Next Article in Journal
Growing Season Stem Water Status Assessment of Qinghai Spruce through the Sap Flow and Stem Radial Variations in the Qilian Mountains of China
Previous Article in Journal
Value Retention, Service Life, Use Intensity and Long-Term Productivity of Wood Chippers as Obtained from Contractor Records
Previous Article in Special Issue
Let’s not Miss the Forest for the Trees: A reply to Pinto et al. Forests 2017, 8(7), 230

REDD+ Crossroads Post Paris: Politics, Lessons and Interplays

Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2017, 8(12), 508;
Received: 18 December 2017 / Revised: 19 December 2017 / Accepted: 19 December 2017 / Published: 20 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue REDD+ Crossroads Post Paris: Politics, Lessons and Interplays)
This article introduces the special issue “REDD+ crossroads post Paris: politics, lessons and interplays”. The contributions to the special issue demonstrate, first, that REDD+ design in the studied countries has generally lacked social legitimacy and sidelined key actors that have an important role in shaping land-use sector dynamics. Second, they show that REDD+ early actions have tended to oversimplify local realities and have been misaligned with other policy goals and local needs. Third, REDD+ efforts have remained constrained to the forestry or climate mitigation policy sectors and have thus suffered from a lack of harmonization across local, national and international concerns, specifically of contradictory policy. As REDD+ moves from its preparedness to its implementation phase, more research efforts should be aimed at analysing the power relations that underpin and determine the design and implementation of REDD+ policies and actions, the potential for and limits to the vertical and horizontal harmonization of land-use policies and management, and the processes of resistance to or accommodation of REDD+ practices on the ground. In doing so, we advocate for multi-and transdisciplinary research that does not take for granted the benefits of REDD+ and which critically scrutinizes the multiple goals of this ambitious international policy framework, and where it sits within the broader Paris Agreement implementation agenda. View Full-Text
Keywords: REDD+; environmental governance; politics; conflict; climate change REDD+; environmental governance; politics; conflict; climate change
MDPI and ACS Style

Corbera, E.; Schroeder, H. REDD+ Crossroads Post Paris: Politics, Lessons and Interplays. Forests 2017, 8, 508.

AMA Style

Corbera E, Schroeder H. REDD+ Crossroads Post Paris: Politics, Lessons and Interplays. Forests. 2017; 8(12):508.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Corbera, Esteve, and Heike Schroeder. 2017. "REDD+ Crossroads Post Paris: Politics, Lessons and Interplays" Forests 8, no. 12: 508.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop