Next Article in Journal
Development of a New TRIPLEX-Insect Model for Simulating the Effect of Spruce Budworm on Forest Carbon Dynamics
Previous Article in Journal
Species Richness of the Family Ericaceae along an Elevational Gradient in Yunnan, China
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2018, 9(9), 512;

Policy Design to Support Forest Restoration: The Value of Focused Investment and Collaboration

Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Ecosystem Workforce Program, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 28 July 2018 / Revised: 9 August 2018 / Accepted: 23 August 2018 / Published: 24 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Economics and Human Dimensions)
Full-Text   |   PDF [11261 KB, uploaded 24 August 2018]   |  


To address rapid change and complex environmental management challenges, governance approaches must support collective action across actors and jurisdictions, and planning at appropriate spatial extents to affect ecological processes. Recent changes in U.S. national forest policy incorporate new tools to facilitate collaborative landscape restoration, providing an opportunity to examine the relationship between policy design and governance change. Based on 151 interviews with agency personnel and partners, and a survey of 425 agency staff members, we investigated how two new policy approaches affected the governance of forest restoration and also looked at the other factors that most significantly affected policy implementation. Our findings reveal that, under these policies, multi-year funding commitments to specific landscapes, combined with requirements to work collaboratively, resulted in larger scales of planning, improved relationships, greater leveraged capacity, and numerous innovations compared to the past. A history of collaborative relationships, leadership, and agency capacity were the most significant variables that affected the implementation of policies designed to support collaborative landscape restoration. Our findings suggest that policies that provide focused investment to undertake landscape approaches to restoration, along with specific requirements for interagency and partner collaboration, are yielding positive results and may represent a new era in forest policy in the United States. View Full-Text
Keywords: policy design; scale mismatch; forest governance; collaborative governance policy design; scale mismatch; forest governance; collaborative governance

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Schultz, C.A.; Mclntyre, K.B.; Cyphers, L.; Kooistra, C.; Ellison, A.; Moseley, C. Policy Design to Support Forest Restoration: The Value of Focused Investment and Collaboration. Forests 2018, 9, 512.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top