, C.; Picon, M.; et al. Effect on HBs antigen clearance of addition of pegylated interferon alfa-2a to nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy versus nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy alone in patients with HBe antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B and sustained undetectable plasma hepatitis B virus DNA: A randomised, controlled, open-label trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 2, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Liaw, Y.F. Finite nucleos(t)ide analog therapy in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: An emerging paradigm shift. Hepatol. Int. 2019, 13, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Boyd, A.; Piroth, L.; Maylin, S.; Maynard-Muet, M.; Lebosse, F.; Bouix, C.; Lascoux-Combe, C.; Mahjoub, N.; Girard, P.M.; Delaugerre, C.; et al. Intensification with pegylated interferon during treatment with tenofovir in HIV-hepatitis B virus co-infected patients. J. Viral Hepat. 2016, 23, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Boyd, A.; Houghtaling, L.; Moh, R.; Chekaraou, M.A.; Gabillard, D.; Eholie, S.P.; Anglaret, X.; Zoulim, F.; Danel, C.; Lacombe, K.; et al. Clinical outcomes during treatment interruptions in human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis B virus co-infected patients from Sub-Saharan Africa. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2017, 97, 1936–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Raimondo, G.; Locarnini, S.; Pollicino, T.; Levrero, M.; Zoulim, F.; Lok, A.S.; Taormina Workshop on Occult HBV Infection Faculty Members. Update of the statements on biology and clinical impact of occult hepatitis B virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2019, 71, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Martinez, M.G.; Villeret, F.; Testoni, B.; Zoulim, F. Can we cure hepatitis B virus with novel direct-acting antivirals? Liver Int. 2020, 40 (Suppl. S1), 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Dusheiko, G. Will we need novel combinations to cure HBV infection? Liver Int. 2020, 40 (Suppl. S1), 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Iser, D.M.; Lewin, S.R. The pathogenesis of liver disease in the setting of HIV-hepatitis B virus coinfection. Antivir. Ther. 2009, 14, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Viruses 13 01341 g001a 550Viruses 13 01341 g001b 550
Figure 1. Summary of hepatitis B “e” antigen seroclearance (a) and hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance rates (b) in studies of hepatitis B virus (HBV) mono-infected and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HBV co-infected individuals undergoing potent anti-HBV therapy with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues. The size of the squares is proportional to the number of study participants. The selection of articles is described in Table 1. The assumptions used to derive seroclearance estimates are described in the Supplementary Methods S1.
Figure 1. Summary of hepatitis B “e” antigen seroclearance (a) and hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance rates (b) in studies of hepatitis B virus (HBV) mono-infected and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HBV co-infected individuals undergoing potent anti-HBV therapy with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues. The size of the squares is proportional to the number of study participants. The selection of articles is described in Table 1. The assumptions used to derive seroclearance estimates are described in the Supplementary Methods S1.
Viruses 13 01341 g001aViruses 13 01341 g001b
Table
Table 1. Search strategy and selection criteria for this literature review.
Table 1. Search strategy and selection criteria for this literature review.
Review SectionsSearch and Selection Strategy
Rates of functional cureWe conducted a literature search using PubMed on 31 March 2021 to retrieve relevant articles in English. We searched using the terms “HBeAg loss”, “HBeAg seroclearance”, “HBeAg seroconversion”, “HBsAg loss”, “HBsAg seroclearance”, “HBsAg seroconversion”, “functional cure”, “tenofovir”, “entecavir”, “nucleoside analogue”, “nucleotide analogue”, and “hepatitis B virus” alone and in combinations to retrieve an initial list of publications. We restricted studies to those including individuals with HBV mono-infection or HIV-HBV co-infection for whom the majority were undergoing treatment with potent NA. We included studies from this search that had results on the number of events, number of individuals included in analysis, and median/mean time or person-years of follow-up.
Determinants of functional cureWe included studies from the search on rates of functional cure that included an analysis describing characteristics of individuals with higher rates of HBsAg-seroclearance. Since no study from this search included data on genetic polymorphisms, we removed the treatment search terms and included the terms “polymorphism”, “allele”, and “genetic mutation” alone and in combinations.
Markers predicting functional cureWe conducted a literature search using PubMed on 31 March 2021 to retrieve relevant articles in English. We used each marker of HBV replication as a search term (i.e., “HBsAg quantification”, “HBsAg composition”, “hepatitis B core-related antigen”, “pre-genomic HBV RNA”, “HBV RNA”, “IP-10”, and “anti-hepatitis B core antibody”). We restricted studies to those including treated individuals with HBV mono-infection and HIV-HBV co-infection.
Table
Table 2. Median rates (range) of serological endpoints related to hepatitis B “e” antigen and hepatitis B surface antigen during treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus infection.
Table 2. Median rates (range) of serological endpoints related to hepatitis B “e” antigen and hepatitis B surface antigen during treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus infection.
Serological EndpointHBV Mono-InfectedHIV-HBV Co-Infected
HBeAg-seroclearance 17.8 (7.1–24.0)8.4 (4.6–24.7)
HBeAg-seroconversion 15.7 (2.2–14.3)4.1 (1.0–23.2)
HBsAg-seroclearance 20.37 (0–1.06)2.39 (0.6–10.46)
HBsAg-seroconversion 20.44 (0–0.92)0.92 (0.15–7.85)
Median (range) rates are those from the selection of studies described in Table 1. The methods used to derive these estimates are described in Supplementary Methods S1; 1 In HBeAg-positive individuals; 2 In both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative individuals. Abbreviations: HBeAg, hepatitis B “e” antigen; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.
Table
Table 3. Serological endpoints evaluated with novel biomarkers in hepatitis B virus mono-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis B virus co-infected individuals.
Table 3. Serological endpoints evaluated with novel biomarkers in hepatitis B virus mono-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis B virus co-infected individuals.
BiomarkerHBV Mono-InfectedHIV-HBV Co-Infected
Direct Markers of Activity
HBsAg levelsHBeAg-seroclearance,
HBsAg-seroclearance		HBeAg-seroclearance,
HBsAg-seroclarance (preliminary)
HBsAg protein composition (L, M, S)HBsAg-seroclearance (preliminary)None
HBcrAg levelsHBeAg-seroclearance 1
HBsAg-seroclearance (preliminary)		HBeAg-seroclearance,
None on HBsAg-seroclarance
pgHBV RNA/HBV RNA levelsHBeAg-seroclearance 2
HBsAg-seroclearance		None
Indirect markers of activity
IP-10 levelsHBeAg-seroclearance,
HBsAg-seroclearance		None
anti-HBc antibody levelsHBeAg-seroconversion,
HBsAg-seroconversion		HBeAg-seroclearance,
None on HBsAg-seroclearance
1 Not concordant between studies; 2 Only examined in studies involving treatment with pegylated-interferon with or without nucleoside/nucleotide analogues. Abbreviations: anti-HBc, anti-hepatitis B core antibody; HBcrAg, hepatitis B core-related antigen; HBeAg, hepatitis B “e” antigen; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IP-10, interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10; pg, pre-genomic.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boyd, A.; Dezanet, L.N.C.; Lacombe, K. Functional Cure of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Individuals With HIV-Coinfection: A Literature Review. Viruses 2021, 13, 1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13071341

AMA Style

Boyd A, Dezanet LNC, Lacombe K. Functional Cure of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Individuals With HIV-Coinfection: A Literature Review. Viruses. 2021; 13(7):1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13071341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boyd, Anders, Lorenza N. C. Dezanet, and Karine Lacombe. 2021. "Functional Cure of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Individuals With HIV-Coinfection: A Literature Review" Viruses 13, no. 7: 1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13071341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop