Next Article in Journal
Full-Genome Sequences of Alphacoronaviruses and Astroviruses from Myotis and Pipistrelle Bats in Denmark
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Winter Dysentery Bovine Coronavirus Isolated from Cattle in Israel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Porcine Lymphotropic Herpesviruses (PLHVs) and Xenotranplantation

Institute of Virology, Free University, 14163 Berlin, Germany
Viruses 2021, 13(6), 1072; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061072
Submission received: 4 May 2021 / Revised: 1 June 2021 / Accepted: 3 June 2021 / Published: 4 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Viruses)

Abstract

:
Porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses -1, -2 and -3 (PLHV-1, PLHV-2 and PLHV-3) are gammaherpesviruses which are widespread in pigs. They are closely related to the Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus, both of which cause severe diseases in humans. PLHVs are also related to bovine and ovine gammaherpesviruses, which are apathogenic in the natural host, but cause severe diseases after transmission into other species. Until now, no association between PLHVs and any pig diseases had been described. However, PLHV-1 causes a post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) after experimental transplantations in minipigs. This disorder is similar to human PTLD, a serious complication of solid human organ transplantation linked to EBV. Xenotransplantation using pig cells, tissues and organs is under development in order to alleviate the shortage of human transplants. Meanwhile, remarkable survival times of pig xenotransplants in non-human primates have been achieved. In these preclinical trials, another pig herpesvirus, the porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV), a roseolovirus, was shown to significantly reduce the survival time of pig xenotransplants in baboons and other non-human primates. Although PLHV-1 was found in genetically modified donor pigs used in preclinical xenotransplantation, it was, in contrast to PCMV, not transmitted to the recipient. Nevertheless, it seems important to use PLHV-free donor pigs in order to achieve safe xenotransplantation.

1. Xenotransplantation: Progress and Virus Safety

Xenotransplantation using pig cells, tissues and organs is under development in order to alleviate the lack of human transplants. For example, in the USA 107,000 men, women, and children are on the national transplant waiting list, as of February 2021. However, only 39,000 transplants were performed in 2020 and 17 people die each day waiting for an organ transplant [1]. To alleviate the shortage of human organs, xenotransplantation is under development. For several reasons, pigs are the most suited donor animals and rejection of pig xenotransplants will be prevented by genetic modifications of the animals [2]. Thanks to these genetic modifications and new powerful immunosuppressive regimens, remarkable survival times have been achieved in preclinical trials with non-human primates [3,4]. For example, pig islet cells for the treatment of diabetes survived 950 days [5] and pig hearts transplanted heterotopically survived 945 days [6]. Whereas in 2011, the survival time of orthotopic (life-supporting) heart transplants was 57 days [7], but thanks to a better strategy, the survival time was 192 days in 2020 [8] and 9 months in 2021 [9]. This improved experimental strategy also included screening for and eliminating the porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV), which is actually a porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV) [10]. It has been shown in numerous preclinical trials that the presence of PCMV/PRV in the pig organ significantly decreases the survival time of the xenotransplant in non-human primates (for review see [11]). PCMV/PRV, also called suid herpesvirus 2 (SuHV-2), is ubiquitous and may cause foetal or neonatal deaths in pigs and it has been associated with runting, rhinitis and pneumonia in piglets. PCMV/PRV was repeatedly found transmitted with pig kidneys and heart transplantations to non-human primates, which were always associated with a significant reduction in the survival time of the xenotransplant. Transmission of PCMV/PRV reduced the survival time of pig kidneys, on average, from 53 days to 14 days in baboons [12], from 28 to 9 days in cynomolgus monkeys [13] and reduced the survival of orthotopically transplanted pig hearts in baboons from 195 days to less than 30 days [14]. These studies also showed for the first time that PCMV/PRV is obviously able to decrease the survival time of the pig transplant without infecting the host, modulating cytokine release and coagulation by interactions with the immune system and endothelial cells [14].
These data show that the transmission of potentially zoonotic viruses from the donor pig to the recipient, and in the near future to human patients, may pose a significant risk for the recipient and therefore donor animals without zoonotic viruses, including herpesviruses, should be used.

2. PLHVs: Biology and Prevalence

Herpesviruses (family Herpesviridae) are pathogens that infect a wide variety of animals, including humans, monkeys, birds, frogs, and fish. The Herpesviridae family contains three subfamilies: alphaherpesvirinae, betaherpesvirinae, and gammaherpesvirinae. Nine human herpesviruses (HHV) have been identified that cause a wide spectrum of human diseases: herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) (HHV-1) causes herpes genitalis and labialis, encephalitis, vision loss and others; HSV-2 (HHV-2)—genital herpes; varicella zoster virus (VZV) (HHV-3)—chickenpox and shingles; Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) (HHV-4)—infectious mononucleosis; cytomegalovirus (CMV) (HHV-5)—mononucleosis and pneumonia; HHV-6A and HHV-6B are the causative agents of roseola (exanthema subitum); HHV-7 is associated with several syndromes, including exanthema subitum and the Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus is HHV-8.
During the course of evolution, most herpesviruses have adapted to a single or a limited number of host species. However, herpesviruses are not so species-specific as previously thought [15], and in recent years, numerous trans-species transmissions of several members of the Herpesviridae family have been reported, which have often resulted in severe or fatal outcomes in the new hosts [16]. For example, herpes B virus is a zoonotic herpesvirus that infects macaques and causes approximately 80% mortality in untreated humans [17].
In pigs, suid herpesvirus 1 (SuHV-1), also known as pseudorabies virus (PRV), causes Aujeszky’s disease in both wild and domestic swine. SuHV-1 has a broad host range and causes disease in distantly related mammals such as sheep, dogs, cattle, mink, and puma [18,19]. SuHV-2 is the above mentioned PCMV/PRV [10].
Porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses -1, -2, and -3 (PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3), also known as SuHV-3, SuHV-4, and SuHV-5, are gammaherpesviruses assigned to the genus Macavirus. Their role as primary pathogens of swine, or as co-factors in other viral infections, is largely unknown. They were found in domestic and wild pig populations and their frequency is comparable between healthy and diseased animals. The prevalence of PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3 varies between 29% and 80%, between 11% and 41%, and between 5 and 65%, respectively, in various studies performed in Germany, Italy, Spain, France, USA, and Ireland, and their prevalence has not changed significantly in the last 20 years [20,21,22,23]. Despite their high prevalence, PLHVs’ relevance for the swine industry appears low. Their transmission occurs mainly horizontally, but vertical transmission is possible [24,25,26]. PLHVs were found in different pig tissues and in the persistently infected porcine B cell line L23 [20,27]. PLHV-1 causes a post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in minipigs after experimental allogenic bone marrow transplantations [28,29,30]. This disorder is similar to human PTLD, a serious complication of solid human organ transplantation linked to EBV (HHV-4).
Porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses (PLHVs) are closely related to alcelaphine herpesvirus type 1, AlHV-1, and ovine herpesvirus type 2, OvHV-2, two gammaherpesviruses. These viruses are apathogenic in their natural hosts but cause serious lymphoproliferative diseases in other species [31]. Accordingly, PLHV could be apathogenic in pigs but pathogenic in other species.

3. Detection Methods

To detect PLHVs, PCR tests and to quantify them, real-time PCRs have been used [20,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. The primers and probes were located in the DNA polymerase gene and in the gene encoding the glycoprotein B.
To detect an antibody response in the infected animals, a Western blot assay and ELISA were established using the recombinant glycoprotein B [43,44]. Antibodies were found in slaughterhouse pigs, which were all PLHV-3 positive by PCR, but not in Göttingen minipigs [44].

4. No Transmission of PLHV in Preclinical and Clinical Xenotransplantation Trials

As described above, PLHVs are very common in slaughterhouse pigs, but they were also detected in pigs generated for xenotransplantation, e.g., in miniature swine and large white pigs [25]. Although caesarean derivation and barrier maintenance significantly reduced the incidence of PLHV infection, in comparison with conventionally reared pigs (from 80% down to 3 to 12.8%), it was not sufficient to eliminate the virus [25]. PLHVs were not found in Göttingen minipigs [35,36,44], which will be used for islet cell transplantation in a German trial and were consequently not transmitted when islet cells of these animals were transplanted in a preclinical trial to rhesus monkeys [37]. In a large study, piglets with the genetic background Landrace x Yorkshire, obtained by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) and derived via caesarean section, were analysed for 30 different porcine viruses using real-time PCR methods [26]. PLHV-3 was detected in five of nine and PLHV-2 in three of nine piglets, whereas no other viruses were found, with the exception of influenza B virus. This study shows that caesarean section can remove PLHVs but is not 100% safe. In another large study, large White-Yorkshire x Landrace F1 animals, used as pancreas donor animals, were screened for more than 30 known viruses [38]. Islets cells from these animals were transplanted into cynomolgus monkeys and none of the donor pigs and recipients had PLHV-1, -2 or -3. In another study, pig kidneys and hearts were transplanted into immunosuppressed baboons [39]. All donor animals carried PCMV, and 55% of them carried PLHV. An increased expression (activation) of PCMV was detected in all recipients, but in contrast to PCMV and despite immunosuppression and transplant rejection, neither transplants that were carrying PLHV-1, nor those that were negative, developed an increased expression (activation) of PLHV-1 [39]. Replication of PLHV was not observed in the baboon recipient despite prolonged pig cell microchimerism [40].
Although PLHV was found in eight out of eight genetically modified pigs used for orthotopic pig heart transplantation, it was not detected in the baboon recipients [14]. PLHVs were not transmitted in the first clinical trials transplanting encapsulated islet cells from Auckland Island pigs, because the donor animals were PLHV negative [41,42].
Reactivation of latent herpesviruses is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in human transplantation. It remains unclear whether zoonotic pig viruses could be reactivated in the transplanted tissue and interact with related human viruses. PLHV-1 encodes several genes with a strong transactivating effect on virus reactivation and replication, which are conserved in gammaherpesviruses, and it was shown that PLHV-1 transactivators upregulated HHV-8 and EBV promoters [45], supporting the hypothesis that PLHV-1 might have pathogenic relevance in the course of xenotransplantation.

5. Treatment, Vaccination and Elimination

At present, there is no treatment and no vaccination against all three PLHVs. In addition, other methods such as early weaning and colostrum deprivation, failed [24], although they had been successfully used in the case of PCMV [24,46]. Unfortunately, caesarean derivation was only partially successful [24,25,26]. Therefore, most of the elimination programs proposed for other viruses [47] cannot be used for PLHV. Only caesarean derivation and selection of the negative animals using sensitive detection methods described above will be successful and can be applied to eliminate PLHV from donor pigs if necessary.

6. Conclusions

Evidence has accumulated that herpesviruses are not as species-specific as thought in the past and that trans-species transmissions of members of the Herpesviridae family resulted in severe or fatal outcomes in the new host. On the other hand, although PLHV was found in genetically modified donor pigs used in preclinical xenotransplantations, it was not, in contrast to PCMV, transmitted to the recipients. Nevertheless, it seems important to use PLHV-free pigs in order to achieve safe xenotransplantation.

Funding

This research was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, TRR 127.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Organ Donation Statistics. Available online: https://www.organdonor.gov/statistics-stories/statistics.html (accessed on 3 May 2021).
  2. Cooper, D.K.C.; Hara, H.; Iwase, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Li, Q.; Ezzelarab, M.; Federzoni, E.; Dandro, A.; Ayares, D. Justification of specific genetic modifications in pigs for clinical organ xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2019, 26, e12516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cooper, D.K.; Satyananda, V.; Ekser, B.; van der Windt, D.J.; Hara, H.; Ezzelarab, M.B.; Schuurman, H.J. Progress in pig-to-non-human primate transplantation models (1998–2013): A comprehensive review of the literature. Xenotransplantation 2014, 21, 397–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Denner, J. Recent progress in xenotransplantation, with emphasis on virological safety. Ann. Transplant. 2016, 21, 717–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Shin, J.S.; Kim, J.M.; Min, B.H.; Yoon, I.H.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, Y.H.; Kang, S.J.; Kim, J.; Kang, H.J.; et al. Pre-clinical results in pig-to-non-human primate islet xenotransplantation using anti-CD40 antibody (2C10R4)-based immunosuppression. Xenotransplantation 2018, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mohiuddin, M.M.; Singh, A.K.; Corcoran, P.C.; Thomas, M.L., III; Clark, T.; Lewis, B.G.; Hoyt, R.F.; Eckhaus, M.; Pierson, R.N., III; Belli, A.J.; et al. Chimeric 2C10R4 anti-CD40 antibody therapy is critical for long-term survival of GTKO.hCD46.hTBM pig-to-primate cardiac xenograft. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Byrne, G.W.; Du, Z.; Sun, Z.; Asmann, Y.W.; McGregor, C.G. Changes in cardiac gene expression after pig-to-primate orthotopic xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2011, 18, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Längin, M.; Mayr, T.; Reichart, B.; Michel, S.; Buchholz, S.; Guethoff, S.; Dashkevich, A.; Baehr, A.; Egerer, S.; Bauer, A.; et al. Consistent success in life-supporting porcine cardiac xenotransplantation. Nature 2018, 564, 430–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mohiuddin, M.M.; Goerlich, C.E.; Singh, A.K.; Zhang, T.; Tatarov, I.; Lewis, B.; Sentz, F.; Hershfeld, A.; Braileanu, G.; Odonkor, P.; et al. Progressive Genetic Modifications with Growth Hormone Receptor Knockout Extends Cardiac Xenograft Survival to 9 Months. Res. Sq. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Denner, J.; Bigley, T.M.; Phan, T.L.; Zimmermann, C.; Zhou, X.; Kaufer, B.B. Comparative Analysis of Roseoloviruses in Humans, Pigs, Mice, and Other Species. Viruses 2019, 11, 1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Denner, J. Reduction of the survival time of pig xenotransplants by porcine cytomegalovirus. Virol. J. 2018, 15, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Yamada, K.; Tasaki, M.; Sekijima, M.; Wilkinson, R.A.; Villani, V.; Moran, S.G.; Cormack, T.A.; Hanekamp, I.M.; Hawley, R.J.; Arn, J.S.; et al. Porcine cytomegalovirus infection is associated with early rejection of kidney grafts in a pig to baboon xenotransplantation model. Transplantation 2014, 98, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sekijima, M.; Waki, S.; Sahara, H.; Tasaki, M.; Wilkinson, R.A.; Villani, V.; Shimatsu, Y.; Nakano, K.; Matsunari, H.; Nagashima, H.; et al. Results of life-supporting galactosyltransferase knockout kidneys in cynomolgus monkeys using two different sources of galactosyltransferase knockout swine. Transplantation 2014, 98, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Denner, J.; Längin, M.; Reichart, B.; Krüger, L.; Fiebig, U.; Mokelke, M.; Radan, J.; Mayr, T.; Milusev, A.; Luther, F.; et al. Impact of porcine cytomegalovirus on long-term orthotopic cardiac xenotransplant survival. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fishman, J. Infectious disease risks in xenotransplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 2018, 18, 1857–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Azab, W.; Dayaram, A.; Greenwood, A.D.; Osterrieder, N. How Host Specific Are Herpesviruses? Lessons from Herpesviruses Infecting Wild and Endangered Mammals. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2018, 5, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wozniakowski, G.; Samorek-Salamonowicz, E. Animal herpesviruses and their zoonotic potential for cross-species infection. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2015, 22, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Marcaccini, A.; Pena, M.L.; Quiroga, M.I.; Bermudez, R.; Nieto, J.M.; Aleman, N. Pseudorabies virus infection in mink: A host-specific pathogenesis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2008, 124, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Glass, C.M.; McLean, R.G.; Katz, J.B.; Maehr, D.S.; Cropp, C.B.; Kirk, L.J.; McKeirnan, A.J.; Evermann, J.F. Isolation of pseudorabies (Aujeszky’sdisease) virus from a Florida panther. J. Wildl. Dis. 1994, 30, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chmielewicz, B.; Goltz, M.; Franz, T.; Bauer, C.; Brema, S.; Ellerbrok, H.; Beckmann, S.; Rziha, H.J.; Lahrmann, K.H.; Romero, C.; et al. A novel porcine gammaherpesvirus. Virology 2003, 308, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Meng, X.J. Emerging and re-emerging swine viruses. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2012, 59 (Suppl. S1), 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. McMahon, K.J.; Minihan, D.; Campion, E.M.; Loughran, S.T.; Allan, G.; McNeilly, F.; Walls, D. Infection of pigs in Ireland with lymphotropic gamma-herpesviruses and relationship to postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome. Vet. Microbiol. 2006, 116, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Franzo, G.; Drigo, M.; Legnardi, M.; Grassi, L.; Menandro, M.L.; Pasotto, D.; Cecchinato, M.; Tucciarone, C.M. Porcine Gammaherpesviruses in Italian Commercial Swine Population: Frequent but Harmless. Pathogens 2021, 10, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mueller, N.J.; Kuwaki, K.; Knosalla, C.; Dor, F.J.; Gollackner, B.; Wilkinson, R.A.; Arn, S.; Sachs, D.H.; Cooper, D.K.; Fishman, J.A. Early weaning of piglets fails to exclude porcine lymphotropic herpesvirus. Xenotransplantation 2005, 12, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tucker, A.; McNeill, F.; Meehan, B.; Galbraith, D.; McArdle, P.; Allan, G.; Patience, C. Methods for the exclusion of circoviruses and gammaherpesviruses from pigs. Xenotransplantation 2003, 10, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hartline, C.B.; Conner, R.L.; James, S.H.; Potter, J.; Gray, E.; Estrada, J.; Tector, M.; Tector, A.J.; Prichard, M.N. Xenotransplantation panel for the detection of infectious agents in pigs. Xenotransplantation 2018, 25, e12427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Krüger, L.; Böttger, J.; Huang, C.A.; Denner, J. Absence of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) production from pig lymphoma cell lines. Virus Res. 2021, 295, 198286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dor, F.J.; Doucette, K.E.; Mueller, N.J.; Wilkinson, R.A.; Bajwa, J.A.; McMorrow, I.M.; Tseng, Y.L.; Kuwaki, K.; Houser, S.L.; Fishman, J.A.; et al. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease after allogeneic transplantation of the spleen in miniature swine. Transplantation 2004, 78, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Doucette, K.; Dor, F.J.; Wilkinson, R.A.; Martin, S.I.; Huang, C.A.; Cooper, D.K.; Sachs, D.H.; Fishman, J.A. Gene expression of porcine lymphotrophic herpesvirus-1 in miniature Swine with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Transplantation 2007, 83, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, C.; Fuchimoto, Y.; Gleit, Z.; Ericsson, T.; Griesemer, A.; Scheier-Dolberg, R.; Melendy, E.; Kitamura, H.; Fishman, J.; Ferry, J.; et al. Post-trans-plantation lymphoproliferative disease in miniature swine after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: Similarity to human PTLD and association with a porcine gammaherpesvirus. Blood 2001, 97, 1467–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Russell, G.C.; Stewart, J.P.; Haig, D.M. Malignant catarrhal fever: A review. Vet. J. 2009, 179, 324–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ehlers, B.; Ulrich, S.; Goltz, M. Detection of two novel porcine herpesviruses with high similarity to gammaherpes-viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 1999, 80, 971–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Garkavenko, O.; Muzina, M.; Muzina, Z.; Powels, K.; Elliott, R.; Croxson, M. Monitoring for potentially xenozoonotic viruses in New Zealand pigs. J. Med. Virol. 2004, 72, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chmielewicz, B.; Goltz, M.; Lahrmann, K.; Ehlers, B. Approaching virus safety in xenotransplantation: A search for unrecognized herpesviruses in pigs. Xenotransplantation 2003, 10, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Morozov, V.A.; Plotzki, E.; Rotem, A.; Barkai, U.; Denner, J. Extended microbiological characterization of Göttingen minipigs: Porcine cytomegalovirus and other viruses. Xenotransplantation 2016, 23, 490–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Krüger, L.; Kristiansen, Y.; Reuber, E.; Möller, L.; Laue, M.; Reimer, C.; Denner, J.A. Comprehensive Strategy for Screening for Xenotransplantation-Relevant Viruses in a Second Isolated Population of Göttingen Minipigs. Viruses 2019, 12, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Plotzki, E.; Wolf-van Buerck, L.; Knauf, Y.; Becker, T.; Maetz-Rensing, K.; Schuster, M.; Baehr, A.; Klymiuk, N.; Wolf, E.; Seissler, J.; et al. Virus safety of islet cell transplantation from transgenic pigs to marmosets. Virus Res. 2015, 204, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gazda, L.S.; Collins, J.; Lovatt, A.; Holdcraft, R.W.; Morin, M.J.; Galbraith, D.; Graham, M.; Laramore, M.A.; Maclean, C.; Black, J.; et al. A comprehensive microbiological safety approach for agarose encapsulated porcine islets intended for clinical trials. Xenotransplantation 2016, 23, 444–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mueller, N.J.; Livingston, C.; Knosalla, C.; Barth, R.N.; Yamamoto, S.; Gollackner, B.; Dor, F.J.; Buhler, L.; Sachs, D.H.; Yamada, K.; et al. Activation of porcine cytomegalovirus, but not porcine lymphotropic herpesvirus, in pig-to-baboon xenotransplantation. J. Infect. Dis. 2004, 189, 1628–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Issa, N.C.; Wilkinson, R.A.; Griesemer, A.; Cooper, D.K.; Yamada, K.; Sachs, D.H.; Fishman, J.A. Absence of replication of porcine endogenous retrovirus and porcine lymphotropic herpesvirus type 1 with prolonged pig cell microchimerism after pig-to-baboon xenotransplantation. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 12441–12448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Wynyard, S.; Nathu, D.; Garkavenko, O.; Denner, J.; Elliott, R. Microbiological safety of the first clinical pig islet xenotransplantation trial in New Zealand. Xenotransplantation 2014, 21, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Garkavenko, O.; Croxson, M.C.; Irgang, M.; Karlas, A.; Denner, J.; Elliott, R.B. Monitoring for presence of potentially xenotic viruses in recipients of pig islet xenotransplantation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 5353–5356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Brema, S.; Lindner, I.; Goltz, M.; Ehlers, B. Development of a recombinant antigen-based ELISA for the sero-detection of porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses. Xenotransplantation 2008, 15, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Plotzki, E.; Keller, M.; Ehlers, B.; Denner, J. Immunological methods for the detection of porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses (PLHV). J. Virol. Methods 2016, 233, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Santoni, F.; Lindner, I.; Caselli, E.; Goltz, M.; Di Luca, D.; Ehlers, B. Molecular interactions between porcine and human gammaherpesviruses: Implications for xenografts? Xenotransplantation 2006, 13, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Egerer, S.; Fiebig, U.; Kessler, B.; Zakhartchenko, V.; Kurome, M.; Reichart, B.; Kupatt, C.; Klymiuk, N.; Wolf, E.; Denner, J.; et al. Early weaning completely eliminates porcine cytomegalovirus from a newly established pig donor facility for xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2018, 25, e12449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Denner, J.; Mueller, N.J. Preventing transfer of infectious agents. Int. J. Surg. 2015, 23, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Denner, J. Porcine Lymphotropic Herpesviruses (PLHVs) and Xenotranplantation. Viruses 2021, 13, 1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061072

AMA Style

Denner J. Porcine Lymphotropic Herpesviruses (PLHVs) and Xenotranplantation. Viruses. 2021; 13(6):1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Denner, Joachim. 2021. "Porcine Lymphotropic Herpesviruses (PLHVs) and Xenotranplantation" Viruses 13, no. 6: 1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13061072

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop