Next Article in Journal
Deadwood Decay in a Burnt Mediterranean Pine Reforestation
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterizing Habitat Elements and Their Distribution over Several Spatial Scales: The Case of the Fisher
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Shade, Fertilizer, and Pruning on Eastern Hemlock Trees and Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ecosystem Service Valuation through Wildfire Risk Mitigation: Design, Governance, and Outcomes of the Flagstaff Watershed Protection Project (FWPP)
Open AccessArticle

Understanding Ecosystem Service Preferences across Residential Classifications near Mt. Baker Snoqualmie National Forest, Washington (USA)

1
Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
2
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
3
U.S. Forest Service, PNW Research Lab, Seattle, WA 98103, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Ir. Kris Verheyen
Forests 2017, 8(5), 157; https://doi.org/10.3390/f8050157
Received: 28 February 2017 / Revised: 21 April 2017 / Accepted: 2 May 2017 / Published: 6 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management Strategies for Forest Ecosystem Services)
Ecosystem services consistently group together both spatially and cognitively into “bundles”. Understanding socio-economic predictors of these bundles is essential to informing a management approach that emphasizes equitable distribution of ecosystem services. We received 1796 completed surveys from stakeholders of the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest (WA, USA) using both in-person workshops and an online platform. Survey respondents rated the importance of 26 ecosystem services. Subsequent analysis revealed six distinct preference bundles of these services: environmental quality, utilitarian values, heritage values, two types of recreational values, and access and roads. Results suggest that the conceptualizations of these bundles are consistent across socio-demographic groups. Resource agencies that seek to frame dialogue around critical values may want to consider these broadly representative bundle sets as a meaningful organizing framework that would resonate with diverse constituents. View Full-Text
Keywords: ecosystem services; forest management; values; preferences; urban; rural ecosystem services; forest management; values; preferences; urban; rural
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Williams, K.; Biedenweg, K.; Cerveny, L. Understanding Ecosystem Service Preferences across Residential Classifications near Mt. Baker Snoqualmie National Forest, Washington (USA). Forests 2017, 8, 157.

AMA Style

Williams K, Biedenweg K, Cerveny L. Understanding Ecosystem Service Preferences across Residential Classifications near Mt. Baker Snoqualmie National Forest, Washington (USA). Forests. 2017; 8(5):157.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Williams, Katherine; Biedenweg, Kelly; Cerveny, Lee. 2017. "Understanding Ecosystem Service Preferences across Residential Classifications near Mt. Baker Snoqualmie National Forest, Washington (USA)" Forests 8, no. 5: 157.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop