Next Article in Journal
Effect of Impregnation with Maltodextrin and 1,3-Dimethylol-4,5-Dihydroxyethyleneurea on Poplar Wood
Previous Article in Journal
Tree-Ring-Recorded Drought Variability in the Northern Daxing’anling Mountains of Northeastern China
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2018, 9(11), 675; https://doi.org/10.3390/f9110675

Bhutan’s Forests through the Framework of Ecosystem Services: Rapid Assessment in Three Forest Types

1
Harvard Forest, Harvard University, 324 North Main St, Petersham, MA 01366, USA
2
Ugyen Wangchuck Institute for Conservation and Environmental Research (UWICER), Lamai Goempa, Jakar, Bumthang 32001, Bhutan
3
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia
4
The School for Field Studies (SFS), Center for Himalayan Environment and Development Studies, Paro 12001, Bhutan
5
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Situ Gede, Sindang Barang, Bogor 16115, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 28 September 2018 / Revised: 23 October 2018 / Accepted: 26 October 2018 / Published: 27 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecology and Management)
Full-Text   |   PDF [2016 KB, uploaded 30 October 2018]   |  

Abstract

Forests in mountain ecosystems provide a diversity of services and goods in mountain landscapes, and the immediate utility of the forest to upstream residents must be balanced with the insurance forests provide for downstream residents in the form of, especially, the services of water regulation and soil stabilization. Little empirical data exist for Bhutan that confirm a causal link between upstream forest use and downstream security. To help to fill this gap, we summarize the results of two literature reviews related to forest ecosystem services and human well-being, using the framework of Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness (GNH). We report preliminary findings of three field-based assessments of forest ecosystem services on hillsides. We conducted an assessment of the perceptions of local residents about the forest ecosystem services in three distinct forest areas of Bhutan. The studies were carried out in high-altitude oak forests, forest management units (FMUs) in government reserve forests, and community plantations. We engaged villagers in focus group discussions and conducted key informant interviews. The strongest evidence in the literature for linkages between forests and GNH was found for the role forests play in socio-economic development and good governance, particularly through the community forestry program. Regulating services of forests were cited as crucial to several aspects of human well-being, but little empirical evidence was provided. To local residents in the three study locations, the provisioning services of forests were highly ranked, as were water regulating services. At the plantation sites, residents felt that the new forests did improve soil stability and water provisioning services. Cultural services were identified but not highly prioritized. Awareness of forest ecosystem services was high among participants in the study, but understanding of the causal links between forest use and human well-being was mixed. Lack of direct evidence about causal pathways between upstream forest condition and downstream security leaves gaps in our knowledge and even perpetuates myths and misconceptions about the role that forests play. We encourage further research at multiple scales and using mixed methods to test hypotheses on the linkages between forests and human well-being in mountain landscapes. View Full-Text
Keywords: mountain ecosystem; forest ecosystem services; Himalaya; ecosystem service assessment; Gross National Happiness mountain ecosystem; forest ecosystem services; Himalaya; ecosystem service assessment; Gross National Happiness
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Sears, R.R.; Choden, K.; Dorji, T.; Dukpa, D.; Phuntsho, S.; Rai, P.B.; Wangchuk, J.; Baral, H. Bhutan’s Forests through the Framework of Ecosystem Services: Rapid Assessment in Three Forest Types. Forests 2018, 9, 675.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top